IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2005;46:4153-4158.)
© 2005 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
DOI:  10.1167/iovs.05-0423

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hawker, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Dua, H. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hawker, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Dua, H. S.

Asymmetry in Optic Disc Morphometry as Measured by Heidelberg Retina Tomography in a Normal Elderly Population: The Bridlington Eye Assessment Project

Matthew J. Hawker,1 Stephen A. Vernon,1 Gerard Ainsworth,1 Jonathan G. Hillman,2 Harmish K. MacNab,2 and Harminder S. Dua1

1From the Department of Ophthalmology, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom; and 2The Medical Centre, Bridlington, United Kingdom.

PURPOSE. To define the normal range of asymmetry in optic disc parameters measured by the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT II; Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Dossenheim, Germany) in a normal elderly population.

METHODS. Optic disc analysis of 918 eyes of 459 normal elderly patients was performed. All patients were consecutive in a cohort screened for eye disease. Normality was defined with a normal visual field on automated suprathreshold screening, intraocular pressure less than 22 mm Hg, and minimum corrected visual acuity of 6/12. Asymmetry measures were calculated by subtracting the values of the smaller disc from those of the larger disc.

RESULTS. Subjects’ mean age (262 female and 197 male) was 72.6 years (range, 65.5–89.3). There was no significant difference in disc area or rim area between the right and left eyes. Neither rim-to-disc area ratio asymmetry nor rim measurement asymmetries were significantly affected by age or sex. Rim-to-disc area ratio asymmetry was much less affected by the increasing difference in disc size than was absolute rim asymmetry. The 2.5th and 97.5th percentile limits of normality for the rim-to-disc area ratio asymmetry in the global and temporal–inferior analyses were –0.212 and 0.154, and –0.331 and 0.261, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS. The normal range of parameter asymmetry in an age group relevant to glaucoma may be useful in the discrimination of normal from early glaucoma. Asymmetry analysis may improve discriminatory ability by reducing parameter variability based on disc size. The rim-to-disc area ratio asymmetry measure is likely to be the most useful parameter in describing normality with consistency.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
M J Hawker, S A Vernon, C L Tattersall, and H S Dua
Detecting glaucoma with RADAAR: the Bridlington Eye Assessment Project
Br. J. Ophthalmol., June 1, 2006; 90(6): 744 - 748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology