HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (16) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pardue, M. T. Articles by Ball, S. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pardue, M. T. Articles by Ball, S. L.

Neuroprotective Effect of Subretinal Implants in the RCS Rat

¹From the Atlanta VA Medical Center, Decatur, Georgia; the ²Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; ³Optobionics Corp., Naperville, Illinois; and the ⁴Cleveland VA Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.

PURPOSE. Retinal prosthetics have been designed to interface with the neural retina by electrically stimulating the remaining retinal circuits after photoreceptor degeneration. However, the electrical stimulation provided by the subretinal implant may also stimulate neurotrophic factors that provide neuroprotection to the retina. This study was undertaken to determine whether electrical stimulation from a subretinal photodiode-based implant has a neuroprotective effect on photoreceptors in the RCS rat, a model of photoreceptor degeneration.

METHODS. Eyes of RCS rats were implanted with an active or inactive device or underwent sham surgery before photoreceptor degeneration. Outer retinal function was assessed with electroretinogram (ERG) recordings weekly until 8 weeks after surgery, at which time retinal tissue was collected and processed for morphologic assessment, including photoreceptor cell counts and retinal layer thickness.

RESULTS. At 4 to 6 weeks after surgery, the ERG responses in the active-implant eyes were 30% to 70% greater in b-wave amplitude than the responses from eyes implanted with inactive devices, those undergoing sham surgery, or the nonsurgical control eyes. At 8 weeks after surgery the ERG responses from active-implant eyes were not significantly different from the control groups. However, the number of photoreceptors in eyes implanted with the active or inactive device was significantly greater in the regions over and around the implant versus sham-surgical and nonsurgical control eyes.

CONCLUSIONS. These results suggest that subretinal electrical stimulation provides temporary preservation of retinal function in the RCS rat. In addition, implantation of an active or inactive device into the subretinal space causes morphologic preservation of photoreceptors in the RCS rat until 8 weeks after surgery. Further studies are needed to determine whether the correlation of neuropreservation with subretinal implantation is due to electrical stimulation and/or a mechanical presence of the implant in the subretinal space.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. J. Phillips, T. A. Walker, H.-Y. Choi, A. E. Faulkner, M. K. Kim, S. S. Sidney, A. P. Boyd, J. M. Nickerson, J. H. Boatright, and M. T. Pardue Tauroursodeoxycholic Acid Preservation of Photoreceptor Structure and Function in the rd10 Mouse through Postnatal Day 30 Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., May 1, 2008; 49(5): 2148 - 2155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. L. Kent, I. V. Glybina, G. W. Abrams, and R. Iezzi Chronic Intravitreous Infusion of Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor Modulates Electrical Retinal Stimulation Thresholds in the RCS Rat Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2008; 49(1): 372 - 379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Morimoto, T. Fujikado, J.-S. Choi, H. Kanda, T. Miyoshi, Y. Fukuda, and Y. Tano Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation Promotes the Survival of Photoreceptors and Preserves Retinal Function in Royal College of Surgeons Rats Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2007; 48(10): 4725 - 4732. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Scholz Perspectives on: Materials Aspects for Retinal Prostheses Journal of Bioactive and Compatible Polymers, September 1, 2007; 22(5): 539 - 568. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K.-i. Miyake, M. Yoshida, Y. Inoue, and Y. Hata Neuroprotective Effect of Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation on the Acute Phase of Optic Nerve Injury Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., May 1, 2007; 48(5): 2356 - 2361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. J. DeMarco Jr, G. L. Yarbrough, C. W. Yee, G. Y. McLean, B. T. Sagdullaev, S. L. Ball, and M. A. McCall Stimulation via a Subretinally Placed Prosthetic Elicits Central Activity and Induces a Trophic Effect on Visual Responses Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., February 1, 2007; 48(2): 916 - 926. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J Salzmann, O P Linderholm, J-L Guyomard, M Paques, M Simonutti, M Lecchi, J Sommerhalder, E Dubus, M Pelizzone, D Bertrand, et al. Subretinal electrode implantation in the P23H rat for chronic stimulations Br. J. Ophthalmol., September 1, 2006; 90(9): 1183 - 1187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Y. Chow Effect of Sham Surgery on Retinal Function After Subretinal Transplantation of the Artificial Silicone Retina--Reply Arch Ophthalmol, August 1, 2005; 123(8): 1156 - 1157. [Full Text] [PDF]