IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2005;46:2225-2229.)
© 2005 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
DOI:  10.1167/iovs.04-1198

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arditi, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arditi, A.

Improving the Design of the Letter Contrast Sensitivity Test

Aries Arditi

From the Arlene R. Gordon Research Institute, Lighthouse International, New York, New York.

PURPOSE. To develop a small-format letter contrast sensitivity test with improved accuracy, suitable for portable use and near testing, and having a simple and unambiguous scoring system that can be used with reference to existing norms.

METHODS. A near test, printed on resin-coated paper and mounted on plastic was developed by using Sloan letters, with 0.04 log unit contrast decrements between each letter and a simple scoring procedure. Monte Carlo methods and a Weibull function model of visual performance were used to assess test accuracy.

RESULTS. The new test has 28% lower score standard deviations than the Pelli-Robson Contrast Sensitivity Chart, over a wide range of low misreporting rates, while maintaining test scores that differ from the Pelli-Robson by 0.01 log unit, permitting use of norms collected with the Pelli-Robson test.

CONCLUSIONS. While maintaining comparability with Pelli-Robson norms, the new test has improved accuracy in comparison with the Pelli-Robson chart and several other advantages that result from its smaller size.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
K. Thayaparan, M. D Crossland, and G. S Rubin
Clinical assessment of two new contrast sensitivity charts
Br. J. Ophthalmol., June 1, 2007; 91(6): 749 - 752.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
S. A. Haymes, K. F. Roberts, A. F. Cruess, M. T. Nicolela, R. P. LeBlanc, M. S. Ramsey, B. C. Chauhan, and P. H. Artes
The letter contrast sensitivity test: clinical evaluation of a new design.
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2006; 47(6): 2739 - 2745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology