HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (15) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Atchison, D. A. Articles by Pope, J. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Atchison, D. A. Articles by Pope, J. M.

Shape of the Retinal Surface in Emmetropia and Myopia

¹From the Centre for Health Research—Optometry and the ²School of Physical and Chemical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

PURPOSE. To determine and compare the shapes of the retinas of emmetropic and myopic eyes.

METHODS. Nonrotationally symmetrical ellipsoids were mathematically fitted to the retinal surfaces of 21 emmetropic and 66 myopic eyes (up to –12 D) of participants aged 18 to 36 years (mean, 25.5) using transverse axial and sagittal images derived from magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS. The shapes of the ellipsoids varied considerably between subjects with similar refractive errors. The shapes were oblate (steepening toward the equator) in most of the emmetropic eyes (i.e., the axial dimensions of the ellipsoids were smaller than both the vertical and horizontal dimensions). As myopia increased, all ellipsoid dimensions increased with the axial dimension increasing more than the vertical dimension, which in turn increased more than the horizontal dimension (increases in approximate ratios 3:2:1). The relative difference in the increase of these dimensions meant that as the degree of myopia increased the retinal shape decreased in oblateness. However, few myopic eyes were prolate (flattening toward the equator). Independent of myopia, the ellipsoids were tilted about the vertical axis by 11° ± 13°, and ellipsoid centers were decentered horizontally by 0.5 ± 0.4 mm nasally and 0.2 ± 0.5 mm inferiorly, relative to the fovea.

CONCLUSIONS. In general both emmetropic and myopic retinas are oblate in shape, although myopic eyes less so. This finding may be relevant to theories implicating the peripheral retina in the development of myopia.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Hasebe, H. Ohtsuki, T. Nonaka, C. Nakatsuka, M. Miyata, I. Hamasaki, and S. Kimura Effect of Progressive Addition Lenses on Myopia Progression in Japanese Children: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Masked, Crossover Trial Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2008; 49(7): 2781 - 2789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. O. Mutti, J. R. Hayes, G. L. Mitchell, L. A. Jones, M. L. Moeschberger, S. A. Cotter, R. N. Kleinstein, R. E. Manny, J. D. Twelker, K. Zadnik, et al. Refractive Error, Axial Length, and Relative Peripheral Refractive Error before and after the Onset of Myopia Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2007; 48(6): 2510 - 2519. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. D. Singh, N. S. Logan, and B. Gilmartin Three-dimensional modeling of the human eye based on magnetic resonance imaging. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2006; 47(6): 2272 - 2279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]