IOVS AJP: Renal Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2006;47:169-178.)
© 2006 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
DOI:  10.1167/iovs.04-0564

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pidcoe, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by Wetzel, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pidcoe, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by Wetzel, P. A.

Oculomotor Tracking Strategy in Normal Subjects with and without Simulated Scotoma

Peter E. Pidcoe1 and Paul A. Wetzel2

1From the Departments of Physical Therapy and 2Bioengineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.

PURPOSE. Experiments were conducted on five subjects with no visual impairment to assess tracking strategy differences in subjects with and without a simulated central scotoma.

METHODS. Subjects were asked to visually track horizontally moving periodic and nonperiodic sinusoidal stimuli through a ±5° range. Scotoma simulation was achieved electronically with a closed-loop feedback system using horizontal eye movement measurements from a monocular limbus eye tracker updated at a rate of 500 Hz. The scotoma was centrally located and had defined horizontal half widths of 1, 2, and 3°. Vertical eye position measurements from a video-based dark-pupil tracker were used to identify and remove trials in which extreme vertical eye position deviations reduced the effectiveness of the simulation.

RESULTS. All subjects developed a preferred retinal locus (PRL) in the left visual field and demonstrated a tendency for saccadic redirection to this area. Saccadic endpoints into the PRL outnumbered foveally directed saccades by a factor of 2:1. The PRL was located outside the compromised central vision region, typically near the edge of the scotoma boundary, for all subjects except one. This subject had a PRL within the simulated scotoma under two conditions, but the percentage of total time spent at the "compromised" PRL was less than for other subjects.

CONCLUSIONS. Subjects with no visual impairment confronted with a central scotoma develop a preferred retinal locus to replace the nonfunctional fovea and appear to suppress normal refoveating saccadic behavior in favor of this location.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
L. Wang, L. Yang, and G. Dagnelie
Initiation and Stability of Pursuit Eye Movements in Simulated Retinal Prosthesis at Different Implant Locations
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2008; 49(9): 3933 - 3939.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology