IOVS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2006;47:386-396.)
© 2006 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
DOI:  10.1167/iovs.05-0428

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dhomen, N. S.
Right arrow Articles by Sowden, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dhomen, N. S.
Right arrow Articles by Sowden, J. C.

Absence of Chx10 Causes Neural Progenitors to Persist in the Adult Retina

Nathalie S. Dhomen,1 Kam S. Balaggan,2 Rachael A. Pearson,1 James W. Bainbridge,2 Edward M. Levine,3 Robin R. Ali,2 and Jane C. Sowden1

1From the Developmental Biology Unit, Institute of Child Health, and the 2Institute of Ophthalmology, University College of London, London, United Kingdom; and the 3John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.

PURPOSE. Mutation of the Chx10 homeobox gene in mice and humans causes congenital blindness and microphthalmia (small eyes). This study used Chx10–/– (ocular retardation) mice to investigate how lack of Chx10 affects progenitor/stem cell behavior in the retina and ciliary epithelium (CE).

METHODS. The distribution of mitotic retinal progenitor cells (RPCs) during embryonic development was analyzed using phosphohistone 3 (H3)-labeling. DNA flow cytometry was used to measure DNA content. The distribution and phenotype of dividing cells in the postnatal retina and CE was analyzed by incorporation of the thymidine analogue BrdU and immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS. The Chx10–/– embryonic retina maintained a constantly sized population of mitotic RPCs during development, causing the mitotic index to increase markedly over time compared with the wild type. Also, the proportion of cells in the G1 phase of the cell cycle was increased compared with the wild type. Of interest, division of RPC-like cells with neurogenic properties persisted in the adult Chx10–/– retina. Colabeling for BrdU and the neural progenitor marker nestin or the neuronal markers ß3-tubulin, syntaxin, and VC1.1 showed that new amacrine-like neurons developed in the adult central retina. By contrast, cells with these characteristics were not observed in the mature wild-type retina. In the mature CE, BrdU-positive cells were observed in both wild-type and Chx10–/– mice. However, neurogenesis from this cell population was not evident.

CONCLUSIONS. Without Chx10, proliferative expansion of the embryonic RPC pool is markedly reduced. In the adult retina, lack of Chx10 results in a population of dividing neural progenitor cells that persist and produce new neurons in the central retina.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. Damiani, J. J. Alexander, J. R. O'Rourke, M. McManus, A. P. Jadhav, C. L. Cepko, W. W. Hauswirth, B. D. Harfe, and E. Strettoi
Dicer Inactivation Leads to Progressive Functional and Structural Degeneration of the Mouse Retina
J. Neurosci., May 7, 2008; 28(19): 4878 - 4887.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
K. M. Nishiguchi, H. Kaneko, M. Nakamura, S. Kachi, and H. Terasaki
Identification of Photoreceptor Precursors in the Pars Plana during Ocular Development and after Retinal Injury
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2008; 49(1): 422 - 428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology