IOVS AJP: Cell Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2006;47:4393-4400.)
© 2006 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
DOI:  10.1167/iovs.05-1428

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Loudon, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Simonsz, H. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Loudon, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Simonsz, H. J.

Predictors and a Remedy for Noncompliance with Amblyopia Therapy in Children Measured with the Occlusion Dose Monitor

Sjoukje E. Loudon,1 Maria Fronius,2 Caspar W. N. Looman,3 Musarat Awan,4 Brigitte Simonsz,1,3 Paul J. van der Maas,3 and Huibert J. Simonsz1

1From the Departments of Ophthalmology and 3Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; the 2Department of Ophthalmology, J. W. Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; and the 4Department of Ophthalmology, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.

PURPOSE. Noncompliance is one of the limiting factors in the success of occlusion therapy for amblyopia. Electronic monitoring was used to investigate predictors of noncompliance, and, in a prospective randomized clinical trial, determined the effectiveness of an educational program.

METHODS. Compliance was measured electronically during 1 week every 3 months in 310 newly diagnosed amblyopic children. The family’s demographic parameters and the child’s clinical parameters were assessed for their influence on the level of compliance. In addition to standard orthoptic care, children were randomized to receive an educational cartoon story, reward stickers, and an information sheet for the parents (intervention group), or a picture to color (reference group). These and the electronic device were distributed during home visits by researchers. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of compliance (actual/prescribed occlusion time) in the two groups. The secondary outcome measure was the influence of demographic and clinical factors on compliance.

RESULTS. Compliance was associated with parental fluency in the national language, country of origin, level of education, and initial visual acuity of the child. During the first 1-week measurement period children in the intervention group had better compliance than the reference group had (78% ± 32% vs. 57% ± 40%; P < 0.0001), and fewer children were not occluded at all (3 vs. 23 in the reference group; P < 0.0001). This difference remained throughout the study period.

CONCLUSIONS. Poor parental fluency in the national language, a low level of education, and poor acuity at the start of treatment were predictors of low compliance. An educational program primarily aimed at the child improved compliance and reduced the number of children who did not comply with occlusion at all.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
S. E Loudon and H. J Simonsz
Occlusion therapy for amblyopia
BMJ, October 6, 2007; 335(7622): 678 - 679.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology