| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1From the Centre for Eye Research Australia, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; the 2Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.; the 3National Health and Medical Research Council Centre for Clinical Eye Research, Flinders University and Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; and 4Vision Cooperative Research Center, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
PURPOSE. To explore the psychometric properties of the Impact of Vision Impairment scale (IVI) by using Rasch analysis.
METHODS. Three hundred fourteen first-time referrals to low-vision clinics completed the 32-item IVI. The data were Rasch-analyzed with a partial credit model using RUMM2020 software (RUMM Laboratory, Perth, WA, Australia). The overall fit of the model, response scale, individual item fit, differential item functioning, unidimensionality, and person-separation reliability were assessed.
RESULTS. Initially, 26 items displayed disordered thresholds. However, collapsing the response scale to three categories (4 items) and four categories (28 items) produced ordered response thresholds for all items. Four items with high proportions of missing responses, poor spread, high skewness, and deviation between observed and expected model curves were then removed. This adjustment produced overall fit to the Rasch model (item–trait interaction 
2 = 118.3; P = 0.32). The final mean (SD) person and item fit residuals ere 0.06 (0.85) and –0.20 (1.45), respectively. The person-separation reliability was 0.9, indicating that the scale was able to discriminate between several different groups of participants. The revised scale was well targeted to the participants, with similar mean locations for items (0.00) and persons (0.16). A significant difference between participants of mild, moderate, and severe visual impairment (ANOVA; P 0.001) supported the criterion validity of the Rasch-scaled IVI.
CONCLUSIONS. The results provide support for the measurement properties of the Rasch-scaled 28-item version of the IVI and of its potential for assessing outcomes of low-vision rehabilitation. A raw score-to-Rasch person measure conversion is supplied.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  E. L. Lamoureux, S.-M. Saw, J. Thumboo, H. L. Wee, T. Aung, P. Mitchell, and T. Y. Wong The Impact of Corrected and Uncorrected Refractive Error on Visual Functioning: The Singapore Malay Eye Study Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2009; 50(6): 2614 - 2620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. L. Lamoureux, K. Pesudovs, J. Thumboo, S.-M. Saw, and T. Y. Wong An Evaluation of the Reliability and Validity of the Visual Functioning Questionnaire (VF-11) Using Rasch Analysis in an Asian Population Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2009; 50(6): 2607 - 2613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. d. Toit, A. Palagyi, J. Ramke, G. Brian, and E. L. Lamoureux Development and Validation of a Vision-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire for Timor-Leste Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2008; 49(10): 4284 - 4289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. L. Lamoureux, J. F. Pallant, K. Pesudovs, G. Rees, J. B. Hassell, and J. E. Keeffe The Effectiveness of Low-Vision Rehabilitation on Participation in Daily Living and Quality of Life Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2007; 48(4): 1476 - 1482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. L. Lamoureux, J. F. Pallant, K. Pesudovs, G. Rees, J. B. Hassell, and J. E. Keeffe The Impact of Vision Impairment Questionnaire: An Assessment of Its Domain Structure Using Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Rasch Analysis Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2007; 48(3): 1001 - 1006. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
