IOVS Journal of Virology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2006;47:5337-5347.)
© 2006 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
DOI:  10.1167/iovs.06-0557

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (32)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kotecha, A.
Right arrow Articles by Garway-Heath, D. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kotecha, A.
Right arrow Articles by Garway-Heath, D. F.

Corneal Thickness- and Age-Related Biomechanical Properties of the Cornea Measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer

Aachal Kotecha,1,2 Ahmed Elsheikh,3 Cynthia R. Roberts,4,5 Haogang Zhu,1,2 and David F. Garway-Heath1,2

1From the Glaucoma Research Unit, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom; the 2Department of Optometry and Visual Science, City University, London, United Kingdom; the 3Division of Civil Engineering, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom; and the 4Departments of Ophthalmology and 5Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.

PURPOSE. The Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) is a new instrument that measures the corneal biomechanical response (corneal hysteresis, CH) to rapid indentation by an air jet. CH is the difference in applanation pressures (P1, P2) between the rising and falling phases of the air jet. The investigation had two parts: a characterization study and a validation study. In the characterization study, the purposes were to investigate the intraocular pressure (IOP)–dependence of CH and to characterize the performance of the ORA. In the validation study, the purposes were to investigate the association between CH and both age and central corneal thickness (CCT) and the agreement between ORA and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) IOP measurements.

METHODS. For the characterization study, data were collected from 105 untreated subjects (45 ocular hypertensive patients and 60 normal subjects; mean age, 60 years, range, 26–82). GAT and ORA measurements were performed before and after IOP lowering of one randomly selected eye with apraclonidine drops. The change in P1 and P2 (arbitrary units) in relation to change in GAT IOP was analyzed to calibrate the instrument. The relation between P1, P2, and CCT was explored and ORA IOP was derived from the analyses. For the validation study, ORA and GAT IOP and CCT were measured in 144 eyes of 144 untreated subjects (mean age, 58 years; range, 19–83). The characterization calculations were applied to the dataset and values of CH and ORA IOP were calculated. The relationship between CH and both subject age and CCT was determined. The associations between CH and CCT and between ORA and GAT IOPs, were investigated by linear regression analysis. The agreement between measuring devices was calculated.

RESULTS. In the characterization study, P1 changed by 6.41 arbitrary units for every 1-mm Hg change in GAT IOP. CH (P1 – P2) changed by –1.60 arbitrary units for every 1-mm Hg change in GAT IOP. For each unit change in P2, P1 changed by 1.27 units. From this association a new IOP-independent corneal factor was derived [P1 – (P2/1.27)] and is termed the corneal constant factor (CCF; mm Hg). ORA IOP normalized for CCF was defined as P2 – CCF (mm Hg). The CCF (mm Hg) was associated with CCT (micrometers) and with age: CCF = [(0.036 · CCT) – (0.028 · age)] + 1.06 (adjusted r2 = 0.34; P < 0.0001 for CCT, P = 0.007 for age). Normalized ORA IOP measurements were not associated with CCT. GAT IOP was associated with CCT and CCF—more strongly with the latter: GAT IOP = (0.03 · CCT)+1.52 (r2 = 0.06, P = 0.002); GAT IOP = (0.65 · CCF) + 4.5 (r2 = 0.13, P < 0.0001). The mean difference (95% limits of agreement) between GAT and normalized ORA IOP was 0.1 (–6.6 to +6.8) mm Hg.

CONCLUSIONS. The CCF describes an IOP-independent biomechanical property of the cornea that increases with thicker CCT and decreases with greater age. It is moderately strongly associated with CCT and yet explains more of the interindividual variation in GAT IOP than does CCT. Normalized ORA IOP measurements are not associated with CCT.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
M. A. del Buey, J. A. Cristobal, F. J. Ascaso, L. Lavilla, and E. Lanchares
Biomechanical Properties of the Cornea in Fuchs' Corneal Dystrophy
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2009; 50(7): 3199 - 3202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
L. Lim, N. Cheung, G. Gazzard, Y.-H. Chan, T.-Y. Wong, and S.-M. Saw
Corneal Biomechanical Properties and Retinal Vascular Caliber in Children
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2009; 50(1): 121 - 125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
L Lim, G Gazzard, Y-H Chan, A Fong, A Kotecha, E-L Sim, D Tan, L Tong, and S-M Saw
Corneal biomechanics, thickness and optic disc morphology in children with optic disc tilt
Br. J. Ophthalmol., November 1, 2008; 92(11): 1461 - 1466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
L. Lim, G. Gazzard, Y.-H. Chan, A. Fong, A. Kotecha, E.-L. Sim, D. Tan, L. Tong, and S.-M. Saw
Cornea Biomechanical Characteristics and Their Correlates with Refractive Error in Singaporean Children
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2008; 49(9): 3852 - 3857.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
D. H. Glass, C. J. Roberts, A. S. Litsky, and P. A. Weber
A Viscoelastic Biomechanical Model of the Cornea Describing the Effect of Viscosity and Elasticity on Hysteresis
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2008; 49(9): 3919 - 3926.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
A. P. Wells, D. F. Garway-Heath, A. Poostchi, T. Wong, K. C. Y. Chan, and N. Sachdev
Corneal Hysteresis but Not Corneal Thickness Correlates with Optic Nerve Surface Compliance in Glaucoma Patients
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2008; 49(8): 3262 - 3268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
R. J. Casson, L. M. Abraham, H. S. Newland, J. Muecke, T. Sullivan, D. Selva, and T. Aung
Corneal Thickness and Intraocular Pressure in a Nonglaucomatous Burmese Population: The Meiktila Eye Study
Arch Ophthalmol, July 1, 2008; 126(7): 981 - 985.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
J. Moreno-Montanes, M. J. Maldonado, N. Garcia, L. Mendiluce, P. J. Garcia-Gomez, and M. Segui-Gomez
Reproducibility and Clinical Relevance of the Ocular Response Analyzer in Nonoperated Eyes: Corneal Biomechanical and Tonometric Implications
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2008; 49(3): 968 - 974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
K Hamilton, D Pye, S Hua, F Yu, J Chung, and Q Hou
The effect of contact lens induced oedema on the accuracy of Goldmann tonometry in a mature population
Br. J. Ophthalmol., December 1, 2007; 91(12): 1636 - 1638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
J. Caprioli
Intraocular Pressure Fluctuation: An Independent Risk Factor for Glaucoma?
Arch Ophthalmol, August 1, 2007; 125(8): 1124 - 1125.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology