IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2006;47:641-644.)
© 2006 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
DOI:  10.1167/iovs.04-0268

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Susanna, R.
Right arrow Articles by Morita, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Susanna, R., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Morita, C.

Correlation of Asymmetric Glaucomatous Visual Field Damage and Water-Drinking Test Response

Remo Susanna, Jr, Marcelo Hatanaka, Roberto Murad Vessani, Alexandre Pinheiro, and Celso Morita

From the Glaucoma Service, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

PURPOSE. To determine whether there is a correlation between asymmetric glaucomatous visual field (VF) damage and water-drinking test (WDT) response.

METHODS. A retrospective analysis was conducted of VF and WDT data from 101 patients with glaucoma in clinical therapy, who were receiving treatment with the same topical medication in both eyes, and asymmetric VF defect. Eyes were classified according to mean deviation (MD) into "better" and contralateral "worse" eyes. Maximum mean difference in basal IOP was 2 mm Hg between both eyes. The peak IOP and fluctuation obtained with the WDT were compared between both groups. For the statistical analysis, the Tukey post hoc multiple comparison test and paired t-test were used.

RESULTS. Better and contralateral worse eyes presented mean MDs of –4.6 ± 5.3 and –9.0 ± 7.4 dB, respectively (P < 0.001). Mean basal IOPs were 13.9 ± 3.3 and 13.9 ± 3.1 mm Hg, respectively (P = 0.67). Mean maximum IOPs after water ingestion were 16.5 ± 3.8 mm Hg in the group with less severe VF defect and 17.2 ± 4.1 mm Hg in the contralateral group with worse visual fields (P < 0.001). Mean fluctuation (maximum IOP – minimum IOP after water ingestion) was 3.6 ± 1.8 and 4.4 ± 2.2 mm Hg (P < 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSION. Eyes with worse MDs presented higher IOP peaks and fluctuation after water ingestion. This study demonstrates a lower capacity of eyes with worse glaucomatous lesion to respond to a stimulus that leads to a transitory elevation of IOP.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
F. Manz
Hydration and Disease
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., October 1, 2007; 26(suppl_5): 535S - 541S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology