HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Díaz-Doutón, F. Articles by Artal, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Díaz-Doutón, F. Articles by Artal, P.

Comparison of the Retinal Image Quality with a Hartmann-Shack Wavefront Sensor and a Double-Pass Instrument

¹From the Centre de Desenvolupament de Sensors, Instrumentació i Sistemes, Universidad Politécnica de Cataluña, Terrassa, Spain; the ²Laboratorio de Óptica, Departamento de Física, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain; and the ³Instituto de Microcirugía Ocular (IMO) and Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.

PURPOSE. Wavefront sensors provide quite useful information on the optical quality of the eye. However, in eyes where very high-order aberrations and scattered light are prominent, wavefront sensors may overestimate retinal image quality. This study showed that, in those cases, the double-pass technique is a complementary tool for better estimation of ocular optical quality.

METHODS. A double-pass (DP) instrument was used, based on recording images of a point source in near-infrared light after reflection in the retina and double-pass through the ocular media. The aberrations were also measured with a prototype of near-infrared Hartmann-Shack (HS) wavefront sensor adapted to the clinical environment. From the wave aberrations, the modulation transfer function (MTF) was calculated (MTF_HS). The MTF was also obtained from the double-pass images (MTF_DP). Both techniques were applied in normal young subjects as the control and in three other groups of eyes: older subjects, after LASIK refractive surgery, and after IOL implantation.

RESULTS. The MTFs obtained from DP and HS techniques were compared. In the group of normal eyes with low levels of intraocular scattering, these estimates were quite similar, indicating that both techniques captured well most of the optical degradation. However, in eyes where scatter was more predominant (e.g., early cataract, posterior capsular opacification after IOL implantation) the MTF provided by the HS sensor was always higher than the MTF obtained from DP. A single parameter was used to indicate the differences.

CONCLUSIONS. In eyes with low scattering, DP and HS techniques provided similar estimates of the retinal image quality. However, in a patient’s eye with mild to severe amount of scatter, wavefront sensors might overestimate image quality, whereas the DP technique produces a more accurate description of the optical quality, better correlated with the quality of vision.