IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2006;47:1845-1852.)
© 2006 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
DOI:  10.1167/iovs.05-1153

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tarczy-Hornoch, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tarczy-Hornoch, K.

Myopic Refractive Error in Adult Latinos: The Los Angeles Latino Eye Study

Kristina Tarczy-Hornoch,1,2 Mei Ying-Lai,3 Rohit Varma,1,2,3 and the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study Group4

1From the Doheny Eye Institute, the 2Department of Ophthalmology, and the 3Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.

PURPOSE. To estimate gender- and age-specific prevalence of myopia and identify risk indicators for myopia in a population-based sample of Latino adults aged 40 years and older in La Puente, California.

METHODS. Noncycloplegic automated refraction with supplemental standardized subjective refraction was performed for presenting visual acuity worse than 20/20. Potential risk indicators for myopia were evaluated by questionnaire and clinical examination. The gender- and age-specific prevalence of spherical equivalent myopia in phakic eyes was calculated. Multiple logistic regression identified independent risk indicators for myopia.

RESULTS. Refractive error was analyzed for the worse eye of 5927 of 6357 participating Latinos. The overall prevalence of myopia ≤ –1.0 D was 16.8%, and of high myopia ≤ –5.0 D, 2.4%. When participants were stratified by age, myopia initially decreased with age and then increased in the oldest groups in association with nuclear opacification. Risk indicators for myopia were: oldest and youngest age groups, presence of diabetes mellitus, high acculturation, high school or higher education, and birth in the United States. The latter two were also predictors of high myopia.

CONCLUSIONS. Risk indicators for myopia in adult Latinos include higher education, birth in the United States, high acculturation, and diabetes. The burden of myopia in older Latinos exceeds that in African Americans and non-Hispanic whites in the United States.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
S. Vitale, L. Ellwein, M. F. Cotch, F. L. Ferris III, and R. Sperduto
Prevalence of Refractive Error in the United States, 1999-2004
Arch Ophthalmol, August 1, 2008; 126(8): 1111 - 1119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology