HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Vujosevic, S. Articles by Cavarzeran, F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Vujosevic, S. Articles by Cavarzeran, F.

Diabetic Macular Edema: Correlation between Microperimetry and Optical Coherence Tomography Findings

¹From the Fondazione G. B. Bietti per l’Oftalmologia, IRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico), Roma, Italy; and the ²Department of Ophthalmology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

PURPOSE. To compare the changes in macular sensitivity (microperimetry) and macular thickness with different degrees of diabetic macular edema.

METHODS. Sixty-one eyes of 32 consecutive diabetic patients were included in this cross-sectional study. All included eyes underwent functional and morphologic examination of the macular area. Best corrected visual acuity (ETDRS charts), macular sensitivity, and macular thickness were quantified. Lesion-related macular sensitivity and retinal fixation were investigated with an advanced, automatic microperimeter. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was used to quantify macular thickness.

RESULTS. The 61 included eyes were graded, by two retinal specialists, for diabetic macular edema as follows: 16 were graded as no macular edema (NE), 30 as non–clinically significant macular edema (NCSME), and 15 as clinically significant macular edema (CSME). Macular thickness significantly increased from the NE to the CSME group (P < 0.0001), whereas macular sensitivity significantly decreased from the NE to the CSME group (P < 0.0021). A significant correlation coefficient was noted between retinal sensitivity and normalized macular thickness (r = –0.37, P < 0.0001). Linear regression analysis showed a decrease of 0.83 dB (P < 0.0001) for every 10% of deviation of retinal thickness from normal values. Visual acuity and central macular sensitivity correlated significantly in the NCSME group (r = –0.6, P = 0.0008), but not in the NE (r = –0.144, P = 0.6) or in the CSME (r = –0.46, P = 0.11) groups.

CONCLUSIONS. Macular edema may be better documented by adding macular sensitivity mapping by microperimetry to macular thickness measurement by OCT and visual acuity determination because macular sensitivity seems to be a relevant explanatory variable of visual function, independent of macular thickness data. Moreover, microperimetry may be of value in predicting the outcome of diabetic macular edema, because it incorporates a functional measure that may supplement the predictive value of OCT and visual acuity.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C G Kiss, T Barisani-Asenbauer, C Simader, S Maca, and U Schmidt-Erfurth Central visual field impairment during and following cystoid macular oedema Br. J. Ophthalmol., January 1, 2008; 92(1): 84 - 88. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Midena, S. Vujosevic, E. Convento, A. Manfre', F. Cavarzeran, and E. Pilotto Microperimetry and fundus autofluorescence in patients with early age-related macular degeneration Br. J. Ophthalmol., November 1, 2007; 91(11): 1499 - 1503. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. C. Issa, H.-M. Helb, K. Rohrschneider, F. G. Holz, and H. P. N. Scholl Microperimetric Assessment of Patients with Type 2 Idiopathic Macular Telangiectasia Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2007; 48(8): 3788 - 3795. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]