IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2007;48:157-165.)
© 2007 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
doi:10.1167/iovs.06-0935
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCally, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Green, W. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McCally, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Green, W. R.

Light-Scattering and Ultrastructure of Healed Penetrating Corneal Wounds

Russell L. McCally,1,2 David E. Freund,1 Andrew Zorn,3 Jennifer Bonney-Ray,1 Rhonda Grebe,2 Zenaida de la Cruz,2 and W. Richard Green2

1From the Applied Physics Laboratory, The Johns Hopkins University, Laurel, Maryland; 2The Wilmer Ophthalmological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland; and 3Whiting School of Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.

PURPOSE. To investigate quantitatively for the first time the relationship between light-scattering and ultrastructure of semitransparent scars resulting from penetrating wounds in rabbit cornea.

METHODS. Penetrating wounds, 2 mm in diameter, were made in the central cornea and allowed to heal for 3.6 to 4.5 years at which time the rabbits were killed. The scar and cornea thickness outside the scar were measured using ultrasonic pachymetry. Corneas were excised immediately and their transmissivity was measured from 400 to 700 nm. The tissue was then prepared for transmission electron microscopy. Transmission electron micrographs (TEMs) were analyzed to determine fibril positions and radii. Scattering was calculated using the direct summation of fields (DSF) method.

RESULTS. Scar thickness averaged 0.26 ± 0.04 mm, and the scars were flat. Thickness outside the scars averaged 0.40 ± 0.04 mm. Three scars were moderately transparent, five were less transparent, and one was much less transparent. The wavelength dependence of the measured total scattering cross- section was indicative of the presence of voids (lakes) in the collagen fibril distribution, and lakes were evident in the TEMs. The images showed enlarged fibrils and some showed bimodal distributions of fibril diameters. Calculated scattering was characteristic of that expected from regions containing lakes—a finding consistent with the scattering measurements.

CONCLUSIONS. Despite the long healing time, these scars remained highly scattering. A combination of lakes, disordered fibril distributions, and a significant population of enlarged fibrils can explain the scattering. A possible cellular contribution cannot be ruled out.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology