|
|
||||||||
1From the Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; 2Helen Keller International, New York, New York; 3Helen Keller Mexico, Chihuahua, Mexico; 4IEEPO/Ver Bien, Oaxaca, Mexico; 5Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland; and 6Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
PURPOSE. To quantify the impact on self-reported visual functioning of spectacle provision for school-aged children in Oaxaca, Mexico.
METHODS. The Refractive Status Vision Profile (RSVP), a previously validated tool to measure the impact of refractive correction on visual functioning, was adapted for use in rural children and administered at baseline and 4 weeks (27.3 ± 4.4 days) after the provision of free spectacles. Visual acuity with and without correction, age, sex, and spherical equivalent refraction were recorded at the time of follow-up.
RESULTS. Among 88 children (mean age, 12 years; 55.7% girls), the median presenting acuity (uncorrected or with original spectacles), tested 4 weeks after the provision of free spectacles, was 6/9 (range, 6/6–6/120). Significant improvements in the following subscales of the RSVP were seen for the group as a whole after the provision of free spectacles: function, 11.2 points (P = 0.0001); symptoms, 14.3 points (P < 0.0001); total score, 10.3 points (P = 0.0001). After stratification by presenting vision in the better-seeing eye, children with 6/6 acuity (n = 22) did not have significant improvement in any subscale; those with acuity of 6/7.5 to 6/9 (n = 34) improved only on function (P = 0.02), symptoms (P = 0.005), and total score (P = 0.003); and those with acuity of 6/12 or worse improved on total score (P < 0.0001) and all subscales. Subjects (n = 31) with uncorrected myopia of –1.25 D or more had a mean improvement in total score of 15.9 points (P < 0.0001), whereas those with uncorrected myopia between –0.50 and –1.00 D inclusive (n = 53) had a mean improvement of 8 points (P = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS. Provision of spectacles to children in this setting had a significant impact on self-reported function, even at modest levels of baseline visual disability. The correlation between presenting vision/refraction and improvement and the failure of children 6/6 at baseline to improve offer evidence for a real effect.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Li, Y. Song, X. Liu, B. Lu, K. Choi, D. S. C. Lam, M. Zhang, M. Zheng, Y. Wang, A. Sharma, et al. Spectacle Acceptance among Secondary School Students in Rural China: The Xichang Pediatric Refractive Error Study (X-PRES)--Report 5 Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2008; 49(7): 2895 - 2902. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Congdon, Y. Wang, Y. Song, K. Choi, M. Zhang, Z. Zhou, Z. Xie, L. Li, X. Liu, A. Sharma, et al. Visual Disability, Visual Function, and Myopia among Rural Chinese Secondary School Children: The Xichang Pediatric Refractive Error Study (X-PRES)--Report 1 Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2008; 49(7): 2888 - 2894. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |