HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Salvetat, M. L. Articles by Brusini, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Salvetat, M. L. Articles by Brusini, P.

Rarebit Perimetry in Normal Subjects: Test–Retest Variability, Learning Effect, Normative Range, Influence of Optical Defocus, and Cataract Extraction

¹From the Department of Ophthalmology, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Udine, Italy; and the ²Department of Ophthalmology, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.

PURPOSE. To study normative ranges, learning effect (LE), test–retest variability (TRV), and influence of blur and cataract in normal subjects by using rarebit perimetry (RBP).

METHODS. Seventy-five normal subjects underwent visual field (VF) testing with standard automated perimetry (SAP) and RBP. LE and TRV for RBP were assessed in repeated examinations conducted on four different days. LE was evaluated by comparing results from the first with those of the other three sessions. TRV was studied by calculating differences between retest for each combination of single tests. The blur effect was evaluated by repeated tests with spherical lenses added to the optimum refractive correction (±1.00 to ±6.00 D). The cataract effect was studied in 23 subjects who underwent RBP 1 week before and 1 month after cataract surgery. Mean hit rate (MHR) and mean miss rate (MMR) were analyzed for single areas and test duration.

RESULTS. The mean MHR was 91% ± 5.7% (range, 78%–99%); the mean MMR ranged from 4.0% to 13.8%. MHR significantly decreased with age (mean, 0.21%/year). Mean test time was 268 ± 34.1 seconds. No significant LE was observed. TRV was significantly higher in the central VF zone and in elderly subjects. MHR increased with refractive blur and significantly decreased after cataract surgery. Effects of blur and cataract extraction were significantly higher in the central VF zone, especially in elderly subjects.

CONCLUSIONS. RBP is a rapid and easily accessible VF test. RBP testing did not show a significant LE; however, inter- and intrasubject variability were consistent. Blur and media opacities may give false-positive results in RBP, especially in the central VF, and should be considered.