|
|
||||||||
1From the Department of Ophthalmology, Centre for Eye Research Australia, The University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; 2Faculty of Life and Social Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; the 3NH&MRC (National Health and Medical Research Council) Centre for Clinical Eye Research, Flinders University and Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, SA, Australia; and 4Vision CRC, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
PURPOSE. To evaluate the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary low-vision rehabilitation program on quality of life evaluated by the Impact of Vision Impairment (IVI) instrument.
METHODS. First-time referrals to low-vision clinics were assessed before and after rehabilitation (36 months). Rasch analysis was used to estimate the three IVI subscale and overall values on an interval scale. A mixed betweenwithin subjects ANOVA was used to identify whether presenting visual acuity had an interaction effect with rehabilitation change. Cohen d values were used to estimate the magnitude of the change and the standardized response mean (SRM) procedure was selected to determine the clinical significance of the rehabilitation-induced changes.
RESULTS. One hundred twenty-four women and 68 men (mean age, 80.3 years) completed the rehabilitation. Most had age-related macular degeneration (62%, 119) and were moderately to severely vision impaired (<6/18; 78%, 149). After rehabilitation, significant improvements were recorded for the overall IVI score (P = 0.006) and two subscales: reading and accessing information and emotional well-being (P = 0.007 and 0.009, respectively). No significant improvement was found on the mobility and independence subscale (P = 0.07). The magnitude of the postintervention improvement was found to be relatively moderate (Cohen d = 0.170.30) and clinically modest (SRM = 0.220.42).
CONCLUSIONS. Significant improvements in overall quality of life and two specific areas of daily living in people with low vision were found, although the magnitude and clinical significance of the rehabilitation-induced gains were modest. Further investigation in other models of low-vision rehabilitation is needed to optimize quality of life gains in people with low vision.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. J. Lee, B. L. Lam, S. Arora, K. L. Arheart, K. E. McCollister, D. D. Zheng, S. L. Christ, and E. P. Davila Reported Eye Care Utilization and Health Insurance Status Among US Adults Arch Ophthalmol, March 1, 2009; 127(3): 303 - 310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Stelmack, X. C. Tang, D. J. Reda, S. Rinne, R. M. Mancil, R. W. Massof, and for the LOVIT Study Group Outcomes of the Veterans Affairs Low Vision Intervention Trial (LOVIT) Arch Ophthalmol, May 1, 2008; 126(5): 608 - 617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. P. Shah, H. Minto, M. Z. Jadoon, R. R. A. Bourne, B. Dineen, C. E. Gilbert, M. D. Khan, and on behalf of the Pakistan National Eye Survey Stud Prevalence and Causes of Functional Low Vision and Implications for Services: The Pakistan National Blindness and Visual Impairment Survey Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2008; 49(3): 887 - 893. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P M O'Connor, E L Lamoureux, and J E Keeffe Predicting the need for low vision rehabilitation services Br. J. Ophthalmol., February 1, 2008; 92(2): 252 - 255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |