HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Miyake, K.-i. Articles by Hata, Y. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Miyake, K.-i. Articles by Hata, Y.

Neuroprotective Effect of Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation on the Acute Phase of Optic Nerve Injury

¹From the Division of Integrative Bioscience, Institute of Regenerative Medicine and Biofunction, Tottori University Graduate School of Medical Science, and the ²Division of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan.

PURPOSE. Traumatic optic neuropathy often induces a loss of vision that proceeds rapidly within several hours, together with retinal ganglion cell death, in a much slower time course. Electrical stimulation has previously been shown to rescue injured retinal ganglion cells from cell death. The present study tests whether transcorneal electrical stimulation could preserve visual function after an optic nerve crush.

METHODS. Transcorneal electrical stimulation was given immediately after a calibrated optic nerve crush. We measured visually evoked potentials (VEPs) in the visual cortex of rats before and immediately after the optic nerve crush and after the transcorneal stimulation to estimate an extent of damage and effects of stimulation in individual animals. In addition, the retinal axons were labeled with a fluorescent anterograde tracer to determine whether the transcorneal electrical stimulation can protect the retinal axons from degeneration.

RESULTS. The optic nerve crush was made at an intensity that does not allow a spontaneous recovery of VEP for 1 week. The transcorneal stimulation immediately increased VEP amplitude impaired by the optic nerve crush, and this augmentation was often preserved after 1 week. In the stimulated animals, a larger amount of retinal axons projected centrally beyond the crushed region in comparison to the unstimulated animals.

CONCLUSIONS. Transcorneal electrical stimulation would restore the functional impairment of optic nerve by traumatic injury at a very early stage and protect retinal axons from the ensuing degeneration.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Inomata, K. Tsunoda, G. Hanazono, Y. Kazato, K. Shinoda, M. Yuzawa, M. Tanifuji, and Y. Miyake Distribution of Retinal Responses Evoked by Transscleral Electrical Stimulation Detected by Intrinsic Signal Imaging in Macaque Monkeys Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., May 1, 2008; 49(5): 2193 - 2200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. L. Kent, I. V. Glybina, G. W. Abrams, and R. Iezzi Chronic Intravitreous Infusion of Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor Modulates Electrical Retinal Stimulation Thresholds in the RCS Rat Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2008; 49(1): 372 - 379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]