HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chu, P. H. W. Articles by Brown, B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chu, P. H. W. Articles by Brown, B.

Luminance-Modulated Adaptation of Global Flash mfERG: Fellow Eye Losses in Asymmetric Glaucoma

¹From the Laboratory of Experimental Optometry (Neuroscience), School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China; and the ²Institute of Health and Biological Innovation and School of Optometry, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.

PURPOSE. To use the global flash multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) in patients with asymmetric glaucoma to determine whether retinal function is affected in fellow eyes that have no glaucomatous visual field defects.

METHODS. Forty normal subjects and 12 patients with asymmetric glaucoma were recruited for visual field and mfERG measurement. The mfERG was assessed by using a global-flash stimulation paradigm with four video frames: 103 scaled hexagonal elements followed by a dark frame, a global-flash frame, and a dark frame. The localized luminance difference was set at 96%, 65%, 49%, and 29% display contrast during the four different test conditions, respectively. The first-order kernel response was measured, and the "adaptive index" which has been used previously was calculated.

RESULTS. In fellow eyes with normal visual fields, the amplitude of the induced component (IC) was significantly reduced, and the adaptive index was reduced by a factor of almost 10 (P < 0.0001), as it was in the glaucomatous eyes. Although the adaptive index in the better (fellow) eye of the patients with glaucoma was slightly higher than in the eyes with diagnosed glaucoma, these differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS. The significant reduction of the adaptive index in the better eyes in subjects with asymmetric glaucoma shows that the fast adaptive mechanism(s) were reduced in these eyes. This implies that eyes that have functionally normal visual acuity and visual fields have abnormal fast-adaptive mechanisms.