IOVS Learning & Memory
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2007;48:3566-3575.)
© 2007 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
DOI:  10.1167/iovs.06-1149

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuo, C.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Inoue, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuo, C.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Inoue, Y.

Prognosis-Determinant Candidate Genes Identified by Whole Genome Scanning in Eyes with Pterygia

Chuan-Hui Kuo, Dai Miyazaki, Nobuhiko Nawata, Takeshi Tominaga, Atsushi Yamasaki, Yuji Sasaki, and Yoshitsugu Inoue

From the Division of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Tottori University Medical School, Yonago, Japan.

PURPOSE. To identify the genes that can differentiate primary from recurrent pterygia.

METHODS. The transcriptional differences of primary and recurrent pterygia were first determined by microarray analyses. Computational analyses were used to extract the biological significance of the genes accurately, and a significant functional classification of the genes was made by unsupervised methodologies. After confirming the functional classification for primary and recurrent pterygia by a clustering algorithm, a support vector machine (SVM) algorithm was applied. Based on a machine learning technique, the minimum number of genes that can accurately classify primary and recurrent pterygia was determined.

RESULTS. Clustering analyses classified primary and recurrent pterygia transcriptomes and identified 10 clusters associated with distinct biological processes. When the SVM algorithm was applied to the microarray-analyzed products from three primary and three recurrent cases, periostin, TIMP-2, and L-3-phosphoserine phosphatase homolog (PSPHL) were identified as the minimum set of predictors with 100% accuracy. A differential expression of these genes in primary and recurrent pterygia was confirmed by immunohistochemistry. When the 24 patients with primary disease and the 8 patients with recurrent disease were analyzed with this gene set, an accuracy of classification of 84.38% was achieved.

CONCLUSIONS. Periostin, TIMP-2, and PSPHL can be used as predictor genes for the recurrence of pterygia. Their biological activities may explain the events leading to recurrences of pterygia and thus may be genes to target for pharmaceutical interventions.








HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology