IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2007;48:3714-3718.)
© 2007 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
DOI:  10.1167/iovs.06-1304
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cao, X.-G.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cao, X.-G.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, Y.

Responses of Human Lens Epithelial Cells to Quercetin and DMSO

Xiao-Guang Cao,1 Xiao-Xin Li,1 Yong-Zhen Bao,1 Nian-Zeng Xing,2 and Yi Chen1

1From the Department of Ophthalmology, People’s Hospital of Peking University, Beijing, Peoples Republic of China; and the 2Department of Urology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital University of Medical Science, Beijing, Peoples Republic of China.

PURPOSE. Oxidative stress is an initiating factor in the development of maturity-onset cataract. Diet has a significant impact on cataract development, and individual dietary components responsible for the protective effect include flavonoids, of which quercetin is the most important. The purpose of this study was to investigate the protective effect of quercetin and its toxicity for human lens epithelial cells (HLECs).

METHODS. HLECs in culture were incubated for 48 hours with either 1% (vol/vol) dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) alone or with this concentration of DMSO and between 0.1 and 100 µM of quercetin. Nonstimulated cells served as control cultures. The viability of HLECs was measured by the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) colorimetric assay. Gene expression was assessed with reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Cellular apoptosis was examined by in situ immunocytochemistry using terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated biotin-dUTP nicked labeling (TUNEL) and by flow cytometry, using annexin V-FITC apoptosis detection.

RESULTS. DMSO (1% vol/vol) decreased cell viability, increased cellular apoptosis, and upregulated Bax in these cells; 0.1 µM quercetin inhibited these effects and protected HLECs from the toxicity of DMSO. Higher concentrations of quercetin the viability of HLECs decreased. In a dose-dependent response to quercetin, cellular apoptosis increased and the change correlated with upregulation of Bax and decreased cell viability.

CONCLUSIONS. Quercetin, at a low concentration (0.1 µM), protects HLECs and reverses the toxic effects of DMSO (1% vol/vol). However, at higher concentrations, quercetin is toxic to HLECs with an LD50 of 90.85 µM. Quercetin induced apoptosis and upregulates apoptotic genes in HLECs in a dose-dependent manner.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology