IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2007;48:3995-4001.)
© 2007 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
DOI:  10.1167/iovs.06-1387

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Little, J.-A.
Right arrow Articles by Saunders, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Little, J.-A.
Right arrow Articles by Saunders, K. J.

The Impact of Optical Factors on Resolution Acuity in Children with Down Syndrome

Julie-Anne Little,1 J. Margaret Woodhouse,2 Jan S. Lauritzen,1 and Kathryn J. Saunders1

1From the Vision Sciences Research Group, Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom; and the 2School of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom.

PURPOSE. Down syndrome (DS) is associated with reduced visual acuity that cannot be explained by motivational or attentional factors. To isolate the contribution of optical factors to visual performance in DS, two types of resolution acuity were measured: grating resolution acuity, which is limited by optical quality, and interferometric acuity, which effectively bypasses the optics of the eye.

METHODS. Twenty-nine children with DS (age range, 9–16 years) were tested. Sixty-eight age-matched, developmentally healthy children acted as controls. All wore best refractive correction, and none had clinically significant ocular disease. Grating resolution and interferometric acuity were measured according to a two-alternative, forced-choice procedure.

RESULTS. There was no change in grating resolution acuity or interferometric acuity with age in either group. Mean grating resolution acuities were –0.12 log of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR; SD ± 0.07) for the control group and +0.48 logMAR (SD ± 0.09) for the DS group. Mean interferometric acuities were –0.11 logMAR (SD ± 0.08) for the control group and +0.004 (SD ± 0.06) for the DS group. In the DS group, the mean interferometric acuity was reduced by a factor of 1.3, whereas mean grating resolution acuity was substantially reduced, by a factor of 4.1, compared with controls.

CONCLUSIONS. Grating resolution and interferometric thresholds are reduced in children with DS. However the discrepancy between developmentally healthy children and those with DS is greater for grating resolution acuity, suggesting that degradation in optical quality is a major contributor to poor visual performance in children with DS.








HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology