IOVS Read the Free BMJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2008;49:77-80.)
© 2008 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
DOI:  10.1167/iovs.07-0962

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Healey, P.
Right arrow Articles by Hammond, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Healey, P.
Right arrow Articles by Hammond, C. J.

The Heritability of Optic Disc Parameters: A Classic Twin Study

Paul Healey,1,2 Francis Carbonaro,2,3 Bronwen Taylor,1 Tim D. Spector,3 Paul Mitchell,1 and Christopher J. Hammond3,4

1From the University of Sydney, Department of Ophthalmology (Centre for Vision Research, Westmead Millennium Institute, Westmead Hospital), Sydney, Australia; the 3Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology Unit, King’s College, London School of Medicine, London, United Kingdom; the 4Princess Royal University Hospital, Bromley Hospitals NHS Trust, Orpington, United Kingdom.

PURPOSE. To examine the roles of genetic and environmental factors in the optic disc in a classic twin study.

METHODS. Five hundred six pairs of twins were recruited to participate from the Twins U.K. Adult Twin Registry at St. Thomas’ Hospital, London. Photographs of the optic disc were obtained, and the covariance of optic disc, cup, and rim areas within monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) pairs was compared, and genetic modeling techniques were used to determine the relative contributions of genes and environment to the variation in optic disc parameters in this population.

RESULTS. Mean optic disc, cup, and rim areas were 2.62 (range, 1.06–4.87), 0.98 (range, 0.25–4.72), and 1.64 (range, 1.43–6.16) mm2, respectively. The MZ correlations were higher than those of DZ pairs for disc and cup areas (correlation coefficient, 0.73/0.81 and 0.41/0.50 for MZ and DZ twins, respectively). The correlation for optic rim was also higher in MZ (0.62) than in DZ (0.43) pairs. Modeling suggested heritability for the optic disc area of 0.73 and for the optic cup area of 0.66. The heritability of the rim area was lower at 0.34, with a significant shared environmental component of 0.27 and individual factors (including measurement error) explaining 39% of the variance of the rim area.

CONCLUSIONS. This study has demonstrated that genetic effects were important in the determination of optic disc parameters in this twin population, with genetic factors explaining 73%, 66%, and 34% of the variation of optic disc, cup, and rim areas, respectively. Environmental factors also seemed to be important.








HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology