IOVS Journal of Experimental Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2008;49:2449-2455.)
© 2008 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
DOI:  10.1167/iovs.07-0877

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Owen, V. M. F.
Right arrow Articles by Hitchings, R. A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Owen, V. M. F.
Right arrow Articles by Hitchings, R. A.

Glaucoma and Fitness to Drive: Using Binocular Visual Fields to Predict a Milestone to Blindness

Victoria M. F. Owen,1 David P. Crabb,1 Edward T. White,2 Ananth C. Viswanathan,2 David F. Garway-Heath,2 and Roger A. Hitchings2

1From the Department of Optometry and Visual Science, City University, London, United Kingdom; and the 2Glaucoma Research Unit, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

PURPOSE. To use binocular integrated visual field (IVF) measures to predict which patients will lose visual function to a level below the legal standard for driving.

METHODS. Data from patients attending a glaucoma clinic were collected longitudinally. The time from baseline until failure to meet the criteria of the driver’s license test was modeled with Cox regression. Visual field status at baseline and visual field deterioration rate at 2 years from baseline for various monocular and binocular VF indices were investigated as predictor variables. The model that provided the best fit to the data was validated using bootstrap resampling.

RESULTS. Of the patients, 20% (60/299; 95% confidence interval, 16%–25%) failed to meet the visual field criteria to prevent driver’s license loss during an average follow-up of 7 years. The median age of patients was 64 years. The binocular IVF measurements gave a better fit to the observed data than the monocular measurements. Initial average visual field sensitivity and rate of visual field loss of sensitivity were significant predictors of failure to meet driver’s license test criteria.

CONCLUSIONS. The IVF provides a method by which binocular visual fields can be incorporated into patient management and allows, for example, a prediction of future driver’s license loss. The rate of binocular IVF sensitivity loss at 2 years of follow-up may help identify patients who could benefit from intensified intervention.








HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology