|
|
||||||||
1From the Doheny Eye Institute and the 2Department of Ophthalmology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
PURPOSE. To determine the mechanism by which IL-1β induces FGF-2 and to elucidate the signaling pathways of IL-1β–induced FGF-2 in corneal endothelial cells (CECs).
METHODS. Expression and/or activation of FGF-2, p38, ERK1/2, and Akt was analyzed by immunoblot analysis. Cell proliferation was measured by MTT assay. Pharmacologic inhibitors were used to block PI 3-kinase, p38, or ERK1/2.
RESULTS. Brief stimulation of CECs with IL-1β activated PI 3-kinase and p38 in a biphasic fashion. The first wave of activation, triggered by IL-1β, involves the inductive activity of IL-1β on FGF-2 production; the second wave of activation, triggered by the induced FGF-2, involves the promotion of cellular activities. In both pathways, p38 acts downstream to PI 3-kinase. The inductive activity of IL-1β on FGF-2 is further evidenced by the conditioned medium, which contains a large amount of FGF-2. Stimulation of CECs with IL-1β also activated ERK1/2 in a delayed fashion. The IL-1β–induced FGF-2 exerted cellular activities using distinct pathways: the second wave of activation of PI 3-kinase and p38 was involved in cell migration, whereas cell proliferation was simultaneously stimulated by ERK1/2 and the second wave of PI 3-kinase. Likewise, the conditioned medium demonstrated cellular activities and pathways identical with those observed in cells treated with IL-1β.
CONCLUSIONS. These data suggest that CECs produce FGF-2 by IL-1β stimulation through PI 3-kinase and p38. The IL-1β–induced FGF-2 facilitates cell migration via PI 3-kinase and p38, whereas it stimulates cell proliferation using PI 3-kinase and ERK1/2 in parallel pathways.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J.-S. Song, J. G. Lee, and E. P. Kay Induction of FGF-2 Synthesis by IL-1{beta} in Aqueous Humor through P13-Kinase and p38 in Rabbit Corneal Endothelium Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., February 1, 2010; 51(2): 822 - 829. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |