IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1167/iovs.08-2996 on January 24, 2009
(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2009;50:2927-2931.)
© 2009 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
doi:10.1167/iovs.08-2996

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
iovs.08-2996v1
50/6/2927    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhao, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Lu, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhao, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Lu, F.

Intraocular Pressure and Calculated Diastolic Ocular Perfusion Pressure during Three Simulated Steps of Phacoemulsification In Vivo

Yune Zhao,1 Xingyu Li,1 Aizhu Tao,1 Jianhua Wang,2 and Fan Lu1

1From the School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical College, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China; and the 2Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, Florida.

PURPOSE. To investigate the fluctuations of directly measured intraocular pressure (IOP) and induced diastolic ocular perfusion pressure (DOPP) during three simulated steps of phacoemulsification in vivo.

METHODS. Twenty-five eyes of 25 patients who underwent phacoemulsification were evaluated. A pressure transducer was inserted into the anterior chamber to measure IOP directly. The cortical cleanup and viscoelastic removal, nuclear disassembly, and anterior capsular polishing stages of phacoemulsification were simulated. Baseline, static, and dynamic IOP measurements at each stage were conducted before a routine phacoemulsification procedure was performed. DOPP was determined as the difference between diastolic blood pressure and IOP.

RESULTS. The directly measured IOP fluctuated from 13 ± 4.7 to 96 ± 6.2 mm Hg during the simulated steps of phacoemulsification (repeated-measurement ANOVA, P < 0.001). It was elevated more than 39 mm Hg compared with the baseline in static and dynamic measurements (post hoc, P < 0.001). Static DOPPs were lower than 0 mm Hg in all cases during simulated cortical cleanup and viscoelastic removal and in 19 cases during simulated nuclear disassembly. Dynamic DOPPs were lower than 0 mm Hg in 14 cases during simulated cortical cleanup and viscoelastic removal.

CONCLUSIONS. IOP and DOPP fluctuate widely during simulated steps of phacoemulsification. Further studies may be needed to establish the effect of the transient fluctuations in DOPP on visual function.








HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology