IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


A more recent version of this article appeared on March 1, 2009
(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. )
© 2008 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
doi:10.1167/iovs.08-1843

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (P<P[PDF])
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
iovs.08-1843v1
50/3/1087    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Varikooty, J.
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, T. L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Varikooty, J.
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, T. L

Article

The interblink interval I: The relationship between sensation intensity and tear film disruption

Jalaiah Varikooty 1* and Trefford L Simpson 2

1 Centre for Contact Lens Research, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada
2 Centre for Contact Lens Research, School of Optometry, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jpvariko{at}uwaterloo.ca.


   Abstract

Purpose: To find the relationship between tear film drying and sensation during the inter-blink period. Methods: One eye was taped shut and after a blink, the subjects were required to keep their other eye open. Digital video images of the ocular surface (with fluorescein) were obtained using a slit lamp biomicroscope while twenty three subjects rated the intensity of the ocular surface sensation by adjusting a 1-turn potentiometer to represent the strength of the sensation. They were trained to use the potentiometer before the data were collected. In addition, the characteristics of the sensation as spoken by the subject were recorded. Results: Sensation was generally triphasic with initial constant sensation and a subsequent biphasic period, with intensity increasing slowly followed by a rapid increase before subjects blinked (correlations were all r>0.95). Tear film drying dynamics were also biphasic, and drying and sensation were strongly associated with the correlation between the break in the bilinear functions of sensation and drying being 0.94. Conclusions: Our method provides novel information about the development of ocular sensation during ocular surface drying. As evidenced by the complex functions required to adequately describe the relationships, tear film drying and ocular surface sensations are associated in complex ways.

Key Words: tear film, psychophysics, dry eye, ocular discomfort







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology