IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


A more recent version of this article appeared on March 1, 2009
(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. )
© 2008 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
doi:10.1167/iovs.08-2281

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (P<P[PDF])
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
iovs.08-2281v1
50/3/1168    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Norcia, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Harrad, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Norcia, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Harrad, R.

Article

DISPARITY TUNING OF BINOCULAR FACILITATION AND SUPPRESSION AFTER NORMAL VERSUS ABNORMAL VISUAL DEVELOPMENT

Anthony M. Norcia 1*, Julia Hale 2, Mark Pettet 3, Suzanne P. McKee 3, and Richard Harrad 2

1 The Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, 2318 Fillmore St, San Francisco, California, 94115, United States
2 Bristol Eye Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom
3 Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, California, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: amn{at}ski.org.


   Abstract

PURPOSE: To study the pattern of facilitatory and suppressive binocular interactions in stereo-deficient patients with strabismus and in normal controls. METHODS: Visual Evoked Potentials were recorded in response to a vernier onset/offset pattern presented to one eye, either monocularly or paired dichoptically with a straight vertical square-wave grating, which when fused with the target in the other eye gave rise to a percept of a series of bands appearing in depth from an otherwise uniform plane or with a grating that contained offsets that produced a standing disparity and the appearance of a constantly segmented image, portions of which moved in depth. RESULTS: Participants with normal stereopsis showed facilitative and suppressive binocular interactions that depended on which dichoptic target was presented. Patients with long-standing, constant strabismus lacked normal facilitative binocular interactions. The response to a normally facilitative stimulus was reduced below the monocular level when it was presented to the dominant eye of patients without anisometropia, consistent with classical strabismic suppression of the non dominant eye. The dominant eye of strabismic patients without anisometropia retained a suppressive input from crossed but not uncrossed disparity stimuli presented to the non-dominant eye. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal disparity processing can be detected with the dichoptic VEP method we describe. Our results suggest that suppression in stereoblind, non-amblyopic observers is determined by a binocular mechanism responsive to disparity. In some cases, the sign of the disparity is important and this suggests a mechanism that can explain diplopia in patients made exotropic after surgery for esotropia.

Key Words: visual development, binocular vision, stereopsis, visual evoked potential, amblyopia, strabismus




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
V. E. Das
Alternating Fixation and Saccade Behavior in Nonhuman Primates with Alternating Occlusion-Induced Exotropia
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2009; 50(8): 3703 - 3710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology