IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


A more recent version of this article appeared on November 1, 2009
(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. )
© 2009 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
doi:10.1167/iovs.09-3419

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (P<P[PDF])
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
iovs.09-3419v1
50/11/5348    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ashby, R.
Right arrow Articles by Schaeffel, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ashby, R.
Right arrow Articles by Schaeffel, F.

Article

The Effect of Ambient Illuminance on the Development of Deprivation Myopia in Chicks

Regan Ashby 1*, Arne Ohlendorf 2, and Frank Schaeffel 3

1 Section of Neurobiology of the Eye, Institute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tuebingen, Institute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tuebingen, Section of Neurobiology, Calwerstrasse 7/1, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany, Tuebingen, 72076, Germany
2 Section of Neurobiology of the Eye, Institute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
3 Section of Neurobiology of the Eye, University Eye Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: regan.ashby{at}klinikum.uni-tuebingen.de.


   Abstract

Purpose: Recent epidemiological studies have shown that children who spend a higher proportion of time outdoors are less likely to develop myopia. We have investigated whether light levels may be a relevant factor in the development of myopia. Methods: Paradigm 1: chicks were form-deprived for 5 days, with the translucent diffusers removed daily for 15 min under one of three lighting conditions (1) normal laboratory lighting (500 lux), (2) intense laboratory lighting (15,000 lux), or (3) daylight (30,000 lux). Paradigm 2: continuously form-deprived chicks were raised for four days under one of three lighting conditions: (1) low laboratory lighting (50lux), (2) normal laboratory lighting (500 lux), or (3) intense laboratory lights (15,000 lux). Axial length and refraction were measured at the commencement and cessation of treatment, with corneal curvature measured additionally in paradigm 2. Results: Chicks exposed daily to either sunlight or intense laboratory lights for 15 min had significantly shorter eyes (8.81±0.05mm, p<0.01; 8.88±0.04mm; p<0.01) and less myopic refractions (-1.1±0.45D, p<0.01; -3.4±0.6D; p<0.01) than chicks which had their diffusers removed under normal laboratory light levels (8.98±0.03mm, -5.3±0.5D). Continuously form-deprived chicks reared under high light levels had shorter eyes (8.54±0.02mm; p<0.001) and less myopic refractions (+0.04±0.7D; p<0.001) compared to those chicks reared under normal light levels (8.64±0.06mm, -5.3±0.9D). Low lighting (50 lux) did not further increase deprivation myopia. Conclusions: Exposing chicks to high light levels, either sunlight or intense laboratory lights, retards the development of experimental myopia.

Key Words: myopia, form deprivation, eye growth, outdoor activity







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2009 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology