IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


A more recent version of this article appeared on November 1, 2009
(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. )
© 2009 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
doi:10.1167/iovs.09-3455

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (P<P[PDF])
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
iovs.09-3455v1
50/11/5130    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by He, M.
Right arrow Articles by Foster, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by He, M.
Right arrow Articles by Foster, P. J.

Article

Refractive error and biometry in older Chinese adults: the Liwan Eye Study

Mingguang He 1*, Wenyong Huang 2, Yuetao Li 2, Yingfeng Zheng 2, Qiuxia Yin 2, and Paul J. Foster 3

1 State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, 54 Xianlie Road, Guangzhou, 510060, China
2 State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangzhou, China
3 Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mingguang_he{at}yahoo.com.


   Abstract

Purpose: To assess the prevalence of refractive error and describe the distribution of ocular biometry and its association with refraction in adult Chinese. Methods: Random clustering sampling was used to identify adults aged 50 years and over in Liwan District, Guangzhou. Refraction was determined by subjective refraction that achieved the best-corrected vision based on monocular measurement. Ocular biometry was measured by A-mode ultrasound using a handheld applanation probe. Results: Among 1405 participants in the study, data from 1269 phakic right eyes were available for analysis. The prevalence of myopia (SE<-0.5 D), hyperopia (SE>+0.5 D), and astigmatism (cylinder>0.75 D) was 32.3% (95% CI: 27.8-34.6%), 40.0% (95% CI: 37.3-42.7%), and 48.3% (95% CI: 45.6-51.1%), respectively. The spherical equivalent tended to become hyperopic at 60 years and shift toward myopia at 75 years. Axial length did not change with age but was consistently shorter in women. Lens thickness increased with age and tended to be greater in women. Conclusions: The prevalence of myopia and biometric distribution in this urban Chinese cohort are similar to those observed in Singaporean Chinese but greater than in Mongolians and Europeans. Further studies are needed to clarify the role of environmental factors in the myopia rates.

Key Words: prevalence, myopia, refractive error , biometry







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2009 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology