IOVS Am. J. Clin. Nutrition
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bylund, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Chacko, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bylund, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Chacko, D. M.
(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 1999;40:2299-2306.)
© 1999 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.

Characterization of {alpha}2 Adrenergic Receptor Subtypes in Human Ocular Tissue Homogenates

David B. Bylund1 and David M. Chacko2

From the Departments of 1 Pharmacology and 2 Ophthalmology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha.

Abstract

PURPOSE. To determine the predominant {alpha}2 adrenergic receptor subtypes present in the human eye.

METHODS. Saturation- and competition-receptor–binding experiments were performed with the radioligand [3H]RX821002 in human ciliary body, retinal pigmented epithelium–choriocapillaris, iris, and neurosensory retina. The affinities of various adrenergic antagonists in these ocular tissues were compared with their affinities for the cloned {alpha}2A, {alpha}2B, and {alpha}2C adrenergic receptor subtypes.

RESULTS. The density of {alpha}2 adrenergic receptors was highest in the iris (440 femtomoles/mg protein), lowest in the neurosensory retina (14 femtomoles/mg protein), and intermediate in the other two tissues (approximately 90 fmol/mg protein). The drug affinities in all four human ocular tissues were highly correlated (correlation coefficients between 0.94 and 0.97) with the affinities for the human {alpha}2A adrenergic receptor subtype and poorly correlated (correlation coefficients between 0.15 and 0.66) with the {alpha}2B and {alpha}2C subtypes.

CONCLUSIONS. In agreement with previous studies in several animal species, the {alpha}2 adrenergic receptors in the human ciliary body, retinal pigmented epithelium–choriocapillaris, iris, and neurosensory retina are predominately of the {alpha}2A subtype.

Glaucoma is characterized by a progressive loss of visual sensitivity resulting from optic nerve damage. Because high intraocular pressure is the most important risk factor for glaucoma, the treatment of glaucoma has emphasized the reduction of intraocular pressure.1 Alpha-2 adrenergic agonists such as brimonidine and apraclonidine are effective ocular hypotensive agents,2 3 4 although their mechanism of action is not clear.5 6 7 The development of subtype-selective {alpha}2 adrenergic agents for topical application is desirable to reduce both systemic and ocular side effects. An understanding of the distribution of {alpha}2 receptor subtypes in the eye would be useful in designing new drugs with greater effectiveness and fewer adverse effects.

Based on both pharmacologic and molecular evidence, there are three major types of adrenergic receptors, {alpha}1, {alpha}2, and ß, each of which is further divided into three or four subtypes.8 The evidence for {alpha}2 adrenergic receptor subtypes has come from binding and functional studies in various tissues and cell lines and more recently in cells transfected with the cDNA for the receptors.9 On the basis of these studies, three {alpha}2 adrenergic receptor subtypes have been defined. The {alpha}2A adrenergic receptor subtype, for which prazosin has a relatively low affinity and oxymetazoline a relatively high affinity, is found in the human platelet and the HT29 cell.8 The second subtype, the {alpha}2B, was identified in neonatal rat lung and in the NG108 cell.10 This subtype has a relatively high affinity for prazosin and a low affinity for oxymetazoline. A third subtype, the {alpha}2C, has been identified in an opossum kidney cell line.11 Although this subtype also has a relatively high affinity for prazosin and a low affinity for oxymetazoline, it is pharmacologically distinct from the {alpha}2B subtype.12 All three subtypes have been cloned from the human.13 14 15 Using the homogenate radioligand-binding technique, {alpha}2 adrenergic receptors have been identified in ocular tissues of several species, including the ciliary body, retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE)–choriocapillaris, iris, and neurosensory retina of both the cow16 17 and the pig18 and the ciliary body of the rabbit.19 The results of these binding studies indicate that the {alpha}2A subtype is the predominant, if not the only, {alpha}2 adrenergic subtype in these ocular tissues, with the exception of the porcine neurosensory retina, which may contain a very low density (4 femtomoles/mg protein) of the {alpha}2C subtype. Although similar binding studies have not yet been conducted with human ocular tissues, it appears likely that the predominant human ocular {alpha}2 adrenergic subtype may also be the {alpha}2A.

In contrast to these binding data, immunofluorescence labeling of the human ciliary body indicates the presence of {alpha}2B and {alpha}2C subtypes, but not the {alpha}2A subtype.20 Similarly, studies using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) suggest the presence of the {alpha}2B and {alpha}2C subtypes, but not the {alpha}2A subtype, in a transformed cell line of human nonpigmented epithelium20 and only the {alpha}2B subtype in the human ciliary body.21 To determine whether this apparent discrepancy is the result of species differences or of differences in techniques, we investigated the {alpha}2 subtypes in human ocular tissues by the radioligand-binding technique. On the basis of receptor-binding experiments using the {alpha}2 antagonist radioligand [3H]RX821002, we conclude that the {alpha}2 adrenergic receptors in the human ciliary body, RPE–choriocapillaris, iris, and neurosensory retina are predominately of the {alpha}2A subtype.

Methods

Drugs and Chemicals
[3H]RX821002 (specific activity 52–59 Ci/millimole) was obtained from Amersham International (London, UK); rauwolscine, WB 4101, and spiroxatrine from Research Biochemicals, (Natick, MA); and oxymetazoline from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Prazosin and ARC-239 were generous gifts from Pfizer (Groton, CT) and Boehringer–Ingelheim (Ridgefield, CT), respectively. Drugs were prepared as 5- or 10-mM stock solutions and diluted in 5 mM HCl. The stock solution for prazosin was in methanol, for spiroxatrine in 80% dimethyl sulfoxide-20% 1 M HCl, and for all other drugs in 5 mM HCl.

Tissue
Human eyes were obtained frozen from the Missouri Lions Eye Bank and bisected at approximately 7 to 8 mm posterior to the limbus while bathed in 50 mM Tris buffer at 4°C. Under a dissecting microscope, the anterior hyaloid face and lens material were carefully dissected from the iris and ciliary body. The remnants of neurosensory retina, RPE, and choriocapillaris were removed from their attachments at the ora serrata in the anterior portion of the bisected globe. The iris was then removed by disinserting the iris root from the base of the ciliary body, thus releasing the base of the ciliary body then released from its attachment to the scleral spur anteriorly.

The various tissues were suspended in 25 ml ice-cold 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8 at 25°C) and homogenized (model TR-10 Tissumiser; Tekmar, Cincinnati, OH). The homogenate was filtered through a 53-µm nylon mesh, centrifuged at 1400 rpm for 10 minutes. The supernatant was transferred to another tube, recentrifuged at 20,000 rpm for 10 minutes and the pellet frozen at -80°C.

Radioligand-Binding Assays
Saturation- and competition-binding experiments were performed as described previously, using 25 mM sodium phosphate buffer at pH 7.4.16 17 22 Briefly, saturation experiments were performed using two sets of duplicate tubes that contained 970 µl of membrane suspension and 20 µl [3H]RX821002. The protein concentration was adjusted to ensure that the specifically bound radioligand was less than 10% of the total added radioligand. One set of tubes contained 10 µl (-)-norepinephrine (final concentration, 100 µM) to determine nonspecific binding. Specific binding was calculated as the difference between total and nonspecific binding. After a 40-minute incubation at room temperature, the suspensions were filtered through glass fiber filter strips (GF/B; Whatman, Clifton, NJ), which had been soaked overnight in 0.1% polyethylenimine, using a 48-sample manifold (Brandel Cell Harvester; Biomedical Research and Development, Gaithersburg, MD). The tubes and filters were washed twice with 5 ml ice-cold 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), and the radioactivity on the filter was determined by liquid scintillation spectroscopy. The Kd and maximum binding (Bmax) values were calculated from nonlinear regression of bound versus free ligand concentrations using a statistical software program (Prism; GraphPad, San Diego, CA). Kd values are geometric means and Bmax values are arithmetic means. Protein concentrations were determined by the method of Bradford23 with bovine serum albumin as the standard.

For inhibition experiments, 20 µl of a fixed concentration of radioligand [3H]RX821002 (final concentration, 0.24 ± 0.04 nM, which is near the Kd concentration) and various concentrations of unlabeled drug (10 µl) were added to duplicate tubes containing 970 µl of the membrane suspension. Assays were then performed as described for saturation experiments. Competition binding data were analyzed (Prism; GraphPad) to determine the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) assuming a one-site model. The pseudo Hill slope was determined by fitting the data to the four-parameter logistic equation. In some cases, the fit of the data to a one-site model was compared with the fit to a two-site model. IC50 values were converted to Ki values by the method of Cheng and Prusoff24 and are presented as geometric means.

Results

The selective {alpha}2 adrenergic antagonist [3H]RX821002 demonstrated saturable and high-affinity binding to membrane preparations from human ocular tissues (Fig. 1 A). The density of receptor-binding sites (Bmax) was highest in the iris, intermediate in the ciliary body and RPE–choriocapillaris, and lowest in the neurosensory retina (Table 1) . The density was 30 times higher in the iris than in the neurosensory retina, and 5 times higher than in the ciliary body and RPE–choriocapillaris. The data were linear when plotted by the method of Rosenthal,25 consistent with [3H]RX821002 binding to a single class of sites (Fig. 1B) . The affinity (Kd) of [3H]RX821002 was essentially identical in the ciliary body, iris, and RPE–choriocapillaris but slightly lower (higher Kd) in the neurosensory retina (Table 1) . The Kd values for these ocular tissues are similar to those obtained under identical binding conditions for the cloned {alpha}2A subtype (0.25 nM), but lower than those for the {alpha}2B and {alpha}2C subtypes (0.89 and 0.58 nM, respectively),22 indicating that the {alpha}2A may be the major subtype in these tissues.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Saturation radioligand-binding experiments of {alpha}2 adrenergic receptors. Membrane preparations from four human ocular tissues were incubated with various concentrations of [3H]RX821002 (Free) and the specific binding (Bound) determined. Specific binding was calculated as the difference between the total binding and the nonspecific binding (100 µM norepinephrine). The results presented are from a single experiment, and the mean ± SEM of four similar experiments are presented in Table 1 . (A) The results as a hyperbolic saturation curve, determined by nonlinear regression. (B) Data have been transformed to a Rosenthal plot that linearizes the data.25

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Affinity (Kd) and Density (Bmax) of {alpha}2 Adrenergic Receptor Sites Determined by [3H]RX821002 Binding

 
Inhibition radioligand-binding experiments were used to investigate further which {alpha}2 adrenergic receptor subtypes are present in human ocular tissues. In the ciliary body, various adrenergic agents inhibited [3H]RX821002 binding with the expected rank order for an {alpha}2A receptor (Fig. 2) . With the exception of the agonist norepinephrine, none of the slope factors (pseudo Hill coefficients) was significantly less than 1.0, indicating the presence of a single major receptor subtype. Oxymetazoline was approximately 300 times more potent than prazosin in inhibiting [3H]RX821002 binding (Table 2) , similar to the 100-fold difference found for the cloned {alpha}2A subtype and much different from the prazosin and oxymetazoline ratios of 0.04 and 0.35 found for the cloned {alpha}2B and {alpha}2C subtypes, respectively.26 The affinities of the antagonists used for the {alpha}2B and {alpha}2C subtypes relative to the {alpha}2A subtype are shown in Table 3 . The large range of relative affinities (230–0.02) indicates that this set of agents can easily differentiate the {alpha}2A subtype from the {alpha}2B and {alpha}2C subtypes. The Ki values determined for the iris, RPE–choriocapillaris, and neurosensory retina were very similar to those of the ciliary body (Table 2) , indicating that the {alpha}2A subtype is also the predominant {alpha}2 adrenergic receptor subtype in these tissues.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Inhibition radioligand-binding experiments of ciliary body {alpha}2 adrenergic receptors. Membrane preparations of human ciliary body were incubated with various concentrations of the indicated adrenergic agents and with 0.24 nM [3H]RX821002. The data are presented as the percentage of specific binding in the absence of any inhibitor. Specific binding was calculated as the difference between total binding and nonspecific binding. Typical levels of total binding and nonspecific binding in cpm were: 1000 and 200 (iris); 550 and 120 (ciliary body); 750 and 150 (RPE–choriocapillaris); 120 and 35 (neurosensory retina). The IC50 values, determined by nonlinear regression, were used to calculate Ki values. The results presented are from a single experiment, and the mean ± SEM of three similar experiments are presented in Table 2 .

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Affinities (Ki) of Adrenergic Drugs of Ocular {alpha}2 Adrenergic Receptors as Determined by [3H]RX821002 Binding

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Relative Affinities of Adrenergic Antagonists for Human {alpha}2 Adrenergic Receptor Subtypes

 
To compare the affinities in the four tissues more systematically, the logarithms of the Ki values (pKi values) of the six antagonists listed in Table 2 , as well as the Kd values of [3H]RX821002 for the ciliary body, were plotted against those for the other three tissues (Fig. 3) . In all three cases, the correlation coefficients were close to 1.0, indicating that the same subtype is present in all four tissues. Similarly, the pKi values for the ciliary body were correlated with the pKi values obtained previously for the three cloned human subtypes (Fig. 4) . The values for the ciliary body correlated highly with those for the human {alpha}2A subtype (r = 0.97) but poorly with the {alpha}2B (r = 0.22) and the {alpha}2C (r = 0.50) subtypes. Similar results were obtained for the other three human ocular tissues (Table 4) .



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. The correlation of pKi values of adrenergic antagonists for human ciliary body with the human RPE–choriocapillaris (A), iris (B), and neurosensory retina (C). The data are taken from Tables 1 and 2 . The correlation coefficients (r) are also shown. A summary of the correlation coefficients is presented in Table 4 .

 


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. The correlation of pKi values (logarithm of the Ki or Kd values) of adrenergic antagonists for ciliary body with the cloned human {alpha}2 adrenergic receptor subtypes {alpha}2A (A), {alpha}2B (B), and {alpha}2C (C). The data are taken from Tables 1 and 2 and from Berlie et al.16 The correlation coefficients (r), are also shown. A summary of the correlation coefficients for all four human ocular tissues with the three cloned human {alpha}2 adrenergic receptor subtypes is shown in Table 4 .

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Correlation Coefficients (r) from Correlations of pKi Values Between Human Ocular Tissues and the Cloned Human {alpha}2 Adrenergic Receptor Subtypes

 
Although these data clearly indicate that the {alpha}2A subtype is the predominant {alpha}2 adrenergic receptor subtype in human ocular tissues, the possibility of a low density of an additional {alpha}2 subtype cannot be excluded. In the porcine neurosensory retina, for example, 85% of the receptors are {alpha}2A, but 15% are {alpha}2C.18 Furthermore, the {alpha}2C subtype is the main {alpha}2 receptor in a human retinoblastoma cell line (Y79).27 These observations prompted a more careful evaluation of the data. The Kd value for [3H]RX821002 was somewhat higher in the neurosensory retina than in the other tissues (Table 1) . Similarly, in the neurosensory retina the slope factors for many of the antagonists were less than 1.0. Spiroxatrine has a 40-fold higher affinity for the human {alpha}2C subtype, compared with the {alpha}2A, and thus is a good antagonist for detecting a minor amount of {alpha}2C in the presence of the {alpha}2A subtype. If a measurable amount of {alpha}2C were present in the neurosensory retina, then the spiroxatrine inhibition data should fit a two-site model better than a one-site model. In four of six inhibition experiments in the neurosensory retina, the data fit a two-site model significantly better than a one-site model (P < 0.05). For the four experiments that modeled better as two sites, the higher affinity site had a median effective concentration (EC50) of 1.4 nM and accounted for 56% of the receptors, whereas the lower affinity site had an EC50 of 72 nM. When the data for all six experiments were combined and fit as a single curve, similar results were obtained (Fig. 5) . Thus, it appears likely that the human neurosensory retina contains a significant amount of both the {alpha}2A and {alpha}2C subtypes.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Inhibition of [3H]RX821002 binding to the {alpha}2 adrenergic receptors in the neurosensory retina by spiroxatrine. The data shown are the merged data from six experiments. Each data point is the mean of duplicate determinations. A two-site model fit the data significantly better than a one-site model (F = 5.0; P = 0.009). The higher affinity site had an EC50 of 3.7 nM and accounted for 74% of the receptors, whereas the lower affinity site had an EC50 of 104 nM.

 
Discussion

Alpha-2 adrenergic agents, such as brimonidine and apraclonidine, effectively lower intraocular pressure, although the mechanisms involved are not yet well understood. Three presumed sites of action for these agonists are the ciliary nonpigmented epithelium (reduction of aqueous humor production), ciliary muscle (increase in uveoscleral outflow facility), and the trabecular meshwork (increase in trabecular outflow). In addition, in some species a central site of action for {alpha}2 agonists is also probable. Brimonidine and apraclonidine are equally efficacious in decreasing aqueous humor production,28 presumably by acting on the nonpigmented epithelium of the ciliary body. However, brimonidine7 and oxymetazoline29 also appear to increase uveoscleral outflow, whereas apraclonidine increases outflow through the trabecular meshwork.6 One potential explanation for these differences is that the agonists have differential potencies at the three {alpha}2 adrenergic receptor subtypes, and that these subtypes are differentially located in the relevant ocular tissues.

Several techniques have been used to define the localization of {alpha}2 adrenergic receptors in the human eye. Autoradiographic studies found high levels of {alpha}2 adrenergic receptors in the iris epithelium and ciliary epithelium, as well as in the ciliary muscle, retina, and RPE.30 In these studies, the total pool of {alpha}2 receptors was visualized, but the individual receptor subtypes were not considered. In the human ciliary body, immunofluorescence labeling indicates the presence of the {alpha}2B and {alpha}2C subtypes, but not the {alpha}2A subtype.20 In contrast to these immunofluorescence results, our radioligand-binding data indicate that the {alpha}2A is the main, if not the only, subtype present in the human ciliary body, iris, and RPE–choriocapillaris. The neurosensory retina appears to contain mostly {alpha}2A and perhaps some {alpha}2C. This conclusion is based on a comparison of Ki values in the ocular tissues with previous data from our laboratory with the cloned human subtypes expressed in COS cells.26 Our conclusion that the {alpha}2A is the major subtype in human ocular tissues is consistent with radioligand-binding studies in the cow, rabbit, and pig, which also identify the {alpha}2A subtype as the main ocular subtype.16 18 19

In contrast to our results from the radioligand-binding technique are the results obtained using PCR and immunofluorescence techniques. Two studies have used PCR to determine the absence or presence of mRNA encoding the three {alpha}2 adrenergic receptor subtypes in the human eye. In a transformed cell line of human nonpigmented epithelium, PCR studies indicate the presence of mRNA for the {alpha}2B and {alpha}2C subtypes, but not the {alpha}2A.21 In a second, similar study published thus far only in abstract form, the PCR technique indicated the presence of only the {alpha}2B subtype in a transformed cell line of human nonpigmented epithelium and in the human ciliary body.21 Both studies also examined rabbit iris–ciliary body. The former study found evidence for mRNA for all three subtypes, whereas the latter study found only the {alpha}2A and {alpha}2B subtypes. The single study using the immunofluorescence technique suggested the presence of the {alpha}2B and {alpha}2C subtypes, but not the {alpha}2A, in the human ciliary body.20 By contrast all three subtypes were found in the rabbit iris–ciliary body. Thus, although these two techniques appear to differ on exactly which subtypes are present in human and rabbit ocular tissues, they agree that the {alpha}2A subtype is absent in human tissues studied. This conclusion is not supported by the results of the radioligand-binding studies reported here.

It is of interest that the immunofluorescence technique identifies all three subtypes in the rabbit ciliary body,20 whereas the radioligand-binding approach finds only the {alpha}2A subtype.19 Because immunofluorescence is not a quantitative approach, it may be that the other two subtypes are present in such low concentrations in the rabbit ciliary body that they are not detected by the radioligand-binding technique, or that they are not functional (i.e., unable to bind ligand) proteins. That there was no immunofluorescence detection of the {alpha}2A subtype in the human ciliary body is of concern, because this is the major subtype detected by the radioligand technique in all four species investigated to date: human, cow, pig, and rabbit. Furthermore, the cultured human trabecular meshwork cells express only the {alpha}2A subtype.31 As Huang et al.20 point out, the {alpha}2A subtype may well exist in the human eye but was not detected in their immunofluorescence experiments, perhaps because the antibody used was not sufficiently sensitive. However, the PCR studies should have detected the mRNA for the {alpha}2A subtype if it were present. Similarly, it is possible that the {alpha}2B and {alpha}2C subtypes are present at low density in the human ciliary body, and thus were not detected by the radioligand technique because of the presence of a much higher density of the {alpha}2A subtype. Another potential resolution to the difference in conclusions reached by the two techniques is one of receptor subtype localization, because the radioligand-binding technique detects the binding in the tissue as a whole, whereas the immunofluorescence experiments detect receptors only in a small area. Thus, the {alpha}2A subtype could be the major subtype in the ciliary body but did not happen to be in the specific place studied in the immunofluorescence experiments. Conversely, the {alpha}2B and {alpha}2C subtypes may be localized to the specific places studied in the immunofluorescence experiments, but not sufficiently widely distributed to be detected by the radioligand-binding technique.

Based on the data in Figure 5 , it appears probable that some {alpha}2C (or possibly {alpha}2B) receptors are present in the neurosensory retina. A firm conclusion cannot be drawn, however, because the data were significantly better fit by a two-site model in only four of the six individual experiments. In addition, the IC50 values for spiroxatrine derived from Figure 5 (3.7 µM and 104 µM) do not agree well with the Ki values determined for the human clones (5.5, 0.19, 0.13 µM) for the {alpha}2A, {alpha}2B, and {alpha}2C subtypes, respectively.26 The low density of {alpha}2 adrenergic receptors in the neurosensory retina and the limited availability of human tissue make it difficult to resolve this issue clearly.

The density of {alpha}2 adrenergic receptors has now been determined in one or more ocular tissues in four species, as is summarized in Fig. 6 . It is remarkable that the relative density in the four tissues is different in each species and that the highest density for each tissue is found in a different species. For example, in the cow, the receptor density in the neurosensory retina is approximately 100 times higher than in the human. The significance of this marked species variability is unknown at the present time. Furthermore, it must be emphasized that receptor density does not necessarily relate to either its physiological or pharmacologic importance.



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. The density (Bmax) of ocular {alpha}2 adrenergic receptors in various species. The data for the human are from Table 1 , the data for the cow, pig, and rabbit (ciliary body was the only tissue studied in rabbit) are from Bylund et al.,17 Wikberg–Matsson et al.,18 and Jin et al.,19 respectively.

 
The pineal gland and the neurosensory retina share many similarities including light sensitivity and embryonic origins. In the pineal gland, the ß adrenergic receptor shows similar species variations in density. The sheep pineal has a very high density of ß adrenergic receptors (4400 femtomoles/mg protein32 ), the rat is approximately 10 times lower (550 femtomoles/mg protein33 ), and the human (35 femtomoles/mg protein34 ) and hamster (55 femtomoles/mg protein33 ) are 10 times lower yet. By contrast, the {alpha}2 receptor density is relatively constant in the three species that have been examined to date: human, 63 femtomoles/mg protein (David Bylund, unpublished); cow, 71 femtomoles/mg protein35 ; and rat, 69 femtomoles/mg protein.36

Some {alpha}2 adrenergic agents, including those used in the treatment of glaucoma, also bind to the nonadrenergic imidazoline sites. The I1 imidazoline site may have a role in regulating blood pressure,37 but its role, if any, in regulating intraocular pressure is unknown.38 39 Our studies do not address this issue because the radioligand that we chose ([3HRX821002) has a low affinity for imidazoline sites40 and thus would not bind to those sites under the conditions of our assay. In addition, norepinephrine, which does not bind to imidazoline sites, was used to define nonspecific binding in our studies, thereby eliminating any contribution of imidazoline sites to our data.

Alpha-2 adrenergic agonists are increasingly used in glaucoma therapy. There is some evidence to suggest that these agents may have some direct neuroprotective effect on the optic nerve in addition to the protective effect of reduced intraocular pressure.41 42 However, long-term studies are needed to evaluate the extent to which {alpha}2 adrenergic agents preserve visual function. Attempts to design new {alpha}2 agents with increased specificity and thus fewer side effects will be strengthened by a better understanding of the {alpha}2 adrenergic receptor subtype(s) mediating the ocular hypotensive effects of these agents.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Ronald J. Walkenbach and the Missouri Lions Eye Tissue Bank, Columbia, for the human eyes used in this study and Laurie J. Iversen for excellent technical assistance.

Footnotes

Supported by a seed grant from the University of Nebraska Medical Center and a grant from Allergan, Inc.

Submitted for publication January 20, 1999; revised March 26, 1999; accepted April 20, 1999.

Proprietary interest category: C5.

Corresponding author: David B. Bylund, Department of Pharmacology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 986260 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-6260. E-mail: dbylund@unmc.edu

References

  1. Alward, WLM (1998) Medical management of glaucoma N Engl J Med 339,1298-1307[Free Full Text]
  2. Chacko, DM, Camras, CB (1994) The potential of {alpha}2-adrenergic agonists in the medical treatment of glaucoma Curr Opin Ophthalmol 5,76-84
  3. Walters, TR (1996) Development and use of brimonidine in treating acute and chronic elevations of intraocular pressure: a review of safety, efficacy, dose response, and dosing studies Survey Ophthalmol 41,S19-S26
  4. Wilensky, JT (1996) The role of brimonidine in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma Survey Ophthalmol 41,S3-S7
  5. Serle, JB (1994) Pharmacological advances in the treatment of glaucoma Drugs Aging 5,156-170[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Toris, CB, Tafoya, ME, Camras, CB, et al (1995) Effects of apraclonidine on aqueous humor dynamics in human eyes Ophthalmology 102,456-461[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Toris, CB, Gleason, M, Camras, CB, et al (1995) Effects of brimonidine on aqueous humor dynamics in human eyes Arch Ophthalmol 113,1514-1517[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Bylund, DB (1988) Subtypes of {alpha}2-adrenoceptors: pharmacological and molecular biological evidence converge Trends Pharmacol Sci 9,356-361[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Bylund, DB (1992) Subtypes of {alpha}1- and {alpha}2-adrenergic receptors FASEB J. 6,832-839[Abstract]
  10. Bylund, DB, Ray-Prenger, C, Murphy, TJ (1988) Alpha-2A and alpha-2B adrenergic receptor subtypes: antagonist binding in tissues and cell lines containing only one subtype J Pharmacol Exp Ther 245,600-607[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Murphy, TJ, Bylund, DB (1988) Characterization of alpha-2 adrenergic receptors in the OK cell, an opossum kidney cell line J Pharmacol Exp Ther 244,571-578[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Blaxall, HS, Murphy, TJ, Baker, JC, et al (1991) Characterization of the alpha-2C adrenergic receptor subtype in the opossum kidney and in the OK cell line J Pharmacol Exp Ther 259,323-329[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Kobilka, BK, Matsui, H, Kobilka, TS, et al (1987) Cloning, sequencing, and expression of the gene encoding for the human platelet {alpha}2-adrenergic receptor subtypes Science 238,650-656[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Regan, JW, Kobilka, TS, Yang-Feng, TL, et al (1988) Cloning and expression of a human kidney cDNA for an {alpha}2-adrenergic receptor subtype Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85,6301-6305[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Weinshank, RL, Zgombick, JM, Macchi, M, et al (1990) Cloning, expression, and pharmacological characterization of a human {alpha} 2B-adrenergic receptor Mol Pharmacol 35,681-688[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Berlie, JR, Iversen, LJ, Blaxall, HS, et al (1995) Alpha-2 adrenergic receptors in the bovine retina: presence of only the alpha-2D subtype Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 36,1885-1892[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Bylund, DB, Iversen, LJ, Matulka, WJ, et al (1997) Characterization of alpha-2 adrenergic receptor subtypes in bovine ocular tissue homogenates J Pharmacol Exp Ther 281,1171-1177[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Wikberg-Matsson, A, Wikberg, JES, Uhlén, S. (1996) Characterization of {alpha}2-adrenoceptor subtypes in the porcine eye: identification of {alpha}2A-adrenoceptors in the choroid, ciliary body and iris, and {alpha}2A- and {alpha}2C-adrenoceptors in the retina Exp Eye Res 63,57-65[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Jin, Y, Verstappen, A, Yorio, T. (1994) Characterization of {alpha}2-adrenoceptor binding sites in rabbit ciliary body membranes Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 35,2500-2508[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Huang, Y, Gil, DW, Vanscheeuwijck, P, et al (1995) Localization of {alpha}2-adrenergic receptor subtypes in the anterior segment of the human eye with selective antibodies Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 36,2729-2739[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Yorio T, Jin Y. Identification of alpha-2 adrenoceptor subtype mRNA in the ciliary body [ARVO Abstract]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995;36(4):S139. Abstract nr 677.
  22. Deupree, JD, Hinton, KA, Cerutis, DR, et al (1996) Buffers differentially alter the binding of [3H]rauwolscine and [3H]RX821002 to the alpha-2 adrenergic receptor subtypes J Pharmacol Exp Ther 278,1215-1227[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Bradford, MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding Anal Biochem 72,248-254[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Cheng, Y-C, Prusoff, WH (1973) Relationship between the inhibition constant (KI) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50 per cent inhibition (I50) of an enzymatic reaction Biochem Pharmacol 22,3099-3108[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Rosenthal, HE (1967) Graphical method for the determination and presentation of binding parameters in a complex system Anal Biochem 20,525-532[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Bylund, DB, Blaxall, HS, Iversen, LJ, et al (1992) Pharmacological characteristics of {alpha}2-adrenergic receptors: comparison of pharmacologically defined subtypes with subtypes identified by molecular cloning Mol Pharmacol 42,1-5[Abstract]
  27. Gleason, MM, Hieble, JP (1992) The {alpha}2-adrenoceptors of the human retinoblastoma cell line (Y79) may represent an additional example of the {alpha}2C-adrenoceptor Br J Pharmacol 107,222-225[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Schadlu, R, Maus, TL, Nau, CB, et al (1998) Comparison of the efficacy of apraclonidine and brimonidine as aqueous suppressants in humans Arch Ophthalmol 116,1441-1444[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Wang, R-F, Lee, P-Y, Taniguchi, T, et al (1993) Effect of oxymetazoline on aqueous humor dynamics and ocular blood flow in monkeys and rabbits Arch Ophthalmol 111,535-538[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Matsuo, T, Cynader, MS (1992) Localization of alpha-2 adrenergic receptors in the human eye Ophthalmic Res 24,213-219[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Stamer, WD, Huang, Y, Seftor, REB, et al (1996) Cultured human trabecular meshwork cells express functional {alpha}2A adrenergic receptors Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 37,2426-2433[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Foldes, A, Maxwell, CA, Hinks, NT, et al (1982) Effects of steroids on beta-adrenergic binding sites in sheep pineal glands Biochem Pharmacol 31,1369-1374[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Craft, CM, Morgan, WW, Jones, DJ, et al (1985) Hamster and rat pineal gland beta-adrenoceptor characterization with iodocyanopindolol and the effect of decreased catecholamine synthesis on the receptor J Pineal Res 2,51-66[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Little, KY, Kirkman, JA, Duncan, GE (1996) ß-Adrenergic receptor subtypes in human pineal gland J Pineal Res 20,15-20[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Simonneaux, V, Ebadi, M, Bylund, DB (1991) Identification and characterization of {alpha}2d-adrenergic receptors in bovine pineal gland Mol Pharmacol 40,235-241[Abstract]
  36. Schaad, NC, Klein, DC (1992) Characterization of alpha 2-adrenergic receptors on rat pinealocytes Endocrinology 130,2804-2810[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Eglen, RM, Hudson, AL, Kendall, DA, et al (1998) "Seeing through a glass darkly": casting light on imidazoline "I" sites Trends Pharmacol Sci 19,381-390[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Chu, TC, Wong, W, Gluchowski, C, et al (1996) Rilmenidine-induced ocular hypotension: role of imidazoline1 and alpha2 receptors Curr Eye Res 15,943-950[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Munk, SA, Lai, RK, Burke, JE, et al (1996) Synthesis and pharmacologic evaluation of 2-endo-amino-3-exo-isopropylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptane: a potent imidazoline1 receptor specific agent J Med Chem 39,1193-1195[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Miralles, A, Olmos, G, Sastre, M, et al (1993) Discrimination and pharmacological characterization of I2-imidazoline sites with [3H]idazoxan and alpha-2 adrenoceptors with [3H]RX821002 (2-methoxy idazoxan) in the human and rat brains J Pharmacol Exp Ther 264,1187-1197[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Wen, R, Cheng, T, Li, YW, et al (1996) {alpha}2-adrenergic agonists induce basic fibroblast growth factor expression in photoreceptors in vivo and ameliorate light damage J Neurosci 16,5986-5992[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Yoles, E, Wheeler, LA, Schwartz, M. (1999) {alpha} 2-adrenoreceptor agonists are neuroprotective in a rat model of optic nerve degeneration Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40,65-73[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
M. Saylor, L. K. McLoon, A. R. Harrison, and M. S. Lee
Experimental and Clinical Evidence for Brimonidine as an Optic Nerve and Retinal Neuroprotective Agent: An Evidence-Based Review
Arch Ophthalmol, April 1, 2009; 127(4): 402 - 406.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
M. Aihara, J. D. Lindsey, and R. N. Weinreb
Effect on Diurnal Intraocular Pressure Variation of Eliminating the {alpha}-2 Adrenergic Receptor Subtypes in the Mouse
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2008; 49(3): 929 - 933.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
R. H. Rosa Jr., T. W. Hein, Z. Yuan, W. Xu, M. I. Pechal, R. L. Geraets, J. M. Newman, and L. Kuo
Brimonidine evokes heterogeneous vasomotor response of retinal arterioles: diminished nitric oxide-mediated vasodilation when size goes small
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2006; 291(1): H231 - H238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
F B Kalapesi, M T Coroneo, and M A Hill
Human ganglion cells express the alpha-2 adrenergic receptor: relevance to neuroprotection
Br. J. Ophthalmol., June 1, 2005; 89(6): 758 - 763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
A. E. de Salamanca, K. F. Siemasko, Y. Diebold, M. Calonge, J. Gao, M. Juarez-Campo, and M. E. Stern
Expression of Muscarinic and Adrenergic Receptors in Normal Human Conjunctival Epithelium
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., February 1, 2005; 46(2): 504 - 513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
D W Evans, S L Hosking, D Gherghel, and J D Bartlett
Contrast sensitivity improves after brimonidine therapy in primary open angle glaucoma: a case for neuroprotection
Br. J. Ophthalmol., December 1, 2003; 87(12): 1463 - 1465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
D. C. Baptiste, A. T. E. Hartwick, C. A. B. Jollimore, W. H. Baldridge, B. C. Chauhan, F. Tremblay, and M. E. M. Kelly
Comparison of the Neuroprotective Effects of Adrenoceptor Drugs in Retinal Cell Culture and Intact Retina
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2002; 43(8): 2666 - 2676.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
A. Wikberg-Matsson and U. Simonsen
Potent {alpha}2A-Adrenoceptor-Mediated Vasoconstriction by Brimonidine in Porcine Ciliary Arteries
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2001; 42(9): 2049 - 2055.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
S. Guimaraes and D. Moura
Vascular Adrenoceptors: An Update
Pharmacol. Rev., June 1, 2001; 53(2): 319 - 356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bylund, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Chacko, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bylund, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Chacko, D. M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS