|
|
||||||||
1 From the Dipartimento di Informatica e Sistemistica, University of Pavia, Italy and the Departments of 2 Neurology, 3 Biomedical Engineering, and 4 Neuroscience, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University Hospitals, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS. Using the scleral search-coil technique, eye movements were measured in 10 normal subjects as they made voluntary, disjunctive gaze shifts comprising a range of saccades and vergence movements.
RESULTS. By analyzing eye acceleration records, the authors identified small-amplitude (0.20.7°), high-frequency (2333 Hz), conjugate horizontal oscillations of the eyes during the vergence movement that followed the initial saccade. When the shift of the fixation point required a large vergence component (17°), every subject showed these oscillations; they were present in approximately a third of responses. Approximately 5% of responses showed oscillations that had horizontal and vertical components. Oscillations were less prominent with shifts that had smaller vergence components and were absent after saccades made between targets located at optical infinity.
CONCLUSIONS. These findings suggest that a common mechanism gates both the saccadic and vergence components of disjunctive gaze shifts, a likely candidate being the pontine omnipause neurons. When a saccade is immediately followed by a prolonged vergence movement, the omnipause neurons remain silent, leading to small-amplitude saccadic oscillations. Shifts in the point of visual fixation that require a large vergence movement may be a useful experimental strategy to induce saccadic oscillations.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Voluntary shifts of gaze angle between different objects located at distance is achieved mainly by saccadesrapid movements that carry the eyes in the same direction (versional or conjugate movements). The premotor signals for saccades made in the horizontal plane are generated by burst cells in the reticular formation of the pons, so-called because these neurons give an intense burst of discharge preceding each rapid eye movement.2 3 4 The activity of burst neurons is gated by so-called omnipause neurons, which lie in the adjacent nucleus raphe interpositus and are tonically active except during saccades.5 6 7 The high-gain properties of the saccadic system make it prone to development of high-frequency (1035 Hz) conjugate oscillations of the eyes that become manifest in certain disease states.8 9
Voluntary shifts of the line of sight between objects lying at different depths in the environment require vergence movements, during which the eyes rotate in opposite directions (disjunctive rotations). When coupled with conjugate gaze shifts, vergence movements are initiated by midbrain vergence burst neurons,10 and recent electrophysiological evidence suggests that these cells also are inhibited by omnipause neurons lying in nucleus raphe interpositus.11 The vergence system is not as high-gain as the saccadic system (e.g., eye accelerations are lower), but vergence oscillations can be induced in certain experimental conditions at frequencies of up to 2.5 Hz.12
Most natural shifts of the fixation point are made between objects lying at different gaze angles and depth planes in the visual environment, requiring both saccadic and vergence components. During studies of such combined saccadevergence movements, we fortuitously found that, during the vergence movement that followed the saccade, conjugate oscillations of the eyes occurred at frequencies indicating that they were saccadic in origin.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We measured horizontal and vertical eye movements using the magnetic search-coil technique, with 6-ft field coils (CNC Engineering, Seattle, WA) that used a rotating magnetic field in the horizontal plane and an alternating magnetic field in the vertical plane. Search coils were calibrated before each experimental session using a protractor device. The system was 98.5% linear over an operating range of ±20°, the SD of system noise was less than 0.02° and cross talk between horizontal and vertical channels was less than 2.5%.
Visual Stimuli
To elicit combined saccadicvergence movements, we initially used
a version of the classic Müller paradigm in which fixation is
alternatively shifted between distant and near targets, both aligned on
the visual axis of one eye.13
Although this stimulus
requires a movement of only the unaligned eye, both eyes make a
combined saccadicvergence gaze shift. The far visual stimulus was a
bright laser spot projected onto a wall at 7.3 m (optical
infinity). The near visual stimulus was a 2-mm LED positioned along the
visual axis of one eye so that a convergence angle of approximately
17° was required to view it binocularly. Subjects heads were
restrained while they made self-paced shifts of the fixation point
between the far and near targets.
To determine how different combinations of vergence and versional movements might influence the generation of conjugate oscillations, we peformed four control experiments on four of the subjects. The first control (horizontal nonaligned) was with both stimuli separated in the horizontal plane so that a horizontal saccade of approximately 8° and a change in vergence angle of approximately 8° were required (i.e., both targets not aligned on one eye). A second control (midsagittal and vertical) was with both targets aligned on the subjects midsagittal plane but with the far target 8° higher, so that a symmetrical vergence movement of approximately 8° and vertical saccade of approximately 8° were required. A third control (oblique nonaligned) was with the stimuli separated in both horizontal and vertical planes, so that a horizontal saccade of approximately 8°, a vertical saccade of approximately 8°, and a change in vergence angle of approximately 8° were required. A fifth control was with two far targets separated horizontally by approximately 16° so that saccades without vergence were required.
Because transient saccadic oscillations are reported to occur during blinks,14 15 we monitored eyelid movements using vertical electro-oculography electrodes in two subjects.
Data Analysis
To avoid aliasing, coil signals were passed through KrohnHite
Butterworth filters (bandwidth 0150 Hz) before digitization at 500 Hz
with 16-bit resolution. These digitized coil signals were filtered with
an 80-point software filter (Remez FIR; bandwidth 0100 Hz). We
compared original and filtered signals of eye position, velocity, and
acceleration and detected no attenuation or phase shift. Eye velocity
and acceleration were obtained using a four-point differentiator based
on a least-squares procedure that produced similar peak values to, but
introduced less noise than, a simple two-point differentiation
algorithm.16
The equation used had the following
structure:
![]() |
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
2 test to compare the proportion of
responses showing oscillations occurring during the Müller
paradigm with the other paradigms (Table 2)
. Some representative records are shown in Figure 2
. We found that the proportion of responses showing oscillatory
responses during the Müller paradigm was significantly greater
than for all the control conditions (P < 0.01). No
oscillations were encountered during saccades between the distant
targets, apart from occasional dynamic overshoots.9
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The presence of these conjugate oscillations suggests that the saccadic system is still active (i.e., the omnipause neurons are silent) during the vergence movement that follows the saccade. Current models of saccade generation suggest that if the omnipause neurons are not inhibiting burst neurons and a motor command is no longer provided to the burst neurons, then small saccadic oscillations will occur.8 This occurs, for example during oblique saccades if the vertical component is pathologically slow; horizontal oscillations occur during the completion of the vertical component.18 The oscillations shown by our subjects also support the hypothesis that both saccades and vergence burst neurons are gated by omnipause neurons.18 The latter idea has received electrophysiological support from the demonstration that microstimulation of omnipause neurons slows ongoing vergence movements.11 Thus, one interpretation of the present findings is that omnipause neurons become silent whenever the motor error (difference between desired change in eye position and the current eye position) calls for a conjugate gaze shift above a minimum threshold. The inhibition of omnipause neurons allows for the generation of a saccadic eye movement, but the firing of these neurons does not resume until the global motor error (combined version and vergence errors) declines below a threshold level. If the version error is reduced below threshold before the vergence error, then the omnipause neurons are still silent, and saccadic oscillations may be produced by discharge of burst neurons.
Although our subjects showed conjugate oscillations during most of the vergence movements that followed saccades, oscillations were usually absent for the vergence movement made before the saccadic movement. Thus, it appears that the initial vergence movement that preceded the saccade did not require that the omnipause neurons cease discharge. Our subjects made self-paced gaze shifts, and it is possible that the initial vergence movements were anticipatory in nature, similar to the conjugate drifts of the eyes that precede saccades made in response to predictable target jumps.19 The dynamic properties of these initial vergence movements suggests that they may not depend on vergence burst neurons.
Some normal subjects are able to induce a "voluntary" nystagmus, which consists of high-frequency saccadic oscillations.20 21 Interestingly, such people commonly use a voluntary vergence effort as a strategy to induce their saccadic oscillations. Our observations suggest that most people unwittingly show development of saccadic oscillations during combined saccadicvergence movementsa marker of the common pontine switch that enables us to make such gaze shifts. The ability to induce saccadic oscillations experimentally provides a new tool to test current models for saccade generation.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported by US Public Health Service Grant EY06717; the Office of Research and Development, Medical Research Service, Department of Veterans Affairs; and the Evenor Armington Fund (RJL).
Submitted for publication November 25, 1998; revised March 8, 1999; accepted March 23, 1999.
Proprietary interest category: N.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Serra, K. Liao, M. Matta, and R. J. Leigh Diagnosing disconjugate eye movements: Phase-plane analysis of horizontal saccades Neurology, October 7, 2008; 71(15): 1167 - 1175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Van Horn and K. E. Cullen Dynamic Coding of Vertical Facilitated Vergence by Premotor Saccadic Burst Neurons J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2008; 100(4): 1967 - 1982. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Van Horn, P. A. Sylvestre, and K. E. Cullen The Brain Stem Saccadic Burst Generator Encodes Gaze in Three-Dimensional Space J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2008; 99(5): 2602 - 2616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Vernet, Q. Yang, G. Daunys, C. Orssaud, T. Eggert, and Z. Kapoula How the Brain Obeys Hering's Law: A TMS Study of the Posterior Parietal Cortex Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2008; 49(1): 230 - 237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. N. Kumar, Y. Han, L. F. Dell'osso, D. M. Durand, and R. J. Leigh Directional Asymmetry During Combined Saccade-Vergence Movements J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2005; 93(5): 2797 - 2808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Rucker, B. E. Shapiro, Y. H. Han, A. N. Kumar, S. Garbutt, E. L. Keller, and R. J. Leigh Neuro-ophthalmology of late-onset Tay-Sachs disease (LOTS) Neurology, November 23, 2004; 63(10): 1918 - 1926. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Busettini and L. E. Mays Pontine Omnipause Activity During Conjugate and Disconjugate Eye Movements in Macaques J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2003; 90(6): 3838 - 3853. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Garbutt, Y. Han, A. N. Kumar, M. Harwood, C. M. Harris, and R. J. Leigh Vertical Optokinetic Nystagmus and Saccades in Normal Human Subjects Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2003; 44(9): 3833 - 3841. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. N. Kumar, Y. Han, S. Garbutt, and R. J. Leigh Properties of Anticipatory Vergence Responses Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2002; 43(8): 2626 - 2632. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Bhidayasiri, D.E. Riley, J.T. Somers, A.J. Lerner, J.A. Buttner-Ennever, and R.J. Leigh Pathophysiology of slow vertical saccades in progressive supranuclear palsy Neurology, December 11, 2001; 57(11): 2070 - 2077. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |