|
|
||||||||
1 From the Departments of Optometry and Radiography and 2 Nursing and Health Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS. Linearity, sensitivity, and precision of FRASC and ascorbic acid loss during 7 days storage were assessed; total antioxidant activity and ascorbic acid and uric acid concentrations of reflex tears from 47 healthy subjects were measured.
RESULTS. FRASC has good precision, linearity, and sensitivity. Ascorbic acid is stable for at least 7 days at moderately acidic pH (pH 3.6) and low temperature. Total antioxidant activity and ascorbic acid and uric acid concentrations (mean ± SD) in reflex tears were 409 ± 162, 23 ± 9.6, and 68 ± 46 µM, respectively. Ascorbic acid and uric acid constituted around half the total antioxidant activity measured. There was a significant correlation between uric acid and total antioxidant activity (r = 0.754; P < 0.0001). Men had significantly (P = 0.0045) higher tear ascorbic acid concentrations than women.
CONCLUSIONS. FRASC is suitable for measuring total antioxidant activity and ascorbic acid in human tears. Further clinical study is needed to investigate the malefemale difference seen, to characterize the remaining 50% antioxidant activity, and to investigate the effects of environmental conditions, antioxidant supplementation, age, and ocular disease on tear antioxidant status.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The gold standard method of measuring ascorbic acid is by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).15 However, this method requires highly specialized equipment and a high level of technical skill. In addition, HPLC is a time-consuming "one-by-one" type of analysis, which can be problematic when an unstable analyte is being measured. Furthermore, HPLC cannot be used to measure the total antioxidant activity of biological fluids.
An antioxidant can be broadly defined as any substance that delays or inhibits oxidative damage to a target molecule.2 16 The measurement of total antioxidant activity of a biological fluid is a composite measurement of the combined effects of individual scavenging antioxidants within the sample and may provide insight into the overall prooxidantantioxidant balance.2 17 Several methods of measuring total antioxidant activity are available and have been used with blood plasma.18 19 20 In this study we used the ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay.20 21 This fast and relatively simple method has been used for plasma but not, to date, for tear fluid. In addition, a recent modification of the FRAP assay, known as FRASC,21 22 enables the simultaneous measurement of total antioxidant activity and ascorbic acid concentration in the sample. Unlike HPLC, the FRASC assay takes only a few minutes, is relatively inexpensive, and provides two indices of antioxidant status. This makes FRASC a potentially valuable tool for use with fluids, such as tears, where both measurements are desirable and where sample volumes are small.
The speed of FRASC is of particular benefit in measuring unstable antioxidants, such as ascorbic acid, which are destroyed rapidly ex vivo. Ascorbic acid is often stabilized in biological fluids ex vivo by the addition of strong acid, such as metaphosphoric acid.13 However, this method of stabilization cannot be used for samples to be analyzed by FRASC, because the enzyme used (ascorbic oxidase) in the assay would be denatured. It was of interest, therefore, to investigate whether ascorbic acid could be adequately stabilized in solution at pH 3.6, the pH of the FRASC reaction.
The aims of this study, therefore, were to evaluate FRASC for the simultaneous measurement of total antioxidant activity and ascorbic acid concentration in human tears, to investigate the stability of ascorbic acid at a pH compatible with the use of FRASC as a measuring tool, and to investigate the antioxidant status, based on total antioxidant activity and ascorbic acid and uric acid measurements, of tear fluid from healthy eyes.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ascorbic acid standards (between 0 and 100 µM) were prepared in 300 mM acetate buffer (pH 3.6) and, separately, in aged tears. These solutions were used immediately after preparation. Aged tears refers to pooled tear fluid from healthy subjects, which was stored at room temperature for 3 days before use. This aged tear fluid contained no native ascorbic acid (results not shown). Different amounts of ascorbic acid in acetate buffer (pH 3.6) were added to the aged tears to produce tear-based solutions of known ascorbic acid concentration at pH 3.6. To assess linearity, one set of tear-based ascorbic acid standards (0, 2.5, 12.5, 25.0, and 50.0 µM) was prepared and measured in duplicate, and nine sets of ascorbic acid standards in acetate buffer (0, 5, 25, 50, and 100 µM) were prepared and each set was measured singly. The limit of detection for ascorbic acid in the FRASC assay was assessed by calculating the mean + 3 SD of the absorbance readings of a sample containing no ascorbic acid (distilled water) measured 10 times. Precision was assessed by nine measurements of one set of standards run in parallel (in-run), and of six sets of standards run on separate days (between-run). To assess stability in moderately acidic medium, solutions of ascorbic acid (pH 3.6) of known concentration were divided into aliquots and stored at -70°C; at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7 days after preparation, an aliquot of each solution was thawed and the ascorbic acid concentration was measured and compared with that of the freshly prepared (at day 0) solution.
For tear analysis, 47 young adults (29 men, 18 women; mean ± SD age, 23 ± 3 years) were recruited. Subjects were apparently healthy nonsmokers who were not on medication or taking vitamin supplements. From each subject approximately 120 µl of tears, induced by the yawn reflex, was collected using 20 µl disposable capillary tubes (Drummond Scientific, Broomall, PA) and according to the procedure of Callender and Morrison.23 To determine whether there was any antioxidant or interfering contamination of the tear sample due to contact with the capillary tube, freshly prepared ascorbic acid standards in acetate buffer were measured with and without passage through capillary tubes, which showed no difference (results not shown).
Reagents and equipment used for the FRASC assay for total antioxidant
power and ascorbic acid concentration measurement were as described in
detail elsewhere,14
20
21
22
with the use of a Cobas Fara
centrifugal analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland). In brief,
the FRASC method uses the ability of antioxidants to reduce an
FeIII-TPTZ complex to its blue-colored
FeII form. The change in absorbance at 593 nm
(
A593nm) after a reaction time of 4
minutes is due to the combined activity of all the reacting
antioxidants present in the sample (i.e., the total ferric reducing
[antioxidant] power, or FRAP value).20
Ascorbic acid is
selectively destroyed in one of a pair of samples by ascorbic oxidase,
and the difference between paired samples in terms of their absorbances
at 593 nm after a 1-minute reaction time is due to ascorbic
acid.20
21
FRASC reagents were as follows: 300 mM acetate
buffer (pH 3.6) was prepared by dissolving 3.1 g sodium acetate
trihydrate (Riedel-de Haen, Hannover, Germany) in distilled
water, with 16 ml glacial acetic acid (BDH Laboratory Supplies,
Poole, England) added; this was made up to one liter with
distilled water; a 10 mM TPTZ (2,4,6 tripyridyl-s-triazine; Fluka
Chemicals, Buchs, Switzerland) solution in 40 mM HCl (BDH) and
a 20 mM FeCl3 ·
6H2O (BDH) solution in distilled water were
prepared. Working FRASC reagent was prepared freshly as required by
mixing 25 ml acetate buffer with 2.5 ml of TPTZ solution and 2.5 ml of
ferric chloride solution. A 4 IU/ml solution of ascorbic oxidase (EC
1.10.3.3 from Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO) was prepared in distilled
water, divided into aliquots, and stored at -70°C until use. Freshly
prepared aqueous solutions of FeII (1000 µM
from FeSO4 · 7 H2O;
Riedel-de Haen) and ascorbic acid (5, 25, 50, and 100 µM
from extra pure crystals; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) were used
for calibration of the assay.
To prepare the samples for FRASC and uric acid analysis, 60 µl of each sample (tears, ascorbic acid test solutions, and calibrators) was mixed with 20 µl 300 mM acetate buffer in each of two sample cups. To one of the paired cups, 32 µl of ascorbic oxidase solution was added; 32 µl of distilled water was added to the other paired cup. Calibrators were also treated in pairs. After mixing, the paired ascorbic oxidasediluted ("+ao") and water-diluted ("-ao") samples were loaded onto the analyzer for automated measurement. Calculation of FRASC results was performed from absorbance readings as follows21 22 :
Using the water-diluted samples, the FRAP (µM) value =
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Uric acid was measured using a commercially available uricase/PAP kit (Unimate 7; Roche Diagnostics) on a Cobas Fara and following the manufacturers instructions.
This study was approved by the Human Subjects Ethics Subcommittee of the Hong Kong Polytechnic University. All subjects gave their informed consent to take part in the study, and all procedures involving human subjects complied with the Declaration of Helsinki, as revised in 1989.
For statistical analysis, the unpaired t-test was used to detect differences between males and females; Pearsons correlation was used to investigate relationships, and repeated measures ANOVA test was used to investigate stability.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3.0%
(n = 6) at between 5 and 100 µM ascorbic acid and
<2.0% for both at between 10 and 200 µM FRAP values. No decrease
was seen in ascorbic acid stored in acetate buffer (pH 3.6) and low
temperature (-70°C) for up to 7 days (Fig. 2)
. Mean ± SD ascorbic acid and uric acid concentrations and the
total antioxidant activity (as the FRAP value) of tears were,
respectively, 23 ± 9.6, 68 ± 46, and 409 ± 162 µM,
showing a wide interindividual variation. No significant differences
were found between men and women in terms of total antioxidant activity
or uric acid in tears; however, men had significantly higher
(P = 0.0045) ascorbic acid concentrations
(Table 1)
. There was a significant correlation (r = 0.754;
P < 0.0001) between the uric acid concentration and
the FRAP value of human tears, but no significant correlation was seen
between ascorbic acid concentration and the FRAP value
(r = 0.0656; P = 0.661).
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To date there are no data on overall antioxidant status, or total antioxidant activity, of tear fluid. The antioxidant status of tear fluid is of interest because tears are the first barrier protecting the cornea against oxidative damage from radiation, atmospheric oxygen, and toxic chemicals.2 8 9 11 In addition to defense, antioxidants may have a role in modulating wound healing and inflammatory responses in the cornea and in improving tear stability.4 24 25 26 27 28 This has implications for corneal health, particularly in contact lens wearers.4 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 In the present study, the average total antioxidant activity (as the FRAP value) of human reflex tears from apparently healthy young subjects was 409 µM, but there was wide interindividual variation. In plasma, uric acid and ascorbic acid together contribute around 80% of the total antioxidant activity, which is around 1000 µM, the rest being largely vitamin E, bilirubin, and protein.18 19 20 31 In tears, uric acid and ascorbic acid account for around half the total antioxidant activity. What constitutes the other half remains to be determined; however, tear fluid is unlikely to contain significant amounts of either the lipid soluble vitamin E or bilirubin (which has an intense yellow color) and has a very low protein content.32 Low levels of cysteine and tyrosine have been detected in tear fluid,9 and these may contribute to the antioxidant activity of tears. There are likely to be other, as yet undetected, antioxidants, and further study is needed to characterize these, to investigate the effects of diet, and to explore the relationship between plasma and tear antioxidant status.
To date there has been only one published report of uric acid levels in human tears.9 Uric acid is an endogenous compound and has been suggested to be an important physiological antioxidant.2 8 However, elevated plasma uric acid is associated with coronary heart disease, diabetes, and renal failure.33 34 Therefore, although uric acid may make a significant contribution to the total antioxidant activity of biological fluids, including plasma and tears, increased levels are not desirable because these indicate disease rather than health.
The results of this present study showed mean ± SD ascorbic acid concentration of 23 ± 9.6 µM in reflex tears from 47 subjects and that men had significantly higher levels than women. This is the first report of a malefemale difference in tear ascorbic acid concentrations and is interesting, because men have not been found to have higher ascorbic acid concentrations in plasma.31 Previously published data on tear ascorbic acid are conflicting and sparse3 9 11 12 but generally showed higher concentrations than those found in the present study (see Table 2 ).
|
The tear film protects the cornea and is a mixture of basal tears and reflex tears.38 This study has shown that stimulated tears contain significant levels of ascorbic acid and antioxidant activity, so it is likely that the tear film also contains ascorbic acid. The immediate source of this ascorbic acid is not yet clear. Dietary ascorbic acid is distributed via the blood plasma and actively accumulated in cells owing to the actions of both a passive and an active transport mechanism.2 31 36 Ocular tissues are particularly rich in ascorbic acid. It is possible that intracellular ascorbic acid acts as a reservoir to maintain levels in extracellular fluids such as tears, and leakage from the ascorbic acid-rich corneal epithelial cells may be one source of tear ascorbic acid. However, it has been shown that ascorbic acid is absorbed from plasma by the secretory acinar cells, with consequent accumulation in the lacrimal gland.39 Because of ascorbic acid accumulation in this gland, it is likely that reflex tears contains ascorbic acid on secretion. Furthermore, it is possible that tear fluid is a source of corneal epithelial ascorbic acid (i.e., that tears transport ascorbic acid from the plasma to the external ocular tissues). This mirrors the situation of tears as a source of other nutrients, such as oxygen and glucose, for the avascular cornea.
In conclusion, this study evaluated, in analytical terms, the FRASC assay for the measurement of total antioxidant activity and ascorbic acid in human tears. FRASC is a modified version of the ferric reducing (antioxidant) power (FRAP) assay and is an objective and reproducible measuring tool to assess the combined in vitro ability of scavenging, electron donating antioxidants in biological samples. However, as with all in vitro tools the clinical utility of the results obtained can only be determined by extensive clinical study. Results of this study have validated the use of the FRASC assay for measuring total antioxidant activity and ascorbic acid in human tears. Results also indicate that uric acid and ascorbic acid constitute around half the total antioxidant activity (as the FRAP value) of human reflex tears and that uric acid, but not ascorbic acid, showed a significant correlation with the total antioxidant activity. This is likely to be because of the lower concentration of ascorbic acid in tears. However, unlike the situation with uric acid, it may be possible to significantly increase the ascorbic acid content of tears by increasing the dietary intake, and this is worth further study. In addition, the data collected provide a baseline to support future clinical study to investigate the malefemale difference seen here, to characterize the as yet unidentified antioxidants in tears, and to investigate the effects of environmental conditions, antioxidant supplementation, aging, and ocular disease on the antioxidant status of human tears.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Submitted for publication February 24, 2000; revised May 5, 2000; accepted May 22, 2000.
Commercial relationships policy: N.
Corresponding author: Iris Frances Forster Benzie, Department of Nursing and Health Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong. hsbenzie{at}polyu.edu.hk
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J Horwath-Winter, O Schmut, E-M Haller-Schober, A Gruber, and G Rieger Iodide iontophoresis as a treatment for dry eye syndrome Br. J. Ophthalmol., January 1, 2005; 89(1): 40 - 44. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ringvold, E. Anderssen, and I. Kjonniksen Impact of the Environment on the Mammalian Corneal Epithelium Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2003; 44(1): 10 - 15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V Peponis, M Papathanasiou, A Kapranou, C Magkou, A Tyligada, A Melidonis, T Drosos, and N M Sitaras Protective role of oral antioxidant supplementation in ocular surface of diabetic patients Br. J. Ophthalmol., December 1, 2002; 86(12): 1369 - 1373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. K. M. Choy, P. Cho, W.-Y. Chung, and I. F. F. Benzie Water-Soluble Antioxidants in Human Tears: Effect of the Collection Method Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2001; 42(13): 3130 - 3134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |