|
|
||||||||
1 From the Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia; and 2 Department of Physiology, Institute for Biomedical Research, University of Sydney, Australia.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS. Serial sections of adult rat EOMs were stained with isoform-specific monoclonal antibodies against an array of myosin heavy chains. Immunofluorescent antibody staining of whole adult rat EOMs, examined by confocal microscopy, demonstrated the longitudinal variations of isoforms along individual fibers.
RESULTS. Each global fiber type reacted predominantly with a single isoform-specific antibody and showed no longitudinal variation. Two major orbital fibers were defined, and both contained multiple myosin heavy chains. Both orbital singly and multiply innervated fibers stained proximal and distal to the neuromuscular junction with antibody to embryonic myosin heavy chain, but this isoform was sharply and completely excluded from the domain of the neuromuscular junction. Orbital singly innervated fibers also contained the EOM-specific isoform at the neuromuscular junction. Orbital multiply innervated fibers did not contain the EOM-specific isoform, but additionally contained a slow isoform along their entire length.
CONCLUSIONS. Adult rat EOMs show unique fiber types with arrangements of myosin heavy chain isoforms not seen in other skeletal muscles. Moreover, unique cellular mechanisms must exist to target each isoform to its proper domain along individual orbital fibers.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although vertebrate limb muscles have always been the paradigm for studies of myogenesis, several other muscle groups have functional specializations and patterns of MyHC gene expression distinct from those seen in limb muscles.2 The patterns of gene expression in these muscle "allotypes" appear to be intrinsically controlled. Among these atypical muscle groups are the extraocular muscles (EOMs). EOMs differ in functionally significant ways from skeletal muscles. Most conspicuously, the morphologically, physiologically, or biochemically defined fiber types in EOMs do not correspond to those in skeletal muscles.3
For example, in addition to adult MyHC isoforms found in skeletal muscles, EOMs also synthesize a slow-tonic MyHC4 and an EOM-specific MyHC,5 6 as well as isoforms normally found only in developing fibers. Their fibers have shorter contraction times but lower tension generation than fibers in other skeletal muscles.7 Their combination of fast contractile properties and high oxidative capacity with high fatigue resistance is unusual among skeletal muscles and further emphasizes the singular complexity of these muscles. Moreover, in both the global and orbital layers of the EOMs, multiply innervated fibers are found, fibers unseen in other skeletal muscles. Finally, some EOM fibers synthesize multiple MyHC isoforms and may localize them differentially along the length of the fiber.8
The ability of EOMs to perform their wide range of required motions is dependent on the contractile properties of the individual fibers; these properties, in turn, are dependent to a large degree on the specific complement of MyHC isoforms expressed in each fiber. Before one can understand the contributions that unusual fiber types can make to both the physiology and disease susceptibility of EOMs, we must clarify the relationship between the MyHC isoforms and the three-dimensional architecture of the EOMs. Similarly, questions of gene regulation mechanisms make it important to determine whether EOM fibers synthesize one or more MyHCs, which isoforms are localized differentially along individual fibers, and whether they are responsive to external cues in a manner unique to these muscles. In this study we used a battery of monoclonal antibodies to investigate the localization of MyHC isoforms among rat EOM fiber types.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-cardiac (F8812F8)14
, and
neonatal (BF-34, Stefano Schiaffino, unpublished data). Some muscles
were also stained with Ta51, an antibody against neurofilaments
(Virginia Lee, unpublished data). Frozen sections were
preincubated with 5% goat serum, washed, and incubated in appropriate
concentrations of primary antibody. After additional washing, sections
were reacted with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)labeled goat
anti-mouse IgG and examined in a fluorescence microscope (DM IRB Leica;
Deerfield, IL). Some muscles were also stained with Texas-red labeled
phalloidin, which reacts with actin filaments. Animals were maintained
in approved accommodations at the School of Medicine, University of
Pennsylvania and used in accordance with the ARVO Statement for the Use
of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research.
Confocal Microscopy of Whole EOMs
The protocol for staining whole EOM muscles was adapted from one
provided by Patricia Laboski, modified from the procedure of Dent et
al.15
Briefly, EOMs were exposed in isolated orbits and
glycerinated in skinning solution (140 mM KCl, 8 mM
MgCl2, 5 mM Na2 adenosine
triphosphate (ATP), 30 mM MOPS, and 4 mM EGTA, pH
7.1) for 48 hours. Muscles were then excised, rinsed in
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and exposed to collagenase (type II,
no. 6885; Sigma), 36° for 30 minutes, to increase permeability across
the muscle. After washing with PBS, muscles were preincubated in PBS
containing 2% nonfat dry milk and 0.5% Triton X-100 (PBSMT). Muscles
were stained overnight in PBSMT containing the appropriate dilution of
primary antibody, washed thoroughly, and exposed overnight to an
FITC-labeled goat anti-mouse antibody. Muscles were examined by a laser
scanning confocal microscope, LSM 510 (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen,
Germany).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and ß), the three
adult rat fast-twitch MyHCs (IIa, IIb, and IIx), the developmental
isoforms (embryonic and neonatal), and a tissue specific
EOM-MyHC6
16
(Rubinstein, unpublished data). We used
isoform-specific anti-MyHC monoclonal antibodies to localize seven of
these isoforms within adult rat EOM fibers.
MyHC Content of Global Fibers
Anti-MyHC immunohistochemistry distinguished four fiber types in
the global region of rat EOMs. Each global fiber type stained
predominantly with one antibody, although we cannot rule out small
amounts of additional MyHCs undetectable by this method. In the global
region, there did not appear to be any longitudinal variation in
staining, and the antibodies showed a distinct pattern of distribution
for each fiber type.
Antibody against the IIb MyHC stained a number of large fibers in the core of the global region (Fig. 1A ). This antibody reacted with neither fibers in the orbital region nor fibers in the area bordering the orbital region. Antibody to the IIa MyHC, by contrast, stained smaller fibers that were scattered predominantly around the periphery of the global region and that surrounded the core of fibers containing the IIb MyHC (Fig. 1B) . Few IIa positive fibers were found in the IIb "core" of the global region. As with the antibody to MyHC IIb, anti-IIa MyHC stained global fibers throughout their length. A small number of fibers in the orbital region, especially some small fibers close to the orbital-global boundary, also reacted with this antibody (see further discussion later).
|
-cardiac MyHC,17
this
was not true in the rat (see later discussion). This antibody also
stained a set of smaller fibers in the orbital region. Finally,
staining the global region with a mixture of antibodies against the
IIa, IIb, and slow-twitch isoforms resulted in a number of widely
scattered fibers that failed to stain (Fig. 1D)
. These fibers also did
not react with antibodies to embryonic,
-cardiac, slow tonic, or
EOM-specific MyHCs (see Fig. 4
). Because polymerase chain reaction
(PCR) and gel electrophoresis showed the presence of IIx MyHC and
because our recent quantitative PCR studies have shown that IIx
comprises approximately 15% of the MyHC isoforms in EOMs (unpublished
data), we propose that these unreactive fibers seen in the global
region of Figure 1D
contain the IIx MyHC. It is possible, however, that
these fibers contain a distinct, as yet unrecognized, isoform. Also,
because this is a negative reaction, the possibility that the IIx
isoform also exists in other fibers of the global and orbital
regionin the presence of other isoformscannot be discounted.
|
|
|
|
To confirm and to delineate more precisely the longitudinal variation of MyHC isoforms along orbital fibers, we combined fluorescent antibody staining of whole EOMs with confocal microscopy. Figure 5A shows the orbital region of a rat EOM stained with the antibody to embryonic MyHC. This antibody stained a majority of fibers in the orbital region, as seen in the cross sections; however, there was a sharp exclusion of staining at the putative neuromuscular junction region, although staining was present throughout the remainder of the fiber.
|
The area devoid of staining with the anti-embryonic MyHC antibody (Fig. 5A)
was related to the neuromuscular junction. Under the light
microscope, we could visualize the motoneuron entering this specific
region. To confirm this, we double stained EOMs with FITC-labeled
anti-embryonic MyHC antibody (Fig. 6A
) and with Texas red-labeled Ta51, a monoclonal antibody to
neurofilaments (Fig. 6B)
. Figure 6C
is a superimposition of Figures 6A
and 6B . This shows the putative neuromuscular junction area with
embryonic MyHC positive fibers approaching from both sides. The great
majority of neurofilaments were located in the region devoid of
staining with the anti-embryonic MyHC antibody, strongly suggesting
that this region is the location of the neuromuscular junction.
Staining with Texas redlabeled
-bungarotoxin confirmed this
finding (not shown).
|
Because others have shown that the orbital slow fibers may contain some slow tonic MyHC, we tested a number of polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies against the slow tonic MyHC. Unfortunately, all the slow tonic antibodies reacted with the same fibers stained by NOQ7-54D, the antibody to the slow-twitch MyHC. Therefore, we cannot differentiate between slow-twitch and slow tonic fibers. Moreover, staining sections with BF-34, an antibody against the neonatal MyHC did not give clean results. All fibers, except those reacting with the antibody to slow-twitch MyHC, reacted with BF-34. Unfortunately, other skeletal muscles showed the same pattern of staining, even though PCR did not identify the neonatal MyHC mRNA in those muscles. Therefore, it is also not possible to localize the neonatal isoform, although others have suggested a distribution similar to the one we have described for the embryonic MyHC.8 19
Because PCR showed the presence of
-cardiac MyHC mRNA (Rubinstein,
unpublished results), we used F8812F8 to stain sections and discovered
a small population of cells, possibly oMIFs, which additionally reacted
with that antibody (Fig. 4E)
. No global region fibers in the rat
reacted with the anti-
-cardiac MyHC antibody.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We suggest that each of the global fiber types may correlate with the synthesis of oneor predominantly oneMyHC isoform synthesized through the length of the fiber (see Table 1 ), and evidence from the literature supports this correlation. Brueckner et al.19 have shown that the global red fibers have a pattern similar to our staining pattern with anti-IIa MyHC antibody. Both their work and ours have shown that the IIb isoform is the predominant one in the global region. Moreover, our pattern of staining with the anti-slow-twitch MyHC antibody parallels the pattern seen by a number of investigators for both gMIFs and oMIFs.5 19 20
Both major orbital layer fiber types contain multiple MyHCs, which are arranged independently along the fiber. Both contain the embryonic MyHC proximal and distal to the motor endplate. The majoritypresumably the oSIFscontain the EOM specific MyHC at the motor endplate, while a smaller numberpresumably the oMIFscontain throughout their length MyHC(s) reactive against our anti-slow antibody. While the longitudinal variation of MyHC isoforms in orbital cells has been previously demonstrated, the precise isoforms involved and their domains have not previously been known. Our results are consistent with those of Brueckner et al.19 who used a cDNA probe to show that the EOM specific isoform was found only in the orbital region. They also showed that an antibody to developmental isoforms reacted proximal and distal to the neuromuscular junction with little reaction around the neuromuscular junction.
Our results for orbital fibers are also consistent with those described by Jacoby et al.8 for rat EOMs. In their study, all orbital fibers reacted with an antibody that recognized embryonic and/or neonatal MyHC away from the endplate region; oSIFs also reacted along the full length with an antibody that recognized all fast isoforms, while oMIFs also reacted with this antibody, but only in the endplate region. Presumably, the fast isoform reacting with their generic anti-fast MyHC antibody at the motor endplate was the tissue specific extraocular isoform. They dissected individual fibers and demonstrated a continuation of myofibrils from stained to non-stained regions across the putative neuromuscular junction region of orbital fibers. Their demonstration of a gap in staining with an antibody to developmental MyHCs in the presumptive neuromuscular junction area correlates exactly with our results.
In summary, the data support the notion that in the rat, oSIFs express EOM-specific MyHC principally in the endplate region, while the embryonic MyHC is excluded from the endplate region but is present in the rest of the fiber. The distribution of MyHC types along the length of oMIFs is less clear. This fiber type has ultrastructural characteristics of fast fibers at the endplate region, but slow-tonic characteristics in the rest of the fiber.21 While fast MyHC reactivity in oMIF is confined to the endplate region, we additionally found uniform staining of these fibers with our anti-slow antibody. This finding cannot be interpreted to mean that slow-twitch MyHC is uniformly distributed along the length; this antibody may cross-react with the slow-tonic MyHC which may be present away from the endplate region.
There are species differences in the distribution of MyHC isoforms in
EOM fibers. In the rabbit, EOM MyHC is seen only in the global
region,20
although it is localized predominantly in the
orbital region in the rat. Thus, in the rabbit, some other fast isoform
must take the place of the EOM-specific MyHC we found in the motor
endplate region of rat oSIFs. In the rabbit, the
-cardiac MyHC is
the major MyHC in the MIFs17
; but in the rat, it is the
slow-twitch or slow-tonic MyHC, with the
-cardiac MyHC present in
only a few orbital fibers.
What is the significance of the considerable greater complexity of MyHCs in EOMs compared with limb muscles? Recent measurements on single EOM fibers have shown a very wide dynamic range of the mechanical parameter, fmin, which reflects the kinetics of cross-bridge cycling (Li, Rossmanith and Hoh, unpublished observations). Fmin values below and above those found in limb muscle fibers were obtained from EOM fibers and may be related to the presence of embryonic/neonatal and EOM-specific MyHCs, respectively, which are absent in adult limb muscle fibers.
A common feature of orbital fibers is the occurrence of a kinetically fast central segment (the endplate region) flanked by kinetically slower segments. In the case of oSIFs, the central segment contains EOM-specific MyHC associated with high speed22 and high fmin (Li et al.), while the flanking segments contain embryonic MyHC associated with slow speed and low fmin (Li et al.). For oMIFs, the central segment has fast-twitch electrophysiological properties7 and high sarcoplasmic reticulum volume21 which ensures rapid release and uptake of Ca2+. These arrangements in orbital EOM fibers may permit rapid changes in gaze. Consider that these fibers are activated to hold the globe in a given position, and a need arises to change the gaze in the direction which involves lengthening these fibers, as during a saccade in the off direction. Without the fast central segment, the slow cross-bridges in these fibers would resist rapid lengthening by developing high tensions as in fibers undergoing eccentric contractions. By having a central segment which can relax more rapidly, lengthening can be accommodated initially by the sarcomeres within this region without stretching the slower segments.
Although longitudinal variation of isoforms is not the rule in skeletal muscles, several other examples do exist. The extrafusal nuclear bag fibers of the rat show similar longitudinal variations23 ; denervation of the developing fibers results in the synthesis of the same MyHC isoforms, but an absence of longitudinal differences. It is also possible that the EOM MyHC might serve a purpose other than movement. The EOMs of billfish contain an outer layer of thermogenic cells, the heater cells, which are specialized to warm the overlying brain. Although they contain contractile proteins, they fail to assemble them into myofibrils and lack the highly organized contractile structures typical of other muscle cells. Moreover, in some of these heater cells the ends of the cells do contain assembled myofibrils while the centers do not.24 These cells, then, have a phenotype with a typical contractile appearance at one end and the thermogenic (few myofibrils, extensive SR and mitochondria) appearance at the other. This is analogous to the longitudinal variation we have seen in orbital fibers of mammalian EOMs; and these heater cells may be the forebears of unusual fibers seen in todays EOMs.
In these thermogenic cells of the billfish as well as in the orbital fibers with their longitudinal variation, there must be unique mechanisms that regulate the synthesis and assembly of one set of muscle specific proteins at the neuromuscular junction and a distinct set in the extrajunctional area. Whether this is related to specific synthetic capacities of junctional versus non-junctional nuclei or to some other sorting mechanism remains to be evaluated.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Submitted for publication January 11, 2000; revised May 15 and June 22, 2000; accepted July 5, 2000.
Commercial relationships policy: N.
Corresponding author: Neal A. Rubinstein, Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 1052 Biomedical Research Building II/III, 421 Curie Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104. nrubinst{at}mail.med.upenn.edu
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. S. Rhee and J. F.Y. Hoh Immunohistochemical Analysis of Myosin Heavy Chain Expression in Laryngeal Muscles of the Rabbit, Cat, and Baboon J. Histochem. Cytochem., October 1, 2008; 56(10): 929 - 950. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Fraterman, U. Zeiger, T. S. Khurana, M. Wilm, and N. A. Rubinstein Quantitative Proteomics Profiling of Sarcomere Associated Proteins in Limb and Extraocular Muscle Allotypes Mol. Cell. Proteomics, April 1, 2007; 6(4): 728 - 737. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. J. Wiesen, S. Bogdanovich, I. Agarkova, J.-C. Perriard, and T. S. Khurana Identification and Characterization of Layer-Specific Differences in Extraocular Muscle M-Bands Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2007; 48(3): 1119 - 1127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Mu, J. Wang, H. Su, and I. Sanders Adult Human Upper Esophageal Sphincter Contains Specialized Muscle Fibers Expressing Unusual Myosin Heavy Chain Isoforms J. Histochem. Cytochem., March 1, 2007; 55(3): 199 - 207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Fraterman, T. S. Khurana, and N. A. Rubinstein Identification of acetylcholine receptor subunits differentially expressed in singly and multiply innervated fibers of extraocular muscles. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2006; 47(9): 3828 - 3834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. V. Welham, G. Marriott, and D. M. Bless Proteomic profiling of rat thyroarytenoid muscle. J Speech Lang Hear Res, June 1, 2006; 49(3): 671 - 685. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Toniolo, L. Maccatrozzo, M. Patruno, F. Caliaro, F. Mascarello, and C. Reggiani Expression of eight distinct MHC isoforms in bovine striated muscles: evidence for MHC-2B presence only in extraocular muscles J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2005; 208(22): 4243 - 4253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Fischer, M. T. Budak, M. Bakay, J. R. Gorospe, D. Kjellgren, F. Pedrosa-Domellof, E. P. Hoffman, and T. S. Khurana Definition of the unique human extraocular muscle allotype by expression profiling Physiol Genomics, August 11, 2005; 22(3): 283 - 291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Budak, S. Bogdanovich, M. H. J. Wiesen, O. Lozynska, T. S. Khurana, and N. A. Rubinstein Layer-specific differences of gene expression in extraocular muscles identified by laser-capture microscopy Physiol Genomics, December 15, 2004; 20(1): 55 - 65. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Khanna, G. Cheng, B. Gong, M. J. Mustari, and J. D. Porter Genome-Wide Transcriptional Profiles Are Consistent with Functional Specialization of the Extraocular Muscle Layers Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2004; 45(9): 3055 - 3066. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. A. Rubinstein, J. D. Porter, and J. F. Y. Hoh The Development of Longitudinal Variation of Myosin Isoforms in the Orbital Fibers of Extraocular Muscles of Rats Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2004; 45(9): 3067 - 3072. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Wang, Y. Han, H. Su, and L. Mu Expression of Unique and Developmental Myosin Heavy Chain Isoforms in Adult Human Digastric Muscle J. Histochem. Cytochem., July 1, 2004; 52(7): 851 - 859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. S. Rhee, C. A. Lucas, and J. F. Y. Hoh Fiber Types in Rat Laryngeal Muscles and Their Transformations After Denervation and Reinnervation J. Histochem. Cytochem., May 1, 2004; 52(5): 581 - 590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bicer and P. J. Reiser Myosin Light Chain 1 Isoforms in Slow Fibers from Global and Orbital Layers of Canine Rectus Muscles Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2004; 45(1): 138 - 143. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Kjellgren, M. Ryan, K. Ohlendieck, L.-E. Thornell, and F. Pedrosa-Domellof Sarco(endo)plasmic Reticulum Ca2+ ATPases (SERCA1 and -2) in Human Extraocular Muscles Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2003; 44(12): 5057 - 5062. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Cheng, M. J. Mustari, S. Khanna, and J. D. Porter Comprehensive Evaluation of the Extraocular Muscle Critical Period by Expression Profiling in the Dark-Reared Rat and Monocularly Deprived Monkey Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2003; 44(9): 3842 - 3855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. H. Andrade, A. P. Merriam, W. Guo, G. Cheng, C. A. McMullen, K. Hayess, P. F. M. van der Ven, and J. D. Porter Paradoxical absence of M lines and downregulation of creatine kinase in mouse extraocular muscle J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2003; 95(2): 692 - 699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Lucas and J. F. Y. Hoh Distribution of Developmental Myosin Heavy Chains in Adult Rabbit Extraocular Muscle: Identification of a Novel Embryonic Isoform Absent in Fetal Limb Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2003; 44(6): 2450 - 2456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Kjellgren, L.-E. Thornell, J. Andersen, and F. Pedrosa-Domellof Myosin Heavy Chain Isoforms in Human Extraocular Muscles Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2003; 44(4): 1419 - 1425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. W. C. Rosser and E. Bandman Heterogeneity of protein expression within muscle fibers J Anim Sci, February 1, 2003; 81(14_suppl_2): E94 - 101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Briggs and F. Schachat The superfast extraocular myosin (MYH13) is localized to the innervation zone in both the global and orbital layers of rabbit extraocular muscle J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2002; 205(20): 3133 - 3142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Schachat and M. M. Briggs Phylogenetic implications of the superfast myosin in extraocular muscles J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2002; 205(15): 2189 - 2201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Fischer, J. R. Gorospe, E. Felder, S. Bogdanovich, F. Pedrosa-Domellof, R. S. Ahima, N. A. Rubinstein, E. P. Hoffman, and T. S. Khurana Expression profiling reveals metabolic and structural components of extraocular muscles Physiol Genomics, May 10, 2002; 9(2): 71 - 84. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Blumer, R. Wasicky, P. C. Brugger, W. Hoetzenecker, W. L. M. Wicke, and J.-R. Lukas Number, Distribution, and Morphologic Particularities of Encapsulated Proprioceptors in Pig Extraocular Muscles Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2001; 42(13): 3085 - 3094. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. S. Kranjc, J. Sketelj, A. D'Albis, and I. Erzen Long-Term Changes in Myosin Heavy Chain Composition after Botulinum Toxin A Injection into Rat Medial Rectus Muscle Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2001; 42(13): 3158 - 3164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||