|
|
||||||||
1 From the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis; and the 2 Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, St. Louis University Medical Center, Missouri.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS. Eyes of normal Lewis rats were analyzed for the expression of complement regulatory proteins, membrane cofactor protein (MCP), decay-acceleration factor (DAF), membrane inhibitor of reactive lysis (MIRL, CD59), and cell surface regulator of complement (Crry), using immunohistochemistry, Western blot analysis, and reverse transcriptionpolymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Zymosan, a known activator of the alternative pathway of complement system was injected into the anterior chamber of the eye of Lewis rats. Animals were also injected intracamerally with 5 µl (25 µg) of neutralizing monoclonal antibody (mAb) against rat Crry (5I2) or CD59 (6D1) in an attempt to develop antibody induced anterior uveitis; control animals received 5 µl of sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), OX-18 (25 µg), G-16-510E3 (25 µg), or MOPC-21 (25 µg). The role of complement system in antibody-induced uveitis was explored by intraperitoneal injection of 35 U cobra venom factor (CVF), 24 hours before antibody injection. Immunohistochemical staining and sodium dodecyl sulfatepolyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) with Western blot analysis were used to detect the presence of membrane attack complex (MAC) and C3 activation products, respectively, in normal and antibody-injected rat eyes.
RESULTS. Complement activation product MAC was present in the normal rat eye, and intraocular injection of zymosan induced severe anterior uveitis. The complement regulatory proteins, MCP, DAF, CD59, and Crry, were identified in the normal rat eye. Soluble forms of Crry and CD59 were also detected in normal rat aqueous humor. Severe anterior uveitis developed in Lewis rats injected with a neutralizing mAb against Crry, with increased formation of C3 split products. Systemic complement depletion by CVF prevented the induction of anterior uveitis by anti-Crry mAb. Intracameral injection of anti-rat CD59 (6D1), anti-rat MHC class I antigen (OX-18), anti-rat Ig (G-16-510E3), or MOPC-21 caused no inflammatory reaction.
CONCLUSIONS. The results suggest that the complement system is continuously active at a low level in the normal eye and is tightly regulated by intraocular complement regulatory proteins.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In man, soluble forms of various complement regulatory factors, such as C1 inhibitor, C3b inactivator, MCP, and DAF have been reported in normal intraocular fluid and tears.11 12 13 14 In 1998, Goslings et al.15 reported the presence of a 1.3-kDa complement inhibitory factor in normal rabbit aqueous humor. However, there are no reports in the literature describing the presence of soluble complement regulatory proteins in the aqueous and/or vitreous of normal rats.
The eye is an immune-privileged site that contains a number of immunosuppressive factors that presumably protect it from potentially dangerous immune and inflammatory reactions.16 In the past, several investigators have focused on the role of these factors in the protection of this important organ; however, the contribution of the complement system has been largely ignored. The present study was designed to investigate the immune relevance of the complement system and complement regulatory protein in the eye.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Antibodies and Reagents
Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), anti-rat Crry/p65 (clone 5I2, mouse
IgG1) anti-rat MHC antigen RT 1A (clone OX-18, mouse IgG1), and
anti-rat immunoglobulin (clone G-16-510E3, mouse IgG1) were purchased
from PharMingen (San Diego, CA). IgG fraction of goat antiserum to rat
C3 was from ICN Biochemicals (Aurora, OH). Rat monoclonal anti-CD59
(6D1, mouse IgG1) antibody was kindly provided by Bryan P.
Morgan, Department of Medical Biochemistry, University of Wales
College of Medicine (Cardiff, UK), and anti-rat CD59 (clone TH9, mouse
IgG1) was obtained from Research Diagnostics (Flanders, NJ). A mouse
mAb against rat C5b-9 complex (MAC), 2A1 (mouse IgG1) was a generous
gift from William G. Couser (University of Washington, Seattle).
MOPC-21 (mouse IgG1) was purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Purified
cobra venom factor (CVF) was from Quidel (San Diego, CA).
Zymosan Injection
Stock suspension (10 mg/ml) of zymosan (Sigma) was prepared and
diluted in sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4) and was
thoroughly mixed just before use. Rats were divided into six groups,
each containing 12 animals. Rats in groups 1 and 2 were injected
intracamerally with 5 and 50 µg zymosan suspension (5 µl),
respectively, with a 30-gauge needle fitted to a Hamilton syringe.
Control eyes (group 3) were injected with 5 µl of sterile PBS.
Animals in groups 4 and 5 received purified CVF 24 hours before
receiving 5 and 50 µg zymosan, respectively. Polystyrene latex beads
(Sigma) were used as the control particles and were prepared as a
10-mg/ml suspension in sterile PBS. Twelve animals (group 6) were
injected intracamerally with 5 µl of this suspension, as described.
Development and severity of intraocular inflammation were monitored by
clinical and histopathologic examination (in masked fashion), as
previously described.17
18
The experiment was repeated
twice.
In one experiment, the final dilution (1 µg/µl) of zymosan suspension was prepared in normal rat aqueous humor, and 5 µl of this suspension was injected intracamerally into normal Lewis rats (n = 24), as described earlier.
Antibody Injection and Histopathology
Animals were divided into 11 groups, each containing 16 animals.
Lewis rats in groups 1 and 2 were injected intracamerally with 25 µg
(5 µl) of neutralizing antibodies against rat CD59 (6D1) or Crry
(5I2), respectively, by means of a 10-µl Hamilton syringe and
30-gauge needle. The control animals (group 3) received 5 µl of
saline, and additional control treatments (groups 4, 5, and 6)
consisted of intracameral injection of 25 µg OX-18, anti-rat
immunoglobulin, or MOPC-21, respectively. To deplete complement in
vivo, Lewis rats (groups 7 and 8) were injected with 35 U purified CVF
intraperitoneally, 24 hours before anti-CD59 or anti-Crry injection,
respectively. Groups 9, 10, and 11 consisted of control animals (as
described) and received similar treatment with CVF. Animals were
examined by slit lamp at 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96
hours after antibody injection for clinical signs of uveitis, and
anterior uveitis was graded, using the criteria previously
described.17
18
Eyes were also harvested for histologic
analysis to assess the development and severity of inflammation.
Freshly enucleated eyes were fixed immediately for 24 hours in 2.5%
buffered glutaraldehyde and transferred into 10% neutral formalin.
Fixed and dehydrated tissues were then embedded in paraffin.
Six-micrometer sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and
examined by light microscopy. The histologically determined intensity
of uveitis was scored on an arbitrary scale of 0 to
4.17
18
The experiment was repeated twice. Clinical and
histologic examinations were performed in masked fashion.
CH50 Assay
Anticoagulant-free blood was collected from the tail vein of
normal and CVF-injected Lewis rats, and serum was isolated. A
CH50 assay was performed on these serum samples
according to a method described in the literature.19
Immunohistochemical Studies
Frozen sections were stained with anti-Crry and anti-MAC
antibodies, and paraffin sections were stained with anti-CD59. All
antibodies were used at 1:200 dilution for immunohistochemical
staining. For frozen sections, eyes were placed in optimal cutting
temperature (OCT) compound (Miles, Indianapolis, IN), snap frozen, and
stored in sealed vials at -80°C. Eyes were sectioned by cryostat at
a thickness of 6 µm, air dried overnight (18 hours), fixed in cold
acetone for 10 minutes, and rehydrated in PBS (pH 7.2). For paraffin
sections, eyes were removed, fixed in formalin, and processed for
paraffin sectioning. Sections were then deparaffinized two times for 5
minutes in xylene, two times for 5 minutes in absolute ethanol, 3
minutes in 95% ethanol, 3 minutes in 70% ethanol, and 5 minutes in
PBS. Fixed sections were immersed in a 0.3% hydrogen peroxide-methanol
solution for 20 minutes to inactivate endogenous peroxidase and then
rinsed well in PBS. Immunohistochemical staining was performed with an
anti-mouse IgG immunoperoxidase staining kit (Vector, Burlingame, CA)
according to the manufacturers directions. The sections were treated
with 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (DAB) for 10 minutes, counterstained with
Mayers hematoxylin for 10 minutes, washed thoroughly in cold tap
water, and coverslipped with an mounting media for viewing by light
microscopy. Control stains were performed with nonrelevalant antibodies
of the same immunoglobulin subclass at concentrations similar to those
of the primary antibodies. Additional controls consisted of staining by
omission of the primary antibody or secondary biotinylated antibodies.
Intraocular Content
Anesthetized animals were perfused through the heart with 200 ml
sterile pyrogen-free saline. Eyes were then immediately enucleated.
Conjunctiva and extraocular muscles were carefully removed, and the
intraocular tissue from each eye was collected by using a previously
described method.20
The intraocular tissues, which
consisted of uvea, retina, lens, aqueous humor, and vitreous, were used
for total RNA extraction and Western blot analysis.
RT-PCR Analysis
Equal amounts of the total RNA were used to detect the mRNA
levels of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), MCP, DAF,
CD59, and Crry by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction
(RT-PCR; RNA-PCR kit; PerkinElmer, Norwalk, CT). Total RNA was
extracted from pooled intraocular content isolated from normal Lewis
rats (20 eyes; RNeasy Mini Kit; Qiagen, Valencia, CA), according to the
kit manufacturers specifications. The sense and antisense
oligonucleotide primers for rat GAPDH, MCP, DAF, CD59, and Crry were
synthesized at Gibco (Grand Island, NY). The primer sequences and the
predicted sizes of amplified cDNA are presented in Table 1
. The cDNA was synthesized using an antisense primer
corresponding to a particular rat complement regulatory protein, murine
leukemia virus (MuLV) reverse transcriptase, and 4 µg of total RNA in
a total volume of 20 µl (pH 8.3). RT reaction was first performed at
24°C for 10 minutes, then at 42°C for 15 minutes. The reaction
mixture was heated at 99°C for 5 minutes, and the RT product was
mixed with DNA polymerase (AmpliTaq; PerkinElmer) and
sense primer in a buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM KCl, 2.0 mM
MgCl2 (pH 8.3), and 50 mM of each dNTP in a
100-µl volume. The mixture was then amplified by PCR using 25 cycles.
The thermal cycle profile used in this study was as follows: an initial
denaturing at 94°C for 5 minutes and then 30 seconds in each cycle,
annealing the primer with DNA at 60°C for 1 minute, and extending the
primer at 72°C for 90 seconds. All reactions were normalized for
GAPDH expression. The negative controls consisted of omission of RNA
template or reverse transcriptase from the reaction mixture. PCR
products were analyzed on 2% agarose gel. PCR-amplified DNA fragments
were subcloned into PCR 2.1-TOPO cloning vector (TOPO TA cloning kit;
Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturers protocol.
Clones were sequenced using an automated DNA sequencer (ABI 310;
PerkinElmer Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, with the ABI Prism
dRhodamine terminator cycle kit with AmpliTaq DNA polymerase
FS). Sequencing primers included M13 forward and reverse primers.
|
Western blot analysis was also performed on normal rat aqueous humor, essentially as just described. Pooled aqueous humor was analyzed on 10% SDS-PAGE under nonreducing conditions, and separated proteins were transferred to a PVDF membrane. The resultant blots were probed with 1:1000 dilution of mAb to rat CD59 (clone TH9) or anti-rat Crry mAb (1:1000). Control blots were reacted with the equivalent concentration of MOPC-21. Rat splenocytes purified by Ficoll density centrifugation were solubilized at a concentration of 5 x 107 cells/ml in PBS containing 1% NP-40 (Sigma) and the described protease inhibitors. The splenocyte membrane fraction separated from insoluble material by centrifugation at 33,000g for 20 minutes was used as the positive control in the Western blot analysis.
Statistical Analysis
Differences between groups were evaluated by MannWhitney test.
P < 0.05 was considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
chain of reduced C3b is present at 110 kDa (observed in Fig. 2
); however, the ß chain at 76 kDa was not seen. The 76-kDa ß chain
of C3b and iC3b did not undergo cleavage during complement activation
and was only visualized after overnight incubation with the primary
antibody (not shown). The 68-kDa and 43-kDa
chains of iC3b were
also identified on Western blot (Fig. 2A)
. A similar banding pattern
was observed with normal rat serum (the positive control; not shown).
The blot incubated with normal goat serum did not show any
immunoreactivity (Fig. 2B) .
|
|
These results demonstrate that components of the complement cascade are present within the normal eye and can be activated by the anterior chamber injection of zymosan to produce severe uveitis.
Presence of Complement Regulatory Proteins in the Normal Rat Eye
Because complement and complement activation products are present
within the normal rat eye but intraocular inflammation is not unless
the complement cascade is activated by zymosan, we hypothesized an
important role for complement regulatory proteins in the normal eye.
Consequently, normal rat eyes were analyzed for the presence of Crry,
CD59, MCP, and DAF using immunohistochemistry, Western blot analysis,
and RT-PCR.
Immunohistochemical Analysis.
mAbs against rat CD59 and Crry were used to stain normal rat eyes. We
do not have polyclonal antibodies to rat CD59 and Crry, and antibodies
against rat MCP and DAF are not commercially available. Intensity of
staining was graded using an arbitrary scale previously described by
us.6
Controls in which equivalent concentrations of
irrelevant mAb were substituted for the primary antibodies were
negative. Our results are summarized in Table 2 . The corneal epithelium, iris, ciliary body, and retina were moderately
stained for CD59; weak staining was observed in the corneal stroma and
choroid. A similar staining pattern was observed with anti-Crry, except
that there was no staining in the retina.
|
|
|
|
Antibody-Induced Uveitis
If complement regulatory proteins are important in normally
preventing complement-induced anterior uveitis, neutralization of one
or more of these proteins should induce inflammation. Anterior uveitis
developed in all Lewis rats (n = 32) injected intracamerally
with a single dose (25 µg) of neutralizing mAb to Crry (clone 5I2).
Clinically, the inflammatory reaction was first noted 4 to 6 hours
after antibody injection, peaked between 18 to 24 hours, and resolved
by day 4 (Fig. 7A
). Histologic examination revealed PMN infiltration of the iris
and ciliary body with spillover into aqueous humor (Fig. 7B)
.
|
Intracameral injection of 6D1 (25 µg), an mAb that suppresses the function of rat CD59 caused no inflammatory reaction (not shown). Additionally, similar intracameral injection of anti-rat RT1A (Fig. 7B) , anti-rat immunoglobulin (data not shown), MOPC-21 (Fig. 7A) , or PBS alone (not shown) did not cause intraocular inflammation. Low levels of complement activation products were detected in the eyes of these animals (not shown), similar to normal control animals. Thus, the neutralization of only Crry, a complement regulatory protein, resulted in complement-mediated anterior uveitis, which was abolished by the depletion of complement with CVF.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The presence of complement activation products within the normal eye
was confirmed by Western blot analysis. Specifically, we identified C3b
and iC3b, which are cleavage products of C3, in the buffer extracts of
intraocular content obtained from the normal rat eye. Activation of the
complement cascade through the classic or the alternative pathway
results in the conversion of C3 to C3b; the latter, consists of two
peptide chains,
and ß, with a molecular weight of 110 and 76 kDa,
respectively.25
26
C3b has a short half-life and is
rapidly inactivated to iC3b by the enzyme factor I and a cofactor MCP.
Factor I has been reported in normal eyes,11
and we have
shown in the present study that MCP is present in the normal rat eye.
With SDS-PAGE, iC3b shows three peptides that have apparent molecular
weight of 76, 68, and 43 kDa under reducing
conditions.25
26
Activation of the complement system is
necessary to generation of complement split products; thus, their
presence is indisputable evidence of complement activation in the
normal eye. Cleavage of C3 protein is essential, not only for
activation of either complement pathway, but also for the generation of
MAC (C5b-9). In humans the presence of MAC has been described in the
normal cornea.27
Our immunohistologic demonstration of MAC
in tissues of the anterior segment of rat eye is consistent with these
observations and is further evidence that complement activation occurs
at low levels under normal conditions in the eye.
C3 and complement activation products, including MAC and C3 fragments, have been reported in various human inflammatory diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus,28 rheumatoid arthritis,29 30 and anterior uveitis.31 However, the presence of complement activation products in normal tissue has been the subject of some controversy. Using immunoelectron microscopy, immunofluorescence and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) several groups have noted the presence of complement activation product, at low levels in normal human skin,32 kidney,33 and serum.34 Using RT-PCR, Yasojima et al.35 showed that mRNAs for C3 and other complement proteins are present in normal human brain, liver, spleen, kidney, and heart. These investigators also reported the presence of C3 activation products in extracts of the normal human hippocampus; however, MAC was not detected.35 Similarly, using an immunoperoxidase technique Pham et al.36 did not observe staining for MAC on normal human liver cells. Although C3 was not identified in the heart of normal Wistar rats37 and MAC formation was not detected in the synovium of Lewis rats,38 C3 and MAC deposits have been identified in the kidney of normal Lewis rats.39 These conflicting reports in various normal tissues may represent organ-specific complement activation or the varying sensitivities of the reagents and techniques used to identify complement components.
If a functional complement system is present and active at a low level in the normal eye then agents known to activate complement by the alternative pathway, such as zymosan,40 may be able to elicit severe inflammation (i.e., anterior uveitis). Zymosan, an insoluble polysaccharide extracted from yeast wall, has been reported to induce severe, complement-mediated inflammation at various sites. Intratracheal administration of zymosan has been shown to induce a marked inflammatory response similar to Farmers lung41 and pleurisy.42 Keystone et al.43 showed in 1977 that chronic proliferative arthritis could be induced in mice by single intra-articular injection of zymosan. In the present study, a single intracameral (i.e., anterior chamber) injection of zymosan (5 or 50 µg) produced severe anterior uveitis in Lewis rats. However, the clinical course of the disease revealed dose dependence. With the higher dose, there was prolonged inflammation and severity.
We explored the role of complement in zymosan-induced uveitis by using CVF, a C3bBb enzyme of cobra, which depletes complement by unrestricted activation of complement through the alternative pathway.44 We observed that a single intraperitoneal injection of 35 units of CVF resulted in almost total loss of serum complement activity (determined by CH50 level) 24 hours after injection, which lasted for 5 days (Sohn et al., unpublished results, 1999). Our results demonstrated that anterior uveitis induced with 5 µg zymosan was completely abolished by decomplementation using CVF. In contrast, pretreatment of rats with CVF did not have a dramatic effect on disease expression when 50 µg zymosan was used, although, the intensity of inflammation was significantly reduced in these CVF-treated rats during the initial phase (i.e., 6 hours and 3 day) of the disease.
Collectively, these results suggest that the administration of a low dose of zymosan resulted in anterior uveitis caused by activation of the alternative pathway of complement. However, with a high challenge dose there was activation of complement during the initial phase of the disease, followed by stimulation of other proinflammatory pathways by high dose of zymosan, which prolonged the intraocular inflammation. A high dose of zymosan has been reported to have multiple proinflammatory activities.45 These results are in accord with observations of Imai et al.,42 who reported that pretreatment of rats with CVF reduced the exudate formation during the early phase (at 0.5 and 5 h) of rat pleurisy induced with a high dose of zymosan. Thus, our results confirmed for the first time that a functionally active complement system is present in the normal rat eye.
Because the normal eye has a functional complement system and there is chronic, low-level complement activation, what prevents persistent complement-mediated intraocular inflammation? Using immunohistochemistry, we demonstrated a differential expression within the eye of the cell surface regulators of complement, CD59, and Crry. CD59 was observed in the corneal epithelium, ciliary body, and retina; whereas Crry was not demonstrated in the retina. Additionally, our immunoblot studies demonstrated the presence of soluble forms of Crry and CD59 in normal rat aqueous humor for the first time. There are no reports in the literature describing the presence of soluble Crry in rat body fluids; however, a previously reported study has identified CD59 in normal rat urine.46
In 1994, Funabashi et al.9 demonstrated that anti-CD59 and anti-Crry antibodies stained the cornea of female Wistar rats. Bardenstein et al.10 recently confirmed that Crry and CD59 are expressed in the eye and also observed staining of the adnexal tissues in these animals. Thus, our present immunohistochemical studies demonstrating the presence of CD59 and Crry in the normal eye are consistent with previous observations of others.9 10
We further investigated the expression of complement regulatory proteins, CD59, Crry, MCP, and DAF, in the normal eye using rat-specific sense and antisense oligonucleotide primers and RT-PCR. During the past 2 years, rat analogues of human MCP and DAF have been identified,47 48 and cDNAs for rat CD59, Crry, MCP, and DAF have been isolated and cloned.47 48 49 50 Our studies demonstrated for the first time the expression of all four complement regulatory proteins within the eye. These findings also confirmed our previous observations. In 1994, we reported the presence of MCP and DAF (or similar molecules) in the normal rat eye, by using polyclonal anti-human antibodies.8
The presence of membrane-bound and soluble complement regulatory proteins in the normal eye suggests an important in vivo regulatory function. Could these molecules be regulating the complement system in the normal eye so that frank intraocular inflammation was not observed in the face of chronic, low-level complement activation? We neutralized the effect of these molecules with the intracameral injection of blocking mAbs to rat CD59 and Crry (antibodies to rat MCP and DAF are not commercially available). A single injection of 25 µg of anti-Crry induced severe acute anterior uveitis. Histopathology revealed an inflamed iris and ciliary body with a heavy infiltration of mainly PMNs. Protein immunoblot analysis demonstrated that C3 activation products, C3b and iC3b, increased markedly in the eye of Crry antibodyinjected animals. Finally, anti-Crryinduced uveitis was completely abrogated by complement depletion with CVF, suggesting that the intraocular inflammation was complement dependent. To our knowledge, this is the first in vivo demonstration that uveitis can be elicited by blocking a complement regulatory protein, Crry.
In contrast, intracameral injection of anti-rat CD59, anti-rat RT1A, and anti-rat immunoglobulin did not induce intraocular inflammation. We used purified IgG1 fractions of these mAbs in our experiments and not the F(ab)2 fragments. The IgG1 fractions of these antibodies or MOPC-21 did not induce inflammation when injected into the rat eye. Furthermore, antibodies that are not directed toward complement regulatory proteins (such as anti-rat RT1A and anti-rat immunoglobulin) did not provoke any inflammatory response when injected intracamerally. Thus, on the basis of these results we do not think that anti-Crryinduced uveitis is due to complement activation triggered by the Fc portion of IgG1 or by immune complexes formed within the eye.
The reason that suppression of Crry, and not CD59, induced severe anterior uveitis may be that these two molecules restrict different steps in the complement cascade. Crry blocks complement activation at an earlier point (C3-convertase level),51 whereas CD59 acts on the terminal step of complement activation.52 Thus, blockade of regulation at an earlier point in the pathway may lead to enhanced complement activation and intraocular inflammation. It should be noted that rat eyes have MCP and DAF (our present results), which, similar to Crry, also control complement activation at the critical step of C3 convertase formation. However, our results, showing that blocking of Crry by mAb (5I2) induced very strong complement activation and intraocular inflammation, suggest that Crry may have a more important regulatory role for C3 convertase than either MCP or DAF in the rat eye. Additionally, rat MCP and DAF have only recently been identified, and their in vivo roles have yet to be clarified.
In light of these observations, we conclude that intraocular complement regulatory proteins tightly control spontaneous complement activation within the normal rat eye. However, under pathologic conditions (analogous to zymosan injection in the anterior chamber) the increased complement activation overcomes the restriction by local complement regulatory proteins, thus causing intraocular inflammation. It is conceivable that by injecting 5 µl of zymosan suspension, we depleted the anterior chamber of soluble complement regulatory proteins. Therefore, the final dilution (1 µg/µl) of zymosan was prepared in normal rat aqueous humor, and 5 µl of this suspension was used for intracameral injection. This concentration was chosen, because our results demonstrated that intraocular inflammation induced with 5 µg zymosan was mediated by the complement activation. Our results show that 5 µg zymosan induced severe anterior uveitis, even if soluble complement regulatory proteins were supplemented by resuspending zymosan in 5 µl of rat aqueous humor instead of in 5 µl of PBS. These results further suggest that zymosan induces increased complement activation that overcomes the restriction by local complement regulatory proteins, but they do not suggest that zymosan-induced anterior uveitis is due to the acute depletion soluble complement inhibitory proteins in the anterior chamber.
Functional suppression of CD59 and Crry has been reported to cause local inflammation.38 53 54 Mizuno et al.38 reported that the intra-articular injection of 6D1 (an mAb to rat CD59) caused joint swelling, thickening of synovial tissues, and infiltration of inflammatory cells. In 1996, Nishikawa et al.53 studied the effect of blocking antibodies to Crry and CD59 after intracutaneous injection in rats. Similar to our observations, these groups also reported that anti-Crry antibodies induce a severe local inflammatory reaction, whereas functional suppression of CD59 has no effect. Matsuo et al.54 studied the in vivo effects of monoclonal and blocking antibodies to CD59 (6D1) and Crry (5I2) after intravenous injection in male Wistar rats. They concluded that mAb 5I2 induces a biphasic change in mean arterial pressure that is complement dependent; suppression of CD59 has no effect.
In conclusion, our studies revealed a novel and unique role for complement in the eye. The complement system is continuously activated (through an alternative pathway) at low levels in normal eye, and intraocular complement regulatory proteins present in the intraocular fluid as well as on the cell membrane tightly regulate this spontaneous complement activation. Control of complement activation at the level of C3 convertase is sufficient to prevent complement-mediated intraocular inflammation. We postulate that a chronic low level of complement activation is necessary as a primary defense mechanism in the eye against endogenous pathogenic infection. However, such a surveillance function of complement must be closely regulated to allow destruction of the putative pathogen without severe inflammation, which would be deleterious to the intraocular structures that subserve vision. Thus, the view we propose is that the endogenous complement inhibitory activity of the eye is not feeble, but rather is finely regulated to allow protection of the eye and that it has the potential to be markedly enhanced if maintenance of vision is threatened. We are currently exploring the role of intraocular complement in the protection against pathogenic invasion and in immune privilege in our laboratory.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported by National Institutes of Health grants EY09730, EY10543, and EY13094 and Core Grant EY02687.
Submitted for publication January 12, 2000; revised May 4, 2000; accepted June 6, 2000.
Commercial relationships policy: N.
Corresponding author: Nalini S. Bora, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kentucky Lions Eye Center, University of Louisville, 301 E Muhammed Ali Boulevard, Louisville, KY 40202. E-mail: nsbora01{at}gwise.louisville.edu
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Jha, B. Matta, V. Lyzogubov, R. Tytarenko, P. S. Bora, and N. S. Bora Crucial Role of Apoptosis in the Resolution of Experimental Autoimmune Anterior Uveitis Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2007; 48(11): 5091 - 5100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. S. Bora, S. Kaliappan, P. Jha, Q. Xu, B. Sivasankar, C. L. Harris, B. P. Morgan, and P. S. Bora CD59, a Complement Regulatory Protein, Controls Choroidal Neovascularization in a Mouse Model of Wet-Type Age-Related Macular Degeneration J. Immunol., February 1, 2007; 178(3): 1783 - 1790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Jha, J.-H. Sohn, Q. Xu, Y. Wang, H. J. Kaplan, P. S. Bora, and N. S. Bora Suppression of Complement Regulatory Proteins (CRPs) Exacerbates Experimental Autoimmune Anterior Uveitis (EAAU). J. Immunol., June 15, 2006; 176(12): 7221 - 7231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Jha, J.-H. Sohn, Q. Xu, H. Nishihori, Y. Wang, S. Nishihori, B. Manickam, H. J. Kaplan, P. S. Bora, and N. S. Bora The complement system plays a critical role in the development of experimental autoimmune anterior uveitis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2006; 47(3): 1030 - 1038. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Engelbert and M. S. Gilmore Fas Ligand but Not Complement Is Critical for Control of Experimental Staphylococcus aureus Endophthalmitis Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2005; 46(7): 2479 - 2486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. N. Mallam, M. Y. Hurwitz, T. Mahoney, P. Chevez-Barrios, and R. L. Hurwitz Efficient Gene Transfer into Retinal Cells Using Adenoviral Vectors: Dependence on Receptor Expression Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2004; 45(6): 1680 - 1687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Y. Niederkorn The immune privilege of corneal grafts J. Leukoc. Biol., August 1, 2003; 74(2): 167 - 171. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |