|
|
||||||||
From the Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS. Human anterior segment organ cultures were subjected to laser treatment
using standard clinical parameters and were returned to culture for 8
hours. The resultant 8-hourconditioned culture medium was then tested
for factor activity by evaluating its ability to produce two typical
trabecular responses to laser treatment, that is, to induce stromelysin
expression or to trigger cell division, when applied to fresh organ
cultures or to cell cultures. Confocal immunohistochemistry of the
laser-treated organ cultures and western immunoblot analysis of the
conditioned medium were used to evaluate changes in potential
candidates for the factor activity. The ability of the interleukin
(IL)-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) and of tumor necrosis factor
alpha (TNF
)blocking antibodies to eliminate the stromelysin
induction was evaluated.
RESULTS. Medium conditioned for 8 hours induced typical trabecular cell division
in anterior segment organ cultures. Medium conditioned for 8 hours, but
not for 30 minutes, induced typical increases in stromelysin expression
in these organ cultures and in cell cultures. After 8 hours, both
trabecular cells in laser-treated organ cultures and in the conditioned
medium contained elevated levels of IL-1ß and TNF
. The
laser-treated organ cultures contained elevated levels of IL-1
, but
it was not secreted into the medium. The ability of conditioned media
to induce stromelysin expression was partially blocked by either the
IL-1ra or the TNF
blocking antibody.
CONCLUSIONS. Laser trabeculoplasty induces the expression and secretion of both
IL-1ß and TNF
within the first 8 hours after treatment. These
cytokines then mediate increased trabecular stromelysin expression.
Putatively, this initiates remodeling of the juxtacanalicular
extracellular matrix, a likely site for the aqueous outflow resistance,
and thus restores normal outflow facility.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Laser trabeculoplasty (LTP), focal laser photocoagulation of the TM, remains a common tool for managing glaucoma.1 7 8 A typical treatment protocol is to apply about 50 uniformly spaced 50-µm diameter burns to 180° of the anterior-central TM with an argon dye laser set on blue-green mode (predominantly 488514.5 nm) with 0.1-second duration at a power setting of 0.7 to 1.0 W.8 A number of variations of this treatment are used, and a wide variety of new laser or related methodologies are available or are in developmental stages. The parameters listed above were derived empirically, primarily from clinical observation.8 9 10 11 12 The success rate of LTP is moderately high (40%85%), depending on the patient sample and criteria used.1 8 13 14 15 The usual response to LTP is a transient elevation of IOP, during which maximum tolerated medication is given, followed by an IOP reduction within 2 to 4 weeks.8 9 12 16 17 The initial elevation of IOP after LTP may be due to trabecular obstruction by cellular and ECM debris, pigment granules, and perhaps some inflammatory effects.8 9 12 The size of the eventual IOP reduction is roughly proportional to the extent of the pretreatment IOP elevation.8 9 16 18 LTP treatment is not usually permanent,9 19 which suggests that it is correcting a consequence of, but not curing, the disease. The efficacy of retreatment protocols is variable.9 20 21 22
Within the first 24 to 48 hours, LTP triggers increased trabecular cell division23 24 25 26 that is localized in humans predominantly to the trabecular insert, a nonfiltering region anterior to Schlemms canal and beneath Schwalbes line.27 Within 2 weeks after LTP, many of these newly divided cells appear to have migrated from the trabecular insert to repopulate and repair the LTP burn sites.27 Previous studies have shown that significant remodeling occurs in the trabecular juxtacanalicular ECM and possibly in the structural organization of the tissue.17 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
Trabecular induction of several members of the matrix metalloproteinase family, particularly stromelysin and gelatinase B, in response to LTP39 may account for this remodeling. This induction is particularly prevalent, within the juxtacanalicular region of the meshwork.40 This family of secreted ECM-degrading enzymes, the matrix metalloproteinases,41 42 43 44 45 46 are thought to be responsible for normal turnover and maintenance of the trabecular ECM.47 48 49 Manipulation of these enzymes activity reversibly modulates aqueous outflow facility in perfused human anterior segment organ culture.50 The trabecular expression of these metalloproteinases and their tissue inhibitors, the TIMPs, is increased by a variety of growth factors and cytokines, particularly IL-1 and TNF.49 51 52
The site of the LTP burns is physically remote from the site of
stromelysin induction. The burns are in the anterior or central portion
of the uveal meshwork and rarely penetrate more than 1/3 of its
depth. The cell division is primarily in the trabecular insert, and the
stromelysin induction occurs primarily in the juxtacanalicular region.
Clinical treatment of only 180° of the meshwork is approximately as
effective as treatment of the full 360°. We found that treatment of
only 180° triggers both cell division and stromelysin induction
throughout the full 360° of the meshwork. These observations lead us
to hypothesize that these LTP responses might be mediated by a factor
that is released in response to treatment. To test this hypothesis, we
evaluated the ability of culture medium, conditioned for 8 hours by
laser-treated organ cultures, to trigger these responses on trabecular
cells and on untreated organ cultures. We then evaluated the
possibility that the mediating factor was one of several growth factors
or cytokines that we had shown to induce trabecular matrix
metalloproteinase expression.49
51
52
Two candidates,
IL-1ß and TNF
, were strongly induced by LTP treatment. The
IL-1ra and TNF
blocking antibodies significantly reduced the
ability of LTP-conditioned medium to induce stromelysin.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, IL-1ß, IL-1ra, and TNF
and IL-1
and IL-1ß antibodies were from R&D Systems (Minneapolis,
MN); the TNF
antibody was from BioSource International (Camarillo,
CA); horseradish peroxidase- or FITC-conjugated secondary antibodies
were from Sigma (St. Louis, MO) or Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR); human
lung fibroblasts were from ATCC (HFL1 CCL 153; Rockville, MD);
Dulbeccos modified Eagles Medium (DMEM) and antibiotic/antimycotic
solution were from Gibco BRL (Gaithersburg, MD); fetal calf serum was
from HyClone (Logan, UT); chemiluminescent detection kits were from
Pierce (Rockford, IL); PicoGreen DNA assay reagent was from Molecular
Probes; RNA extraction kits were from QIAGEN (Valencia, CA);
chondroitinase A was from Seikagaku America (St. Petersburg, FL).
Culture, Laser Treatments, and Conditioned Media
Human eye bank eyes were obtained from the Lions Eye Bank of
Oregon (Portland, OR) and were used for stationary anterior segment
organ culture27
53
or to initiate trabecular meshwork cell
cultures.49
51
Porcine eyes, obtained from Carlton Packing
Company (Carlton, OR), also were used to initiate trabecular meshwork
cell cultures for some studies.51
Human or porcine
trabecular meshwork cells and human lung fibroblasts were cultured in
DMEM with 100 U/ml penicillin G, 100 µg/ml streptomycin sulfate, 0.25
µg/ml Fungizone (Gibco BRL), and 10% fetal calf serum at
37°C, 100% humidity, and 5% CO2. Trabecular cells were
used by passage 5 and were made serum-free for 48 hours before
initiating and during experiments. Human anterior segments explants,
comprised of the intact cornea, the undisturbed trabecular meshwork,
and a 2- to 5-mm rim of sclera with the ciliary body and iris gently
removed, were stabilized in stationary organ culture for 7 days before
starting experiments.53
These explants were cultured
serum-free in 6-well dishes under conditions as detailed above. For
laser treatments, stabilized, paired-eye anterior segment explants were
subjected to standard, clinical-parameter LTP- or sham
treatment23
24
27
31
39
40
and returned to culture for 8
hours to condition the culture medium. The LTP treatment protocol was
to apply 50 uniformly spaced 50-µm diameter burns to 180° of the
anterior-central TM with an argon dye laser set on blue-green mode with
0.1-second duration at a power setting of 1.0 W. For the
sham-treatment, the explant was exposed to the exact same process, but
no LTP burns were applied. After the medium was conditioned for 8
hours, it was collected and either analyzed immediately or aliquoted
and stored at -20°C.
Trabecular [3H]Thymidine Incorporation
[3H]Thymidine uptake by trabecular cells
in explants was evaluated as detailed earlier.23
24
27
Briefly, medium that had been conditioned for 8 hours by either LTP- or
sham-treated explants was diluted 1:1 with fresh medium.
[3H]Thymidine (3 µCi/ml) was added and the
medium was incubated with stabilized untreated paired-eye explants for
48 hours. The explants were then rinsed, bisected, fixed, and processed
for autoradiography as previously detailed.23
Each
microscope slide contained 16 sections (3 µm thick) taken from one
quadrant of an explant, avoiding serial sections, which could contain
portions of the same cell or nucleus. Eight pairs of eyes were exposed
to conditioned medium and analyzed; from each eye, four slides (one
from each quadrant) with 16 nonserial sections per slide were analyzed
by two different individuals. Because each section contains about 100
to 125 trabecular cells, over 50,000 cells were counted for each of the
LTP and the sham treatment groups. Using a masked protocol, nuclei with
more than 20 autoradiographic grains were identified, and their
position within the meshwork was determined. The four regions selected
were the trabecular insert, the trabecular lining of Schlemms canal,
the posterior meshwork, and the central meshwork. The total number of
nuclei in each section also was determined. The data are presented both
as the percentage of total cells in the respective section that exhibit
more than 20 grains over their nuclei (total group) and as the
percentage of the total cells in the section that were positive within
each region.
LTP Factor Assay
To assay for an LTP factor, medium that had been conditioned for 8
hours by either LTP- or sham-treated explants was diluted as indicated
with fresh culture medium or was added without dilution to either
untreated anterior segment organ cultures or to 12- or 24-well plates
of densely confluent human or porcine trabecular meshwork cells or
human lung fibroblast cells. After 24, 36, or 48 hours, the culture
medium was removed, and stromelysin levels were determined by western
immunoblot analysis or by zymography. Microscopic cell counts or
PicoGreen DNA assays following the manufacturers instructions
(Molecular Probes) was used in some cases to establish that the number
of cells per well did not vary significantly with treatments or between
wells because of plating differences.
Confocal Immunohistochemistry
Eight hours after sham or LTP treatment, explants were rinsed in
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and two wedges from opposite sides of
the explants were removed and embedded in OCT containing 2.5%
glycerol, quick-frozen, and stored at -80°C. Sections (6 µm) were
cut with a digital microscope (1720 Cryostat; Leitz, Leica,
Germany), using standard methods. Briefly, sections were
thaw-mounted onto Superfrost Plus (Fischer Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA)
slides, immersed in cold acetone for 2 seconds, and stored at -80°C.
Slides were warmed to room temperature, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde
in PBS for 10 minutes, and then rinsed briefly in PBS. After
preequilibration for 5 minutes at 37°C in buffer, 0.1 U
proteinase-free chondroitinase A was added per milliliter and incubated
for 8 minutes at 37°C.53
54
Slides were washed in room
temperature TBS (50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4) and incubated with
blocking buffer (TBS with 0.3% Triton X-100) for 30 minutes. Primary
antibody (25 µg/ml) in blocking buffer was incubated with slides
for 1 hour at 100% humidity, and slides were rinsed in TBS twice for 3
minutes each time and incubated with secondary antibody (0.82.5
µg/ml) in blocking buffer. Fluorescein-conjugated antibody
incubations were for 45 minutes in the dark at 100% humidity. Sections
were rinsed twice for 5 minutes each in TBS and equilibrated with
antifade buffer (Molecular Probes) for 5 minutes Slides were
coverslipped, sealed, and stored in the dark at 4°C until analysis.
Confocal microscopy was conducted as detailed earlier.50 55 56 Each antibody was evaluated in at least three separate experiments, and a total of 28 pairs of eyes were analyzed. Addition controls included sections from sham and laser treatment without primary antibody. Confocal instrument gain and zero settings were optimized below saturation on an intensely staining sample, and then no setting changes were made for the complete set; images were processed together to avoid introducing artificial differences.
Western Immunoblot Analysis and Zymograms
Western immunoblot analysis and zymography were conducted as
previously detailed,49
51
57
except that horseradish
peroxidaseconjugated secondary antibodies and chemiluminescent
detection (Super Signal; Pierce) were used following the
manufacturers instructions. For zymography, the medium was used
without concentration; for western immunoblot analysis, the medium was
concentrated 10 or 20 times using 10-kDa limit, Centricon
spin-concentrators (Amicon, Beverly, MA). In either case, volumes were
adjusted before applying to gels to normalize for possible processing
differences between samples. Sample normalization was on a "per well
of cells" basis, where cell numbers or cellular DNA content had been
shown to be consistent between wells, as discussed earlier, or on a
"per explant" basis to avoid skewing due to changes in total media
protein with treatments.
RNA Isolations and Dot Blots
RNA was isolated as previously described40
58
or
using RNeasy kits as directed by the manufacturer (QIAGEN). Methods for
dot blots were as described earlier.40
The total cellular
RNA from four trabecular meshworks was pooled. Sample application for
dot blots was normalized, based on total RNA extracted, as estimated
from the absorbance at 260 nm; in most experiments, several dilutions
of each sample were added to adjacent wells of the dot blot apparatus
to established linearity ranges. Treatment of aliquots with RNase-free
DNase before blotting did not affect results, whereas pretreatment with
DNase-free RNase eliminated the dots.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
We also determined whether the factor activity was heat-labile. Heating the LTP-conditioned medium for 1 hour at 80°C reduced its ability to stimulate stromelysin when added to fresh explants, by approximately 80%. Trabecular cells exposed to sham-conditioned medium or to sham-conditioned and then heated medium produced approximately the same low levels of stromelysin (not shown). The effects of these media on gelatinase B expression by human trabecular cells was similar to the effects on stromelysin, and gelatinase A levels were not affected either (data not shown).
To determine whether the factor is released or produced and secreted in response to LTP treatment, we dissected untreated TMs from explants and subjected them to hypotonic shock, sonication, or Triton X-100 extraction. Equivalent amounts of these extracts were unable to induce stromelysin expression by trabecular cells (not shown). We also subjected paired explants to LTP and sham treatment and allowed them to condition medium for only 30 minutes. This conditioned medium also was unable to induce stromelysin expression, when applied to untreated explants or trabecular cells (not shown).
LTP-Treatment Effects on Cellular IL-1
, IL-1ß, and TNF
Levels and Media IL-1ß and TNF
Levels
Confocal immunohistochemistry of anterior segment explants 8
hours after LTP treatment shows strong LTP-induced increases in the
levels of IL-1
, IL-1ß, and TNF
but no appreciable changes in
platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) bb levels (Fig. 4A
). Some basal immunostaining is apparent in sham-treated controls.
Controls in which the first antibody was omitted showed lower levels of
nonspecific staining (not shown). At higher magnification (Fig. 4B)
,
the LTP-induced increases in IL-1
and -1ß and TNF
appear to be
predominantly punctate and cytoplasmic. Some extracellular matrix
immunostaining cannot be ruled out by these methods, although it is
clearly not the dominant site of the immunostaining.
|
or PDBFbb with or without treatment.
However, large increases are apparent in IL-1ß and TNF
levels in
response to LTP treatment. Bands are at predicted sizes for the mature
peptides, based on the literature and recombinant protein standards
were included for the two that were not detectable, that is, IL-1
and PDGFbb. Because the immunostaining for IL-1
was very definite,
without appreciable IL-1
in the medium, trabecular cells from LTP-
and sham-treated explants were extracted with Triton X-100, followed by
extraction with sodium dodecyl sulfatepolyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) sample buffer. Analysis of these extracts by
western immunoblot analysis (Fig. 4C)
shows that cellular IL-1
is
elevated by LTP treatment. Triton did not release the IL-1
, whereas
the sample buffer, containing SDS, did. Detectable basal levels in the
sham-treated explants also are present. In both the sham- and
LTP-treated trabecular cells, IL-1
is observed as a doublet at
approximately 31 kDa, which is the size of the pro-form of this
cytokine and not at the size of the mature peptide form. Thus,
unprocessed IL-1
is present in trabecular cells and is increased by
LTP treatment but is not secreted nor loosely associated with the
plasma membrane.
|
-Blocking Antibody Effects on Stromelysin
Induction by LTP Medium
|
also were able to reduce factor
activity, measured similarly as stromelysin levels produced by cell
cultures in response to medium exposure with or without the addition of
blocking antibodies as indicated (Fig. 6C
6D)
. Parallel treatment with
a PDGFbb-blocking antibody reduces stromelysin induction only slightly.
The final culture medium was concentrated 20 times before addition to
the gels, and the exposure time was 36 hours. | Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
both appear to contribute significantly to the
LTP-factor activity, as evaluated by stromelysin induction. IL-1
increases also are triggered by LTP treatment, but IL-1
is not
secreted and remains primarily in the pro-form within the trabecular
cells. Thus, IL-1
is not itself the LTP factor. Using a different
system and conditions to evaluate laser induction of growth factors or
cytokines, a previous study59
also reported an increase in
cellular but not secreted IL-1
. Of the array of growth factors and
cytokines that we screened for their ability to stimulated trabecular
matrix metalloproteinase expression, IL-1 and TNF were the most
effective.51
52
Although PDGFbb also stimulated trabecular
metalloproteinase expression,51
it is not induced by LTP
treatment and the PDGFbb-blocking antibody has minimal effects on
LTP-factor activity. We have not ruled out additional contributions to
the factor activity by other cytokines or growth factors. The effects of LTP- but not sham-treated explant-conditioned medium on trabecular cell division (Fig. 1) mimics the effects previously reported for direct LTP.23 27 This provides evidence for the release of a factor in response to LTP. The factor initiating this cell division could be the same as or different from the factors that trigger the trabecular MMP response. This response is localized primarily to the trabecular insert, as previously reported,27 and is of a similar magnitude, with 0.2% to 0.3% of total trabecular cells dividing within a 48-hour period and LTP inducing somewhat greater than a doubling in the basal rate.23 27 On the basis our earlier study,27 we believe that in humans only the "stemlike" trabecular insert cells are capable of significant division rates in vivo. That study provided evidence that these freshly divided insert cells then migrate out into the meshwork and repopulate areas where TM cells have been lost. However, the role of this phenomenon in the molecular mechanism of LTP as a treatment for glaucoma is not clear.39 40 Although this is an intriguing question, it was not pursued in more detail herein.
Because IL-1
and -1ß and TNF
can each stimulate their own and
each others expression, an amplification cascade seems
feasible.60
61
62
63
64
Several types of trabecular cell
disruption or extraction do not release the factor activity; thus, the
factor is most likely induced rather than released by LTP treatment.
Although IL-1
is not secreted, it could play an initiating role in
an LTP-factor amplification cascade, for example, by acting within the
cells to stimulate IL-1ß and/or TNF
expression and secretion. One
could also evoke that cellular IL-1
is released from a zone of
damaged trabecular cells near the burns. Because this would involve
only a relatively small number of cells, the amount of IL-1
released
may not be sufficient to be detected by western immunoblot analysis.
However, this could be enough to initiate an amplification cascade of
IL-1ß and/or TNF
expression and secretion spreading out from the
burns and eventually reaching a level to induce metalloproteinase
expression in the juxtacanalicular region of the
meshwork.40
Other molecular mechanisms could be
responsible for initiating the cascade, such as heat shock of the cells
near to but not directly damaged by the LTP burns. Thus, the importance
of the cellular IL-1
increase is not clear. The molecular mechanism
for the IL-1
, IL-1ß, and TNF
induction by LTP also remains to
be determined.
We see very intense IL-1 and TNF immunostaining immediately surrounding individual LTP burns and an absence of similar immunostaining for PDGFbb (data not shown). This may suggest that the LTP effect is initially on a zone of trabecular cells near the burns. However, many cytokines and most antibodies bind nonspecifically to areas of damaged or disrupted tissue or extracellular matrix; thus, this increased localization at the site surrounding the LTP burns could easily be an artifact.
We have previously shown that LTP treatment induces sustained stromelysin and gelatinase B expression,39 particularly within the juxtacanalicular region of the meshwork.40 We also have recently shown that increasing the trabecular matrix metalloproteinase activity reversibly increases outflow facility.50 Thus, the LTP-induced metalloproteinase increases and the juxtacanalicular extracellular matrix remodeling that this would putatively cause provide a plausible explanation for the efficacy of LTP treatment for glaucoma. Understanding at a molecular level how LTP ameliorates glaucomatous IOP elevations may allow the development of improved LTP treatment parameters. Interestingly, the Nd:YAG laser in either thermal or cutting mode also initiates these trabecular responses.65
Although LTP is effective in many cases of glaucoma, it does not
provide a permanent resolution and is not effective in all cases. Our
observation, that the effects of LTP are mediated by a factor and the
identification of this factor as IL-1ß and TNF
may be useful in
designing alternative therapies for glaucoma, would likely be
facilitated by a detailed understanding of the signal transduction
pathways involved in the induction of the factor(s) by LTP and in the
induction of stromelysin and gelatinase B by these LTP factors.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Submitted for publication March 11, 1999; revised August 3, 1999; accepted August 27, 1999.
Commercial relationships policy: N.
Corresponding author: Ted S. Acott, Casey Eye Institute, (CERES), Oregon Health Sciences University, 3375 S.W. Terwilliger, Portland, OR 97201. acott{at}ohsu.edu
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. E. Keller, J. M. Bradley, M. J. Kelley, and T. S. Acott Effects of Modifiers of Glycosaminoglycan Biosynthesis on Outflow Facility in Perfusion Culture Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2008; 49(6): 2495 - 2505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Tovar-Vidales, R. Roque, A. F. Clark, and R. J. Wordinger Tissue Transglutaminase Expression and Activity in Normal and Glaucomatous Human Trabecular Meshwork Cells and Tissues Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., February 1, 2008; 49(2): 622 - 628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Kelley, A. Rose, K. Song, B. Lystrup, J. W. Samples, and T. S. Acott p38 MAP Kinase Pathway and Stromelysin Regulation in Trabecular Meshwork Cells Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2007; 48(7): 3126 - 3137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Xue, N. Comes, and T. Borras Presence of an Established Calcification Marker in Trabecular Meshwork Tissue of Glaucoma Donors Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2007; 48(7): 3184 - 3194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Kelley, A. Y. Rose, K. Song, Y. Chen, J. M. Bradley, D. Rookhuizen, and T. S. Acott Synergism of TNF and IL-1 in the Induction of Matrix Metalloproteinase-3 in Trabecular Meshwork Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2007; 48(6): 2634 - 2643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. S. How, T. Aung, X. Chew, V. H. K. Yong, M. C. C. Lim, K. Y. C. Lee, J.-Y. Toh, Y. Li, J. Liu, and E. N. Vithana Lack of Association between Interleukin-1 Gene Cluster Polymorphisms and Glaucoma in Chinese Subjects Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., May 1, 2007; 48(5): 2123 - 2126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hosseini, A. Y. Rose, K. Song, C. Bohan, J. P. Alexander, M. J. Kelley, and T. S. Acott IL-1 and TNF Induction of Matrix Metalloproteinase-3 by c-Jun N-Terminal Kinase in Trabecular Meshwork. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2006; 47(4): 1469 - 1476. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W G Hodge, K F Damji, W Rock, R Buhrmann, A M Bovell, and Y Pan Baseline IOP predicts selective laser trabeculoplasty success at 1 year post-treatment: results from a randomised clinical trial Br. J. Ophthalmol., September 1, 2005; 89(9): 1157 - 1160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Vittal, A. Rose, K. E. Gregory, M. J. Kelley, and T. S. Acott Changes in Gene Expression by Trabecular Meshwork Cells in Response to Mechanical Stretching Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2005; 46(8): 2857 - 2868. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Amin, N. H. V. Chong, T. A. Bailey, J. Zhang, C. Knupp, M. E. Cheetham, J. Gr |