HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tanaka, K. Articles by Streilein, J. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tanaka, K. Articles by Streilein, J. W.

Xenoreactive CD4⁺ T Cells and Acute Rejection of Orthotopic Guinea Pig Corneas in Mice

From the Schepens Eye Research Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
PURPOSE. To explore immunologic issues involved in orthotopic corneal xenotransplantation in a discordant combination using guinea pigs as donors and mice as recipients.

METHODS. Two-millimeter-diameter guinea pig corneal buttons were transplanted into 1.5-mm-diameter graft beds on mouse corneas using 12 interrupted sutures. Eyelids were maintained occluded with tarsorrhaphy except at the times of clinical inspection. Grafts were considered to be rejected when the pupil margin was not visible clearly through the graft by slit-lamp microscopy.

RESULTS. Guinea pig corneas protected from desiccation by persistent tarsorrhaphy survived indefinitely in the eyes of C.B-17SCID mice but were rejected acutely (but not hyperacutely) in eyes of normal BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice (median survival times, MST, 16 and 10 days, respectively). Graft survival was not extended in mice deficient in µ heavy chain or ß-2 microglobulin genes, slightly extended in mice deficient in the C3 gene (MST of 21 versus 17 days) and greatly extended in mice deficient in the CD4 gene (MST of 26 versus 9 days). Reconstitution of CD4 knock-out (KO) mice with CD4⁺ T cells promoted acute rejection of corneal xenografts.

CONCLUSIONS. Hyperacute rejection does not occur in guinea pig corneal xenografts in mouse eyes, indicating that corneal xenografts are less vulnerable to this type of rejection than other solid tissue xenografts. CD4⁺ T cells are the primary mediators of acute graft rejection, although complement may contribute in a minor way. Neither antibodies nor CD8⁺ T cells participate in acute graft rejection. Because guinea pig cornea grafts in eyes of CD4KO mice are rejected in a delayed fashion, other innate and/or adaptive immune effectors must also be able to cause rejection of orthotopic corneal xenografts.

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Experiments with xenogeneic solid tissue grafts in laboratory animals have revealed that the barriers to success of xenografts significantly exceed the barriers to success of allografts. In experimental animals, organ xenografts, such as kidney and heart, typically suffer immune rejection that is exceedingly fast, often within minutes to hours. The rapidity of rejection reflects the fact that the sera of most species contain "natural" antibodies that react with antigenic epitopes on xenogeneic tissues.^{1 2 3} Species pairs in which the serum of each member contains these natural antibodies are termed "discordant."^{4 5} Natural antibodies are usually directed at carbohydrate antigens, which are expressed on many different cell types, especially vascular endothelial cells. Antibodies, particularly IgM, and complement are the causes of this type of rejection. When hyperacute rejection is prevented experimentally, delayed xenograft rejection typically occurs within 2 to 3 days.⁶ Xenoreactive antibodies, antibodies plus natural killer (NK) cells through antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, NK cells alone, and macrophages have been implicated in this type of rejection.^{7 8 9} If xenografts avoid hyperacute and delayed rejection reactions, they are then vulnerable to cell-mediated rejection, in which T cells are responsible.⁶ Rejections due to this mechanism occur at or beyond 6 to 7 days after grafting.

There are features of the cornea that suggest that its fate as a xenograft might be different from that of other types of solid tissue grafts. First, the cornea is avascular, and, therefore, it may not be vulnerable to hyperacute rejection that occurs when natural antibodies bind to vascular endothelial cells. Second, the cornea forms the anterior surface of the anterior chamber, and the aqueous humor that fills the chamber contains several extremely potent anticomplementary activities.¹⁰ Even if natural antibodies were to bind to corneal endothelium, factors in aqueous humor may thwart complement activation. Third, the cornea is devoid of bone marrow–derived cells termed "passenger leukocytes."^{11 12 13 14} In other solid tissue organs, dendritic cells and macrophages confer on the graft a high level of immunogenicity. In their absence, the ability of a graft to induce immunity to graft-derived antigens is reduced.¹⁵ Fourth, the constitutive expression of CD95 ligand on corneal endothelium has been revealed as a critical factor in the privileged survival of orthotopic corneal allografts in mice.^{16 17}

In the recent past, two groups of investigators have reported on the fate of orthotopic corneal xenografts in a discordant combination using rats as recipients. Whereas Larkin et al.¹⁸ observed rejection of corneal xenografts within 3 days and ascribed the mechanism of rejection to humoral antibodies, Ross et al.¹⁹ didn’t observe rejection until 7 to 9 days and reported indirect evidence that antibodies participated in the graft destruction, especially in preimmunized recipients. Although both studies found evidence of presumed T cell–mediated antigraft reactions, no conclusions were reached on the relative contributions of antibodies and cell-mediated immunity to the rejection process.

To explore and resolve the immunologic mechanisms of corneal xenograft rejection, we chose a discordant combination using guinea pigs as donors and mice as recipients. Our results show that acute, but not hyperacute, rejection occurs in this discordant species combination. Moreover, our evidence indicates that CD4⁺ T cells rather than xenoreactive antibodies play the most significant role in acute rejection of corneal xenografts.

	Methods

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Animals and Anesthesia
Hartley guinea pigs (450–550 g) were purchased from Elm Hill Breeding Laboratories (Chelmsford, MA). BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice were obtained from our animal facility or purchased from Taconic Farm (Germantown, NY). C.B-17SCID (C.B-17/IcrTac-scid) and ß-2 microglobulin–deficient mice (C57BL/6GphTac-[KO]B2m N5) were purchased from Taconic Farm. Immunoglobulin µ-heavy chain–deficient mice (C57BL/6-Igh-6^tm1Cgn) and CD4-deficient mice (C57BL/6-Cd4^tm1Mak) were purchased from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME). The third complement component (C3)–deficient mice and wild-type mice (129-C57BL/6) were a kind gift from Michael C. Carroll, MD (Center for Blood Research, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA). All mice were males, 8 to 12 weeks of age, and were treated according to the ARVO Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research. In all experiments, mice were used as recipients and guinea pigs were used as donors. Corneal grafts were prepared from eyes enucleated after the donor guinea pigs were killed. For experimental manipulations, mice were deeply anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of 3 mg ketamine and 0.0075 mg xylazine.

Orthotopic Corneal Grafting
Donor guinea pig corneas were excised by 2.0-mm-diameter trephine and placed in Hanks’ balanced salt solution until grafting. The graft bed was prepared by excising with vannas scissors a 1.5-mm site from the central cornea of the right eye. The graft was placed in the recipient bed and secured with 12 interrupted 11-0 nylon sutures (Sharpoint; Vanguard, Houston, TX) juxtaposed to the epithelial surface of the recipient cornea. Antibiotic ointment was applied to the corneal surface, and the lids were closed with an 8-0 nylon tarsorrhaphy. Tarsorrhaphy was maintained (except for clinical inspection purposes) until graft rejection was documented. Corneal sutures were removed on day 8.

Assessment of Graft Survival
Grafts were evaluated by slit-lamp biomicroscopy three times a week. The day of rejection was defined when graft transparency was lost (i.e., the iris margin and iris structure were not visible clearly through the graft), and graft clarity never recovered subsequently. For histologic evaluation, grafted eyes were enucleated, fixed and imbedded in methacrylate, sectioned and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H & E), and examined by light microscopy.

Assay of Xenoreactive Antibodies in Mouse Sera
Anti–guinea pig IgM and IgG antibodies were measured using flow cytometry, as described previously.²⁰

CD4⁺ T-Cell Reconstitution
Cervical, inguinal, and mesenteric lymph nodes and spleen were obtained from naive C57BL/6 mice. Spleen cells, depleted of red blood cells by lysis with Tris–NH₄Cl, and lymph nodes cells were pressed through nylon mesh to produce a single-cell suspension. T cells were purified to >90% by a T cell–enrichment column (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). After staining with rat anti-mouse CD8 antibody, CD4⁺ T cells were purified to >90% by magnetic beads (Biotecx Laboratories, Houston, TX). CD4⁺ T cells (15 x 10⁶) were injected intravenously into CD4 knock-out (KO) mice. Corneal xenotransplantation was performed on the day after reconstitution with CD4⁺ T cells.

Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis of graft survival, enabling comparison of median survival times (MST), was performed using the Mantel–Cox rank test.

	Results

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Fate of Xenogeneic Corneal Grafts Placed Orthotopically in the Eyes of Severe Combined Immune Deficient Mice
Our first series of corneal transplants was performed in C.B-17SCID mice, a circumstance in which the recipient lacks adaptive immunity. When tarsorrhaphy was maintained through, all grafts survived beyond 8 weeks (n = 8). In Figure 1A , a SCID mouse eye containing a guinea pig cornea at 4 weeks after transplantation is displayed. The central portion is clear, and the pupil margin can be seen clearly through the graft. Because the guinea pig cornea is approximately three times thicker than the mouse cornea, the margins of the grafts usually became opaque, due to the relative inability of the attenuated endothelium at this point to maintain stromal deturgescence. In Figure 1B , the histologic appearance of an H & E–stained section of grafted tissue at 8 weeks is displayed. The epithelium is intact, a continuous layer of endothelium lines the posterior surface of the graft, and the stroma is well-ordered in a lamellar array with few neovessel profiles and no identifiable infiltrating cells. These findings indicate that in the absence of an adaptive immune response, guinea pig cornea xenografts survive well when placed orthotopically in the eyes of mice.

View larger version (112K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. (A) Clinical appearance of an accepted guinea pig cornea graft in the eye of a C.B-17SCID mouse at 4 weeks after transplantation. The central portion of the graft is clear (black arrows point to graft margin), and the pupil margin can be seen clearly behind (and through) the graft (white arrows point to pupil margin). (B) H & E–stained histologic section of an accepted guinea pig cornea grafted in the eye of a SCID mouse at 8 weeks. Epithelial and endothelial layers are intact; the stroma is well organized with lamellar arrays and contains few neovessels and no infiltrating cells. Magnification, x100.

View larger version (73K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. (A) Kaplan–Meier survival curve of guinea pig cornea grafts in eyes of BALB/c () and C57BL/6 () mice. MST of grafts in eyes of BALB/c mice eyes is 16 days. MST of grafts in eyes of C57BL/6 mice is 10 days. (B) H & E–stained histologic section of guinea pig cornea graft in the eye of a C57BL/6 mouse at 12 days. Graft stroma is edematous and contains many infiltrating cells. No epithelial or endothelial layer is visible. Magnification, x100.

Fate of Xenogeneic Corneal Grafts in Mice with Selected Genes Knocked Out: µ Heavy Chain of Immunoglobulin, Third Component of Complement, ß-2 Microglobulin, and CD4
Mice deficient in the µ heavy chain of immunoglobulin gene (µ KO) lack B cells and the capacity to produce antibodies. These mice, plus their wild-type controls, served as recipients of orthotopic guinea pig cornea grafts. The MSTs of these grafts were determined and are presented in Table 1 . Grafts in both groups of mice were rejected acutely, and there was no difference between the two groups. This result formally excludes antibodies as a requirement for acute rejection of orthotopic guinea pig cornea grafts.

Mice deficient in the ß-2 microglobulin gene (ß-2 µ KO) express class Ia and Ib molecules poorly, and these mice are deficient in class I–restricted CD8⁺ T cells and NK T cells. As the results presented in Table 1 show, guinea pig corneas were rejected acutely and at comparable rates in ß-2µ KO mice and in their wild-type controls. At least with respect to acute xenograft rejection, these results indicate that CD8⁺ T cells (and NK T cells) are not required.

CD4KO mice lack class II–restricted CD4⁺ T cells, an important effector of solid tissue and cornea allografts. Mice of this type and their wild-type controls received orthotopic guinea pig cornea grafts. As the results presented in Table 1 reveal, grafts in the eyes of CD4KO mice survived significantly longer than grafts placed in the eyes of wild-type mice (P < 0.0001). For discussion purposes, we refer to the rapid rejection (within 2–3 weeks) of corneal xenografts in normal C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice as "acute" and the delayed rejection (beyond 3–6 weeks) observed in CD4KO mice as "chronic." To explain the difference between acute and chronic rejection, we postulate that CD4⁺ T cells are the primary, if not the exclusive, mediators of acute rejection of orthotopic guinea pig cornea grafts in mice.

Fate of Xenogeneic Corneal Grafts in the Eyes of CD4KO Mice Reconstituted with CD4⁺ T Cells
To test the hypothesis that CD4⁺ T cells are the mediators of acute corneal xenograft rejection in mice, a reconstitution experiment was performed. Guinea pig corneas were grafted into the eyes of CD4KO mice 1 day after these mice received, intravenously, 15 x 10⁶ CD4⁺ T cells from syngeneic donors with an intact CD4 gene. The results of this experiment are presented in Figure 3 . Reconstituted CD4KO mice rejected guinea pig cornea grafts significantly more swiftly than did nonreconstituted CD4KO mice. This result confirms the key role played by CD4⁺ T cells in acute rejection of orthotopic guinea pig cornea xenografts in mice.

View larger version (12K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier survival curve of guinea pig cornea grafts in eyes of CD4KO mice and in eyes of CD4+ T cell–reconstituted CD4KO mice that received 15 x 106 CD4+ T cells intravenously on the day before transplantation. MST of grafts in eyes of reconstituted CD4KO mice is significantly less than grafts in eyes of unreconstituted CD4KO mice, P < 0.005.

	Discussion

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

We are confident that tarsorrhaphy has no unsuspected protective effect on the capacity of the immune system to destroy cornea grafts. We have conducted experiments with orthotopic corneal allografts that were protected by persistent tarsorrhaphy. We found that allografts placed in both normal and "high-risk" mouse eyes were rejected with the expected tempo and frequency of grafts unprotected by tarsorrhaphy (data not shown).

Our findings that orthotopic guinea pig xenografts survived in SCID mouse eyes beyond 8 weeks, but were rejected between 8 and 16 days in the eyes of normal C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice, indicate that cornea xenografts evoke a destructive adaptive immunity. A similar conclusion was reached by Yamagami et al.,²¹ who reported on the fate of corneal xenografts in a concordant (rat to mouse) situation. Guinea pigs and mice are discordant, and mouse serum constitutively contains anti–guinea pig antibodies. Despite the finding that serum anti–guinea pig IgG titers rose in the sera of C57BL/6 and BALB/c recipients of guinea pig cornea mice (at about the time the orthotopic grafts were rejected), the MST of cornea xenografts in mice genetically deficient in B cells and antibody formation was virtually identical with that of wild-type mice. Thus, we conclude that antibodies play little or no role in the process by which normal mice reject guinea pig cornea grafts acutely. Moreover, no hyperacute rejection (3 days or less) was observed in normal mice that received orthotopic corneal xenografts, indicating that the constitutive presence of preformed anti–guinea pig antibodies also has no deleterious effect on graft survival. The utter failure of antibodies to influence graft outcome in mice probably relates to the blood–ocular barrier, which severely limits access of high-molecular-weight blood-borne molecules into the eye,²² and the intense anti-complementary properties of aqueous humor.^{10 23 24} Thus, the guinea pig cornea in the mouse eye differs from other solid tissue xenografts placed in mice in its virtual invulnerability to antibody-mediated rejection.

Rather, acute rejection of orthotopic guinea pig corneas in mice appears to be mediated primarily, if not exclusively, by CD4⁺ T cells. In the recent past, Takano and Williams²⁵ have published indirect evidence that CD4⁺ T cells participate in rejection of corneal xenografts in rats. Pierson et al.²⁶ reported a similar mechanism in the rejection of xenogeneic skin grafts in mice. Not only did we find that acute rejection was avoided by guinea pig grafts placed in the eyes of CD4KO mice but that reconstitution of these mice with normal CD4⁺ T cells restored the capacity to reject. No similar loss of capacity to reject grafts was observed in mice deficient in CD8⁺ (or NK) T cells. In mice, rejection of orthotopic skin xenografts is mediated largely by CD4⁺ T cells.²⁶ When orthotopic corneal allografts have been studied in mice, CD4⁺ T cells have also been identified as the primary mediators of acute graft rejection.^{27 28} Moreover, the majority of effector T cells in this circumstance is activated via the so-called indirect pathway of allorecognition,²⁹ which means that peptides from donor alloantigens are detected when presented in the context of recipient class I and II major histocompatibility complex molecules. We are currently testing whether recognition and rejection of guinea pig corneas in mice are similarly mediated by "indirect" xenoreactive CD4⁺ T cells.

Despite this emphasis on a key role for CD4⁺ T cells in acute rejection of corneal xenografts in mice, we are not discarding other effector mechanisms as possible contributors. Although guinea pig cornea grafts in the eyes of CD4KO mice were not rejected acutely, many of those grafted were eventually destroyed in a chronic fashion. We do not understand the pathogenesis of these delayed rejections. Several possibilities exist. First, CD4KO mice may, in principle, be slightly "leaky" (although we have no evidence to suggest that). If so, very small numbers of CD4⁺ T cells could emerge through time in these mice and accumulate in sufficient quantities to effect chronic graft rejection. Second, it is possible that CD8⁺ T cells participate in delayed, chronic, rejection. Our current results merely exclude these cells from participating in an important way in acute rejection. Third, the slight but significant prolongation in graft survival observed in the eyes of mice deficient in C3 may correlate with a role for complement in chronic graft rejection, perhaps through the antibody-independent, alternative, pathway. Finally, innate, rather than adaptive, immune effectors may be the culprits responsible for chronic xenograft rejection. Innate cells (NK cells, macrophages) have already been implicated in the rejection of other solid tissue and organ xenografts.^{8 9} Experiments to test this and other possibilities are currently under way.

We have initiated our studies on the immunobiology of orthotopic corneal xenografts because of unique properties of the cornea and the anterior chamber of the eye, which might mitigate the vulnerability of these grafts to rejection. Our results encourage further research in this area. The apparent invulnerability of corneal xenografts to antibody-mediated injury gives them a significant advantage over vascularized solid tissue xenografts. In addition, the key role played by CD4⁺ T cells in acute cornea xenograft rejection suggests that already established immunosuppressive regimens may exist that would be effective treatments.^{27 28 29 30} Topical steroid therapy has long been used to reverse orthotopic corneal allograft rejection in human beings and might be similarly effective in orthotopic corneal xenografts. In an abstract communication, She et al.³¹ reported that the survival of mouse corneas grafted to the eyes of rats was markedly enhanced by the induction of anterior chamber associated immune deviation to mouse alloantigens and by subconjunctival injection of dexamethasone. Experiments to test the effectiveness of topical and systemic immunosuppressive agents in the guinea pig to mouse orthotopic corneal xenograft model will be able to answer this important question.

	Acknowledgements

 
The authors thank Jacqueline M. Doherty and Jimgping Lian for their kind help in the experiments and Michael C. Carroll for the gift of C3KO mice.

	Footnotes

 
Supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grant EY10765. JWS is a recipient of a Research to Prevent Blindness Senior Scientific Investigator Award.

Submitted for publication June 28, 1999; revised September 24, November 11, 1999, and January 4, 2000; accepted January 26, 2000.

Commercial relationships policy: N.

Corresponding author: J. Wayne Streilein, Schepens Eye Research Institute, 20 Staniford Street, Boston, MA 02114. waynes{at}vision.eri.harvard.edu

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 

1. Auchincloss, H. (1988) Xenogeneic transplantation: a review Transplantation 46,1-20[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Platt, JL (1996) Xenotransplantation: recent progress and current perspective Curr Opin Immunol 8,721-728[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Auchincloss, H, Sachs, DH (1998) Xenogeneic transplantation Annu Rev Immunol 16,433-470[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Platt, JL, Vercellotti, GM, Dalmasso, AP, et al (1990) Transplantation of discordant xenografts: a review of progress Immunol Today 11,450-457[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Soares, M, Lu, X, Havaux, X, et al (1994) In vivo IgM depletion by anti-µ monoclonal antibody therapy: the role of IgM in hyperacute vascular rejection of discordant xenografts Transplantation 57,1003-1009[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Schaapherder, AFM, Daha, MR, TeBulte, MTJW, van der Woude, FJ, Gooszen, HG (1994) Antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity against porcine endothelium induced by a majority of human sera Transplantation 57,1376-1382[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Kroshus, TJ, Bolman, RM, III, Dalmasso, AP (1996) Selective IgM depletion prolongs organ survival in an ex vivo model of pig-to-human xenotransplantation Transplantation 62,5-12[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Candinas, D, Belliveau, S, Koyamada, N, et al (1996) T cell independence of macrophage and natural killer cell infiltration, cytokine production, and endothelial activation during delayed xenograft rejection Transplantation 62,1920-1927[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Lin, Y, Vandeputte, M, Waer, M. (1997) Natural killer cell- and macrophage-mediated rejection of concordant xenografts in the absence of T and B cell responses J Immunol 158,5658-5667[Abstract]
10. Goslings, WRO, Prodeus, AP, Streilein, JW, et al (1998) A small molecular weight factor in aqueous humor acts on C1q to prevent antibody-dependent complement activation Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39,989-995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Streilein, JW, Toews, GB, Bergstresser, PR (1979) Corneal allografts fail to express Ia antigens Nature 282,326-327[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Gillette, TE, Chandler, JW, Greiner, JV (1982) Langerhans cells of the ocular surface Ophthalmology 89,700-711[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Rodrigues, MM, Rowden, G, Hackette, J, Bakos, I. (1981) Langerhans cells in the normal conjunctiva and peripheral cornea of selected species Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 21,759-765[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Bergstresser, PR, Fletcher, CR, Streilein, JW (1980) Surface densities of Langerhans cells in relation to rodent epidermal sites with special immunologic properties J Invest Dermatol 74,77-80[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Lafferty, KJ, Prowse, SJ, Simeonovic, CJ, Warren, HS (1983) Immunobiology of tissue transplantation: a return to the passenger leukocyte concept Annu Rev Immunol 1,143-173[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Stuart, PM, Griffith, TS, Usui, N, Pepose, J, Yu, X, Ferguson, TA (1997) CD95 ligand (FasL)-induced apoptosis is necessary for corneal allograft survival J Clin Invest 99,396-402[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Yamagami, S, Kawashima, H, Tsuru, T, et al (1997) Role of Fas-Fas ligand interactions in the immunorejection of allogeneic mouse corneal transplants Transplantation 64,1107-1111[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Larkin, DFK, Takano, T, Standfield, SD, Williams, KA (1995) Experimental orthotopic corneal xenotransplantation in the rat: mechanisms of graft rejection Transplantation 60,491-497[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Ross, JR, Howell, DN, Sanfilippo, FP (1993) Characteristic of corneal xenograft rejection in a discordant species combination Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 34,2469-2476[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Tanaka, K, Streilein, JW. (2000) Immunobiology of xenogeneic cornea grafts in mouse eyes. II. Immunogenicity of xenogeneic cornea tissue grafts implanted in anterior chamber of mouse eyes Transplantation 69,616-623[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Yamagami, S, Isobe, M, Yamagami, H, Hori, J, Tsuru, T. (1997) Mechanism of concordant corneal xenograft rejection in mice Transplantation 64,42-48[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Dernouchamps, JP (1982) The proteins of the aqueous humor Doc Ophthalmol 53,193-248[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Lass, JH, Walter, EI, Burris, TE, et al (1990) Expression of two molecular forms of the complement decay-accelerating factor in the eye and lacrimal gland Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 31,1136-1148[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Bora, NS, Gobleman, CL, Atkinson, JP, Pepose, JS, Kaplan, HJ (1993) Differential expression of the complement regulatory proteins in the human eye Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 34,3579-3584[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Takano, T, Williams, KA (1995) Mechanism of corneal endothelial destruction in rejecting rat corneal allografts and xenografts: a role for CD4⁺ cells Transplantation Proc 27,260-261[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Pierson, RN, III, Winn, HJ, Russell, PS, Auchincloss, H. (1989) Xenogeneic skin graft rejection is especially dependent on CD4⁺ T cells J Exp Med 170,991-996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. He, YG, Ross, J, Niederkorn, JY (1991) Promotion of murine orthotopic corneal allograft survival by systemic administration of anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 32,2723-2728[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Pleyer, U, Milani, JK, Dukes, A, et al (1995) Effect of topically applied anti-CD4 monoclonal antibodies on orthotopic corneal allografts in a rat model Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 36,52-61[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Yamada, J, Kurimoto, I, Streilein, JW (1999) Role of CD4⁺ T cells in immunobiology of orthotopic corneal transplants in mice Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40,2614-2621[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Sano, Y, Streilein, JW, Ksander, BR. (1999) Detection of minor alloantigen-specific cytotoxic T cells after rejection of murine orthotopic corneal allografts: evidence that graft antigens are recognized exclusively via the "indirect pathway." Transplantation 68,963-970[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
31. She, S–C, Moticka, EJ, Feder, J. (1992) Prolonged survival of xenogeneic corneal grafts following anterior chamber injection of xenogeneic lymphocytes [ARVO Abstract] Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 33(4),832Abstract nr 700

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Mimura, S. Yokoo, M. Araie, S. Amano, and S. Yamagami Treatment of Rabbit Bullous Keratopathy with Precursors Derived from Cultured Human Corneal Endothelium Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2005; 46(10): 3637 - 3644. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Mimura, S. Yamagami, S. Yokoo, T. Usui, K. Tanaka, S. Hattori, S. Irie, K. Miyata, M. Araie, and S. Amano Cultured Human Corneal Endothelial Cell Transplantation with a Collagen Sheet in a Rabbit Model Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2004; 45(9): 2992 - 2997. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Higuchi and J. W. Streilein CD8+ T Cell-Mediated Delayed Rejection of Orthotopic Guinea Pig Cornea Grafts in Mice Deficient in CD4+ T Cells Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2003; 44(1): 175 - 182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Tanaka, K.-h. Sonoda, and J. W. Streilein Acute Rejection of Orthotopic Corneal Xenografts in Mice Depends on CD4+ T Cells and Self-Antigen-Presenting Cells Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2001; 42(12): 2878 - 2884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tanaka, K. Articles by Streilein, J. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tanaka, K. Articles by Streilein, J. W.