HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rahi, J. S. Articles by Dezateux, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rahi, J. S. Articles by Dezateux, C.

Congenital and Infantile Cataract in the United Kingdom: Underlying or Associated Factors

From the Departments of ¹ Epidemiology and ² Ophthalmology, Institute of Child Health and Great Ormond Street Hospital, London; and the ³ Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom.

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Appendix A References

 
PURPOSE. Prevention of visual impairment and blindness in childhood due to congenital and infantile cataract is an important international goal. Preventive strategies require information about etiology that is currently unavailable for many regions of the world. From a national epidemiologic study, the underlying or associated factors in newly diagnosed cases of congenital or infantile cataract in the United Kingdom are reported, and the implications for future etiological research are discussed.

METHODS. All children with congenital or infantile cataract newly diagnosed during 1 year in the United Kingdom were ascertained independently through two national active surveillance schemes comprising ophthalmologists and pediatricians, respectively. Detailed information about cases, including disease causes, was collected from reporting clinicians using standard questionnaires.

RESULTS. Of 243 children with newly diagnosed congenital or infantile cataract, 160 (66%) had bilateral disease. Isolated cataract was more common in bilateral than unilateral cases (61% versus 47%, P = 0.05) as was cataract associated with a systemic disorder (25% versus 6%, P < 0.001). Conversely, cataract with associated ocular anomalies was more common in unilateral than bilateral cases (47% versus 14%, P < 0.001). No underlying or associated risk factors for cataract could be identified in 92% of unilateral and 38% of bilateral cases, although putative prenatal and perinatal risk factors were reported in a proportion of these idiopathic cases. Hereditary disease was associated with 56% of bilateral but only 6% of unilateral cases. Prenatal infections and other systemic factors were reported in only 6% of bilateral and 2% of unilateral cases.

CONCLUSIONS. Given the high proportion of idiopathic congenital and infantile cataract, the scope for primary prevention in the United Kingdom is currently limited. There is a need for further etiological research, to examine the roles of environmental and genetic risk factors for idiopathic cataract.

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Appendix A References

 
Prevention of visual impairment due to congenital and infantile cataract is an important component of the World Health Organization’s international program for the elimination of avoidable blindness by 2020.¹ Although visual prognosis after treatment of congenital and infantile cataract has improved recently, especially in industrialized countries,² cataract in infancy is still responsible for approximately one tenth of childhood blindness in the world.³ Thus, primary prevention of cataract in infancy is an important goal. However, information about the causes, which is necessary for planning appropriate strategies, is currently unavailable for many regions of the world and where available, has been derived mainly from studies of selected populations,^{2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10} or from routine sources^{11 12} and is often based on small numbers of cases. We report the underlying or associated factors in a nationally representative cohort of children with newly diagnosed congenital or infantile cataract in the United Kingdom, and we discuss the implications of these findings for future etiological research.

	Methods

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Appendix A References

 
All children with congenital or infantile cataract in the United Kingdom, newly diagnosed during the 12-month period from October 1995 to September 1996 inclusive, were identified prospectively through two independent national active surveillance schemes, one comprising consultant ophthalmologists and the other consultant pediatricians. Pediatricians in the United Kingdom are responsible for the routine ocular examinations of all newborn infants (including assessment of the pupillary red reflex with a direct ophthalmoscope) that are undertaken nationally to detect cataract and other serious ocular diseases.¹³ Pediatricians are also responsible for the assessment of children for the presence of associated systemic disorders, as well as for their management. There is universal and cost-free access to both ophthalmic (treatment) and pediatric (screening) services in the United Kingdom through the National Health Service. Thus, newly diagnosed cases were identified simultaneously but independently through both ophthalmologists and pediatricians.

The ophthalmic surveillance scheme was established for this study through the British Congenital Cataract Interest Group and comprised 89% of all ophthalmologists identified through a national survey to be involved in the treatment of infants with cataract. The national scheme previously established by the British Paediatric Surveillance Unit of the Royal College of Pediatrics and Child Health¹⁴ has facilitated the study of a number of uncommon childhood conditions and has a reporting base that is 92% complete.¹⁵ For the duration of the study, reporting cards were sent to pediatricians monthly and ophthalmologists every 2 months with which to report all cases newly diagnosed in the preceding month or 2 months, respectively. Based on capture–recapture analysis, we estimate that 92% of eligible cases were identified through these schemes.¹⁶

Congenital and infantile cataract are categorized separately in standard disease classification systems with further complex subdivisions according to involvement of other organs.¹⁷ However, in clinical practice the terms are often used interchangeably.¹⁸ Thus, a clinical case definition encompassing both was used in this study. All children, aged 15 years or under, with newly diagnosed congenital or infantile cataract were eligible, including those with congenital cataract or cataract present from infancy or diagnosed after infancy but having salient clinical features indicating earlier onset, such as cataract morphology, an associated congenital ocular anomaly, or nystagmus.^{18 19} Children with minor, visually insignificant lens opacities that did not necessitate regular follow-up or further assessment were ineligible, as were those with cataract acquired secondarily during childhood. Only children born within the United Kingdom were eligible.

After reporting a case, clinicians were asked to provide further details using a structured, mailed questionnaire. Specifically, findings of the ophthalmologic examination, other clinical assessments, and all investigations undertaken were sought. Information about cause of cataract was obtained independently from ophthalmologists and pediatricians and used to categorize cases on the basis of the cataractogenic insult(s), and, in addition, according to the presence or absence of specifically associated ocular or systemic disorders. As numerous causative factors or processes, many rare, have been implicated in congenital and infantile cataract in humans,^{2 19} we collated the heterogeneous underlying or associated factors most commonly reported in published clinical studies in the taxonomy shown in Table 1 . Clinicians were asked to indicate all categories of this taxonomy that applied to each child, based on the findings of the clinical assessments and investigations undertaken—for example, examination by clinical geneticists for hereditary disease or serologic investigation for prenatal infection. Thus, for example, cataract associated with ipsilateral microphthalmos and due to autosomal dominant disease was categorized in the associated ocular disease category as well as in the hereditary without systemic disorder category. Children in whom an underlying or associated risk factor for cataract could not be determined were categorized as having idiopathic disease. As appropriate, further information on cause, provided during the continued follow-up of the entire cohort, was used to supplement the initial report data.

The study conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki for research involving human subjects.

	Results

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Appendix A References

 
Two hundred forty-eight children with newly diagnosed congenital or infantile cataract were identified in 1 year in the United Kingdom, during which time there were 734,000 live births and 10.63 million children aged between 1 and 15 years.²¹ Findings are reported in 243 (98%) children for whom complete data regarding underlying or associated factors were available. Of these, 160 (66%) had bilateral cataract, and 127 (52%) were boys. The median age (range) at detection of cataract was 8 weeks (birth to 15 years), with cataract in 168 children detected by the age of 1 year (Fig. 1) .

View larger version (11K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Age at detection of children with congenital and infantile cataract.

Ninety (56%) bilateral cases but only five (6%) unilateral cases were associated with hereditary disease (Table 3) . There were also markedly differing patterns of inheritance according to laterality and the presence of associated disorders, as shown in Table 4 . All hereditary cases of cataract associated with an ocular disorder were bilateral, most commonly by autosomal dominant inheritance. Of 13 children with cataract associated with Down syndrome, 8 had disease diagnosed in the neonatal period. Of 19 children with cataract associated with various rare autosomal recessive systemic disorders, four with bilateral disease died shortly after diagnosis.

	Discussion

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Appendix A References

 
The underlying or associated factors in children with congenital and infantile cataract in the United Kingdom are diverse. Less than 1% of cases (due to prenatal rubella infection) are definitely amenable to existing specific primary preventive strategies. The scope for developing other preventive strategies is limited by a paucity of knowledge of risk factors for idiopathic disease and by limited therapeutic approaches to hereditary cataract.^{22 23} This complex pattern, including the considerable differences between bilateral and unilateral disease, has implications for further etiological research.

Direct comparison with the findings of other studies^{4 5 6 7 8 9 10 24 25} is problematic, given differences in methodology —particularly, differing case definitions and classifications of causes—and in the reporting of aggregated data for unilateral and bilateral disease in many previous studies. Although methodologically different, a meaningful comparison can be made with a recent Spanish study involving specific examination of newborn infants to ascertain congenital anomalies. In that study, 71 children with cataract were identified from more than 1 million births between 1980 and 1995.²⁶ Aggregated data about causes are similar to those in the present study, with idiopathic and hereditary cataract accounting for the majority of cases.²⁶

There is evidence of change over time in the relative importance of different risk factors of congenital and infantile cataract in industrialized countries.^{4 6 7 10 18 19 24} The implementation of specific primary preventive strategies, such as rubella immunization and avoidance of known teratogens, such as drugs or irradiation,²⁷ have reduced the contribution of some causative factors that continue to be important in many developing countries.^{8 9} Although the pattern of underlying or associated factors in many countries currently at an intermediate level of development is similar to that seen previously in industrialized countries, this is likely to change with time, with idiopathic and hereditary disease becoming the most important categories throughout the world.

Although cataract is reported as the ocular anomaly most likely to occur in isolation, its association with microphthalmia²⁶ supports the critical inductive role of the normal lens in development of the globe.²³ In the present study, anomalies of the globe, without associated systemic disorders, were three times more common in unilateral than bilateral cases, and two thirds of unilateral cases had some degree of microphthalmos compared with half the bilateral cases. These findings are consistent with the occurrence of unilateral cataract associated with microphthalmos arising more frequently as a result of a local, rather than a general, insult during embryogenesis. Extending this further, the striking differences in the causes of unilateral and bilateral disease in the present study may reflect differences in pathogenesis with local, or distal, influences predominating in unilateral disease and generalized, or proximal, factors having more impact in bilateral disease. In future etiological studies of congenital and infantile cataract, and possibly other ocular anomalies, consideration should be given to investigating and analyzing bilateral and unilateral cases separately.

Severe specific adverse perinatal events, particularly hypoglycemia, hypoxia, hypothermia, and pre-eclampsia,^{4 6 7 10 24 25 28 29 30 31 32 33} as well as disorders of sugar metabolism in mothers of affected children,²⁵ have been reported to be associated with congenital cataract, but these factors were reported in only a small proportion of cases in the present study. Similarly, although congenital cataract has been reported after ingestion of certain drugs in pregnancy,²⁷ the role of drugs in six idiopathic cases in the present study is unclear. In two cases, the mothers were taking anticonvulsants that have other ocular teratogenic effects²⁷ ; in two others, the mothers were taking thyroxine, notable in the light of animal experiments demonstrating cataract associated with hypothyroidism²⁴ ; and in another, the mother was treated for hypertension that may have relevance, as both systemic hypertension and antihypertensive drugs have been implicated in adult cataract.³⁴ Further experimental work in these areas to provide clearer understanding of the mechanisms of lenticular damage may be warranted.

The overrepresentation in the present study, compared with the total population,²¹ of children with isolated idiopathic cataract who were born preterm or of low birth weight, is notable in the light of population-based studies of low-birth-weight and preterm children in which congenital cataract, unrelated to retinopathy of prematurity, occurs more frequently than expected.³⁵ An association has previously been reported between congenital ocular anomalies and both low birth weight and prematurity, but only in children with other systemic anomalies.^{36 37} The observation in the present study requires confirmation in other epidemiologic studies. It will also be important to elucidate underlying mechanisms, to establish whether the effects of prematurity or low birth weight are directly cataractogenic—for example, reflecting immaturity of antioxidant enzymatic activity—or are simply markers for other events.

Although a high proportion of serious congenital anomalies in humans are of unknown origin³⁸ the percentage of idiopathic cases in the present study is remarkable. There has been limited study of the environmental, socioeconomic, and demographic determinants of congenital ocular anomalies,^{39 40} and risk factors for idiopathic congenital and infantile cataract remain unclear.^{2 4 6 18 36} In one important study in the United Kingdom⁴¹ based on a multiple-source register of congenital anomalies, cataract was found to be associated with proximity to factory chimneys, incinerators, and gas works, suggesting a possible link with toxic combustion products. Cataract was also found to be statistically associated with deprivation, measured using composite indicators based on electoral ward, but not social class when measured using father’s occupation. Given the small number of cases, however, these associations were subject to sampling error. No associations have been found with paternal age,⁴⁰ maternal age, or birth rank.⁴¹ Although other congenital abnormalities have been reported to occur more frequently in twins than singletons,^{38 42} a higher frequency of ocular anomalies has not been reported.^{38 41 42} Thus, it is of interest that the proportion of twins among those with unilateral idiopathic cataract in the present study is higher than the proportion of such births nationally.²¹ Should future studies confirm this observation, then population based studies of higher order births (for example, using established twin registers) may provide important insights in to the relative importance of genetic and environmental influences in pathogenesis of congenital and infantile cataract.

At present, primary prevention of hereditary cataract is restricted to preconceptional genetic counseling of couples already known to be at risk, and there are no specific therapeutic approaches.^{22 23} Current work to identify the genes responsible for hereditary cataract and to elucidate the role of their products^{2 23 43 44} has focused on autosomal dominant cataract which, in industrialized countries, is reported more frequently than either autosomal recessive or X-linked inheritance.^{23 44} However, because autosomal recessive cataract is more commonly reported in some developing countries in populations with large average family size and high rates of consanguinity,⁹ international collaboration may prove informative to primary and secondary preventive strategies against hereditary cataract.

As the clinical description by Gregg in 1941⁴⁵ of congenital cataract after rubella in pregnancy was one of the first clearly demonstrated risk factors for any congenital anomaly in humans, it is notable that an epidemic of rubella in the United Kingdom in 1996⁴⁶ accounted for the two unexpected cases of cataract in the present study. This serves as a reminder of the importance of implementing and maintaining appropriate public health measures against prenatal infections, as well as continuing public health surveillance for these potentially preventable diseases in all countries.⁴⁶ Furthermore, the findings of this study highlight the importance of liaison between pediatricians and ophthalmologists for effective initial assessment and subsequent management of all children with congenital cataract. That more than a third of bilateral cases had isolated hereditary cataract emphasizes the importance of ophthalmic examination of parents and family members of otherwise healthy children with cataract, to ensure hereditary cases are not overlooked so that genetic counseling may be provided.² The multisystem hereditary disorders accounting for almost a fifth of bilateral cases reflect the increasing range of such uncommon diseases and dysmorphic syndromes in which congenital cataract has been reported.^{2 18 19 47} This emphasizes the importance of early evaluation by an ophthalmologist of all children with relevant systemic disorders that place them at higher risk of ocular disease^{13 47} and, conversely, the value of examination of children with bilateral cataract by a dysmorphologist.

Epidemiologic studies to identify or confirm putative risk factors are needed to inform basic scientific research in this area and to develop new primary preventive strategies. One approach would be through case–control studies, to both test and generate hypotheses regarding prenatal and perinatal risk factors. Irrespective of design, given the rarity of congenital and infantile cataract and the likelihood of multiple risk factors, large collaborative studies, possibly on an international scale, are likely to be necessary. Written descriptions of the surgical treatment of cataract, from as early as the third century BC,⁴⁸ attest to the long history of secondary prevention of visual impairment due to this disorder in adults. Attention to cataract in infancy is more recent,² and primary prevention remains an important goal. We suggest that the findings of this study serve to highlight an agenda for multidisciplinary research on the etiology of congenital and infantile cataract to realize this goal.

	Appendix A

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Appendix A References

 
Members of the British Congenital Cataract Interest Group
Mr W. Aclimandos, Ms G. Adams, Mr S. Armstrong, Mr N. Astbury, Mr A. Assaf, Mr D. Banerjee, Miss L. Beck, Mr A. Beckingsale, Mr G. Bedford, Mr L. Benjamin, Miss B. Billington, Miss T. Blamires, Mr P. Bloom, Mr J. Brazier, Mr D. Brosnahan, Prof A. Bron, Mr I. Brown, Mr R. Brown, Mr D. Boase, Mr J. Bolger, Mr R. Bowell, Miss M. Boodhoo, Mr J. Bradbury, Mr J. Bryars, Miss P. Burgess, Mr J. Burke, Ms L. Butler, Mr D. Calver, Mr A. Casswell, Mr A. Chandna, Mr W. Church, Mr J. Clarke, Mr M. Clarke, Mr R. Condon, Mr M. Cole, Mr M. Dang, Mr S. Daya, Mr R. Darvell, Dr P.D. Davies, Mr C. Dodd, Mr R. Doran, Dr J. Dudgeon, Prof G. Dutton, Mr R. Edwards, Mr A. Evans, Mr N. Evans, Mr J. Elston, Mr H. El-Kasaby, Miss B. Enoch, Mr f.f. Fisher, Prof A. Fielder, Mr B. Fleck, Dr A. Gaskell, Miss M. Gibbens, Mr B. Greaves, Mr R. Gregson, Mr P. Gregory, Mr S. Haworth, Mr M.H. Heravi, Mr R. Holden, Mr R. Humphry, Mr C. Hutchinson, Mr J. Innes, Dr E. Johnson, Mr I.K. Jalili, Mrs N. Kayali, Mr N.C. Kaushik, Mr S. Kaye, Mr S. Kotta, Mr T. Lavy, Mr D. Laws, Miss J. Leitch, Mr C. Liu, Mr I.C. Lloyd, Miss C. MacEwen, Mr G. Mackintosh, Mr A. Mandal, Mr R. Markham, Mr G. McGinnity, Mr B. McCleod, Mr J. McConnell, Mr A. Moore, Mr A. Morrell, Mr R. Morris, Dr G. Morrice, Mr B. Moriarty, Mr A. Mushin, Mr C. Munton, Mr M. Neugebauer, Mr J. Nolan, Mr M. O‘Keefe, Mr G. O‘Connor, Miss R. Ohri, Mr C. Peckar, Mr S. Perry, Mr R. Phillips, Mr N. Price, Mr A. Quinn, Mr I. Quershi, Mr A. Rahman, Mr A. Rennie, Mr A. Ridgway, Mr M. Roper-Hall, Mr E. Rosen, Miss I. Russell Eggitt, Mr A. Shun Shin, Dr V. Thaller, Mr R. Taylor, Mr D. Taylor, Mr W. Tormey, Mr J. Twomey, Mr S. Verghese, Miss S. Vickers, Mr A. Vijaykumar, Mr A. Vivian, Mr H. Willshaw, Mr G. Woodruff, Mr G. Wright, Mrs J. Duvall Young, Mr B. Young, Dr J. Young, Mr A. Zaidi

	Acknowledgements

 
The authors are indebted to all clinicians who contributed information to the study, the Executive Committee of the British Pediatric Surveillance Unit for the opportunity to conduct the study, David Taylor and Catherine Peckham for their advice and support and for comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript, and the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.

	Footnotes

 
Supported by the Medical Research Council of the UK, British Council for the Prevention of Blindness, Children Nationwide Medical Research Fund. JR was supported by a Medical Research Council Clinical Training Fellowship.

Submitted for publication October 20, 1999; revised February 4, 2000; accepted February 18, 2000.

Commercial relationships policy: N.

Corresponding author: Jugnoo S. Rahi, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK. j.rahi@ich.ucl.ac.uk

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Appendix A References

 

1. Thylefors, B. (1998) A global initiative for the elimination of avoidable blindness Am J Ophthalmol 125,90-93[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Taylor, D. (1998) Congenital cataract: the history, the nature and the practice. The Doyne Lecture Eye 12,9-36
3. Foster, A, Gilbert, C. (1997) Epidemiology of visual impairment in children Taylor, D eds. Paediatric Ophthalmology 2nd ed. ,3-12 Blackwell Science London.
4. Pike, MG, Jan, JE, Wong, PKH (1989) Neurological and developmental findings in children with cataracts Am J Dis Child 143,706-710[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Phillips, CI, Levy, AM, Newton, M, Stokoe, NL (1987) Blindness in schoolchildren: importance of heredity, congenital cataract, and prematurity Br J Ophthalmol 71,578-584[Free Full Text]
6. Bryars, JH, Archer, DB (1977) Aetiological survey of visually handicapped children in Northern Ireland Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 97,26-29[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Merin, S, Crawford, JS (1971) The etiology of congenital cataracts Can J Ophthalmol 6,178-182[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Angra, SK (1987) Etiology and management of congenital cataract Indian J Pediatr 54,673-677[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Eckstein, M, Vijayalakshmi, P, Killedar, M, Gilbert, C, Foster, A. (1996) Aetiology of childhood cataract in south India Br J Ophthalmol 80,628-632[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Harley, JD, Hertzberg, R. (1965) Aetiology of cataracts in childhood Lancet 1,1084-1086[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Office of Population Censuses and Surveys. Congenital malformations statistics: notifications 1991. Series MB3 No. 7. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office; 1993.
12. Evans J. Causes of blindness and partial sight in England and Wales 1990–91: Studies on Medical and Population Subjects No 57. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office; 1995.
13. Hall, DM (1996) Health for All Children 3rd ed. Oxford University Press Oxford, UK. Report of the Third Joint Working Party on Child Health Surveillance
14. British Paediatric Surveillance Unit. British Paediatric Surveillance Unit 11th Annual Report 1996–1997. London: Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health; 1997.
15. Godward, S, Dezateux, C. (1996) Validation of the reporting bases of the orthopaedic and paediatric surveillance schemes Arch Dis Child 75,232-236[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Rahi, JS, Dezateux, C, . for the British Congenital Cataract Interest Group (1999) Capture–recapture analysis of ascertainment by active surveillance in the British Congenital Cataract Study Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40,236-239[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. . World Health Organisation (WHO) (1992) International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Health Related Problems World Health Organisation Geneva. 10th Revision
18. Lambert, SR, Drack, AV (1996) Infantile cataracts Surv Ophthalmol 40,427-458[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Lloyd, IC, Goss–Sampson, M, Jeffrey, BG, Kriss, A, Russell–Eggitt, I, Taylor, D. (1992) Neonatal cataract: aetiology, pathogenesis and management Eye 6,184-196
20. Kirkwood, BR (1988) Essentials of Medical Statistics 1st ed. Blackwell Scientific Oxford, UK.
21. . Office for National Statistics (1998) Birth Statistics 1996 Her Majesty’s Stationery Office London. Series FM1 No.25
22. Wright, AF (1997) Gene therapy for the eye Br J Ophthalmol 81,620-623[Free Full Text]
23. Francis, PJ, Berry, V, Moore, AT, Bhattacharya, S. (1999) Lens biology: development and human cataractogenesis Trends Genet 15,191-196[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Francois, J. (1963) Congenital Cataracts Royal Van Gorum Assen, The Netherlands.
25. Endres, W, Shin, YS (1990) Cataract and metabolic disease J Inherit Metab Dis 13,509-516[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Bermejo, E, Martinez–Frias, ML (1998) Congenital eye malformations: clinical-epidemiological analysis of 1,124,654 consecutive births in Spain Am J Med Genet 75,497-504[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Stromland, K, Miller, M, Cook, C. (1991) Ocular teratology Surv Ophthalmol 35,429-446[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Brown, CA (1963) Postnatal cataracts in premature infants Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 83,493-503[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Alden, ER, Kalina, RE, Hodson, WA (1973) Transient cataracts in low birthweight infants J Paediatr 82,314-318[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Guy, LP (1954) Postnatal cataracts in premature infants Am J Ophthalmol 38,65-68[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
31. McKinna, AJ (1966) Neonatal hypoglycemia: some ophthalmic observations Can J Ophthalmol 1,59
32. Liebman, SD (1958) Postnatal development of lamellar cataracts in premature infants Arch Ophthalmol 54,257-258
33. Merin, S, Crawford, JS (1971) Hypoglycemia and infantile cataract Arch Ophthalmol 86,495-498[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Livingston, PM, Carson, CA, Taylor, HR (1995) The epidemiology of cataract: a review of the literature Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2,151-164[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Alberman, E, Benson, J, Evans, S. (1982) Visual defects in children of low birthweight Arch Dis Child 57,818-822[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Stoll, C, Alembik, Y, Dott, B, Roth, MP (1992) Epidemiology of congenital eye malformations in 131,760 consecutive births Ophthalmic Paediatr Genet 13,179-186[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
37. McGinnity, FG, Bryars, JH (1992) Controlled study of ocular morbidity in school children born preterm Br J Ophthalmol 76,520-524[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Doyle, PE, Beral, V, Botting, B, Wale, CJ (1990) Congenital malformations in twins in England and Wales J Epidemiol Community Health 45,43-48[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Dolk, H, Busby, A, Armstrong, BG, Wallis, PH (1998) Geographical variation in anophthalmia and microphthalmia in England, 1988–94 BMJ 317,905-910[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. McIntosh, GC, Olsham, AF, Baird, PA (1995) Paternal age and the risk of birth defects in offspring Epidemiology 6,282-288[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Knox, EG, Lancashire, R. (1991) Epidemiology of congenital malformations Her Majesty’s Stationery Office London.
42. Layde, PM, Erickson, D, Falek, A, McCarthy, BJ (1980) Congenital malformation in twins Am J Hum Genet 32,69-78[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Scott, MH, Hejtmancik, JF, Wozencraft, LA, Reuter, LM, Parks, MM, Kaiser–Kupfer, M. (1994) Autosomal dominant congenital cataract Ophthalmology 101,866-871[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Lund, AM, Eiberg, H, Rosenberg, T, Warburg, M. (1992) Autosomal dominant congenital cataract; linkage relations: clinical and genetic heterogeneity Clin Genet 41,65-69[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Gregg, NM (1941) Congenital cataract following German measles in the mother Trans Ophthalmol Soc Aust 3,35-46
46. Tookey, PA, Peckham, CS (1999) Surveillance of congenital rubella in Great Britain, 1971–96 BMJ 318,769-770[Free Full Text]
47. Cassidy, L, Taylor, D. (1999) Congenital cataract and multi-system disorders Eye 13,464-465
48. Sigerist, HE (1961) A History of Medicine Early Greek, Hindu and Persian Medicine Vol. 2 Oxford University Press Oxford UK.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A L Solebo, I Russell-Eggitt, K K Nischal, A T Moore, P Cumberland, J S Rahi, and on behalf of the British Isles Congenital Cataract Cataract surgery and primary intraocular lens implantation in children <=2 years old in the UK and Ireland: finding of national surveys Br J Ophthalmol, November 1, 2009; 93(11): 1495 - 1498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A P C Lupinacci, M L da Silva Jordao, G Massa, C E L Arieta, and V P Costa Central corneal thickness in children with congenital cataract and children with surgical aphakia: a case-control study Br J Ophthalmol, March 1, 2009; 93(3): 337 - 341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C Gardiner, B Lanigan, and M O'Keefe Postcataract surgery outcome in a series of infants and children with Down syndrome Br J Ophthalmol, August 1, 2008; 92(8): 1112 - 1116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Chak, J. S. Rahi, and on behalf of the British Congenital Cataract Inter The health-related quality of life of children with congenital cataract: findings of the British Congenital Cataract Study Br J Ophthalmol, July 1, 2007; 91(7): 922 - 926. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Chak, A. Wade, J. S. Rahi, and on behalf of the British Congenital Cataract Inter Long-term visual acuity and its predictors after surgery for congenital cataract: findings of the british congenital cataract study. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2006; 47(10): 4262 - 4269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. B. Bateman, L. Richter, P. Flodman, D. Burch, S. Brown, P. Penrose, O. Paul, D. D. Geyer, D. G. Brooks, and M. A. Spence A new locus for autosomal dominant cataract on chromosome 19: linkage analyses and screening of candidate genes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2006; 47(8): 3441 - 3449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B Haargaard and H C Fledelius Down's syndrome and early cataract Br J Ophthalmol, August 1, 2006; 90(8): 1024 - 1027. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Haargaard, J. Wohlfahrt, T. Rosenberg, H. C. Fledelius, and M. Melbye Risk Factors for Idiopathic Congenital/Infantile Cataract Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2005; 46(9): 3067 - 3073. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P K F Addison, V Berry, A C W Ionides, P J Francis, S S Bhattacharya, and A T Moore Posterior polar cataract is the predominant consequence of a recurrent mutation in the PITX3 gene Br J Ophthalmol, February 1, 2005; 89(2): 138 - 141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M.A. Reddy, O.A. Bateman, C. Chakarova, J. Ferris, V. Berry, E. Lomas, R. Sarra, M.A. Smith, A.T. Moore, S.S. Bhattacharya, et al. Characterization of the G91del CRYBA1/3-crystallin protein: a cause of human inherited cataract Hum. Mol. Genet., May 1, 2004; 13(9): 945 - 953. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. P. SanGiovanni, E. Y. Chew, G. F. Reed, N. A. Remaley, J. B. Bateman, T. A. Sugimoto, and M. A. Klebanoff Infantile Cataract in the Collaborative Perinatal Project: Prevalence and Risk Factors Arch Ophthalmol, November 1, 2002; 120(11): 1559 - 1565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. S Rahi, B. Botting, and The British Congenital Cataract Interest Group Ascertainment of children with congenital cataract through the National Congenital Anomaly System in England and Wales Br J Ophthalmol, September 1, 2001; 85(9): 1049 - 1051. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Rahi, G. Adams, I. Russell-Eggitt, and P. Tookey Epidemiological surveillance of rubella must continue BMJ, July 14, 2001; 323(7304): 112 - 112. [Full Text]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rahi, J. S. Articles by Dezateux, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rahi, J. S. Articles by Dezateux, C.