IOVS Infection and Immunity
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wada, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Tamai, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wada, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Tamai, M.
(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2001;42:2395-2400.)
© 2001 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.

Mutation of Human Retinal Fascin Gene (FSCN2) Causes Autosomal Dominant Retinitis Pigmentosa

Yuko Wada1, Toshiaki Abe1, Takayuki Takeshita1, Hajime Sato1, Kenji Yanashima2 and Makoto Tamai1

1 From the Department of Ophthalmology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan; and the 2 National Rehabilitation Center For The Disabled, Saitama, Japan.


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
PURPOSE. To characterize the clinical features of 14 Japanese patients with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (ADRP) who were found to have a mutation in the FSCN2 gene.

METHODS. Mutation screening by single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) was performed in 120 unrelated patients with ADRP, 200 unrelated patients with autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa (ARRP), and 100 patients with simplex RP (SRP). The DNA fragment that showed abnormal mobility on SSCP was sequenced. The clinical features of these patients were determined by visual acuity, slit lamp biomicroscopy, electroretinography, fluorescein angiography, and kinetic visual field testing.

RESULTS. A novel 208delG mutation in the FSCN2 gene was identified in 14 patients from four unrelated families with ADRP. The ophthalmic findings were typical of RP.

CONCLUSIONS. The findings show that a 208delG mutation in the FSCN2 gene produces ADRP. This mutation was found in 3.3% of the patients with ADRP in Japan, which suggests that it may be relatively common in Japanese patients with ADRP.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is a retinal disease that can have a dominant, a recessive, or an X-linked inheritance pattern. Genetic analyses of patients with RP have shown that approximately 30% of the patients with autosomal dominant RP (ADRP) have mutations of the rhodopsin gene or mutations in the RP1 gene. Among these mutations, the Pro23His mutation in the rhodopsin gene accounts for 12% of cases of ADRP.1 These percentages were determined in patients in the United States, but in Japan, only five mutations in the rhodopsin gene (Gly106Arg, Asn15Ser, Glu181Lys, Thr17Met, and Pro347Leu) and no RP1 mutations have been reported.2 3 4 5 6 7 Our results from screening of the rhodopsin gene showed that no other mutation of the rhodopsin gene is present in 99% of Japanese patients with ADRP. Although 10 loci for ADRP, 1q, 3q, 6p, 7p, 7q, 8q, 14q, 17p, 17q, and 19q, have been reported, only four genes, the rhodopsin, peripherin/RDS, NRL, and RP1 genes, were identified. These findings strongly suggest that some other photoreceptor-specific gene may be the cause of RP in the Japanese population.

The retinal fascin gene (FSCN2) is a newly identified photoreceptor-specific gene located on chromosome 17q25, which encodes 516 amino acids.8 9 The fascin gene is associated with the assemblage of the actin-based structures of the connecting cilium plasma membrane and plays an important role in photoreceptor disc formation.8 9 10 11 To date, only five polymorphic mutations in the FSCN2 gene have been reported,9 and a disease-causing mutation in the FSCN2 gene has not been published.

We report the presence of a 208delG mutation of the fascin gene in four unrelated Japanese families with ADRP and describe the clinical features of these patients.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Subjects and Mutation Analysis
We screened genomic DNA samples isolated from 120 unrelated patients with ADRP, 200 unrelated patients with autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa (ARRP), and 100 patients with simplex RP (SRP) for mutations of the FSCN2 gene. We further screened 200 control chromosomes for mutations of this gene.

Genomic DNA was isolated from leukocytes prepared from a sample of each patient’s blood (10–15 ml), by using a protocol previously described in detail.2 For the screenings, nine sets of oligonucleotide primer pairs were used from the genomic sequence of FSCN2. The primer sequences are given in Table 1 . PCR was performed in 50 µl of reaction mixture containing 250 ng genomic DNA, 20 µM of each primer, 200 µM of each dNTP, and 1.25 U Taq polymerase. The buffer contained 50 mM KCl, 10 mM TrisCl (pH 8.3), and 1.5 mM MgCl2.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1. FSCN2 Gene Primers Used for Mutation Screening

 
The following steps were used for the PCR: an initial denaturation for 2 minutes at 94°C; 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 minute; annealing at the exon-specific temperature for 1 minute; extension at 72°C for 2 minutes; and a final extension at 72°C for 10 minutes. Products of the PCR were analyzed by nonradioisotopic single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP).

The amplified DNA fragment was then electrophoresed in 8% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel containing 10% glycerol at 20 W for 8 hours at room temperature. After electrophoresis, DNA bands were visualized by silver staining. The mutation or polymorphism was observed by the presence of abnormal bands derived from a mutant allele. The DNA fragment that showed abnormal mobility on SSCP was then directly sequenced to identify the mutation in the FSCN2 gene on a sequencer (model 310; Perkin Elmer-Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The product of the PCR amplification in exons 1d, 2, 3, and 5 were directly sequenced without SSCP. The PCR products were sequenced in the forward and reverse directions.

The tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki were followed, and informed consent was obtained from all subjects who participated in the study.

Clinical Examination
We examined 14 affected patients from four families (Fig. 1) . The ophthalmic examination included best corrected visual acuity, slit lamp biomicroscopy, kinetic visual field examination, fundus examination, fluorescein angiography (FA), and electroretinography (ERG). Ophthalmoscopic findings were recorded by color fundus photography. Kinetic visual field examination was performed on a Goldmann perimeter with V-4-e, I-4-e, I-3-e, and I-2-e isopters. The area of each isopter was expressed in steradians.12



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 1. Pedigrees of four Japanese families with the 208delG mutation. M, 208delG mutation; +, wild-type sequence of the FSCN2 gene.

 
The ERGs were recorded under controlled conditions that conformed to the standards of the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision.13 The ERGs were elicited by a single flash or 30-Hz flickering red light under light-adapted conditions for the cone-isolated responses. Rod-isolated responses were elicited by a dim blue flash under dark-adapted conditions (30 minutes in the dark). A bright white flash (20 J) in the dark-adapted state was used to elicit maximal mixed rod and cone responses.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
DNA Analysis
The analysis of exon 1 of the FSCN2 gene showed abnormal band shifts in 14 patients from four unrelated families with ADRP. The subsequent nucleotide sequencing analysis disclosed an identical deletion of nucleotide G at cDNA position 208 that was designated as 208delG mutation of the FSCN2 gene (Fig. 2) .



View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 2. Sequence analysis of exon 1 in patient II-4 of family 1 showing the heterozygous 208delG mutation (arrow).

 
Fourteen affected members of four families were heterozygous for the 208delG mutation; nonaffected members did not have the mutation (Fig. 1) . The 208delG mutation was not detected in the chromosomes of 200 patients with ARRP, 100 patients with SRP, and 200 control subjects. Thus, the 208delG mutation cosegregated with the phenotype in the four pedigrees of Japanese families with ADRP. We also found two polymorphisms in the FSCN2 gene in two other patients with ADRP: ACG->ACA in codon 193 (Thr193Thr) and CCT->CCC in codon 228 (Pro228Pro), one of which (Pro288Pro) was the same polymorphism previously reported.9

Clinical Characteristics
The clinical characteristics of the 14 patients from four families associated with the 208delG mutation are summarized in Tables 2 and 3 . All the affected patients had had night blindness from childhood. The visual acuity of patients with 208delG mutation ranged from hand motion to 1.0 in all four families. Patients more than 40 years of age showed a marked decrease of the visual fields and visual acuity.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 2. Clinical Characteristics of Patients with the 208delG Mutation in the FSCN2 Gene

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 3. ERG Results

 
In 11 patients, fundus examination disclosed bilateral pigmentary retinal degeneration and severe attenuation of the retinal arteries. Patient II-2 of family 4 showed pigmentary retinal degeneration associated with atrophic macular degeneration, and patient III-1 of the same family showed only attenuation of retinal vessels and a mottled appearance of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). The fundus of two patients (patient III-1 of family 2 and patient IV-1 of family 4), who were 10 and 4 years old, respectively, showed a mottled appearance of the RPE, attenuation of the retinal vessels, and absence of retinal pigmentary changes (Fig. 3) . These findings showed the early stage of retinal degeneration with the 208delG mutation. The natural course of the fundus changes can be estimated by examining the fundus of three members of family 2 whose ages extended over three generations (Fig. 3) .



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 3. Fundus photographs of the affected members of three generations of family 2. Patients I-2 and II-2 showed advanced, severe retinal degeneration, including attenuated retinal vessels, bone spicule deposits, and atrophy of the macula. Patient III-1 showed a mottled appearance of the RPE and attenuation of retinal vessels without retinal pigmentation.

 
In six patients, Goldmann kinetic visual field testing showed severely constricted central visual fields with the V-4-e target, or in other cases, the patients could not even see the V-4-e target. Goldmann kinetic visual field testing of patient III-1 of family 4, whose only retinal abnormality was attenuation of the retinal vessels and mottled appearance of the RPE, demonstrated a constricted visual field for the I-4-e and I-2-e targets. Patient III-1 of family 2 showed constricted visual fields for the I-4-e, I-3-e, and I-2-e targets.

FA disclosed hyperfluorescence from the posterior pole to the peripheral retina that corresponded with the mottled retina, suggesting atrophic changes in the RPE layer. Three patients (patients III-1 and III-3 of family 1 and patient II-2 of family 2) showed a combination of diffuse hyperfluorescence and patchy hypofluorescence. In addition, cystoid macula edema was observed in patient III-2 of family 3, and sharply demarcated macular degeneration was observed in patient II-2 of family 4.

The results of the ERG recordings are presented in Table 3 , and those for the three members of family 2 are shown in Figure 4 . The scotopic, single-flash, standard-flash ERGs and 30-Hz flicker ERG were mildly reduced in patients III-1 of family 2 and III-1 of family 4, and the single-flash a- and b-waves of the ERGs were mildly reduced in patient IV-1 of family 4. The ERGs of the other patients were nonrecordable (Table 3) .



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 4. ERGs of patients I-2 and II-2 of family 2 showing nondetectable rod and cone responses in scotopic, photopic, standard-flash, and 30-Hz flicker ERGs. Patient III-1 of family 2 showed mildly reduced amplitudes in all ERGs.

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
Fascin is a member of the family of actin-binding proteins. Five fascin genes from distant species, (i.e., urchin, Drosophila, Xenopus, mouse, and human) and two retinal fascins (human and bovine) have been identified.8 9 10 14 15 16 17 18 They are highly conserved, actin-binding proteins, which supports the idea that fascin is a very important protein across species. Relevant to our study, the retinal fascin gene (FSCN2) is a newly identified photoreceptor-specific gene that encodes 516 amino acids and is located on chromosome 17q25.9 Biochemical and morphologic studies have shown that retinal fascin also has actin-bundling activity.11 Retinal fascin is associated with the assemblage of the actin-based structures of the connecting cilium plasma membrane, which contains a cluster of F-actin and plays an important role in photoreceptor disc formation.9 10 11 It is thus reasonable that mutations of the FSCN2 gene could alter the actin-binding and actin-bundling activities of the photoreceptor cells and lead to retinal dystrophies.

RP17 is a novel locus for ADRP detected in two South African families.8 19 20 Because the FSCN2 gene is located on 17q25, RP17 was considered to be a candidate gene for RP type 17 (RP17). However, Tubb et al.9 reported that only five polymorphic mutations in the FSCN2 gene were found in two large RP17-carrying families, and no previous report of a disease-causing mutation in the FSCN2 gene had been published.

We evaluated 120 Japanese patients with ADRP, 200 patients with ARRP, and 100 patients with SRP. Of note, molecular genetic analysis disclosed that 14 patients from four unrelated families had an identical 208delG mutation in the FSCN2 gene and that no mutation was detected in the patients with ARRP and SRP.

This mutation resulted in a frame shift and a premature termination at codon 144, 359 bp downstream from the deletion. If translated, the mutated FSCN2 gene would not encode a functional protein.

Fundus examination of three generations of family 2 disclosed the progression of retinal degeneration with increasing age (Fig. 3) . In the early stage, a 10-year-old patient showed a mottled appearance of the RPE and attenuation of the retinal vessels. In all families, affected individuals more than 40 years old showed marked retinal degeneration.

For human fascin, Ser39 is very important in regulating actin binding, and this residue is also conserved in human retinal fascin.11 Thus, Ser39 is thought to play an important role, not only in human fascin but also in human retinal fascin. Because the 208delG mutation causes a frame shift and premature termination, patients with this mutation do not have Ser39 in the FSCN2 gene. Thus, these patients would be expected to lose the activity of actin binding and have a disorder of photoreceptor formation.

We hypothesize that the 208delG mutation in the FSCN2 gene may be relatively common in Japanese patients with ADRP, because we have found this mutation in 3.3% of unrelated patients with ADRP in Japan, and there have been no reports about pathogenic mutations in the FSCN2 gene in RP type 17 of two families in other countries.8 19 20 Additional families with ADRP, ARRP, and other retinal degenerations are being screened for this mutation to ascertain the phenotype–genotype correlation in the FSCN2 gene in the Japanese population.


   Footnotes
 
Supported in part by a grant from the Research Committee on Chorioretinal Degenerations and Optic Atrophy, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of the Japanese Government, Tokyo, Japan (MT); and Grants-in-Aid A-2-10307041 and 12357010 for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of the Japanese Government, Tokyo, Japan (MT).

Submitted for publication October 10, 2000; revised March 13, 2001; accepted April 6, 2001.

Commercial relationships policy: N.

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Corresponding author: Yuko Wada, Department of Ophthalmology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 1-1, Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-77, Japan. yukow{at}oph.med.tohoku.ac.jp


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. van Soest, S, Westerveld, A, de Jong, PT, Bleeker-Wagemakers, EM, Bergen, AA (1999) Retinitis pigmentosa: defined from a molecular point of view Surv Ophthalmol 43,321-334[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Nakazawa, M, Kikawa-Araki, E, Shiono, T, Tamai, M. (1991) Analysis of rhodopsin gene in patients with retinitis pigmentosa using allele-specific polymerase chain reaction Jpn J Ophthalmol 35,386-393[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Budu, Matsumoto M, Hayasaka, S, Yamada, T, Hayasaka, Y (2000) Rhodopsin gene codon 106 mutation (Gly-to-Arg) in a Japanese family with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa Jpn J Ophthalmol 44,610-614[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Yoshii, M, Murakami, A, Akeo, K, et al (1998) Visual function in retinitis pigmentosa related to a codon 15 rhodopsin gene mutation Ophthalmic Res 30,1-10[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Fujiki, K, Hotta, Y, Murakami, A, et al (1995) Missense mutation of rhodopsin gene codon 15 found in Japanese autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa Jpn J Hum Genet 40,271-277[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Saga, M, Mashima, Y, Akeo, K, Oguchi, Y, Kudoh, J, Shimizu, N. (1994) Autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa: a mutation in codon 181 (Glu->Lys) of the rhodopsin gene in a Japanese family Ophthalmic Genet 15,61-67[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Hayakawa, M, Hotta, Y, Imai, Y, et al (1993) Clinical features of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa with rhodopsin gene codon 17 mutation and retinal neovascularization in a Japanese patient Am J Ophthalmol 115,168-173[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Bardien-Kruger, S, Greenberg, J, Tubb, B, et al (1999) Refinement of the RP17 locus for autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa, construction of a YAC contig and investigation of the candidate gene retinal fascin Eur J Hum Genet 7,332-338[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Tubb, BE, Bardien-Kruger, S, Kashork, CD, et al (2000) Characterization of human retinal fascin gene (FSCN2) at 17q25: close physical linkage of fascin and cytoplasmic actin genes Genomics 65,146-156[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Saishin, Y, Shimada, S, Morimura, H, et al (1997) Isolation of a cDNA encoding a photoreceptor cell-specific actin-bundling protein: retinal fascin FEBS Lett 414,381-386[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Saishin, Y, Ishikawa, R, Ugawa, S, et al (2000) Retinal fascin: functional nature, subcellular distribution, and chromosomal localization Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41,2087-2095[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Welber, RG, Tobler, WR (1986) Computerized quantitative analysis of kinetic visual field Am J Ophthalmol 101,461-468[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Marmor, MF, Arden, GB, Nilson, SEG, Zrenner, E. (1989) Standard for clinical electroretinography Arch Ophthalmol 107,816-819[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Bryan, J, Edwards, R, Matsudaira, P, Otto, J, Wulfkuhle, J. (1993) Fascin, an echinoid actin-bundling protein, is a homolog of the Drosophila singed gene product Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90,9115-9119[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Paterson, J, O’Hare, K. (1991) Structure and transcription of the singed locus of Drosophila melanogaster Genetics 129,1073-1084[Abstract]
  16. Duh, FM, Latif, F, Weng, Y, et al (1994) cDNA cloning and expression of the human homolog of the sea urchin fascin and Drosophila singed genes which encodes an actin-bundling protein DNA Cell Biol 13,821-827[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Edwards, RA, Bryan, J. (1995) Fascins, a family of actin bundling proteins Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 32,1-9[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Edwards, RA, Herrera-Sosa, H, Otto, J, Bryan, J. (1995) Cloning and expression of a murine fascin homolog from mouse brain J Biol Chem 270,10764-10770[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Bardien, S, Ramesar, R, Bhattacharya, S, Greenberg, J. (1997) Retinitis pigmentosa locus on 17q (RP17): fine localization to 17q22 and exclusion of the PDEG and TIMP2 genes Hum Genet 101,13-17[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Bardien, S, Ebenezer, N, Greenberg, J, et al (1995) An eighth locus for autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa is linked to chromosome 17q Hum Mol Genet 4,1459-1462[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 DevelopmentHome page
J. Zanet, B. Stramer, T. Millard, P. Martin, F. Payre, and S. Plaza
Fascin is required for blood cell migration during Drosophila embryogenesis
Development, August 1, 2009; 136(15): 2557 - 2565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 IOVSHome page
Z.-B. Jin, M. Mandai, K. Homma, C. Ishigami, Y. Hirami, N. Nao-i, and M. Takahashi
Allelic Copy Number Variation in FSCN2 Detected Using Allele-Specific Genotyping and Multiplex Real-Time PCRs
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2008; 49(9): 3799 - 3805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch OphthalmolHome page
J. H. Fingert, K. Oh, M. Chung, T. E. Scheetz, J. L. Andorf, R. M. Johnson, V. C. Sheffield, and E. M. Stone
Association of a Novel Mutation in the Retinol Dehydrogenase 12 (RDH12) Gene With Autosomal Dominant Retinitis Pigmentosa
Arch Ophthalmol, September 1, 2008; 126(9): 1301 - 1307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Med. Genet.Home page
Z-B Jin, M Mandai, T Yokota, K Higuchi, K Ohmori, F Ohtsuki, S Takakura, T Itabashi, Y Wada, M Akimoto, et al.
Identifying pathogenic genetic background of simplex or multiplex retinitis pigmentosa patients: a large scale mutation screening study
J. Med. Genet., July 1, 2008; 45(7): 465 - 472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 IOVSHome page
J. Lin-Jones and B. Burnside
Retina-Specific Protein Fascin 2 Is an Actin Cross-linker Associated with Actin Bundles in Photoreceptor Inner Segments and Calycal Processes
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2007; 48(3): 1380 - 1388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 IOVSHome page
Q. Zhang, S. Li, X. Xiao, X. Jia, and X. Guo
The 208delG Mutation in FSCN2 Does Not Associate with Retinal Degeneration in Chinese Individuals
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., February 1, 2007; 48(2): 530 - 533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
R. Kraft, M. M. Escobar, M. L. Narro, J. L. Kurtis, A. Efrat, K. Barnard, and L. L. Restifo
Phenotypes of Drosophila Brain Neurons in Primary Culture Reveal a Role for Fascin in Neurite Shape and Trajectory.
J. Neurosci., August 23, 2006; 26(34): 8734 - 8747.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 IOVSHome page
L. S. Sullivan, S. J. Bowne, D. G. Birch, D. Hughbanks-Wheaton, J. R. Heckenlively, R. A. Lewis, C. A. Garcia, R. S. Ruiz, S. H. Blanton, H. Northrup, et al.
Prevalence of disease-causing mutations in families with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa: a screen of known genes in 200 families.
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2006; 47(7): 3052 - 3064.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
A Schuster, N Weisschuh, H Jagle, D Besch, A R Janecke, H Zierler, S Tippmann, E Zrenner, and B Wissinger
Novel rhodopsin mutations and genotype-phenotype correlation in patients with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa
Br. J. Ophthalmol., October 1, 2005; 89(10): 1258 - 1264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 IOVSHome page
S. Yokokura, Y. Wada, S. Nakai, H. Sato, R. Yao, H. Yamanaka, S. Ito, Y. Sagara, M. Takahashi, Y. Nakamura, et al.
Targeted Disruption of FSCN2 Gene Induces Retinopathy in Mice
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2005; 46(8): 2905 - 2915.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Med. Genet.Home page
C Ziviello, F Simonelli, F Testa, M Anastasi, S B Marzoli, B Falsini, D Ghiglione, C Macaluso, M P Manitto, C Garre, et al.
Molecular genetics of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (ADRP): a comprehensive study of 43 Italian families
J. Med. Genet., July 1, 2005; 42(7): e47 - e47.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch OphthalmolHome page
Y. Wada, T. Abe, T. Itabashi, H. Sato, M. Kawamura, and M. Tamai
Autosomal Dominant Macular Degeneration Associated With 208delG Mutation in the FSCN2 Gene
Arch Ophthalmol, November 1, 2003; 121(11): 1613 - 1620.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 IOVSHome page
M. Martinez-Gimeno, M. J. Gamundi, I. Hernan, M. Maseras, E. Milla, C. Ayuso, B. Garcia-Sandoval, M. Beneyto, C. Vilela, M. Baiget, et al.
Mutations in the Pre-mRNA Splicing-Factor Genes PRPF3, PRPF8, and PRPF31 in Spanish Families with Autosomal Dominant Retinitis Pigmentosa
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., May 1, 2003; 44(5): 2171 - 2177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 IOVSHome page
H. Kondo, T. Tahira, A. Mizota, E. Adachi-Usami, K. Oshima, and K. Hayashi
Diagnosis of Autosomal Dominant Retinitis Pigmentosa by Linkage-Based Exclusion Screening with Multiple Locus-Specific Microsatellite Markers
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2003; 44(3): 1275 - 1281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum Mol GenetHome page
A. Kennan, A. Aherne, A. Palfi, M. Humphries, A. McKee, A. Stitt, D. A. C. Simpson, K. Demtroder, T. Orntoft, C. Ayuso, et al.
Identification of an IMPDH1 mutation in autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (RP10) revealed following comparative microarray analysis of transcripts derived from retinas of wild-type and Rho-/- mice
Hum. Mol. Genet., March 1, 2002; 11(5): 547 - 558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wada, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Tamai, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wada, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Tamai, M.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS