IOVS Brain
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Danciger, M.
Right arrow Articles by Farber, D. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Danciger, M.
Right arrow Articles by Farber, D. B.
(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2001;42:2458-2465.)
© 2001 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.

CORD9 a New Locus for arCRD: Mapping to 8p11, Estimation of Frequency, Evaluation of a Candidate Gene

Michael Danciger1,2, Jaimie Hendrickson1, Jessica Lyon1, Carmel Toomes3, John C. McHale3, Gerald A. Fishman4, Chris F. Inglehearn3, Samuel G. Jacobson5 and Debora B. Farber1,6

1 From the Jules Stein Eye Institute and the 6 Molecular Biology Institute, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine; the 2 Biology Department, Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, California; the 3 Molecular Medicine Unit, University of Leeds, United Kingdom; 4 Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago; and the 5 Scheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
PURPOSE. To determine the locus of the mutant gene causing autosomal recessive cone–rod dystrophy (arCRD) in a consanguineous pedigree, to evaluate a candidate gene expressed in retina that maps to this locus, and to estimate the percentage of arCRD cases caused by mutations in this gene.

METHODS. DNAs from family members were genotyped for markers covering the entire genome at an average spacing of approximately 9 centimorgans (cM). The data were input into a pedigree computer program to produce output files used to calculate lod scores. Significant linkage was revealed at 8cen, prompting the genotyping of a number of additional markers. Exons of a candidate gene were sequenced directly by standard fluorescent dideoxy methods. Haplotype analysis was performed with markers in this locus in 13 multiplex and 2 simplex CRD families in which neither parent had disease.

RESULTS. Four-point linkage analysis gave a maximum lod score of approximately 7.6 at both D8S1769 and GATA101H09 in the large consanguineous family. Recombination events defined an interval of 8.7 cM between D8S1820 and D8S532 within which the gene must lie. This 8p11 locus (CORD9) is immediately distal to but distinct from the RP1 autosomal dominant RP (adRP) locus. Two islands of homozygosity were found in this locus: The alleles of 6 of 10 markers in one of the islands and 2 of 4 in the other were homozygous. The UniGene cluster Hs.8719 (UniGene System, provided by the National Center for Biotechnology Information and available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/UniGene), which tags a gene with significant homology to Dual Specificity Phosphatase 3, maps within the CORD9 interval and is highly expressed in the retina. To evaluate this gene as a potential disease candidate, intron–exon structure was determined, and exons were screened in the consanguineous family. No variants were found that could be related to disease. Haplotype analysis of 15 other families with CRD, using markers at CORD9, excluded this locus in 9 of 15.

CONCLUSIONS. A new arCRD locus (CORD9) has been identified corresponding to a yet unidentified gene in the 8.7-cM interval D8S1820-D8S532. No mutations were found in one candidate gene in affected members of the primary study family. Haplotype analysis of a cohort of 13 multiplex and 2 simplex families with CRD ruled out the CORD9 gene in 9 of 15 of the families. To date, a total of 126 loci carrying gene mutations causing various forms of retinal degeneration have been mapped, and the mutant gene has been identified in 64 of them. However, only 2 loci for arCRD have been documented. This is the report of a third.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cone–rod dystrophy (CRD) is the diagnosis encompassing a group of retinal degenerative diseases that most often initially manifest clinically as maculopathy but also show diffuse photoreceptor impairment on electrophysiological testing. There can be greater cone than rod photoreceptor dysfunction or a relatively equal loss of both cone and rod photoreceptor function.1 2 3 4 5 CRD represents just one of many different clinical presentations of inherited degenerations of the retina, the largest category being retinitis pigmentosa (RP). All of these diseases are progressive, often lead to legal blindness, and can be inherited in an autosomal recessive, autosomal dominant, or X-linked manner. Many are now known to be caused by specific gene defects.6

To date, RP has been associated with mutations in 24 different genes and 16 chromosomal loci for which the defective gene has not yet been found.6 The causes of CRD appear to be less numerous, but still quite diverse: four genes and six loci.6 Two of these are of autosomal recessive inheritance: CORD8 on chromosome 1q12-q247 and the locus corresponding to the ABCA4 gene on chromosome 1p.8 Therefore, when we found an informative, consanguineous family with an autosomal recessive cone–rod dystrophy phenotype, we first demonstrated that the disease was not linked to either of the known recessive CRD loci. We then performed a whole genome linkage search, leading to the identification of a new locus, CORD9, on chromosome 8p11.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Primary Family
We studied a consanguineous family from Brazil that included nine affected members inheriting autosomal recessive CRD (arCRD; Fig. 1 ). Two of the affected individuals in the fifth decade of life were evaluated clinically and with visual function tests, including electroretinograms (ERGs), kinetic visual fields, and static threshold perimetry.3 9 Medical records and historical data were obtained for the other seven affected members. This process was facilitated by a medically qualified unaffected member of the family.



View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 1. Pedigree of the Brazilian family segregating severe arCRD. Circles: females; squares: males; filled symbols: affected members; open symbols: unaffected members. Symbols with a multiplier shown below in the sixth generation represent multiple individuals with identical genotype and phenotype. Squares or circles: sibling groups of the same sex; diamonds: multiple individuals of both sexes. Haplotypes are shown for 14 markers spread across a 12.5-cM region spanning the CORD9 locus on chromosome 8p11. Black bar: the affected haplotype in the left arm of the pedigree. Regions of nonconcordance between the affected haplotypes on the left and right sides are shaded, whereas normal haplotypes are white. Marker D8S1820, at 56.04 cM from the 8p telomere on the Marshfield Genetic map, reveals a crossover between the mother of the sibship on the right and her two cousins, which places the locus proximal to (below, on the figure) this marker. D8S532, at 64.75 cM, detects a crossover in the first unaffected sibling of the sibship on the right, who has inherited both affected alleles at and proximal to this marker, placing CORD9 distal to it (above). Within the 8.71 cM between D8S1820 and D8S532, there are two islands of homozygosity that potentially further refine the locus.

 
Additional CRD-Affected Families
Fifteen other CRD-affected families, each with a small number of affected members were ascertained from two clinical centers specializing in the study of retinal degenerations (University of Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary, Chicago, IL; Scheie Eye Institute, Philadelphia, PA). Diagnoses were based on published clinical and ERG criteria.3 5 In all families, parents did not report or manifest disease. In 13 of the families, there were two or more affected siblings (multiplex), which suggests autosomal recessive inheritance. In the remaining two simplex families, there were three and four unaffected siblings, respectively.

The study protocol adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki for all individuals. Informed consent for all procedures was obtained from all subjects after the nature of the studies had been fully explained.

Genotyping
DNAs were extracted from blood leukocytes by standard methods. The DNAs of the primary family were analyzed for the alleles of 400 polymorphic, high-quality, short tandem repeat markers spanning the genome, with an average spacing of approximately 9 centimorgans (cM) by the Marshfield Mammalian Genotyping Service (provided in the public domain by Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI, and available at http://www.marshfieldclinic.org/research/genetics/genotyping_service/mgsver2.htm). The data were input directly to the Cyrillic pedigree information package (Exeter Software; Setauket, NY) to produce output files for the Linkage program suite (provided by the Human Genome Mapping Project Resources Center, Cambridge, UK and available at http://www.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk/genomeweb/linkage.html). PCR primers for additional markers tested in the 8p12-q12 locus (determined as the critical interval by analysis of the Marshfield data) and selected from the Marshfield genetic map of chromosome 8 (provided in the public domain by Marshfield Clinic, and available at http://www.marshfieldclinic.org/research/genetics/map_markers/maps/indexmapframes.html) were purchased from Research Genetics (Huntsville, AL). The markers were amplified by PCR from genomic DNAs in the presence of [{alpha}-32P]dCTP, electrophoresed in 7% acrylamide denaturing gels, and exposed to x-ray film, as described previously.10 For each marker, all members of the family were run side by side in the same gel.

Haplotype analysis was performed on the 15 other CRD-affected families using the markers D8S499, D8S2319, and D8S1125. Genomic DNAs were extracted, amplified with the appropriate markers and electrophoresed as described for the markers of the primary family. All members of these families were also run side by side in the same gel.

RT-PCR Analysis
Total RNA was extracted from retinal tissue using extraction reagent (TRIzol; Gibco BRL, Grand Island, NY), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The tissue had been dissected from human eyes and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen. One microgram of this RNA was incubated with 100 ng of random primer at 70°C for 10 minutes. The samples were placed on ice and Moloney murine leukemia virus (MMLV) reverse transcriptase buffer, 10 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 1 mM each of the dNTPs (all from Gibco BRL), and 0.5 U RNAsin (Promega, Madison, WI) were added. After equilibration at 37°C for 2 minutes, 200 U MMLV reverse transcriptase was added, and the reactions were incubated at 37°C for 1 hour. The samples were heated to 95°C and 2 µl of the cDNA was used in PCR reactions.

Mutation Screening
The coding exons of DUS3-like and the flanking splice junctions were screened for mutations by direct sequencing. The following primers were used: exon 1, 5'-CGCTTTGTAATTGGTGCAGCTC-3' and 5'-CCAGCGTGGAGAGCC-AGCTG-3' (PCR product, 416 bp); exon 2, 5'- GCTGCTCTGGACTCACTCAAG-3' and 5'-CCTGTCTGCCACCCTTCT-CC-3' (PCR product, 425 bp); exon 3, 5'-GTCTTCCCCAACAACCTGGC-3' and 5'-CAAATTCCAGGCACCCTGTTC-3' (PCR product, 319 bp); and exon 4, 5'-GCCCCATGTCACCCTTTCCC-3' and 5'-CCT-ATCTCCAGCTGGGAGCC-3' (PCR product, 343 bp). Reactions were performed in a 50-µl volume with 50 ng of genomic DNA; 20 pmol of each primer; 200 µM each dATP, dCTP, dGTP, dTTP; 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3); 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.01% gelatin and 1 U Taq DNA polymerase (Gibco BRL). After the initial denaturation step at 96°C for 3 minutes, the samples were processed through 35 cycles of 92°C for 30 seconds, 55°C for 30 seconds, and 72°C for 30 seconds. A final extension step was performed at 72°C for 10 minutes. After amplification, PCR products were processed using a PCR purification kit (Qiaquick; Qiagen, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The PCR product was eluted into 30 µl of 10 mM Tris (pH 8.5), and 5 µl of this purified product was used in a sequencing reaction. Both the forward and reverse strands of the PCR products were directly sequenced (ABI 377 sequencer, using the ABI Prism BigDye Terminator cycle sequencing ready-reaction kit; PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Sequencing reactions were set up according to the manufacturer’s instructions, using either the forward or reverse primers detailed earlier.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Disease Expression of the Primary CRD-Affected Family
Affected members of this family had childhood-onset visual acuity impairment. The disease progressed over decades to major loss of central and then peripheral visual function. At late stages of disease, patients retained only islands of vision in the midperiphery. Funduscopic appearance (Fig. 2) and visual function test results (Fig. 3) in two affected family members in the fifth decade of life are shown. Visual acuities in both patients were 20/200 or worse, and the refractive error was modest myopia with astigmatism. There were small posterior subcapsular cataracts.



View larger version (144K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 2. Fundus photographs of the central (A, B) and temporal retina (C, D) of two affected members of the primary family segregating arCRD. Photographs are of patient A’s right eye (A, C) at age 48 years and patient B’s left eye (B, D) at age 43 years.

 


View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 3. Visual function test results in two affected members of the primary family segregating arCRD. (A) Rod, mixed cone–rod, and cone ERGs from a representative normal subject (left panels) are compared with those from patients A (age 41) and B (age 43). ERGs are from the right eye of the patients. Calibrations are below and to the right of the responses. (B) Kinetic visual fields using V-4e and I-4e test targets (top panels) and gray-scale maps of sensitivity loss from rod (middle panels) and L/M-wavelength cone (bottom panels) static threshold perimetry in the same two patients. Perimetric results in patient A are from the right eye; results in patient B are from the left eye, but are displayed as right eye data for ready comparison. Scales have 16 levels of gray, representing 0 (white) to 3 (black) log units. N, nasal; T, temporal; S, superior; I, inferior fields.

 
In the central retina of the right eye of patient A (Fig. 2A) , there was a large area of discoloration, suggesting retinal pigmented epithelial disturbances. Patient B showed a macular coloboma-like lesion with a central atrophic scar surrounded by a ring of pigmentary change (Fig. 2B) . The central retinal area was discolored as in patient A; there were, in addition, small, discrete, white-yellow patches. In both patients, the fundus temporal to the macula was less pathologic appearing (Figs. 2C 2D) . Both patients had attenuated retinal vessels. Patient B showed temporal pallor of the optic nerve head, whereas this was not as evident in patient A.

Visual function test results are shown in Figure 3 . Compared with ERGs of a representative normal subject, all waveforms of the two patients were severely abnormal (Fig. 3A) . Patient A showed reduced amplitudes but normal timing of both rod and cone ERGs. Patient B had greater reductions in amplitude. Figure 3B shows kinetic perimetry (top panels) and static threshold perimetry in the dark-adapted (middle panels) and light-adapted (bottom panels) states. Sensitivity losses for rods (500-nm stimulus, dark-adapted) and long- (L) and middle (M)-wavelength cones (600-nm stimulus, light-adapted) were calculated from locus-specific normal values and are shown as gray-scale maps (0–3 log units). The psychophysical tests were conducted to position the anatomic fovea at the central fixation target (central scotoma thus truly "central"). Patients otherwise used eccentric fixation loci of approximately 20° from the fovea. By kinetic perimetry, both patients retained midperipheral islands of vision and could see both a large bright target (V-4e) and a smaller bright target (I-4e). Static perimetry also indicated detectable rod and cone sensitivity mainly in the nasal midperiphery. Some loci had no loss of rod or cone sensitivity, whereas other loci showed losses of 1 to 3 log units.

Additional CRD-Affected Families
All 15 probands reported symptoms of decreasing central vision. In addition to reduced visual acuity, these individuals and their affected family members showed color vision disturbances, relative or absolute central scotomas with minimal-to-moderate peripheral field restriction by kinetic perimetry, and ERG abnormalities. ERG b-wave results in patients with detectable signals conformed to the two patterns we have described in CRD3 5 : cone responses substantially worse than those of rods or cone and rod responses equally reduced. A spectrum of macular changes were observed that varied from a blunted foveal reflex or nonspecific mottling of the foveal retinal pigment epithelium, to bull’s eye–appearing macular lesions, to geographic atrophy. Most but not all patients had peripheral retinopathy, which ranged from regions of hypopigmentation to pigment clumping (anterior to the vascular arcades) to large patches of atrophy. Despite a spectrum of visual function and clinical findings in the different families, there was intrafamilial consistency of phenotype with those members at advanced stages showing a more severe version of the disease pattern found in their younger less-affected relatives.

Genotyping of the Primary Family
Analysis of the initial genome-wide scan suggested a locus in a large region around the centromere of chromosome 8 from 8p12 to 8q12. This locus has been named CORD9 (Hugo Gene Nomenclature Committee, http://www.gene.ucl.ac.uk/nomenclature/). Two-point lod scores were calculated for markers in this region from the original genotyping and from additional markers tested by us. There were two peaks: one at D8S1769 (60.3 cM from the p telomere in the Marshfield genetic map) and the other at GATA101H09 (64.6 cM). Multipoint analysis showed a flat approximately 4-cM peak from D8S1769 to GATA101H09 with a lod score of approximately 7.6 for both markers (Fig. 4) . The pedigree (Fig. 1) reveals a consanguineous family with three informative sibships. The three fathers of the sibships are brothers, whereas two of the mothers are sisters and the third is their first cousin. Each of the fathers is third cousin to each of the mothers. Crossovers at D8S1820 and D8S532 place the mutant gene proximal to (below) the former and distal to (above) the latter (legend to Fig. 1 ). According to the Marshfield genetic map, the distance between D8S1820 and D8S532 is 8.7 cM (Fig. 5) .



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 4. Four-point linkage analysis of chromosome 8p11-q11markers D8S1048, D8S1769, and GATA101H09 against cone-rod dystrophy in the consanguineous Brazilian pedigree. Genetic distances are taken from the Marshfield genetic map, measured from the 8p telomere. Lod scores were calculated using the program Linkmap from the Fastlink version of the Linkage package available through the Human Genome Mapping Project Resources Center (Cambridge, UK). Allele frequencies were estimated from alleles sampled within the family, as for the two-point analysis. The maximum lod score, both at D8S1769 and GATA101H09, was 7.6.

 


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 5. Chromosome 8 locus of CORD9. Markers and genetic distances were taken from the Marshfield Genetic map. Ten markers are listed at 60.3 cM in the Marshfield map. The nine affected individuals inherited the same homozygous alleles for six of these markers, and the same heterozygous alleles for the other four. At 64.6 cM there are four markers listed in the map. The nine affected individuals inherited the same homozygous allele for two of the markers and the same heterozygous alleles for two of the markers. A fifth marker was uninformative and a sixth segregated proximal to D8S532. The same heterozygous alleles were inherited for D8S505, D8S283, and D8S513 (at 60.9 cM) which lie between these two possible regions of homozygosity (hatched areas).

 
Because this is a consanguineous family, we searched for a region of homozygosity within the 8.7-cM locus. Figures 1 and 5 show two possible homozygous regions within the locus separated by a region of heterozygosity. Figure 5 also shows that D8S532 (cM 64.8), at the proximal flank of CORD9, is clearly distal to the distal flank of the ORP1 gene, D8S601 at cM 67.2.11 12 ORP1 is the site of mutations responsible for one of the genetic forms of adRP known as RP1.13 14 15 .

Gene Candidate
At the time the CORD9 locus was first discovered, examination of Genemap 99 (provided by NCBI and available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genemap/) identified the expressed sequence tag (EST) stSG4713 within the candidate region. This EST was part of the UniGene cluster Hs.8719 (ESTs, weakly similar to dual-specificity protein phosphatase 3; UniGene System provided by NCBI at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/UniGene). Of the ESTs within this cluster, 48% (43/89) originated from eye or brain cDNA, making this EST, hereafter referred to as dual-specificity protein phosphatase 3-like (DUS3-like), a good candidate for the CORD9 gene. The complete coding sequence of DUS3-like was obtained on the basis of overlapping EST sequences available within GenBank (provided by NCBI and available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/GenBank) and RT-PCR analysis. The mRNA obtained was 1689 bp, contained an open reading frame (ORF) between nucleotide 135 and nucleotide 1008, and encoded a predicted protein of 211 amino acids. The genomic organization of DUS3-like was determined by comparing the sequence of the cDNA with the genomic sequence of clone RP11-2I13 available in GenBank (accession number AC015779). DUS3-like contains four exons and spans 7.5 kb. RT-PCR analysis confirmed a high level of expression of this gene in retina and brain but also showed it was widely expressed in many other tissues (Fig. 6) . Therefore, because the complete genome structure for this relatively short retinally expressed gene was available, we directly sequenced it in family members, but no DNA changes were observed.



View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 6. RT-PCR analysis of DUS3-like. (A) Intra-exonic primers from DUS3-like (5'-CATGGCTAACAACCGCCGGG-3' and 5'-CCTCCACGAGGGTAAGGTGG-3') were used to amplify cDNA generated from retina and a number of other tissues that were available commercially (Clontech). Lane 1, retina; lane 2, brain; lane 3, fetal brain; lane 4, cerebellum; lane 5, spinal cord; lane 6, kidney; lane 7, liver; lane 8, fetal liver; lane 9, trachea; lane 10, lung. (B) GAPDH control.

 
More recently, it has become possible to produce a comprehensive list of known and predicted genes in the CORD9 region using the Genome Web Browser (provided by the University of California Santa Cruz and available at http://genome.ucsc.edu/index.html). A recent version of this revealed 28 known genes and a slightly larger number of predicted genes in the approximately 11-mb centromeric interval between markers D8S1820 and D8S532. It may therefore require further genetic studies to make identification of the gene involved a more feasible undertaking.

Genotyping of the 15 Additional CRD-Affected Families
To estimate the frequency of the CORD9 mutation in arCRD, we performed genotype analysis on 13 multiplex and 2 simplex families in which neither parent had disease, using markers from the locus. We first tested D8S499 because it is a tetranucleotide repeat and was among the markers in the region of homozygosity at 60.3 cM (Fig. 5) . If D8S499 was uninformative, we also tested D8S2319 and D8S1125, tetranucleotide and trinucleotide repeats, respectively, in the same region of homozygosity. In eight of the families, D8S499 did not segregate with disease and in one additional family that was uninformative for D8S499 and D8S2319, D8S1125 did not segregate with disease. This locus could not be ruled out from segregating with disease in the other six families. We use the phrase "could not be ruled out from segregating with disease" because even though the affected individuals in these six families inherited the same unique pair of alleles for the markers tested, the probability of this occurring by chance is high. For example, in a sibship of one unaffected and two affected siblings, the chance that the two affected siblings will uniquely inherit the same pair of alleles of a marker is almost 5 in 100. Therefore, based on our very small sample of 15 families, the frequency of CORD9 mutations can be no more than 6 (40%) of 15 and is almost certainly much lower.


   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
We have performed an entire genome linkage search in a large consanguineous pedigree of Brazilian origin, segregating a severe form of recessive CRD, and have found a new locus CORD9 at 8p11. We identified the candidate gene DUS3-like by uncovering a UniGene cluster of ESTs that maps to the CORD9 locus and has a high frequency of expression in the retina. After determining the mRNA sequence from overlapping EST sequences and RT-PCR analysis, the genomic organization of DUS3-like was determined from a genomic clone available in GenBank. The four exons of the gene were directly sequenced in members of the Brazilian family, but no DNA changes were observed.

Haplotype analysis of 13 multiplex and 2 simplex North American CRD-affected families using markers from the CORD9 locus, ruled out 9 of them, leaving a maximum of 6 (40%) that could have disease-causing mutations in the gene at this locus. It is likely that the actual percentage of mutations is substantially lower. In studies of the PDE6B gene in 30 families with autosomal recessive retinal degeneration, the gene could be ruled out from segregating with disease in 21 families. Exon screening by single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) of the probands from the nine remaining families revealed a homozygous mutation in one and no mutations in either allele of the other eight probands.16

There are at least 40 genes that can cause nonsyndromic RP when mutated (24 genes and 16 additional loci for which the mutant gene has not yet been discovered). Of the 17 arRP genes that have been identified, not one has been shown to have mutations causing more than a small percentage of all arRP.17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 There are four genes and six additional loci for nonsyndromic CRD.6 Only one gene and one locus (with the gene not yet identified) have been associated with arCRD. Mutations in this one gene (ABCA4) have been estimated to account for as much as 70% of cases of arCRD in one study25 but a lesser percentage in another.26 Further molecular studies of patients diagnosed with CRD using published classification schemes3 5 should clarify the frequency of the different genotypes and their relation to phenotype.

In summary, we have identified a new locus for arCRD (CORD9) at 8p11. We have shown that disease can be caused by mutations in the gene at this locus in no more than 6 (40%) of a cohort of 13 multiplex and 2 simplex CRD-affected families, and suggest that this maximum frequency will turn out to be considerably lower for the gene. We have also identified the DUS3-like candidate gene in the CORD9 locus, determined its exon–intron structure, screened it, and found no mutations associated with disease in the primary arCRD family. Although CRD is relatively rare, the pathogenesis of this disease resembles many aspects of the more common age-related macular degeneration. Identification of the gene mutated in CORD9 will, therefore, highlight a new candidate for possible involvement in susceptibility to this increasingly significant disease of older adults.


   Acknowledgements
 
The authors thank David Hanna, Leigh Gardner, Elaine deCastro and Jessica Emmons for clinical coordination; Jiancheng Huang and Daniel Marks for technical assistance; and Thomas Aleman and Arthur Cideciyan for critical advice.


   Footnotes
 
Supported by grants from the Foundation Fighting Blindness, the George Gund Foundation, the NIH (EY08285, EY00331 and EY05627), the Wellcome Trust (#035,535), the British Retinitis Pigmentosa Society, Grant Health Care Foundation, Macular Disease Foundation, Macula Vision Research Foundation and a Research to Prevent Blindness Unrestricted Grant. DBF and SGJ are recipients of Research to Prevent Blindness Senior Scientific Investigators Awards.

Submitted for publication April 13, 2001; revised June 22, 2001; accepted July 6, 2001.

Commercial relationships policy: N.

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Corresponding author: Michael Danciger, Department of Biology, Loyola Marymount University, 7900 Loyola Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90045-8220. mdancige{at}lmu.edu


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Fishman, GA (1976) Progressive human cone-rod dysfunction (dystrophy) Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 81,716-724
  2. Heckenlively, JR, Martin, DA, Rosales, TO (1981) Telangiectasia and optic atrophy in cone-rod degenerations Arch Ophthalmol 99,1983-1991[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Yagasaki, K, Jacobson, SG (1989) Cone-rod dystrophy. Phenotypic diversity by retinal function testing Arch Ophthalmol 107,701-708[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Birch, DG, Anderson, JL (1990) Rod visual fields in cone-rod degeneration: comparisons to retinitis pigmentosa Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 31,2288-2299[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Szlyk, JP, Fishman, GA, Alexander, KR, Peachey, NS, Derlacki, DJ (1993) Clinical subtypes of cone-rod dystrophy Arch Ophthalmol 111,781-788[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Daiger SP, Sullivan LS, Rossiter BJF. RetNet, Retinal Information Network, Diseases Section. http://www.sph.uth.tmc.edu/retnet/.
  7. Khaliq, S, Hameed, A, Ismail, M, et al (2000) Novel locus for autosomal recessive cone-rod dystrophy CORD8 mapping to chromosome 1q12–q24 Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41,3709-3712[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Cremers, FPM, van de Pol, DJR, van Driel, M, et al (1998) Autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa and cone-rod dystrophy caused by splice site mutations in the Stargardt’s disease gene ABCR Hum Mol Genet 7,355-362[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Jacobson, SG, Cideciyan, AV, Huang, Y, et al (1998) Retinal degenerations with truncation mutations in the cone–rod homeobox (CRX) gene Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39,2417-2426[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Danciger, M, Blaney, J, Gao, Y-Q, et al (1995) Mutations in the PDE6B gene in autosomal recessive RP Genomics 30,1-7[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Xu, SY, Denton, M, Sullivan, L, Daiger, SP, Gal, A. (1996) Genetic mapping of RP1 on 8q11–q21 in an Australian family with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa reduces the critical region to 4 cM between D8S601 and D8S285 Hum Genet 98,741-743[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Inglehearn, CF, McHale, JC, Keen, TJ, Skirton, H, Lunt, PW (1999) A new family linked to the RP1 dominant retinitis pigmentosa locus on chromosome 8q J Med Genet 36,646-648[Free Full Text]
  13. Sullivan, LS, Heckenlively, JR, Bowne, SJ, et al (1999) Mutations in a novel retina-specific gene cause autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa Nat Genet 22,255-259[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Pierce, EA, Quinn, T, Meehan, T, McGee, TL, Berson, EL, Dryja, TP (1999) Mutations in a gene encoding a new oxygen-regulated photoreceptor protein cause dominant retinitis pigmentosa Nat Genet 22,248-254[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Guillonneau, X, Piriev, NI, Danciger, M, et al (1999) A nonsense mutation in a novel gene is associated with retinitis pigmentosa in a family linked to the RP1 locus Hum Mol Genet 8,1541-1546[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Danciger, M, Heilbron, V, Gao, Y-Q, Zhao, D-Y, Jacobson, SG, Farber, DB (1996) A homozygous PDE6B mutation in a family with autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa Mol Vis 2,10available at http://www.emory.edu/molvis/v2/danciger[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Morimura, H, Fishman, GA, Grover, SA, Fulton, AB, Berson, EL, Dryja, TP (1998) Mutations in the RPE65 gene in patients with autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa or leber congenital amaurosis Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95,3088-3093[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Gal, A, Li, Y, Thompson, DA, et al (2000) Mutations in MERTK, the human orthologue of the RCS rat retinal dystrophy gene, cause retinitis pigmentosa Nat Genet 26,270-271[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Nakazawa, M, Wada, Y, Tamai, M. (1998) Arrestin gene mutations in autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa Arch Ophthalmol 116,498-501[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Rosenfeld, PJ, Cowley, GS, McGee, TL, Sandberg, MA, Berson, EL, Dryja, TP (1992) A null mutation in the rhodopsin gene causes rod photoreceptor dysfunction and autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa Nat Genet 1,209-213[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. McLaughlin, ME, Ehrhart, TL, Berson, EL, Dryja, TP (1995) Mutation spectrum of the gene encoding the beta subunit of rod phosphodiesterase among patients with autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92,3249-3253[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Dryja, TP, Finn, JT, Peng, YW, McGee, TL, Berson, EL, Yau, KW (1995) Mutations in the gene encoding the alpha subunit of the rod cGMP-gated channel in autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92,10177-10181[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Dryja, TP, Rucinski, DE, Chen, SH, Berson, EL (1999) Frequency of mutations in the gene encoding the alpha subunit of rod cGMP-phosphodiesterase in autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40,1859-1865[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Hagstrom, SA, North, MA, Nishina, PL, Berson, EL, Dryja, TP (1998) Recessive mutations in the gene encoding the tubby-like protein TULP1 in patients with retinitis pigmentosa Nat Genet 18,174-176[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Maugeri, A, Klevering, BJ, Rohrschneider, K, et al (2000) Mutations in the ABCA4 (ABCR) gene are the major cause of autosomal recessive cone-rod dystrophy Am J Hum Genet 67,960-966[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Papaioannou, M, Ocaka, L, Bessant, D, et al (2000) An analysis of ABCR mutations in British patients with recessive retinal dystrophies Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41,16-19[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Genome ResHome page
A. C. Wiik, C. Wade, T. Biagi, E.-O. Ropstad, E. Bjerkas, K. Lindblad-Toh, and F. Lingaas
A deletion in nephronophthisis 4 (NPHP4) is associated with recessive cone-rod dystrophy in standard wire-haired dachshund
Genome Res., September 1, 2008; 18(9): 1415 - 1421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
M Michaelides, G E Holder, D M Hunt, F W Fitzke, A C Bird, and A T Moore
A detailed study of the phenotype of an autosomal dominant cone-rod dystrophy (CORD7) associated with mutation in the gene for RIM1
Br. J. Ophthalmol., February 1, 2005; 89(2): 198 - 206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Med. Genet.Home page
A Hameed, A Abid, A Aziz, M Ismail, S Q Mehdi, and S Khaliq
Evidence of RPGRIP1 gene mutations associated with recessive cone-rod dystrophy
J. Med. Genet., August 1, 2003; 40(8): 616 - 619.
[Full Text]

Home page
 Arch OphthalmolHome page
G. A. Fishman, E. M. Stone, D. A. Eliason, C. M. Taylor, M. Lindeman, and D. J. Derlacki
ABCA4 Gene Sequence Variations in Patients With Autosomal Recessive Cone-Rod Dystrophy
Arch Ophthalmol, June 1, 2003; 121(6): 851 - 855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 IOVSHome page
B. J. Klevering, A. Blankenagel, A. Maugeri, F. P. M. Cremers, C. B. Hoyng, and K. Rohrschneider
Phenotypic Spectrum of Autosomal Recessive Cone-Rod Dystrophies Caused by Mutations in the ABCA4 (ABCR) Gene
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2002; 43(6): 1980 - 1985.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Danciger, M.
Right arrow Articles by Farber, D. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Danciger, M.
Right arrow Articles by Farber, D. B.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS