HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ladas, J. G. Articles by Holland, G. N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ladas, J. G. Articles by Holland, G. N.

Relationship between Aqueous Humor Protein Level and Outflow Facility in Patients with Uveitis

¹ From the Ocular Inflammatory Disease Center, Jules Stein Eye Institute, and ² Department of Ophthalmology, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine; and the ³ Bascom Palmer Eye Institute and the ⁴ Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami, Florida.

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
PURPOSE. To determine whether there is a relationship between the aqueous humor protein level and outflow facility in patients with uveitis.

METHODS. Aqueous humor protein levels were determined by laser flare photometry, and outflow facility was determined by Schiotz tonography.

RESULTS. Thirty patients with uveitis and 10 control subjects were studied. Outflow facility was lower in patients with uveitis (0.21 ± 0.12 µl/min · mm Hg) than in control subjects (0.33 ± 0.05 µl/min · mm Hg, P < 0.001). Patients with uveitis and laser flare photometry results (flare) more than 20 photon units/msec (n = 21) had a lower outflow facility (0.17 ± 0.07 µl/min · mm Hg) than patients with uveitis and flare less than 20 photon units/msec (n = 9, 0.32 ± 0.14 µl/min · mm Hg, P = 0.004). Furthermore, no difference was identified between outflow facility in patients with active uveitis (those who had anterior chamber cells) and flare less than 20 photon units/msec and outflow in control subjects. In patients with uveitis, there was a linear correlation between flare and outflow facility (r = -0.50, P = 0.005). There was no relationship between flare measurements and either intraocular pressure or aqueous humor cell levels when scored with a clinical, semiquantitative system.

CONCLUSIONS. Outflow facility is significantly reduced in patients with uveitis who have high aqueous humor protein levels. Outflow facility appears to be normal in patients with active uveitis whose flare levels are low, and therefore the association between flare and outflow facility does not appear to be an indirect reflection of elevated anterior chamber cells. It is possible that elevated aqueous humor protein levels contribute to the development of uveitic glaucoma in some individuals by decreasing aqueous humor outflow facility, although a causal relationship cannot be established on the basis of this study.

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Secondary glaucoma occurs in up to 20% of patients with uveitis.^{1 2} Elevated intraocular pressure can result from direct obstruction of the anterior chamber angle by pupillary block by iris bombe, peripheral anterior synechiae, or forward rotation of the ciliary body,³ but it can also occur with an open anterior chamber angle. A variety of hypotheses regarding the pathogenesis of open-angle glaucoma in patients with uveitis have been proposed. They include blockage of the trabecular meshwork by cells, trabeculitis, and alteration of aqueous humor flow because of elevated protein levels.^{3 4} There is laboratory evidence to support a role for increased aqueous humor protein in the development of uveitic glaucoma. Using a perfusion apparatus on cadaveric eyes, Epstein et al.⁴ demonstrated decreased outflow facility with various dilutions of serum, when compared with saline. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether there is an in vivo relationship between aqueous humor protein levels and outflow facility in patients with uveitis.

	Materials and Methods

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Study subjects were volunteers recruited from practices at two referral centers (Jules Stein Eye Institute, University of California Los Angeles, and Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Florida). Patients were eligible for the study if they had clinical signs of anterior segment inflammation (cells in the anterior chamber). Patients were excluded from the study if they had factors that might affect outflow facility or tonography measurements, including extensive peripheral anterior synechiae, extensive posterior synechiae resulting in iris bombe, a history of glaucoma surgery, high myopia (>3.0 diopters [D]), corneal diseases or a history of corneal surgery, a history of corticosteroid-induced elevation of intraocular pressure, or use of miotic or mydriatic drugs. No specific diseases were excluded. The control group consisted of volunteers without a history of ophthalmic disease who responded to a flier placed in the enrolling medical centers. The study was approved by institutional review boards at the University of California Los Angeles and the University of Miami and adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki for research involving human subjects.

Only one eye per subject was studied. In subjects with bilateral uveitis with no exclusion criteria in either eye, the right eye was chosen. The following factors were recorded on a standardized data sheet: age, gender, race, duration of uveitis (<3 months; >3 months), anatomic classification of uveitis (as defined by the International Uveitis Study Group),⁵ history of previous surgery, medication history, and presence or absence of posterior synechiae. Cells and flare were scored clinically by the method of Hogan et al.⁶ Intraocular pressure was determined by Goldmann tonometry or TonoPen (Xomed Solan MedTronic, Jacksonville, FL) before laser flare photometry or Schiotz tonography measurements.

Laser flare photometry (FM-500; Kowa Company, Ltd. Electronics and Optics Division, Tokyo, Japan) was performed by a technician according to the recommendations of the Kowa Laser Cell-Flare Photometry Advisory Committee (unpublished). Briefly, measurements were repeated until seven acceptable readings (difference between two background measurements, <15%) were obtained in the study eye. The lowest and highest readings were deleted, and the machine then calculated the mean photometry value and SD of the remaining five measurements. The mean reading for each patient was used for comparisons. Photometry readings are expressed as photon units per millisecond. Readings cannot be translated directly into aqueous humor protein concentration without knowledge of the protein concentration.⁷

Schiotz tonography was performed with the patient supine, according to previously described methods,⁸ without the investigator’s having knowledge of the flare measurements. The initial Schiotz scale reading and final scale reading were recorded. Measures of outflow facility were then obtained from previously published tables.⁸

Statistical Analysis
Comparisons between groups were made with Wilcoxon rank-sum test and the Fisher exact ² test. A linear regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between outflow facility and laser flare photometry readings (flare). P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

	Results

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
There were 30 patients with uveitis and 10 control subjects enrolled in the study. All patients had evidence of active anterior segment inflammation, as evidenced by the presence of cells in the anterior chamber on slit lamp biomicroscopic examination (range, occasional to 3+). The anatomic categories of uveitis were as follows: anterior, 16 patients; intermediate, 2; anterior and intermediate, 1; panuveitis, 10; and posterior uveitis with an anterior chamber "spillover" reaction, 1. International Uveitis Study Group categories refer to the site of primary inflammation and, for the posterior and intermediate categories, do not preclude the additional presence of anterior segment inflammation.

Table 1 lists the demographic and medical characteristics of subjects. There were no significant differences in age or intraocular pressure between groups. There was a weak relationship between groups and gender, with a higher proportion of women in the group of patients with uveitis (P = 0.066). Although groups were not well matched for gender, we found no evidence in subgroup analyses that gender influenced levels of intraocular pressure, aqueous humor outflow facility, or flare in either the uveitis group (all P > 0.11) or the control group (all P > 0.44).

Outflow facility was significantly lower in patients with uveitis (0.21 ± 0.12 µl/min · mm Hg) than in control subjects (0.33 ± 0.05 µl/min · mm Hg, P < 0.001). The mean outflow facility observed in our control group was similar to that reported in previous studies for individuals without ocular disease.^{9 10} There was a wide range of laser flare photometry readings in the patients with uveitis (range, 4.6–193 photon units/msec). All control patients had mean laser flare photometry results of less than 10 photon units/msec.

In the patients with uveitis, there was a statistically significant inverse relationship between outflow facility and laser flare photometry readings (r = -0.50, P = 0.005). The linear progression model shows that outflow facility = -0.0009 x flare + 0.2814 (R² = 0.2489; Fig. 1 ). No relationship was identified between the semiquantitative score for anterior chamber cells and outflow facility.

View larger version (15K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Aqueous humor outflow facility versus laser flare photometry results in patients with uveitis showed a linear correlation (r = -0.50, P = 0.005).

Topical corticosteroid medications were being used to treat 27 of 30 patients with uveitis at the time of the measurements. There was no linear correlation between the daily frequency of topical corticosteroid instillation and outflow facility (R = -0.13, P = 0.481). Of the three patients who were not treated with corticosteroids, two had laser flare photometry measurements less than 20 photon units/msec. There was a positive linear correlation between the daily frequency of topical corticosteroid instillation and flare (R = 0.39, P = 0.035), attributable to the fact that treatment is based, in part, on the severity of inflammatory signs. Nevertheless, when the daily frequency of topical corticosteroid instillation was adjusted in the linear regression model, the effect of flare was almost the same as seen in the unadjusted model (slope = -0.00096, P = 0.007), whereas no effect of daily frequency of topical corticosteroid instillation was seen (slope = 0.001, P = 0.701, R² = 0.2530). Thus, daily topical corticosteroid instillation did not change the relationship between laser flare photometry results and outflow facility.

As noted in Figure 1 , patients tended to cluster at the ends of the range of laser flare photometry readings, with a substantial number of patients having results of less than 20 photon units/msec. It has been our clinical experience that readings below this level are usually not associated with appreciable clinical flare on slit lamp biomicroscopy and that patients with low readings have low rates of other uveitis-associated complications.¹³ We therefore compared aqueous humor outflow facility between patients with uveitis and low laser flare photometry readings (<20 photon units/msec, n = 9) and those with high readings (>20 photon units/msec, n = 21). Patients with low readings had significantly higher outflow facility (Table 2) .

All control subjects had laser flare photometry readings less than 10 photon units/msec. It is unusual for flare to be below this level in patients with active uveitis.¹³ Only three patients with uveitis were identified in this study who had readings of approximately 10 photon units/msec or lower. Two of the three patients were being treated with topical corticosteroids, and each of the three had outflow facility above the mean for the normal control subjects.

	Discussion

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
It is assumed that alterations in aqueous humor outflow account for increased intraocular pressure in the majority of patients with uveitis in whom secondary glaucoma develops. Intraocular pressure can be defined by the equation IOP = F/C + P_v, where F is aqueous production, C is outflow facility, and P_v is episcleral venous pressure. Although aqueous hypersecretion would result in elevated intraocular pressure if outflow facility were to remain unchanged, inflammation of the ciliary body typically results in decreased aqueous production,¹⁴ a fact that has been demonstrated in experimental models of uveitis.^{15 16} When aqueous hypersecretion is observed in forms of experimental uveitis, it is a transient phenomenon that gives way to hyposecretion.¹⁶ Also, the existence of aqueous hypersecretion as a mechanism for secondary glaucoma in clinical situations has been questioned.³

There are a variety of potential mechanisms by which outflow facility might be reduced in patients with uveitis. Mechanical obstruction of the anterior chamber angle can result from pupillary block with iris bombe, peripheral anterior synechiae, or forward rotation of the ciliary body.³ Other proposed mechanisms include blockage of or damage to the trabecular meshwork by cells or protein.^{3 4} Whereas pupillary block and peripheral anterior synechiae can be excluded by careful examination, obstruction of the trabecular meshwork by cells and small molecules would be difficult to identify clinically.

Evidence from animal studies has demonstrated that polymorphonuclear leukocytes can infiltrate the trabecular meshwork and possibly lead to obstruction.¹⁷ The average pore size of the trabecular meshwork is 2 µm¹⁸ and a leukocyte is approximately 7 to 9 µm.¹⁹ Thus, although leukocytes can become deformed, an obstructive phenomenon may occur with a cellular reaction in the anterior chamber. We found no relationship, however, between outflow facility and cells, when graded with a semiquantitative system. We cannot rule out the possibility that a relationship between cells and outflow facility could be identified with more precise measurements, but a practical technique for such precise measurements is not available. Laser photometry cell counts are associated with wide SDs when specific cells are counted⁷ and are not considered to be reliable for these types of precise comparisons. Nevertheless, our study suggests that the role of cells in changing outflow facility may be small or nonexistent, because patients with uveitis and low flare had normal outflow facility, despite the presence of cells on clinical examination. It is possible, however, that cells play a role only if they adhere to and disrupt the trabecular meshwork. Case reports have described patients with evidence of cellular precipitates on the trabecular meshwork with elevated intraocular pressure, despite minimal anterior chamber cellular reaction.²⁰ Thus, the amount suspended within the aqueous humor may not be relevant. The precipitates disappeared and the pressure decreased after treatment with topical corticosteroids. The effect on outflow facility was not investigated in these studies, however.

It has also been proposed that trabeculitis, or inflammation of the tissues that form the trabecular meshwork, can lead to trabecular dysfunction and obstruction to aqueous humor outflow in some patients with uveitis. Hogan et al.²¹ described an enucleated eye from one patient with herpetic uveitis and glaucoma in which there were thick edematous bands of tissue and inflammatory cells within the trabecular meshwork. Animal studies of herpetic uveitis have demonstrated inflammatory cells in the trabecular meshwork.²²

We chose to study elevated aqueous humor protein as an alternative explanation for reduced aqueous humor outflow. Laser flare photometry is a noninvasive technique that can be used to quantify the amount of protein within the aqueous humor.⁷ Multiple studies have demonstrated that protein concentration is linear in relation to laser flare photometry readings, both in vitro and in vivo.^{12 23} Thus, this technique allowed us to make precise comparisons of aqueous humor protein levels with measurements of outflow facility in patients with uveitis. Patients enrolled in this study demonstrated a wide range of laser flare photometry readings, consistent with ranges reported for other heterogeneous groups of patients with uveitis.^{13 24} Our results demonstrate that there is a relationship between aqueous humor protein concentration and outflow facility in patients with uveitis. Furthermore, laser flare photometry readings do not seem to be simply indirect markers of alterations in aqueous humor outflow by other factors related to uveitis, because outflow facility in patients with active uveitis and low laser flare photometry readings was similar to that of control subjects, even though these patients had as many as 2+ cells detected in clinical examination. This observation adds strength to the hypothesis that an increased protein level may play a causal role in lower outflow facility.

Although we had insufficient statistical power to identify whether there were small differences in outflow between normal control subjects and patients with uveitis and low flare, we had sufficient statistical power to state that outflow facility was not reduced by more than 24% of normal levels. In previous studies of outflow facility in patients with open-angle glaucoma, these levels were approximately 40% lower than in age-matched control subjects.¹⁰

Epstein et al.⁴ support the hypothesis that elevated aqueous humor protein may lead to changes in outflow facility. They perfused enucleated eyes with various dilutions of serum and found decreases in outflow facility. Serum diluted to 1.3 g protein/100 ml resulted in a 36% decrease in aqueous outflow facility. This protein concentration is within the range observed in patients with uveitis.^{25 26} They also noted that the obstruction of flow could not be altered by a saline washout and was not proportional to the viscosity of the perfusate, which led them to believe that the protein was either deposited on or adsorbed into the trabecular meshwork. It has been suggested that the scavenging ability of the endothelial cells may become overwhelmed by various materials, which leads to disorganization of the trabecular meshwork and obstruction of outflow.²⁷ Support for this hypothesis comes from histologic samples from patients with pigmentary glaucoma, in which pigment-laden endothelial cells did not maintain normal trabecular architecture.²⁸ Perhaps high levels of protein result in similar changes.

Laser flare photometry does not identify the nature of the protein changes in aqueous humor. It is believed that an increasing proportion of higher molecular weight proteins increases flare.⁷ Thus, the higher flare readings may indicate the presence of larger molecular weight proteins that may have a greater effect on outflow. The relationship between outflow facility and protein may be more complex than a simple bulk protein effect, however. McEwen²⁹ has argued that the presence of proteins in aqueous humor has no effect on its viscosity as it passes through the trabecular meshwork. As an alternative mechanism, increased protein levels may include an outpouring of regulatory proteins that have an effect on the cytoskeletal regulations of aqueous humor outflow through the trabecular meshwork.³⁰

Fautsch et al.³¹ have shown that the product of the gene MYOC, which can be found in the aqueous humor, increases outflow resistance when infused into anterior segments, using a perfusion organ-culture technique in human eyes. Other proteins, such as recombinant ß-galactosidase, bovine serum albumin, and fetal calf serum did not increase outflow resistance in the same system. Also, heat-denatured MYOC protein did not increase outflow resistance, suggesting that outflow resistance is related to an active property of the protein. It is likely that these proteins are not of sufficient amount in clinical disease to alter photometry measurements themselves, however. With regard to the MYOC protein, we found no references on a computerized literature search (Medline, provided in the public domain by the National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, MD, and available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PubMed/) for its concentration in aqueous humor of patients with uveitis. Various regulatory cytokines, however, are found in concentrations ranging from 5 to 500 x 10^-4 µg/100 ml within the aqueous humor of patients with uveitis.^{32 33} In contrast, the total aqueous humor protein concentration in normal eyes ranges from 10 to 20 mg/100 ml,²⁵ and in patients with uveitis, it can increase to levels as high as 2300 mg/100 ml.³⁴ In one study, mean total aqueous humor protein in a group of patients with chronic uveitis ranged from 62 to 388 mg/100 ml (mean, >166.8 ± 132.8 mg/100 ml). Albumin and immunoglobulins accounted for more than 90% of the proteins present.²³ We also found, by regression analysis, no evidence that topical corticosteroids had a direct effect on outflow facility.

The spread of measurement values around the regression line in Figure 1 may simply reflect the imprecision of photometry or Schiotz tonography measurements or both. Alternatively, it may be that change in outflow is a dynamic process occurring over time, as might be seen with protein regulation of trabecular function. Thus, outflow facility may not always reflect the aqueous humor protein levels at the same time point. In support of this concept, we observed one of our patients with HLA-B27–associated anterior uveitis serially and noted that improvement in outflow facility lagged behind the declining aqueous humor protein levels over several visits. We did not, however, routinely measure changes in laser flare photometry results over time in patients with active disease, and thus we do not know precisely the temporal relationship between changes in aqueous humor protein levels and decreased outflow facility or the duration of outflow changes. Nevertheless, a relationship between laser flare photometry results and outflow appears to be present both in patients with recent onset of uveitis and in those with chronic disease.

Our groups were not matched for gender, but we found no evidence that gender affected outflow facility. Previous studies have shown no effect of gender on laser flare photometry results.²⁴

There was no correlation between outflow facility and intraocular pressure, which may be explained by use of glaucoma medications, or, in the absence of such drugs, by alterations in aqueous humor production or other compensatory mechanisms, such as increased uveoscleral outflow, that may occur in patients with uveitis. None of the patients in this study had elevated intraocular pressure or glaucoma, although six patients were being treated with aqueous humor suppressants.

Whether changes in aqueous humor outflow facility of the magnitude seen in this study play a role in the pathogenesis of uveitic glaucoma remains unknown. The regulation of intraocular pressure is multifactorial, and the interaction of factors in patients with uveitic glaucoma is undoubtedly complex, but this study suggests that increased aqueous humor protein levels may play a role in some cases through its effect on outflow facility. Aqueous humor protein should be included among the factors investigated in future studies of uveitis and glaucoma.

	Acknowledgements

 
The authors thank Kowa Company, Ltd. Electronics and Optics Division, Tokyo, Japan, for providing the Kowa FM-500 for use at the Jules Stein Eye Institute during this study.

	Footnotes

 
Presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, May 2000.

Supported in part by the Richard B. Shapiro Uveitis and Glaucoma Fund, Jules Stein Eye Institute (FY, ALC, GNH); Research to Prevent Blindness (GNH); the Skirball Foundation, Los Angeles, California (GNH); the David May II Endowed Professorship (GNH); and the Jules Stein Eye Institute Clinical Research Center. GNH is a recipient of a Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc. Lew R. Wasserman Merit Award.

Submitted for publication February 26, 2001; revised May 10, 2001; accepted May 31, 2001.

Commercial relationships policy: F.

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Corresponding author: Gary N. Holland, Jules Stein Eye Institute, 100 Stein Plaza, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095-7003. uveitis{at}jsei.ucla.edu

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 

1. Panek, WC, Holland, GN, Lee, DA, Christensen, RE (1990) Glaucoma in patients with uveitis Br J Ophthalmol 74,223-227[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Cantor, LB, Schlaegel, TF, Abrams, JH, Weber, JC (1992) Intraocular pressure in anterior uveitis Glaucoma 14,155-158
3. Moorthy, RS, Mermoud, A, Baerveldt, G, et al (1997) Glaucoma associated with uveitis Surv Ophthalmol 41,361-394[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Epstein, DL, Hashimoto, JM, Grant, WM (1978) Serum obstruction of aqueous outflow in enucleated eyes Am J Ophthalmol 86,101-105[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Bloch-Michel, E, Nussenblatt, RB (1987) International Uveitis Study Group recommendations for the evaluation of intraocular inflammatory disease Am J Ophthalmol 103,234-235[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Hogan, MJ, Kimura, SJ (1959) Signs and symptoms of uveitis. I: anterior uveitis Am J Ophthalmol 47,155-170[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Sawa, M, Tsurimaki, Y, Tsuru, T, Shimizu, H. (1988) New quantitative method to determine protein concentration and cell number in aqueous in vivo Jpn J Ophthalmol 32,132-142[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Becker, B, Shaffer, RN, Kolker, AE, Hetherington, J. (1983) Becker-Shaffer’s Diagnosis and Therapy of the Glaucomas 5th ed. Mosby St. Louis.
9. Croft, MA, Oyen, MJ, Gange, SJ, et al (1996) Aging effects on accommodation and outflow facility responses to pilocarpine in humans Arch Ophthalmol 114,586-592[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Larsson, LI, Rettig, ES, Brubaker, RF (1995) Aqueous flow in open-angle glaucoma Arch Ophthalmol 113,283-286[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Mori, M, Araie, M. (1991) A simple method of determining the time course of timolol’s effects on aqueous flow in humans Arch Ophthalmol 109,1099-1103[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Sawa, M. (1990) Clinical application of laser flare-cell meter Jpn J Ophthalmol 34,346-363[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Gonzales CA, Ladas JG, Davis JL, et al. Relationship between laser flare photometry values and complications of uveitis. Arch Ophthalmol. In press.
14. Shields, MB (1997) Glaucoma associated with ocular inflammation Textbook of Glaucoma 4th ed. ,308-322 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Baltimore.
15. Toris, CB, Pederson, JE (1987) Aqueous humor dynamics in experimental iridocyclitis Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 28,477-481[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Mermoud, A, Baerveldt, G, Mickler, DS, et al (1994) Animal model for uveitic glaucoma Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 232,553-560[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Rao, NA, Wacker, WB, Marak, GJ (1979) Experimental allergic uveitis: clinicopathologic features associated with varying doses of S antigen Arch Ophthalmol 97,1954-1958[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Lerman, S. (1966) Basic Ophthalmology ,103-194 McGraw-Hill New York.
19. Fawcett, DW (1986) A Textbook of Histology WB Saunders Philadelphia, PA.
20. Roth, M, Simmons, RJ (1979) Glaucoma associated with precipitates on the trabecular meshwork Ophthalmology 86,1613-1619[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Hogan, MJ, Kimura, SJ, Thygeson, P. (1964) Pathology of herpes simplex kerato-iritis Am J Ophthalmol 57,551-564[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Townsend, WM, Kaufman, HE (1971) Pathogenesis of glaucoma and endothelial changes in herpetic kerato-uveitis in rabbits Am J Ophthalmol 71,904-910[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Shah, SM, Spalton, DJ, Taylor, JC (1992) Correlations between laser flare measurements and anterior chamber protein concentrations Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 33,2878-2884[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Guex-Crosier, Y, Pittet, N, Herbort, CP (1994) Evaluation of laser flare-cell photometry in the appraisal and management of intraocular inflammation in uveitis Ophthalmology 101,728-735[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Zirm, M. (1980) Proteins in aqueous humor Adv Ophthalmol 40,100-172[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Peretz, WL, Tomas, TB (1961) Aqueous humor protein in uveitis: immunoelectrophoretic and gel diffusion studies on normal and pathological aqueous humor Arch Ophthalmol 65,20-23
27. Campbell, DG, Schertzer, RM (1996) Pigmentary glaucoma Ritch, R Shields, MB Krupin, T eds. The Glaucomas 2nd ed. ,975-991 Mosby-Year Book St. Louis, MO.
28. Richardson, TM, Hutchinson, BT, Grant, WM (1977) The outflow tract in pigmentary glaucoma: a light and electron microscopic study Arch Ophthalmol 95,1015-1025[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. McEwen, WK (1958) Application of Poiseuille’s Law to aqueous outflow Arch Ophthalmol 60,290-294
30. Tian, B, Geiger, B, Epstein, DL, Kaufman, PL (2000) Cytoskeletal involvement in the regulation of aqueous humor outflow Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41,619-623[Free Full Text]
31. Fautsch, MP, Bahler, CK, Jewison, DJ, Johnson, DH (2000) Recombinant TIGR/MYOC increases outflow resistance in the human anterior segment Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41,4163-4168[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Calder, VL, Shaer, B, Muhaya, M, et al (1999) Increased CD4⁺ expression and decreased IL-10 in the anterior chamber in idiopathic uveitis Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40,2019-2024[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Lacomba, MS, Martin, CM, Chamond, RR, et al (2000) Aqueous and serum interferon gamma, interleukin (IL) 2, IL-4, and IL-10 in patients with uveitis Arch Ophthalmol 118,768-772[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Oshika, T, Nishi, M, Mochizuki, M, et al (1989) Quantitative assessment of aqueous flare and cells in uveitis Jpn J Ophthalmol 33,279-287[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ladas, J. G. Articles by Holland, G. N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ladas, J. G. Articles by Holland, G. N.