|
|
||||||||
1 From the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; and the 2 Henry and Corinne Bower Laboratory, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS. Meiotic breakpoint mapping in a family of 2314 individuals enabled refinement of the location of the disease gene. The genomic organization and expression profile of known and putative genes within the critical region were determined using bioinformatics, cDNA cloning, and RT-PCR. The coding sequence of genes expressed within the retina was scanned for mutations, by using DNA sequencing.
RESULTS. The disease-causing gene (STGD3) was further localized to 562 kb on chromosome 6 between D6S460 and a new polymorphic marker centromeric to D6S1707. Of the four genes identified within this region, all were expressed in the retina or retinal pigment epithelium. The only coding DNA sequence variant identified in these four genes was a 5-bp deletion in exon 6 of ELOVL4. The deletion is predicted to lead to a truncated protein with a net loss of 44 amino acids, including a dilysine endoplasmic reticulum retention motif. The ELOVL4 gene is the fourth known example of a predicted human protein with homology to mammalian and yeast enzymes involved in the membrane-bound fatty acid chain elongation system. The genomic organization of ELOVL4 and primer sets for exon amplification are presented.
CONCLUSIONS. ELOVL4 causes macular dystrophy in this large family distributed throughout North America and implicates fatty acid biosynthesis in the pathogenesis of macular degeneration. The PCR-based assay for the 5-bp deletion will facilitate more accurate genetic counseling and identification of other branches of the family.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Disease-causing mutations segregating within single families can be difficult to identify with certainty, because all affected patients share the identical genomic DNA segment on which the founding mutation arose. Thus, all DNA sequence variation within the disease locus or critical region is shared by all affected patients and segregates with the trait. In addition to the customary criteria for distinguishing between polymorphisms and mutations, exclusion of other potential disease-causing sequence variation within the disease locus can confirm the mutation.10 Therefore, it is critical to exclude sequence variation in all genes within the disease locus.
The disease locus on chromosome 6q14 for this autosomal dominant Stargardt-like macular dystrophy family has been progressively refined to between novel markers within the region defined by D6S1625 and D6S1707 by us and between D6S460 and D6S391 by other groups.11 12 While this manuscript was in preparation, a 5-bp deletion in the ELOVL4 gene in three branches of this family was reported by Zhang et al.11 In addition to ELOVL4, they reported exclusion of two other genes within their 3100-kb critical region between D6S460 and D6S391.11 We are aware of eight additional genes within their reported critical region that were not excluded and thus could harbor a disease-causing sequence variation. Herein, we report our independent identification and characterization of the gene for autosomal dominant Stargardt-like dominant macular dystrophy and the exclusion by DNA sequencing of the complete coding region of all candidate genes within our 562-kb critical region, defined by D6S460 and a novel marker (260P22.A) centromeric to D6S1707. The expression profile in human retina, genomic organization, and known functional information are presented for 15 genes in or near the critical region for STGD3 that are candidates for other chromosome 6q retinopathies.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Polymorphic Marker Identification, Amplification, and Analysis
Previously reported primers for short tandem repeat (STR)
amplification were purchased from Research Genetics (Huntsville, AL).
Novel dinucleotide (AC)n repeat motifs
were identified using a BLAST 2 Sequences search (available publicly
from the National Center for Biotechnology Information [NCBI] at
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/) of finished and unfinished
genomic sequence within the STDG3 critical region produced
by the Human Chromosome 6 Sequencing Group at the Sanger Centre
(Cambridgeshire, UK) with an (AC)60 sequence
motif. Primers were designed in flanking sequence for amplification.
Polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) were performed on genomic DNA (12.5
ng) in the presence of 1.5 mM MgCl, 1.25 nM each dNTP, 2.5 pM each
primer, and 0.11 U Taq polymerase in a final volume of 6.5
µl under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 95°C for
4 minutes, followed by 30 cycles at 94°C for 10 seconds, 55°C for
10 seconds, and 74°C for 10 seconds, and then a final extension at
74°C for 5 minutes. Amplified products were denatured for 4 minutes
at 94°C in the presence of formamide stop dye (6.5 µl),
snap cooled on ice, resolved at room temperature on 8% denaturing
polyacrylamide gels at 80 W, and transferred to nylon membranes (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN) overnight. DNA was
cross-linked to the membranes for 5 minutes (Photoprep I; Photodyne,
Newberlin, WI). The immobilized products were denatured for 10 minutes
in 0.4 M NaOH and neutralized in 2x SSC.
An oligonucleotide containing an AC15 repetitive sequence was 3'-tailed with digoxigenin (DIG)-11-dUTP and terminal transferase according to the manufacturers instructions (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) and hybridized to the resolved PCR products at 42°C in 5x SSC, 1% blocking reagent, 0.1% N-laurosarkosine, 0.02% SDS. Hybridized membranes were washed in 6x SSC and 0.1% SDS three times for 5 minutes, followed by a single wash in 0.1 M maleic acid, 0.15 NaCl, and 0.3% Tween-20 at pH 7.5 for 1 minute. The products were visualized by incubating membranes with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-DIG antibody for 60 minutes, washing twice in 0.1 M maleic acid and 0.15 M NaCl at pH 7.5 for 15 minutes, followed by a single equilibration in 100 mM Tris-HCl, 100 mM NaCl, and 50 mM MgCL2 at pH 9.5 for 2 minutes. The membranes were incubated with the chromogenic substrate (nitroblue tetrazolium chloride-5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indoyl phosphate 4-toludine sale [NBT/BCIP]) until the desired band intensity was achieved. All results were analyzed by at least two independent investigators and compared with a control sample (CEPH 1331-01) for registering genotypes between assays.
Preparation of Human Retina and Retinal Pigment Epithelium
Adult human eyes were purchased from the Lions Eye Bank
(Omaha, NE). The anterior segment was removed by circumferential
incision posterior to the ora serrata. The retina was removed and snap
frozen in liquid nitrogen. The retinal pigment epithelium
(RPE)choroid complex was rinsed with sterile Hanks balanced salt
solution. The RPE was isolated with minor modifications of a previously
described method.13
Briefly, the RPE surface was
treated with 0.25% trypsin and 0.5% EDTA in Hanks balanced salt
solution at 37°C for 20 minutes or until the RPE cell layer appeared
marbled. The trypsin solution was removed, and the RPE cells were
dislodged and suspended with a stream of Hams F-12 medium without
serum from a pipet. The cells were collected in sterile tubes and
centrifuged at 50g for 3 minutes and then washed once in
Hanks balanced salt solution and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen.
These RPE preparations may contain photoreceptor-derived mRNA.
Total RNA Isolation
Total RNA was prepared from retina and RPE by mincing with
mortar and pestle in liquid nitrogen. The minced powder was collected
into an RNA extraction reagent (RNA Stat-60; Tel-Test, Inc.,
Friendswood, TX). Total RNA was extracted as described by the
manufacturer.
RT-PCR and 5'-RACE
Total RNA (1 µg) was used to make cDNA with a first-strand
synthesis system for RT-PCR (Superscript; Gibco-BRL, Rockville, MD), as
described by the manufacturer. PCR was performed from cDNA using
gene-specific primers as follows: 94°C for 5 minutes; 35 cycles of
94°C for 30 seconds, 55°C for 30 seconds, 72°C for 30 seconds;
and a final extension for 5 minutes at 72°C. Amplification
products were analyzed by ethidium bromide-agarose gel electrophoresis.
5'-Rapid amplification of cDNA ends (5'-RACE) was performed with total
RNA (10 µg) from human retina using the a kit (FirstChoice RLM-RACE;
Ambion, Austin, TX), as described by the manufacturer.
Retina cDNA Library
A cDNA library from two pooled human adult retinas was
constructed using a predigested vector kit (ZAP Express; Stratagene, La
Jolla, CA), as described by the manufacturer. Clones derived from the
amplified library were identified using probes labeled with an enhanced
chemiluminescence system (ECL Direct Nucleic Acid Labeling and
Detection System; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ). Isolated
clones were sequenced, and exon sequences were identified by a BLAST 2
Sequences search of the clone sequence against finished and unfinished
genomic sequences.
Mutation Scanning
Exons were amplified with primers designed in flanking intronic
sequences. Direct DNA sequencing of the amplified products was
performed in one affected and one unaffected patient to scan for DNA
sequence variants.
Genomic and Bioinformatic Resources
Genomic DNA sequence data referred to in this article were
produced by the Chromosome 6 Sequencing Group at the Sanger Centre and
can be obtained at http://www.sanger.ac.uk. A combination of the
BLASTn, BLASTp, BLASTx, and BLAST 2 Sequences programs were used to
identify sequences of candidate genes within the critical region.
Putative CpG islands (regions of DNA at 200 bp in length with
G+C content and a ratio of CpGs of 0.6 or above) within genomic
sequences were identified using CpG Island software (available in the
public domain from European Bioinformatics Institute [EBI],
Cambridgeshire, UK, at http://www.ebi.ac.uk/cpg/). Transmembrane helix
location and topology predictions were made by computer (PredictProtein
software; provided in the public domain by European Molecular Biology
Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany, and available at
http://www.embl-heidelberg.de/predictprotein.html) based on a
previously described algorithm.14
Potential
phosphorylation sites were identified based on a primary- and
secondary-structurebased algorithm.15
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The initial 20-centimorgan (cM) critical region6 was progressively refined during the course of the study by using existing STR polymorphic markers.16 17 The individuals with recombinant markers localizing the disease gene are presented in Table 1 . The 1.8-cM larger critical region defined by affected patients was between centromeric marker D6S1622 at 88.63 cM (patient S110) and telomeric marker D6S1707 at 90.43 cM (patient B3015). Using unaffected patients, the centromeric border was further refined to D6S1625 at 89.23 cM.5 The approximate locations of these boundaries were confirmed by more than one patient with recombinant markers (Table 1) .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 5-bp deletion would be predicted to cause a frameshift with a truncated protein. The truncation would delete 44 amino acids including the dilysine endoplasmic reticulum retention motif. This would be predicted to have a major effect on the function of the protein (Figs. 3 4) .
To exclude this sequence variant as a polymorphism, exon 6 from 144 ethnically matched control individuals was amplified. All individuals exhibited the 334-bp normal band with no other alleles present, demonstrating the absence of this sequence variant on 288 control chromosomes.
Given the expression of ELOVL4 in the retina, the predicted severity of the 5-bp deletion on protein function, and the absence of this sequence variant on 288 control chromosomes, this sequence variant appears to be the cause of autosomal dominant Stargardt-like macular dystrophy. Because any sequence variant within the critical region would segregate with disease in the family, and no unrelated families are known to exist, all other genes within the critical region were screened, and no coding sequence variations were identified (Table 3) .
Expression of ELOVL4
Predicted and known genes within the disease locus for
STGD3 were assayed for expression in RPE and neural retina
isolated directly from human eyes using RT-PCR. Two of the expressed
sequences were grouped together in a cluster that was ultimately
identified as the STGD3 gene and both were expressed in both
the neural retina and RPE preparations by RT-PCR (data not shown). No
expression was identified in the kidney, demonstrating
tissue-restricted expression of ELOVL4 according to RT-PCR
(data not shown). No expressed pseudogenes have been identified for
ELOVL4; thus, these expression results based on RT-PCR are
likely to indicate the presence or absence of gene transcription.
Because primary human RPE preparations may be contaminated with the
overlying photoreceptors, Northern blot analysis for mRNA expression
was performed. Northern blot analysis of human retina, RPE, and kidney
revealed two transcripts in human retina only, demonstrating that
ELOVL4 is expressed only in the retina at detectable levels
(Fig. 5) . A search for alternative splicing using overlapping primer sets along
the message and RT-PCR, failed to identify any evidence for size
variation within the amplified products (data not shown). Based on
these data, ELOVL4 transcripts appear to share identical
coding sequences in the human retina. Thus, the size variation observed
on the Northern blot analysis most likely results from alternative
polyadenylation.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Without independent families to confirm that mutations within ELOVL4 cause disease, we screened the coding sequence and intronexon borders of all known and identifiable genes within the critical region. The disease gene was ultimately localized within 562 kb of completely sequenced genomic DNA on chromosome 6q14. Within this region we were able to identify four genes, all of which were expressed in the retina or RPE. No DNA sequence variants were identified within the exons or their flanking sequences in our affected patients, except for the 5-bp deletion in ELOVL4. Although bioinformatics and homology to expressed sequences led to the identification of several novel genes within this region (Table 3) , we cannot exclude the possibility that one or more genes may have gone undetected. Nonetheless, the extensive genomic and proteomic resources available for eucaryotic genomes and available bioinformatic software make it unlikely that unidentified genes are located within this 562-kb region.
The 5-bp deletion within exon 6 of ELOVL4 is predicted to cause a frameshift starting at amino acid 264 and truncated protein product at amino acid 271. The truncation would lead to the loss of 44 amino acids. The C-terminal region of the normal 314-amino-acid protein is partially conserved within members of the ELOVL protein family and contains a dilysine motif required for retention in the endoplasmic reticulum (Fig. 6) . Thus, the mutation is predicted to disrupt function of the protein. That the 5-bp deletion is not a rare polymorphism was demonstrated by its absence within 288 racematched control chromosomes.
The genomic localization of the STGD3 gene has been progressively refined by several investigators.2 5 6 7 9 11 12 20 21 The reported localizations have all been in agreement, with the exception of unaffected individual III-4 who was reported to exclude D6S284 and telomeric markers by Kniazeva et al.20 The critical region reported herein is based on multiple affected and unaffected patients, and the data on this subject reported by Kniazeva et al.20 most likely represent a genotyping error, diagnostic misclassification, or a nonpenetrant individual. This patient illustrates the difficulties in using unaffected subjects for disease localization.
No experimental data are available on the function of the human ELOVL1, ELOVL2, or ELOVL4 genes. The human homologue of mouse Elovl3 has not been identified to date. Experimental data are available for Elovl3, which is also called Cig30, and a human gene called HELO1, with homology to ELOVL4 (Fig. 6) . Cig30 was reported to complement the phenotype of the fen1/elo2 mutant that has reduced levels of fatty acids in the C20 to C24 range, demonstrating the involvement of the Elovl3 protein in the elongation of very-long-chain fatty acids.18 HELO1 was identified by Leonard et al.,22 based on homology to yeast fen1/elo2. The HELO1 protein was expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae 334 and was found to result in increased elongation of monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids compared with controls.22 Based on the homology to this family of proteins, we hypothesize that ELOVL4 is part of the membrane-bound enzymatic complex that executes the four enzymatic steps in the elongation of very-long-chain fatty acids in the neural retina.23 24 The mRNAs for both of these proteins were expressed in a tissue-restricted pattern, as is ELOVL4 (Fig. 5) .
Seven hereditary retinal diseases have been localized to chromosome 6q14.25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Each of these diseases is within a 30-cM region on chromosome 6q14 between coordinates 80.34 and 111.17 cM. Based on our expression data (Table 3 and unpublished) a large number of genes expressed in the retina and/or RPE are potential candidate genes for these and other hereditary ocular disorders. The evolutionary bases for this chromosomal region with a high density of retinal disease genes are unknown.
Identification of a mutation in ELOVL4 as the cause of
autosomal dominant Stargardt-like macular dystrophy implicates fatty
acid biosynthesis in the pathogenesis of macular dystrophies and
degenerations for the first time. The essential dietary
-linolenic
fatty acid is converted into arachidonic acid (20:4n-6) and
docosahexaenoic acid (22:6n-3) by the fatty acid chain elongation
system.32
Docosahexaenoic acid accounts for 33% of the
fatty acid content of human photoreceptor outer segments and the lipid
environment of the outer segment influences photoreceptor
function.33
34
35
36
37
38
These data are consistent with an
important role for the fatty acid chain elongation system in retinal
function and disease.
Recently, the results of a prospective study examining the hypothesis that ARMD is influenced by dietary lipids showed a positive association between total fat consumption and development of ARMD with visual loss.39 This study and another have reported a negative association between consumption of fish and ARMD.39 40 Although these results lead to the hope that the incidence or severity of macular degeneration may be decreased by dietary modulation, the observation that the dietary precursor to docosahexaenoic acid (linolenic acid) appears to explain the majority of the risk for macular degeneration39 demonstrates the need for a better understanding of retinal fatty acid metabolism before making clinical recommendations to patients.
| Appendix A |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Submitted for publication March 26, 2001; revised May 25, 2001; accepted June 5, 2001.
Commercial relationships policy: N.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page
charge payment. This article must therefore be marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
1734
solely to indicate this fact.
Corresponding author: Albert O. Edwards, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390-9057. albert.edwards{at}utsouthwestern.edu
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Jung, M. Hollmann, and M. A. Schafer The fatty acid elongase NOA is necessary for viability and has a somatic role in Drosophila sperm development J. Cell Sci., August 15, 2007; 120(16): 2924 - 2934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Golczak, Y. Imanishi, V. Kuksa, T. Maeda, R. Kubota, and K. Palczewski Lecithin:Retinol Acyltransferase Is Responsible for Amidation of Retinylamine, a Potent Inhibitor of the Retinoid Cycle J. Biol. Chem., December 23, 2005; 280(51): 42263 - 42273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Karan, C. Lillo, Z. Yang, D. J. Cameron, K. G. Locke, Y. Zhao, S. Thirumalaichary, C. Li, D. G. Birch, H. R. Vollmer-Snarr, et al. Lipofuscin accumulation, abnormal electrophysiology, and photoreceptor degeneration in mutant ELOVL4 transgenic mice: A model for macular degeneration PNAS, March 15, 2005; 102(11): 4164 - 4169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Chen, A. Rattner, and J. Nathans The Rod Photoreceptor-Specific Nuclear Receptor Nr2e3 Represses Transcription of Multiple Cone-Specific Genes J. Neurosci., January 5, 2005; 25(1): 118 - 129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Jiao, R. Ritter III, J. F. Hejtmancik, and A. O. Edwards Genetic Linkage of Snowflake Vitreoretinal Degeneration to Chromosome 2q36 Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2004; 45(12): 4498 - 4503. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. S. Lagali, J. Liu, R. Ambasudhan, L. E. Kakuk, S. L. Bernstein, G. M. Seigel, P. W. Wong, and R. Ayyagari Evolutionarily Conserved ELOVL4 Gene Expression in the Vertebrate Retina Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2003; 44(7): 2841 - 2850. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. B. Haider, A. Ikeda, J. K. Naggert, and P. M. Nishina Genetic modifiers of vision and hearing Hum. Mol. Genet., May 15, 2002; 11(10): 1195 - 1206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |