IOVS AJP: Advances in Physiology Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Smet, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Nussenblatt, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Smet, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Nussenblatt, R. B.
(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2001;42:3233-3238.)
© 2001 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.

Human S-Antigen Determinant Recognition in Uveitis

Marc D. de Smet1,2, George Bitar2, Sumeet Mainigi2 and Robert B. Nussenblatt3

1 From the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and the 2 Clinical Immunology Section and 3 Laboratory of Immunology, National Eye Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
PURPOSE. Soluble antigen (S-Ag) is a member of the arrestin family of protein with which it shares a high level of homology. It is an immunologically privileged retinal antigen that can elicit experimental autoimmune uveitis (EAU) and is thought to be a target for ocular inflammatory diseases. This study was conducted to identify in humans, the immunogenic determinants of human S-Ag and to establish whether a specific response profile occurs in particular ocular inflammatory conditions.

METHODS. Peripheral blood lymphocyte responses were measured against a panel of 40 overlapping synthetic peptides of human S-Ag in patients with chronic uveitis and compared with control subjects. Patients with Behçet disease, sarcoidosis, Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada, and sympathetic ophthalmia were tested.

RESULTS. A limited number of immunodominant determinants were identified for Behçet disease and sarcoidosis. These were all located at sites of limited homology with other known arrestins. In addition, several individual patients had prominent proliferative responses to multiple determinants well above that of control subjects. This determinant spread was observed in all disease entities except sympathetic ophthalmia, which did not show any immunoreactivity to S-Ag. Significant response shifts were also noted over time in two patients.

CONCLUSIONS. The results indicate that there are specific immunodominant determinants to human S-Ag in patients with certain forms of uveitis. However, in individual patients, response is not limited to these determinants. In the chronic stage of disease, response is spread over many determinants.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Soluble retinal antigen (S-Ag) also known as rod arrestin, or 48K protein, is a major component of rod outer segments1 the normal physiological role of which is to quench the visual transduction cascade induced by light activation of rhodopsin.2 3 Although closely related to ß-arrestins, which are ubiquitously distributed throughout the body,4 5 6 rod photoreceptor arrestins are confined to the retina in an immune-privileged site.7 In addition to its normal physiologic function, S-Ag is one of several ocular antigens capable of inducing experimental autoimmune uveitis (EAU) in susceptible hosts.8 EAU is mediated by activated, antigen-specific CD4+ T cells,9 and can be induced by immunization with several S-Ag–derived peptides.10 11 12 Pathologically, the process resembles a number of human conditions thought to be of autoimmune origin.8 S-Ag is thought to be immunopathogenic in humans, either causing or prolonging certain forms of uveitis. In accordance with this notion, a large number of patients with uveitis were found to respond to bovine S-Ag in lymphocyte proliferation assays.13 14 15 In addition, lymphocyte responses have been noted to a few peptide determinants derived from both the bovine and human S-Ag sequences.13 16 17

The immune response against a whole protein is usually targeted toward a small number of peptide determinants. To initiate the immune response requires binding to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules on the surface of antigen-presenting cells (APCs) and presentation to receptive T cells.18 19 Because of the polymorphism of MHC molecules, the majority of immunogenic peptide determinants bind strongly to only a single or a limited set of MHC molecules.20 However, some peptide determinants bind to several heterogeneous MHC molecules and may even cross species.21 22 In the case of myelin basic protein, for example, certain peptides, encephalitogenic in experimental animals, have been found to be recognized by lymphocytes from patients with multiple sclerosis.23 24 In this study, we decided to use a panel of overlapping synthetic peptides of human S-Ag to test their immunoreactivity in patients with various forms of uveitis as well as in control subjects. It is then possible to define a spectrum of immune reactivity for each disease entity and to identify the limited set of determinants with particularly high immunoproliferative responses. Response to a few of these determinants was also observed over time.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Antigen Synthesis and Preparation
Forty overlapping oligomeric peptide determinants of human S-Ag, spanning the entire length of the human S-Ag sequence,25 were synthesized by Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA). Each peptide determinant measured 20 amino acids in length, except for the last one, which measured 15 amino acids. Each peptide determinant overlapped the previous sequence by 10 amino acids. The exact sequence and the nomenclature used throughout this article are shown in Figure 1 . Peptides were synthesized by solid-phase chemistry using t-butyloxycarbonyl derivatives of the amino acids on an automated peptide synthesizer and were purified by HPLC to at least 95% purity. The amino acid composition of each peptide was verified using amino acid analysis and automated gas-phase sequencing. In proliferation assays, a final concentration in each well of 20 and 100 µg/ml was used.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 1. Sequence of human S-Ag and its overlapping peptide determinants. The nomenclature is indicated under each determinant.

 
Patient Selection
Patients participating in this study were selected from the pool of patients under observation in the uveitis clinic of the National Eye Institute, Bethesda, Maryland. Control subjects were taken from among the NEI medical and paramedical staff, and were age matched as closely as possible with the study population. Before participating in the study, all patients gave informed consent for a protocol approved by the Medical Review Board of the National Eye Institute and in compliance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. In all patients with active uveitis involving the posterior segment, the disease was controlled with cyclosporine (1.0–5.0 mg/kg · d) and prednisone (2.5–30 mg/d). Any patient with a reactivation of uveitis in the 3 months before this study was considered to have clinically active disease. A decrease in visual acuity by two lines or more on an Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) reading card was associated with evidence of vitreal or retinochoroidal inflammation characterized an active uveitis. Patients had one of the following disorders: Behçet disease, ocular sarcoidosis, Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) syndrome, or sympathetic ophthalmia. The diagnosis for each condition was established as described elsewhere.13 Patients with Behçet disease met the diagnostic criteria from the International Behçet’s Disease Study Group.26 Those with ocular sarcoidosis had typical retinochoroidal granulomatous uveitis. Patients with VKH met the criteria of the American Uveitis Society27 or had typical fundus and fluorescein findings. Patients with sympathetic ophthalmia had a clinical picture compatible with the diagnosis and a history of multiple surgeries or ocular trauma in one eye. Characteristics of the patients are given in Table 1 .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1. Characteristics of Patients with Uveitis and Control Subjects

 
Lymphocyte Proliferation Assays
Mononuclear lymphocytes were separated on isolymph gradient (Gallard-Schlesinger, Carle Place, NY) from heparinized blood shortly after the sample was obtained. Cells were resuspended in RPMI 1640 with HEPES (Gibco, Grand Island, NY), supplemented with glutamine (2 mM), penicillin (100 U/ml), streptomycin (100 µg/ml), and 10% commercial heat-inactivated human AB serum (Biocell Laboratories, Carson, CA). These cells were immediately placed in culture at a density of 2 x 105 cells/well in the presence of antigen, in flat-bottomed, 96-well plates (Costar, Cambridge, MA). All assays were plated in triplicate. Antigen concentrations were either 20 or 100 µg/ml. Peptides were tested simultaneously. For control of immune reactivity, purified protein derivative (PPD; Parke-Davis, Morris Plains, NJ) and purified phytohemagglutinin (PHA; Murex Diagnostics, Dartford, UK) were also tested. For the last 12 hours before harvesting at day 5, each well was pulsed with [3H]thymidine (2 Ci/mmol, 0.5 µCi per 10 µl/well; New England Nuclear, Boston, MA). Results are expressed as a stimulation index (SI = mean counts per minute in stimulated cultures/mean counts per minute in unstimulated control cultures).

Data Analysis
SIs for each peptide determinant were analyzed in two ways. First, the results obtained from control subjects were compared with those from patients per disease entity for each peptide determinant. Comparisons were made using a nonparametric test for analysis of variance (Kruskal-Wallis) with a postanalysis correction for comparison of data pairs (Dunn test). Statistical analysis was performed by computer (Prism software, ver. 2.0; GraphPad Inc., San Diego, CA). The second analysis method involved the determination of the frequency with which the SI in patients was above the tolerance limit of control samples. This tolerance limit for a given peptide determinant was set as the mean SI of control subjects + 2 SD.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Patient Characteristics and Assessment of Lymphocyte Response
Twenty-nine patients and 15 volunteers were tested for their lymphocyte proliferative responses to a panel of overlapping human S-Ag peptide determinants at 20 µg/ml and 100 µg/ml. Because the optimal culture conditions for lymphocyte proliferation with these peptide determinants was not known, both concentrations were used. All patients had shown evidence of retinal inflammatory disease for at least 8 months (8–120 months) before being tested. All patients had a chronic remitting course of disease at the time, with the exception of the patients with sympathetic ophthalmia, in whom the disease was quiescent for more than 1 year before testing. A number of patients had a history of an acute inflammatory episode in the 6 months before testing (Table 1) . Control of lymphocyte responsiveness was determined in each group by testing with PPD and PHA, as indicated in the Methods section. The average SIs were as follows: control subjects: PHA 44, PPD 75; Behçet disease: PHA 78, PPD 24; sarcoidosis: PHA 66, PPD 11; VKH: PHA 42, PPD 27; sympathetic ophthalmia: PHA 47, PPD 7. There was no significant difference between groups in the response to PHA. There was also no significant difference between the various patient groups with regard to the response to PPD. Their responses were lower than in the control group, in which the difference was largely due to a few high responders.

Determinant Mapping Using Analysis of Variance
Proliferative responses to individual peptides were highly variable. In general the response to antigen was strongest with the higher antigen concentration (Figs. 3 4) . To test for internal consistency, one volunteer was repeatedly tested at different time points over a period of 1 year. Each proliferative response remained well within the mean + 2 SD of control subjects, except at one of the nine time points, when deviant responses were noted to several peptides. Analysis of variance used to compare SIs from each patient group to control subjects revealed a statistically significant difference in only a limited number of peptides (Table 2) . These were found in two disease entities: Behçet disease and sarcoidosis.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 3. Average SIs for each determinant at a peptide concentration of 100 µg/ml per well. Error bars, SD. Data are shown for disease categories showing a significant deviation from control subjects. The profile for sympathetic ophthalmia is similar to that in control subjects, except for determinant 3 (mean SI, 4.0 ± 3.5).

 


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 4. Proportion of responders above the tolerance limit per determinant. The tolerance limit was set as the mean + 2 SD of the response in control subjects. In sympathetic ophthalmia, one responder was found for determinants 2, 3, 6, 11, 21, 25, 27, and 38.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 2. Disease-Related Peptide Determinants of Human S-Ag

 
Determinant Mapping Using a Tolerance Limit Threshold
Although an analysis of variance showed that there were no statistically significant differences for most peptide determinants between control subjects and patients, several patients had SIs considerably higher than that of control subjects for particular determinants. Because these could correspond to a subset of patients with an active immune response, a different approach was used to identify these determinants. Response in these cases can be better characterized as having overcome a minimal threshold (or tolerance limit) of response, defined as the mean of control subjects + 2 SD. This analysis showed in all disease entities a heterogeneous response to S-Ag. In the case of sympathetic ophthalmia, the following determinants gave significant responses: 2, 6, 11, 21, 22, 25, 27, and 38. In each case, only one patient, but not always the same one, produced an SI above threshold. For the remaining disease entities, the number of significant responders varied considerably among disease entities and among determinants (Fig. 4) . Determinant 21 and 22 in sarcoidosis and determinant 35 in VKH were prominent in a majority of patients. Overall, patients with sarcoidosis were most likely to show a heightened response. Response heterogeneity was observed in all disease entities but was limited in sympathetic ophthalmia (Table 3) .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 3. Maximum Number of Immunoproliferative Determinants Recognized by Individual Patients per Disease Category

 
Two patients with Behçet disease were tested on two separate occasions. In one case, the responses were measured 3 months later and in the other after 6 months. A shift in antigenic response was noted for certain determinants (Table 4) . A similar shift was not observed in a normal volunteer.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 4. Response to Selected Determinants of S-Ag Over Time

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
Patients with uveitis showed a high degree of heterogeneity in their lymphoproliferative response to determinants of human S-Ag. Such heterogeneity is not surprising, given that patients carried a variety of diagnoses and were at different stages of disease activity and duration. However, two patterns of response were observed, one of which appeared to be disease specific and the other specific to individual patients. The first relates to a generalized increase in lymphocyte proliferation accompanying selected determinants in patients with Behçet disease or sarcoidosis, whereas the second relates to the observation that a number of patients had heightened immune responses to specific determinants, significantly above the mean of control subjects. This heightened response in the presence of whole S-Ag, had previously been shown to be a sign of disease activity within weeks of the assay.28

The immunogenic determinants associated with Behçet disease and sarcoidosis (Table 2) are adjacent to highly immunogenic or pathogenic determinants in the experimental model EAU. Determinants 19, 20, and 36 induce uveitis in the Lewis rat.29 Determinant 18 is immunoproliferative in the cynomolgus monkey.30 Because the determinants we studied are 20 amino acids long, the minimal immunologic trigger for each determinant is nested somewhere within the peptide sequence. Use of smaller synthetic peptides should make it possible to identify the minimal immunogenic sequence and in particular reveal whether the same sequence is immunogenic in all species. The identification of appropriate targets may be facilitated by selecting sequences that do not have homology with known nonretinal arrestins and that are not expressed in the thymus.31 32 33

The second pattern of response was observed in a limited number of patients for most disease entities studied, except sympathetic ophthalmia. A heightened response was present to a variable but significant number of determinants. Each response pattern was patient specific and involved more determinants in patients with long-standing chronic disease (Table 3) . Recent observations in experimental autoimmune encephalitis have shown that with disease recurrence, there is a decrease in autoreactivity to the primary determinant and the emergence of other, previously cryptic determinants, the appearance of which is linked with disease progression.34 35 This process follows a rather predictable course in which the spread to new determinants characterizes particular phases of the disease and is amenable to peptide-based therapy.36 A similar plasticity of self-recognition has been observed in patients with multiple sclerosis.37 Over a 12- to 18-month follow-up of patients with multiple sclerosis, antigen spread was noted but also an abrupt shift in responses to an extensive array of self-determinants. We infer that a similar process is present in patients with uveitis.

Certain patients showed an immune response, which over time either significantly increased or decreased baseline level (Table 4) . However, variations were present among disease entities, because the response in sympathetic ophthalmia was limited to a few determinants. The relatively limited determinant spread in this latter disease may indicate that S-Ag does not play a role in the disease process, because the overall response profile was very similar to that of control subjects. Pathologic changes in this disease are located within the choroid, and experimentally, a similar disease pattern is induced by using choroidal antigens.38 Determinant spreading is likely to be an integral part of the immune response over time to antigens that contribute to the disease process. Inherent in determinant spreading is a shift in response over time. We observed in two patients, but not in a volunteer, such a shift in antigenic responses over time (Table 4) . This shift in autoreactivity is unlikely to be an artifact, because repeat testing of a volunteer over a 12-month period showed only limited variations in SIs that remained within 2 SD of the mean of all control subjects. These shifts in responses correspond well to the observations made in multiple sclerosis and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) and suggest that antigen spreading also occurs in patients with uveitis.36 37 This deserves to be studied in more detail with a number of patients observed after surgery.

In summary, the present study demonstrates the existence of a number of disease-specific antigenic determinants in two disease entities: namely Behçet disease and sarcoidosis. These were associated with unique sequences within the human S-Ag sequence and were related to pathogenic sites in the experimental model. It also demonstrates the existence of a number of determinants associated with immune responses in individual patients. These responses were present in patients with a retinal disease pattern. The observations give credence to the notion that retinal autoantigens play a role in certain forms of uveitis. Further study of determinant responses in patients with uveitis may help to identify the exact site of the immune activation and may provide the rationale for an attempt at peptide-based therapy.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 2. Average SIs for each peptide determinant at a concentration of 20 µg/ml per well. Error bars, SD. Data are shown for the disease categories that showed a significant deviation from the mean of control subjects. The profile of patients with sympathetic ophthalmia was similar to that of control subjects, except for determinant 3 (mean SI, 1.9 ± 1.4) and determinant 6 (mean SI, 2.1 ± 1.6).

 

   Footnotes
 
Supported by a grant from the Edmond and Marianne Blaauwfonds of the University of Amsterdam.

Submitted for publication January 30, 2001; revised July 17, 2001; accepted July 30, 2001.

Commercial relationships policy: N.

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Corresponding author: Marc D. de Smet, Rm G2–217, Department of Ophthalmology, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam 1105AZ, The Netherlands. m.d.desmet{at}amc.uva.nl


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Hirsch, JA, Shubert, C, Gurevich, VV, Sigler, PB (1999) The 2.8 Å crystal structure of visual arrestin: a model for arrestin’s regulation Cell 97,257-269[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Granzin, J, Wilden, U, Choe, HW, et al (1998) X-ray crystal structure of arrestin from bovine rod outer segments Nature 391,918-921[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Wilden, U. (1995) Duration and amplitude of the light-induced cGMP hydrolysis in vertebrate photoreceptors are regulated by multiple phosphorylatoin of rhodopsin and by arrestin binding Biochemistry 34,1446-1454[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Lohse, MJ, Benovic, JL, Codina, J, Caron, MG, Lefkowitz, RJ (1990) Beta-arrestin: a protein that regulates beta-adrenergic receptor function Science 248,1547-1550[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Attramadal, H, Arriza, JL, Aoki, C, et al (1992) ß-arrestin2, a novel member of the arrestin/ß-arrestin gene family J Biol Chem 267,17882-17890[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Sterne-Marr, R, Gurevich, VV, Goldsmith, P, et al (1993) Polypeptide variants of ß-arrestin and arrestin3 J Biol Chem 268,15640-15648[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Craft, CM, Whitmore, DH, Wiechmann, AF (1994) Cone arrestin identified by targeting expression of a functional family J Biol Chem 269,4613-4619[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Gery, I, Mochizuki, M, Nussenblatt, RB (1986) Retinal specific antigen and immunopathogenic processes they provoke Prog Retinal Res 5,75-109
  9. Mochizuki, M, Kuwabara, T, McAllister, C, Nussenblatt, RB, Gery, I. (1985) Adoptive transfer of experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis in rats Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 26,1-9[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Kotake, S, de Smet, MD, Wiggert, B, et al (1991) Analysis of the pivotal residues of the immunodominant and highly uveitogenic determinant of interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein (IRBP) J Immunol 146,2995-3001[Abstract]
  11. Hirose, S, Singh, VK, Donoso, LA, et al (1989) An 18-mer peptide derived from the retinal S antigen induces uveitis and pinealitis in primates Clin Exp Immunol 77,106-111[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Gregerson, DS, Obritsch, WF, Fling, SP (1987) Identification of a uveitogenic cyanogen bromide peptide of bovine S-antigen and preparation of a uveitogenic peptide specific T cell line Eur J Immunol 17,405-411[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. de Smet, MD, Yamamoto, JH, Mochizuki, M, et al (1990) Cellular immune responses of patients with uveitis to retinal antigens and their fragments Am J Ophthalmol 110,135-142[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Yamamoto, JH, Minami, M, Inaba, G, Masuda, K, Mochizuki, M. (1993) Cellular autoimmunity to retinal specific antigens in patients with Behçet’s disease Br J Ophthalmol 77,584-589[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Doekes, G, van der Gaag, R, van Kooyk, Y, et al (1987) Humoral and cellular immune responsiveness to human S-antigen in uveitis Curr Eye Res 6,909-919[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Hirose, S, Donoso, LA, Shinohara, T, et al (1990) Lymphocyte responses to peptide M and to retinal S-antigen in uveitis patients Jpn J Ophthalmol 34,298-305[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. de Smet, MD, Wiggert, B, Chader, GJ, et al (1990) Cellular immune responses to fragments of S-antigen in patients with uveitis Usui, M Ohno, S Aoki, K eds. Conference Proceedings Ocul Immunol Today 918,285-288 Elsevier Tokyo.
  18. Unanue, ER, Cerottini, JC (1989) Antigen presentation FASEB J 3,2496-2502[Abstract]
  19. Watts, C. (1997) Capture and processing of exogenous antigens for presentation on MHC molecules Annu Rev Immunol 15,821-850[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Buus, S, Sette, A, Colon, SM, Miles, C, Grey, HM (1987) The relation between major histocompatibility complex (MHC) restriction and the capacity of Ia to bind immunogenic peptides Science 235,1353-1358[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Panina-Bordignon, P, Tan, A, Termijtelen, A, et al (1989) Universally immunogenic T cell epitopes: promiscuous binding to human MHC class II and promiscuous recognition by T cells Eur J Immunol 19,2237-2242[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Sinigaglia, F, Guttinger, M, Kilgus, J, et al (1988) A malaria T-cell epitope recognized in association with most mouse and human MHC class II molecules Nature 336,778-780[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Martin, R, Howell, MD, Jaraquemada, D, et al (1991) A myelin basic protein peptide is recognized by cytotoxic T cells in the context of four HLA-DR types associated with multiple sclerosis J Exp Med 173,19-24[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Martin, R, McFarland, HF, McFarlin, DE (1992) Immunological aspects of demyelinating diseases Annu Rev Immunol 10,153-187[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Shinohara, T, Donoso, L, Tsuda, M, Yamaki, K, Singh, VK (1989) S-antigen: Structure, function and experimental autoimmune uveitis (EAU) Prog Retinal Res 8,51-65
  26. . Behçet’ dieae reearch committee of Japan (1974) Behçet’s disease: guide to diagnosis of Behçet’s disease Jpn J Ophthalmol 18,291-294
  27. Snyder, DA, Tessler, HA (1980) Vogt-Koyonagi-Harada syndrome Am J Ophthalmol 90,69-75[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. de Smet, MD, Dayan, M. (2000) Prospective determination of T cell responses to S-antigen in Behçet’s Disease patients and control subjects Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41,3480-3484[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. de Smet, MD, Bitar, G, Roberge, FG, Gery, I, Nussenblatt, RB (1993) Human S-antigen: presence of multiple immunogenic and immunopathogenic sites in the lewis rat J Autoimmun 6,587-599[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Fukushima, A, Lai, JC, Chanaud, NP, III, et al (1996) Permissive recognition of immunodominant determinants of the retinal S-antigen in different rat strains, primates and humans Int Inmmunol 9,169-177
  31. Xu, H, Wawrousek, EF, Redmond, TM, et al (2000) Transgenic expression of an immunologically privileged retinal antigen extraocularly enhances self tolerance and abrogates susceptibility to autoimmune uveitis Eur J Immunol 30,272-278[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. McPherson, SW, Roberts, JP, Gregerson, DS (1999) Systemic expression of rat soluble retinal antigen induces resistance to experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis J Immunol 163,4269-4276[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Egwuagu, CE, Charukamnoetkanok, P, Gery, I. (1997) Thymic expression of autoantigens correlates with resistance to autoimmune disease J Immunol 159,3109-3112[Abstract]
  34. Tuohy, VK, Yu, M, Yin, L, Kawczak, JA, Kinkel, RP (1999) Spontaneous regression of primary autoreactivity during chronic regression of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis J Immunol 189,1033-1042
  35. Lehmann, PV, Forsthuber, T, Miller, A, Sercarz, EE (1992) Spreading of T-cell autoimmunity to cryptic determinants of an autoantigen Nature 358,155-157[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Yu, M, Johnson, JM, Tuohy, VK (1996) A predictable sequential determinant spreading cascade invariably accompanies progression of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis: a basis for peptide-specific therapy after onset of clinical disease J Exp Med 183,1777-1788[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Tuohy, VK, Yu, M, Weinstock-Guttman, B, Kinkel, RP (1997) Diversity and plasticity of self recognition during the development of multiple sclerosis J Clin Invest 99,1682-1690[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Chan, CC, Roberge, FG (1996) Sympathetic ophthalmia Pepose, JS Holland, GN Wilhelmus, KR eds. Ocular Infection and Immunity ,723-733 Mosby St Louis.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
C. A. Deeg, D. Pompetzki, A. J. Raith, S. M. Hauck, B. Amann, S. Suppmann, T. W. F. Goebel, U. Olazabal, H. Gerhards, S. Reese, et al.
Identification and Functional Validation of Novel Autoantigens in Equine Uveitis
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, August 1, 2006; 5(8): 1462 - 1470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 IOVSHome page
C. A. Deeg, B. Amann, A. J. Raith, and B. Kaspers
Inter- and Intramolecular Epitope Spreading in Equine Recurrent Uveitis
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., February 1, 2006; 47(2): 652 - 656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 IOVSHome page
Z. Karabekian, S. D. Lytton, P. B. Silver, Y. V. Sergeev, J. P. Schneck, and R. R. Caspi
Antigen/MHC Class II/Ig Dimers for Study of Uveitogenic T Cells: IRBP p161-180 Presented by both IA and IE Molecules
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2005; 46(10): 3769 - 3776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BloodHome page
O. M. Z. Howard, H. F. Dong, S. B. Su, R. R. Caspi, X. Chen, P. Plotz, and J. J. Oppenheim
Autoantigens signal through chemokine receptors: uveitis antigens induce CXCR3- and CXCR5-expressing lymphocytes and immature dendritic cells to migrate
Blood, June 1, 2005; 105(11): 4207 - 4214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 IOVSHome page
C. A. Deeg, S. Reese, H. Gerhards, G. Wildner, and B. Kaspers
The Uveitogenic Potential of Retinal S-Antigen in Horses
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2004; 45(7): 2286 - 2292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
A D Dick
A bird in the hand . . .
Br. J. Ophthalmol., December 1, 2002; 86(12): 1324 - 1324.
[Full Text]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Smet, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Nussenblatt, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Smet, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Nussenblatt, R. B.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS