IOVS News in Physiological Sciences
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, H.
Right arrow Articles by Weber, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, H.
Right arrow Articles by Weber, A. J.
(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2001;42:966-974.)
© 2001 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.

BDNF Enhances Retinal Ganglion Cell Survival in Cats with Optic Nerve Damage

Hao Chen1 and Arthur J. Weber1,2,3

1 From the Department of Physiology, 2 Neuroscience Program, and 3 Center for Clinical Neuroscience and Ophthalmology, Michigan State University, East Lansing.


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
PURPOSE. To determine whether brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a neuroprotectant in the small rat eye, might also serve as an effective neuroprotectant in larger vertebrate eyes.

METHODS. A cat optic nerve crush model was combined with standard histologic staining and analysis techniques. Twenty-nine animals were studied, with the noninjected eye serving as the control eye.

RESULTS. No treatment, or intravitreal injection of sterile water, resulted in an approximately 50% loss of ganglion cells 1 week after nerve crush. By contrast, the mean percentages of surviving ganglion cells measured in eyes receiving injections of 15, 30, 60, and 90 µg BDNF at the time of the nerve damage were 52%, 81%, 77%, and 70%, respectively. Similar values were obtained for ganglion cell density. Cell size measurements suggest a complex response among the different classes of cat ganglion cells; 30 µg BDNF treatment retained the highest number of large ganglion cells, whereas 90 µg minimized the loss of medium-sized neurons and retained normal proportions of large, medium, and small ganglion cells.

CONCLUSIONS. The data show that BDNF is an effective neuroprotectant in primate-sized eyes after optic nerve injury. Although the amount required to achieve neuroprotection is much greater than that needed for the small rat eye (30 µg versus 0.5 µg), when differences in vitreal volume are considered, the effective dose is similar (0.01 µg BDNF/µl vitreal volume). High doses of BDNF induce inflammation and result in a decrease in total ganglion cell survival but appear necessary to save medium-sized neurons, which are affected most severely by nerve injury.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is a disease of the visual system that results, in part, from pressure-induced damage to the optic nerve (ON) at the level of the lamina cribrosa (LC).1 2 In addition to nerve fiber degeneration, the disease also is characterized by atrophy and a loss of ganglion cells from the retina itself.3 4 5 6 7 8 Because previous work has shown that elevation of intraocular pressure (IOP) disrupts axonal transport at the LC, the ganglion cell loss associated with POAG is considered to reflect, in part, a decrease in the level of trophic material these neurons receive from their target sources.9 10 11 12

Recent studies, using in vivo and in vitro techniques, have shown that neurons and glia within the mammalian retina contain receptors for different neurotrophic factors, and that direct application of these factors can influence the survival of injured ganglion cells.13 14 In particular, studies of the rat visual system, have indicated that brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a member of the nerve growth factor family of proteins, is highly effective in reducing the rate of axotomy-induced retinal ganglion cell death.15 16 17 18 19 BDNF also has been shown to undergo both anterograde and retrograde axonal transport, and it has been implicated in reducing die-back and promoting axonal regeneration after ON injury.20 21

Based on these data, and a longstanding interest in different treatment strategies for reducing retinal ganglion cell degeneration in the glaucomatous primate eye, we initiated a series of experiments aimed at determining whether BDNF might also exert a neuroprotective effect on injured ganglion cells in the larger cat eye, where, compared with the small rat eye, drug dose and diffusion differences might be limiting factors.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Subjects
Twenty-nine adult cats were used in this study. All were specific-pathogen free and weighed 3 to 4 kg. The cat was selected for use based on ease of manipulating its ON, the well-defined morphologies of cat retinal ganglion cells,22 23 24 25 26 27 and the similar vitreal volumes of the cat and primate eyes compared with that of the rat (~3 to 4 ml versus ~50 µl in the rat; Reference 28 , and unpublished data). All procedures were approved by the Animal Use Committee at Michigan State University, and all adhered to the ARVO Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research.

Surgical Procedures
Initial anesthesia was achieved by placing the cat in a Plexiglas chamber and introducing a mixture of 4% isoflurane (IsoFlo, Abbott Labs, Abbott, IL) and pure oxygen, delivered at 3 l/min. Each cat then was intubated, and anesthesia maintained using a 2.5 to 3.5% isoflurane-oxygen mixture (0.5 l/min.). Analgesia and sedation consisted of an intramuscular injection of glycopyrrolate (0.05 mg/kg; Fort Dodge Labs, Fort Dodge, IA), and subcutaneous injections of torbugesic (0.2 mg/kg; Butler, Columbus, OH) and acepromazine (0.04 mg/kg; Butler). Hydration was maintained intravenously with sterile saline (0.9%). Heart and respiratory rates were monitored every 15 minutes. Body temperature was maintained at 37°C using a heating pad. The head was stabilized using a vacuum-activated, "beanbag-like," restraining device (Olympic Vac; Olympic Medical, Seattle, WA). In five animals, the pupils were dilated with 1% tropicamide HCl (Mydriacyl; Alcon, Fort Worth, TX) and contact lenses containing 1 to 2 drops of 0.5% proparacaine HCl (Alcaine; Alcon) were placed on the eyes. Pre- and postsurgery fundus photographs of the retinal blood vessels were obtained using a fundus camera (TRC-50; Topcon, The Netherlands). Additional fundus photographs were obtained at the time of sacrifice.

Using sterile procedures, the bone overlying the left frontal sinus was removed to expose the roof of the bony orbit. All openings to the frontal sinus then were sealed with bone wax. This avoided disturbing the cat’s olfactory senses, which can result in a severe loss of appetite. A fine-tipped scalpel blade was used to make an opening in the dorsal surface of the orbit. Careful blunt dissection of the overlying tissues exposed the ON without disturbing the nerve sheath or retinal artery. The ON was stabilized with a hook, and a smooth-faced bulldog clamp that exerts approximately 1024 g of force was place on the nerve for 15 seconds at a distance 2 to 3 mm behind the globe. The bone wax plugs then were checked, the frontal sinus was packed with Gelfoam (Upjohn, Kalamazoo, MI) soaked with sterile saline, and the overlying skin sutured. The contact lenses were removed, and the eyes treated with sterile ophthalmic ointment. After removal of the intubation tube, each animal was monitored until it was able to move about freely and feed. Postoperative pain medication (torbugesic, 0.2 mg/Kg) was provided as needed.

BDNF Injections
Single or multiple intravitreal injections (15, 30, 60, or 90 µg at 1µg/µl) of sterile recombinant BDNF (Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, NY) were made into the left (ON crush) eye of 19/29 cats. Of the remaining 10 cats, 3 did not undergo any surgical procedures, 5 underwent a unilateral ON crush but no treatment, 1 underwent an ON crush and an intravitreal injection of 60 µl of sterile water, and 1 received an intravitreal injection of sterile water, but no ON crush. Three animals that received 90-µg injections of BDNF also received, for 1 week, daily intraperitoneal injections (35 mg/kg) of the nitric oxide synthase blocker, N-{omega}-nitro-L-arginine-methylester (L-NAME). All BDNF injections were made immediately after the ON crush. In most cases the injections were made through the opening in the frontal sinus at a point approximately 5-mm posterior to the ora serrata. Three animals received a second intravitreal injection of the same dose 4 days after crush (Table 1) . For these injections, which were made just posterior to the ora, the animals were anesthetized with ketamine HCl (10 mg/kg) and the eyes treated with Alcaine (Alcon). All injections were made using a Hamilton syringe with a 30 ga. needle. Care was taken to ensure that the complete bevel of the needle was within the vitreal chamber, but that it did not hit the lens.29 Intraocular injections were made over a 1 minute period, with the needle left in place for an additional 30 seconds to allow for diffusion of the drug away from the injection site.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1. Summary of Cell Number, Size, and Density Measurements

 
Survival Period and Tissue Processing
After a 7-day survival period, 24/29 of the animals were anesthetized deeply with pentobarbital sodium (50 mg/kg), and perfused transcardially with 0.5 l of saline (0.9%) followed by 2 l of a solution containing 1.5% paraformaldehyde and 2.0% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). One week was selected as the baseline survival period because initial cell measurements showed that this time period resulted in a consistent, but not overly severe, change in ganglion cell number (~50% decrease) in the untreated eye (Table 1 , Fig. 5 ). After overnight postfixation, the retinas were dissected, wholemounted onto subbed glass slides, dehydrated, and stained with cresyl violet. Care was taken during mounting to make the relief cuts in superior temporal retina as shallow as possible. This avoided any distortion in the region from which the ganglion cell samples were obtained.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 5. Summary histograms comparing the changes in cell number and size after different BDNF treatment paradigms. Eyes receiving 30 µg and 60 µg injections of BDNF showed significantly greater ganglion cell survival than the untreated or 15 µg treated eyes. Values are the number of eyes examined under each condition. Error bars are ± SD.

 
Ganglion Cell Measurements and Identification
Retinal ganglion cells from normal, untreated, and BDNF-treated eyes were compared using a computer-based imaging system. The region selected for quantitative analysis occupied 1.72 mm2, and was located 3 mm above and 1.5 mm temporal to the area centralis (Fig. 1) . This region was chosen because of the relatively constant size and density of ganglion cells in this location of the cat retina.22 A stage digitizer (AccuStage, Shoreview, MN) was used to properly orient30 each retina on the microscope, and to standardize the starting point and stage movements used for cell sampling. From the starting point, 42 digital images (41,000 µm2/image) were obtained systematically using a high resolution video camera (chilled CCD, model C5985; Hamamatsu) and 40x objective. The retinal images were collected as three dorsaL-ventral passes composed of 14 images each. Double counting was avoided by separating each sample column horizontally by 500 µm, and vertically by using the previous image as a reference. Cell size, density, and number were determined directly from the digital images using image analysis software (Image Pro Plus, Media Cybernetics). Neurons were classified as ganglion cells based on the criteria of Stone.24 25 In brief, they had to display a distinct nucleus and nucleolus, and have a clear ring of cytoplasm completely surrounding the nucleus. Although this conservative approach most likely underestimated the number of small ganglion cells, it also reduced the number of nonganglion cells included in the measurements.26 27 Based on these criteria, our estimates of ganglion cell density, as well as the proportions of small, medium, and large ganglion cells in the normal sample region were comparable to those reported by Stone.24



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 1. Schematic drawing showing the approximate location of the retinal sample area (stippled) for the left retina. The area centralis (AC) and optic disc (OD) were used as references to properly orient the retina.

 
Statistical Analysis
All data are presented as means ± 1SD. Differences in mean cell number, size, and density were compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), combined with the Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons (SPSS, Chicago, IL). Paired comparisons of cell size distributions were made using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test (SPSS) for two independent samples. In all cases, P = 0.05 was used as the level of significance.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Effects of ON Crush on Retinal Vasculature
In all cases, ON damage was achieved by placing a small bulldog clamp on the ON 2 to 3 mm behind the left eye for 15 seconds. Fundus photographs obtained pre- and postsurgery, as well as after the 1 week survival period for five randomly-selected animals, indicated that this brief period of pressure had no adverse effect on the vasculature of the inner retina.

Cellular Changes in Untreated Retinae
While brief ON compression did not compromise the retinal vasculature, it did result in a significant loss of ganglion cells (~50%) from the retina within the 1-week test period. Neurons undergoing atrophic changes were identified by their irregular shape, pale-staining cytoplasm, clumped chromatin, and displaced nuclei (Figs. 2A 2B ). Although no degenerating neurons were observed in normal retinas, systematic examination (x250) of the sample region in animals receiving an ON crush but no treatment with BDNF revealed a high density of atrophic profiles (~26.9 profiles/mm2) in these retinas.



View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 2. Low (A) and high (B) power photomicrographs showing examples of normal (stars) and degenerating (arrowheads) ganglion cells after ON crush. Examples of glial cells are indicated by arrows. Atrophic neurons are recognized by their irregular shape and clumped chromatin. Scale bar, 30 µm (A); 15 µm (B).

 
The data presented in Figure 3 compare the cellular morphology of the normal cat retina with that from cats that received a unilateral ON crush, a 1-week survival period, and no BDNF treatment. For the 24 normal retinas examined, we found the sample regions to contain an average of 539 ± 48 ganglion cells, with a mean population soma size of 411 ± 47 µm2, and a mean cell density of 313 ± 28 neurons/mm2 (Table 1) . Twenty six percent of the ganglion cells in the sample region had small (65–300 µm2) somata, 68% had medium-sized cell bodies (301–800 µm2), and 6% contained large (800–2000 µm2) somata.



View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 3. Photomicrographs and cell size histograms comparing the cellular morphology of the normal retina with that from cats that received an ON crush but no BDNF treatment. ON injury resulted in a significant loss of medium- and large-sized ganglion cells, and an increased level of gliosis. The data are based on 3 animals under each condition. Scale bar, 50 µm.

 
One week after ON crush, the mean number of ganglion cells within the sample region decreased to 263 ± 39 neurons, a reduction of 51.2% (Table 1 , Figs. 3 5 ). Mean soma size decreased 23%, to 316 ± 57µm2, and cell density now was only about one-half normal (151 ± 28 neurons/mm2). The percentage of neurons with large cell bodies decreased from 6% to 3.2%, whereas those with medium-sized somata decreased from 68% to 40.6% of the total population. While the proportion of small ganglion cells within the sample region more than doubled (56.2% versus 26%), this increase was due primarily to the loss of large (decrease from 98 to 25 neurons) and medium-sized neurons (from 1099 to 316 neurons), and not a significant increase in the number of small neurons (from 420 to 438 neurons) due to cell shrinkage. These cellular changes are reflected in the cell size histograms of Figure 3 , which show a clear decrease in the number of large and medium-sized ganglion cells, and a shift toward smaller soma sizes. The untreated retinas also showed a clear increase in the number of glial cells (compare normal with untreated, Fig. 3 ). Despite these changes, however, most surviving ganglion cells retained their round-oval shape, and well-defined nucleus and nucleolus.

Cellular Changes in Sham and BDNF-Treated Retinae
Single Injections.
The photomicrographs and cell size histograms in Figure 4 compare the cellular morphology of the 24 normal retinas with that from the 12 animals (three per treatment condition) that received intravitreal injections of BDNF at the time of nerve crush. In all cases, the BDNF-treated animals were examined after a 1-week survival period.



View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 4. Photomicrographs and cell size histograms comparing the cellular morphology of the normal retina with that of cats that received an ON crush and different levels of BDNF treatment. The highest percentage of surviving ganglion cells were measured after 30 µg injections. Higher doses resulted in inflammation and reduced ganglion cell survival. The data are based on 3 animals under each condition. Scale bar, 50 µm.

 
Injecting either sterile water (60 µl) or 15 µg of BDNF into the vitreal chamber at the time of the nerve crush had little or no beneficial effect. The retinas from these cats did not differ qualitatively or quantitatively from those of cats that received an ON crush, but no BDNF treatment (Table 1 , Figs. 3 5A ). Both the untreated and the 15 µg BDNF-treated retinas contained many microglia and a high density of atrophic profiles (~28 profiles/mm2). Both also showed comparable ganglion cell loss (51% and 48%, respectively). The density of ganglion cells in the sample regions of the untreated and 15 µg–treated retinas were 151 neurons/mm2 and 163 neurons/mm2, approximately one half the cell density measured in the normal retinas (313 neurons/mm2). Cell size measurements (Fig. 5B ) indicated an approximately twofold greater decrease in mean soma size in the untreated eyes (23%) than in those receiving 15 µg of BDNF (11%), but neither reduction was significantly different from normal. The sample region in the BDNF-treated eyes contained a lower percentage of small ganglion cells (46.8% versus 56.2%), and higher percentages of medium (48.2% versus 40.6%) and large (5.2% versus 3.2%) ganglion cells compared with the untreated eyes. Although this difference is indicated by a reduced amount of skew in the cell size histogram of the 15 µg BDNF versus untreated animals (compare Figs. 3 and 4 ), the cell size distributions for both groups of animals were statistically different from normal.

Intravitreal treatment with 30 µg of BDNF at the time of nerve crush resulted in a significant improvement in the number and appearance of surviving ganglion cells (Figs. 4 5) . Neurons in these retinas had well-defined membranes, uniformly distributed Nissl substance, and a clear nucleus and nucleolus. The mean percent difference in ganglion cell number between the normal and treated eyes for these animals was 19%, indicating a survival level of 81%. This represents a significant saving of ganglion cells compared with the untreated and 15 µg BDNF-treated eyes (49% and 52%, respectively). Although ganglion cell density in the sample region of these animals was only 81% of normal, it was 60% higher than that measured in the untreated and 15 µg BDNF-treated retinas. The density of atrophic profiles in the 30 µg BDNF-treated animals was only 4.6 profiles/mm2, significantly lower than the approximately 28 profiles/mm2 measured in the untreated and 15 µg BDNF–treated retinas. Ganglion cells in the 30 µg BDNF–treated eyes were approximately 5% smaller than normal (389 µm2 versus 411 µm2), but as a population had a mean soma size that was 13% to 23% greater than that of the untreated (316 µm2) and 15 µg BDNF–treated (367 µm2) eyes. These differences were not statistically significant. The percentages of ganglion cells within the sample region with small, medium, and large somata in the 30 µg BDNF–treated eyes were 39.9%, 53.9%, and 6.2%, respectively. This represented an increase in the proportions of cells with large and medium-sized somata, which resulted in a broadening of the cell size distribution compared with normal. The two distributions, however, were not statistically similar.

Increasing the dose of BDNF to either 60 µg or 90 µg also resulted in a significant improvement in the appearance and number of surviving ganglion cells when compared with either no treatment or treatment with 15 µg of BDNF. Similar to the 30 µg BDNF–treated animals, the sample regions of these eyes contained low densities of atrophic profiles (6.6 and 1.3 profiles/mm2, respectively). However, unlike the 15 µg and 30 µg BDNF–treated animals in which increased levels of BDNF produced increased numbers of surviving ganglion cells, in these eyes ganglion cell number decreased with the application of higher doses of neuroprotectant (30 µg: 81%; 60 µg: 77%; 90 µg: 70%). The mean number of ganglion cells in the sample region of the 60 µg BDNF–treated eyes (414 cells) was significantly greater than that measured in the untreated (263 cells) and 15 µg BDNF–treated eyes (281 cells), but the mean number measured in the 90 µg BDNF–treated eyes (378 cells) was not (Fig. 5A , Table 1 ). Overall, the ganglion cells in the 60 µg–treated eyes were approximately 16% smaller than normal (345 µm2 versus 411 µm2), whereas those in the 90 µg–treated eyes were slightly larger than normal (420 µm2). The sample region in the 60 µg–treated eyes showed a slightly lower than normal proportion of ganglion cells (4.2% versus 6%) with large somata and a higher than normal proportion (53% versus 26%) with small somata. The cell size distributions indicated a continued reduction in the number of ganglion cells with medium-sized somata. By contrast, the proportions of ganglion cells with small, medium, and large somata in the eyes treated with 90 µg of BDNF were almost identical with those measured in the normal eyes (30.5% versus 26%; 64.2% versus 68%; 5.4% versus 6%). Mainly, this was due to the increased survival of medium-sized ganglion cells. Nevertheless, the cell size distributions for both the 60 µg and 90 µg remained statistically different from normal.

One noticeable difference between the 30 µg, 60 µg, and 90 µg BDNF–treated retinas was a clear increase in the number of inflammatory cells present with increased levels of the drug (Figs. 4 and 6) . In most cases the inflammatory cells were distributed near blood vessels, or scattered randomly across the retina. However, in some areas these cells appeared to be clustered over specific neuronal profiles (Fig. 6B) .



View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 6. Photomicrographs showing the inflammatory response produced by injection of 90 µg of BDNF. Most inflammatory cells were either randomly distributed or associated with blood vessels (A, arrows). Others were clustered over unidentified retinal profiles (B, arrowheads). Scale bar, 50 µm.

 
Multiple BDNF Injections.
Three cats with unilateral ON crush received dual injections of BDNF. In all animals, the first injection was made at the time of the ON crush and the second injection 4 days post-crush. Two cats received double injections of 30 µg of BDNF, while the third cat received multiple 60 µg BDNF injections. In all cases, the percentage of surviving ganglion cells was comparable to that of a single injection given at the time of the nerve crush (30 µg: 81% versus 84%; 60 µg: 77% versus 76%). Similarly, no differences were seen with respect to single versus multiple injections and mean soma size (30 µg: 389 µm2 versus 408 µm2; 60 µg: 345 µm2 versus 345 µm2) or ganglion cell density (neurons/mm2) within the sample area (30 µg: 254 versus 264; 60 µg: 244 versus 237).

Combined BDNF and L-NAME Injections
Three cats that received high doses of BDNF (90 µg) also were treated during the 1-week survival period with daily injections of L-NAME, a nitric oxide synthase specific inhibitor (35 mg/kg per day). Although treatment with L-NAME eliminated the inflammatory response induced by the high levels of BDNF, it did not result in a significant change in the size, number, or density of ganglion cells measured when compared with animals that received 90 µg injections of BDNF alone (size: 315.3 ± 32.6 µm2 versus 420 ± 64 µm2; number: 383 ± 62.9 cells versus 378 ± 31cells; density: 223 ± 36.4 neurons/mm2 versus 219 ± 18 neurons/mm2).


   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
The primary goal of this study was to determine whether BDNF, a well-known neuroprotectant in the small rat eye, might also serve as an effective neuroprotectant in primate-sized eyes, where dose and diffusion differences may be limiting factors. The importance of these data derives from their potential use in the treatment of retinal diseases, and in particular glaucoma, where a reduction in target-derived neurotrophin levels has been implicated as playing a role in retinal ganglion cell death.11 12

In agreement with previous studies in the rat,15 16 17 18 19 our data show that intravitreal application of BDNF also can enhance retinal ganglion cell survival in cats after ON injury. This result was not unexpected, because ganglion cells in the cat retina (Chen H, unpublished data, 2000) like those in the rat and other species,31 32 33 express TrkB, the high-affinity BDNF receptor. However, in contrast with the rat, in which relatively small amounts of BDNF (~0.5–5 µg), and sometimes vehicle solution alone, have been shown to promote ganglion cell survival, we found that in the larger cat eye, vehicle solution alone had no beneficial effect, and that approximately 30 µg of BDNF was needed to achieve a significant level of neuroprotection. Although this amount of drug may appear excessive, when it is taken into consideration that the vitreal chamber of the cat eye is approximately 60-fold larger than that of the rat (3 ml versus 50 µl), the effective dose for these different eyes is approximately the same (~0.01 µg BDNF/µl of vitreal volume).

Increasing the amount of BDNF injected above 30 µg resulted in a decrease, rather than increase, in ganglion cell survival (Fig. 5A) . Eyes receiving 30 µg of BDNF showed the highest level of survival (81%), whereas those receiving 60 and 90 µg showed progressively fewer surviving cells (77% and 70%, respectively). A similar dose-related limitation in BDNF effectiveness has been reported in the rat retina,34 as well as in other areas of the central nervous system (CNS).35 36 37 Although many factors may be involved, recent work has focused on two specific mechanisms. The first concerns BDNF-induced nitric oxide (NO) neurotoxicity,36 38 39 40 and the second involves BDNF-induced downregulation of the TrkB receptor.35 41 42 43 Nitric oxide is a relatively ubiquitous molecule that modulates a number of different physiological processes. Typically, NO is localized in a tissue by immunocytochemical recognition of its synthesizing enzyme, nitric oxide synthase (NOS). Of the different isoforms, neuronal NOS (nNOS) and inducible NOS (iNOS) have been studied most completely in the retina. Species differences aside, there is good evidence that nNOS is found in all five of the major cell types of the vertebrate retina (ganglion, amacrine, bipolar, horizontal and photoreceptor), and iNOS is associated primarily with Müller cells and microglia.38 39 44 45 Recent studies in the rat have shown that both nNOS and iNOS activity are elevated after ON section and/or intravitreal injection of BDNF.38 39 That increased NOS activity affects retinal ganglion cell survival is indicated by the neuroprotective action of concurrent administration of NOS inhibitors.34 38 39

In addition to BDNF-induced iNOS activation in microglia, it also has been hypothesized that BDNF induces iNOS activity in immune-competent cells.38 Both these mechanisms are relevant to the present study, where ON crush produced an increase in the number of microglia (Figs. 3 4) and high doses of BDNF (90 µg), with ON crush or alone, generated a strong inflammatory response within the retina (Figs. 4 6) . We unexpectedly found that treatment with the NOS-inhibitor L-NAME blocked the BDNF-induced inflammatory response, but did not enhance ganglion cell survival, a result in direct contrast with that obtained in the rat. Although it is possible that differences in dose (50 mg/kg per day versus 35 mg/kg per day)38 and route of administration (intravitreal versus intraperitoneal)39 are the cause of this variation, that the retinas of the L-NAME treated cats appeared normal suggests that iNOS derived from BDNF-activated immune cells was not a limiting factor. It does not rule out, however, incomplete blockade of other NO sources.

BDNF exerts its influence on ganglion and other cells in the retina via TrkB receptors.46 47 There are two types of TrkB receptor: full length and truncated. The basic difference between the two is that the truncated form shows some amino acid residue variations and lacks the cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase domain. Neurotrophin binding to the extracellular domain of the full-length receptor induces phosphorylation of tyrosine residues within the cytoplasmic domain. Downstream of the phosphorylated internal domain are several intracellular signaling pathways, and activation of these pathways has been shown to regulate gene expression related to cell death and survival.48 49 50 51 52 Recent studies have demonstrated that continuous application of BDNF to the brain or cultured neurons results in a decrease in TrkB receptor protein and/or mRNA,35 41 42 43 and we have found this also to be true in the rat retina.53 A single injection of BDNF (5 µg) produces approximately a 96% decrease in retinal TrkB protein over the first 24 hours. Recovery is slow, achieving only approximately 31% of normal at 14 days after injection. Studies using chimeric structures of the TrkA and TrkB receptors indicate that a short sequence in the juxtamembrane region of the cytoplasmic domain is responsible for neurotrophin-induced downregulation of the TrkB receptor.42 Based on these data, it is reasonable to hypothesize that BDNF-induced downregulation of the TrkB receptor may also have played a role in limiting drug effectiveness in the present study. In addition, it may also have been responsible for our failure, and that of others, to achieve enhanced ganglion cell survival through the administration of multiple injections of BDNF. Given the rapid receptor downregulation and long recovery time,53 it is not surprising that our administration of a second BDNF injection just 4 days after ON crush did not increase ganglion cell survival over that seen with the initial treatment. DiPolo et al.,19 did not find a similar decrease in TrkB effectiveness (until ~10 days after axotomy) with prolonged delivery of BDNF; however, this result may reflect a positive side to their approach. By transfecting retinal Müller cells to produce and release BDNF, their method of drug delivery was much less invasive than that used here and in the other rat studies. In addition, the relatively slow delivery of BDNF in their retinas may have allowed adjacent truncated TrkB receptors to better buffer the concentration of drug within the eye,54 55 thereby preventing rapid activation of various inhibitory mechanisms.

The cell size measurements (Figs. 3 4) indicate that although both large and medium-sized ganglion cells are affected, ON crush has a much more severe effect on the medium-sized cells. One week after ON crush and no BDNF treatment, both populations of neurons showed approximately a 75% reduction in ganglion cell number within the sample area. However, because medium-sized ganglion cells comprise a much larger proportion of all ganglion cells in the cat retina,22 23 24 25 26 27 the number of medium-sized ganglion cells lost from these retinas was approximately 10 times greater than that of large ganglion cells (783 medium versus 72 large). Shrinkage of medium-sized cells did not appear to be a significant factor; there was only a 4% increase in the number of small ganglion cells in these animals. A rapid and severe loss of medium-sized ganglion cells is consistent with other studies of ON damage in the cat,56 57 58 including elevation of IOP.59 A similar selective loss of medium-sized cells also has been reported in the avian retina with experimental glaucoma.60 Although these results appear to be in contrast with human glaucoma, in which it generally is thought that large ganglion cells are most susceptible, anatomic7 and physiological61 62 evidence indicates that small and medium-sized ganglion cells also can be affected severely in the glaucomatous human retina.

The primary effect of the BDNF treatments was to restore balance to the proportions of small-, medium-, and large-sized ganglion cells within the sample region. Treatment with 30 µg BDNF saved the largest number of ganglion cells, including the highest number of large ganglion cells. The increase in medium, and particularly small ganglion cells, may reflect the increased ability of the BDNF at this dose to block the rapid loss of medium-sized cells, but not maintain their normal size. Increasing the amount of BDNF injected to 90 µg caused a reduction in the number of large and small ganglion cells, but produced the largest saving of medium-sized neurons. This resulted in a normal balance in the cell proportions. Although more cell-specific studies are needed, the data suggest differential sensitivities of large and medium-sized ganglion cells to intravitreal application of BDNF. Large ganglion cells appear to respond well to low doses, but their survival is limited by high doses. Medium-sized cells appear to respond less well to low doses, but do not show a decline with high levels of drug application. This differential effect may reflect differences in the number and type (full length versus truncated) of TrkB receptors present on large versus medium ganglion cells, or it might reflect differences in retinal circuitry. The close association of large ganglion cells with amacrine cells, which also contain TrkB receptors and are capable of producing NO, may be a disadvantage to these neurons in the presence of high levels of BDNF. Ongoing studies are designed to isolate the potential differential influences of BDNF on the various classes of cat ganglion cells.

In summary, the data presented here indicate that BDNF is a suitable neuroprotectant for use in primate-sized eyes. The best intravitreal dose for short-term treatment, which may be sufficient when combined with a reduction in IOP, appears to be approximately 0.01 µg BDNF/µl vitreal volume. Improving the long-term neuroprotective effectiveness of BDNF will require a better understanding of the differential effect the drug has on different classes of ganglion cells, as well as the relation between these neurons and other BDNF-sensitive elements of the retina.


   Acknowledgements
 
The authors thank Judith McMillan for technical assistance with the surgical procedures, histology, and cell measurements.


   Footnotes
 
Supported by National Eye Institute Grant EY11159 (AJW) and a grant from the Michigan State University Foundation.

Submitted for publication August 22, 2000; revised December 11, 2000; accepted January 8, 2001.

Commercial relationships policy: N.

Corresponding author: Arthur J. Weber, Department of Physiology, B-512 West Fee Hall, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824. weberar{at}msu.edu


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Quigley, HA, Addicks, EM (1981) Regional differences in the structure of the lamina cribrosa and their relation to glaucomatous optic nerve damage Arch Ophthalmol 99,137-143[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Quigley, HA, Hohman, R, Addicks, EM, Green, WR (1981) Morphologic changes in the lamina cribrosa and their relation to glaucomatous optic nerve damage Arch Ophthalmol 99,137-143
  3. Weber, AJ, Kaufman, PL, Hubbard, WC (1998) Morphology of single ganglion cells in the glaucomatous primate retina Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39,2304-2320[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Glovinsky, Y, Quigley, HA, Dunkelberger, GR (1991) Retinal ganglion cell loss is size dependent in experiment glaucoma Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 32,484-490[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Glovinsky, Y, Quigley, HA, Pease, ME (1993) Foveal ganglion cell loss is size dependent in experimental glaucoma Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 34,395-400[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Quigley, HA, Dunkelberger, GR, Green, WR (1988) Chronic human glaucoma causing selectively greater loss of large optic nerve fibers Ophthalmology 95,357-363[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Quigley, HA, Dunkelberger, GR, Green, WR (1989) Retinal ganglion cell atrophy correlated with automated perimetry in human eyes with glaucoma Am J Ophthalmol 107,453-464[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Quigley, HA, Sanchez, RM, Dunkelberger, GR, L’Hernault, NL, Baginski, TA (1987) Chronic glaucoma selectively damages large optic nerve fibers Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 28,913-920[Abstract]
  9. Quigley, HA, Anderson, DR (1976) The dynamics and location of axonal transport blockade by acute intraocular pressure elevation in primate optic nerve Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 15,606-616[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Anderson, DR, Hendrickson, A. (1974) Effect of intraocular pressure on rapid axonal transport in monkey optic nerve Invest Ophthalmol 13,771-783[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Pease, ME, McKinnon, SJ, Quigley, HA, Kerrigan-Baumrind, LA, Zack, DJ (2000) Obstructed axonal transport of BDNF and its receptor TrkB in experimental glaucoma Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41,764-774[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Quigley, HA, McKinnon, SJ, Zack, DJ, Pease, ME, Kerrigan-Baumrind, L, Kerrigan, DF, Mitchell, RS (2000) Retrograde axonal transport of BDNF in retinal ganglion cells is blocked by acute IOP elevation in rats Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41,3460-3466[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Aguayo AJ, Clarke TN, Jelsma P, Hyman Friedman HC, Bray GM. Effects of neurotrophins on the survival and regrowth of injured retinal neurons. In: Growth factors as drugs for neurological and sensory disorders. Wiley, Chichester. (Ciba Found Symp 196) 1996:135–148.
  14. Reh TA, McCabe K, Kelley MW, Bermingham-McDonogh O. Growth factors in the treatment of degenerative retinal disorders. In: Growth factors as drugs for neurological and sensory disorders. Wiley, Chichester. (Ciba Found Symp 196) 1996:120–134.
  15. Mansour-Robaey, S, Clarke, DB, Wang, YC, Bray, GM, Aguayo, AJ (1994) Effects of ocular injury and administration of brain-derived neurotrophic factor on survival and regrowth of axotomized retinal ganglion cells Proc Natl Acad Sci 91,1632-1636[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Mey, J, Thanos, S. (1993) Intravitreal injections of neurotrophic factors support the survival of axotomized retinal ganglion cells in adult rats in vivo Brain Res 602,304-317[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Peinado-Ramón, P, Salvador, M, Villegas-Pérez, MP, Vidal-Sanz, M. (1996) Effects of Axotomy and Intraocular Administration of NT-4, NT-3, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor on the survival of adult rat retinal ganglion cells Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 37,489-500[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Sawai, H, Clarke, DB, Kittelerova, P, Bray, GM, Aguayo, AJ (1996) Brain-derived neurotrophic factor and neurotrophin-4/5 stimulate growth of axonal branches from regenerating retinal ganglion cells J Neurosci 16,3887-3894[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Di Polo, AD, Aigner, LJ, Dunn, RJ, Bray, GM, Aguayo, AJ (1998) Prolonged delivery of brain-derived neurotrophic factor by adenovirus-infected Müller cells temporarily rescues injured retinal ganglion cells Proc Natl Acad Sci 95,3978-3983[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Fawcett, JP, Bamji, SX, Causing, CG, Aloyz, R, Ase, AR, Reader, TA, McMlean, JH, Miller, FD (1998) Functional evidence that BDNF is an anterograde neuronal trophic factor in the CNS J Neurosci 18,2808-2821[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Weibel, D, Kreutzberg, GW, Schwab, ME (1995) Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) prevents lesion-induced axonal die-back in young rat optic nerve Brain Res 679,249-254[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Boycott, BB, Wässle, H. (1974) The morphological types of ganglion cells of the domestic cat’s retina J Physiol 240,397-419[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Kolb, H, Nelson, R, Mariani, A. (1981) Amacrine cells, bipolar cells and ganglion cells of the cat retina: a Golgi study Vision Res 21,1081-1114[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Stone, J. (1965) A quantitative analysis of the distribution of ganglion cells in the cat’s retina J Comp Neurol 124,337-352[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Stone, J. (1978) The number and distribution of ganglion cells in the cat’s retina J Comp Neurol 180,753-772[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Wong, ROL, Hughes, A. (1987) The morphology, number, and distribution of a large population of confirmed displaced amacrine cells in the adult cat retina J Comp Neurol 255,159-177[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Hughes, A. (1981) Population magnitudes and distribution of the major modal classes of cat retinal ganglion cell as estimated from HRP filling and a systematic survey of the soma diameter spectra for classical neurones J Comp Neurol 197,303-339[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Cole, DF. (1974) Comparative aspects of the intraocular fluids Davson, H Graham, LT, Jr. eds. The Eye 5,71-162 Academic Press New York.
  29. Leon, S, Yin, Y, Nguyen, J, Irwin, N, Benowitz, LI (2000) Lens injury stimulates axon regeneration in the mature rat optic nerve J Neurosci 20,4615-4626[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Vakkur, GJ, Bishop, PO, Kozak, W. (1963) Visual optics in the cat including posterior nodal distance and retinal landmarks Vision Res 3,289-314
  31. Jelsma, TN, Friedman, HH, Berkelaar, M, Bray, GM, Aguayo, AJ (1993) Different forms of the neurotrophin receptor trkB mRNA predominate in rat retina and optic nerve J Neurobiol 24,1207-1214[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Perez, MTR, Caminos, E. (1995) Expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and of its functional receptor in neonatal and adult rat retina Neurosci Lett 183,96-99[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Cellerino, A, Kohler, K. (1997) Brain-derived neurotrophic factor/neurtrophin-4 receptor TrkB is localized on ganglion cells and dopaminergic amacrine cells in the vertebrate retina J Comp Neurol ,149-160
  34. Klöcker, N, Cellerino, A, Bähr, M (1998) Free radical scavenging and inhibition of nitric oxide synthase potentiates the neurotrophic effects of brain-derived neurotrophic factor on axotomized retinal ganglion cells in vivo J Neurosci. 18,1038-1046[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Frank, L, Ventimiglia, R, Anderson, K, Lindsay, RM, Rudge, JS (1996) BDNF down-regulates neurotrophin responsiveness, TrkB protein and TrkB mRNA levels in cultured rat hippocampal neurons Eur J Neurosci 8,1220-1230[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Ishikawa, Y, Ikeuchi, T, Hatanaka, H. (2000) Brain-derived neurotrophic factor accelerates nitric oxide donor-induced apoptosis of cultured cortical neurons J Neurochem 75,494-502[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Vejsada, R, Sagot, Y, Kato, SC (1994) BDNF-mediated rescue of axotomized motor neurones decreases with increasing dose NeuroReport 5,1889-1892[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Klöcker, N, Kermer, P, Gleichmann, M, Weller, M, Bähr, M (1999) Both the neuronal and inducible isoforms contribute to upregulation of retinal nitric oxide synthase activity by brain-derived neurotrophic factor J Neurosci. 19,8517-8527[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Koeberle, PD, Ball, AK (1999) Nitric oxide synthase inhibition delays axonal degeneration and promotes the survival of axotomized retinal ganglion cells Exp Neurol 158,366-381[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Neal, M, Cunningham, J, Matthews, K. (1998) Selective release of nitric oxide from retinal amacrine and bipolar cells Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39,850-853[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Knusel, B, Gao, H, Okazaki, T, Yoshida, T, Mori, N, Hefti, F, Kaplan, DR (1997) Ligand-induced down-regulation of trk messenger RNA, protein and tyrosine phosphorylation in rat cortical neurons Neuroscience 78,851-862[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Sommerfeld, MT, Schweigreiter, R, Barde, YA, Hoppe, E. (2000) Down regulation of the neurotrophin receptor TrkB following ligand binding J Biological Chem 275,8982-8990[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Frank, L, Wiegand, SJ, Siuciak, JA, Lindsay, RM, Rudge, JS (1997) Effects of BDNF infusion on the regulation of TrkB protein and message in adult rat brain Exp Neurol 145,62-70[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Kim, IB, Lee, EJ, Kim, KY, Ju, WK, Oh, SJ, Joo, CK, Chun, MH (1999) Immunocytochemical localization of nitric oxide synthase in the mammalian retina Neurosci Lett 267,193-196[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Neufeld, AH, Shareef, S, Pena, J. (2000) Cellular localization of neuronal nitric oxide synthase (NOS-1) in the human and rat retina J Comp Neurol 416,269-275[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Klein, R, Nanduri, V, Jing, S, Lamballe, F, Tapley, P, Bryant, S, Cordon-Cardo, C, Jones, KR, Reichardt, LF, Barbacid, M. (1991) The TrkB tyrosine protein kinase is a receptor for brain-derived neurotrophic factor and neurotrophin-3 Cell 66,395-403[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Squinto, SP, Stitt, TN, Aldrich, TH, Davis, S, Bianco, SM, Radziejewski, C, Glass, DJ, Masiakowski, P, Furth, ME, Valenzuela, DM, DiStefano, PS, Yancopoulos, GD (1991) TrkB encodes a functional receptor for brain-derived neurotrophic factor and neurotrophin-3 but not nerve growth factor Cell 65,885-893[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  48. Segal, RA, Greenberg, ME (1996) Intracellular signaling pathways activated by neurotrophic factors Ann Rev Neurosci 19,463-489[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  49. Wahlin, KJ, Campochiaro, PA, Zack, DJ, Adler, R. (2000) Neurotrophic factors cause activation of intracellular signaling pathways in Müller cells and other cells of the inner retina, but not photoreceptors Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41,927-936[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Meyer-Franke, A, Wilkinson, GA, Kruttgen, A, Hanson, MG, Jr, Reichardt, LF, Barres, BA. (1998) Depolarization and cAMP elevation rapidly recruit TrkB to the plasma membrane of CNS neurons Neuron. ,681-693
  51. Finkbeiner, S, Tavazoie, SF, Maloratsky, A, Jacobs, KM, Harris, KM, Greenberg, ME (1997) CREB: A major mediator of neuronal neurotrophin responses Neuron 19,1031-1047[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  52. Pizzorusso, T, Ratto, GM, Putignano, E, Maffei, L. (2000) Brain-derived neurotrophic factor causes cAMP response element binding protein phosphorylation in absence of calcium increases in slices and cultured neurons from rat visual cortex J Neurosci 20,2809-2816[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Chen H, Weber AJ. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) reduces TrkB protein levels in the normal retina and following optic nerve crush in rats. Soc Neurosci Abstr. 2000.
  54. Alderson, RF, Curtis, R, Alterman, AL, Linday, RM, DiStefano, PS (2000) Truncated TrkB mediates the endocytosis and release of BDNF and neurotrophin-4/5 by rat astrocytes and Schwann cells in vitro Brian Res 871,210-222[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  55. Eide, FF, Vining, ER, Eide, BL, Zang, K, Wang, X-Y, Reichardt, LF (1996) Naturally occurring truncated trkB receptors have dominant inhibitory effects on brain-derived neurotrophic factor signaling J Neurosci 16,3123-2129[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Cottee, LJ, FitzGibbon, T, Westland, K, Burke, W. (1991) Long survival of retinal ganglion cells in the cat after selective crush of the optic nerve Eur J Neurosci 3,1245-1254[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  57. Silveira, LCL, Russelakit-Carneiro, M, Perry, VH (1994) The ganglion cell response to optic nerve injury in the cat: differential responses revealed by neurofibrillar staining J Neurocytol 23,75-86[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  58. Watanabe, M, Sawai, H, Fukuda, Y. (1995) Number and dendritic morphology of retinal ganglion cells that survived after axotomy in adult cats J Neurobiol 27,189-203[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  59. Zhou, Y, Wang, W, Ren, B, Shou, T. (1994) Receptive field properties of cat retinal ganglion cells during short-term IOP elevation Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 35,2758-92764[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Takatsuji, K, Tohyama, M, Sato, Y, Nakamura, A. (1988) Selective loss of retinal ganglion cells in albino avian glaucoma Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 29,901-909[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. Johnson, CA (1994) Selective versus nonselective losses in glaucoma J Glaucoma 3,S32-S44
  62. Greenstein, VC, Halevy, D, Zaidi, Q, Koenig, KL, Ritch, RH (1996) Chromatic and luminance systems deficits in glaucoma Vision Res 36,621-629[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 IOVSHome page
M. E. Pease, D. J. Zack, C. Berlinicke, K. Bloom, F. Cone, Y. Wang, R. L. Klein, W. W. Hauswirth, and H. A. Quigley
Effect of CNTF on Retinal Ganglion Cell Survival in Experimental Glaucoma
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., May 1, 2009; 50(5): 2194 - 2200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 IOVSHome page
T. Sato, T. Fujikado, T.-S. Lee, and Y. Tano
Direct Effect of Electrical Stimulation on Induction of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor from Cultured Retinal Muller Cells
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2008; 49(10): 4641 - 4646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Physiol.Home page
A. J. Weber, C. D. Harman, and S. Viswanathan
Effects of optic nerve injury, glaucoma, and neuroprotection on the survival, structure, and function of ganglion cells in the mammalian retina
J. Physiol., September 15, 2008; 586(18): 4393 - 4400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 IOVSHome page
A. J. Weber and C. D. Harman
BDNF Preserves the Dendritic Morphology of {alpha} and {beta} Ganglion Cells in the Cat Retina after Optic Nerve Injury
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2008; 49(6): 2456 - 2463.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 IOVSHome page
M. M. Loeliger, T. Briscoe, and S. M. Rees
BDNF Increases Survival of Retinal Dopaminergic Neurons after Prenatal Compromise
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2008; 49(3): 1282 - 1289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 IOVSHome page
C. J. Lieven, M. J. Hoegger, C. R. Schlieve, and L. A. Levin
Retinal ganglion cell axotomy induces an increase in intracellular superoxide anion.
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2006; 47(4): 1477 - 1485.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BrainHome page
V. Pernet and A. Di Polo
Synergistic action of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and lens injury promotes retinal ganglion cell survival, but leads to optic nerve dystrophy in vivo
Brain, April 1, 2006; 129(4): 1014 - 1026.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
L. Cheng, P. Sapieha, P. Kittlerova, W. W. Hauswirth, and A. Di Polo
TrkB Gene Transfer Protects Retinal Ganglion Cells from Axotomy-Induced Death In Vivo
J. Neurosci., May 15, 2002; 22(10): 3977 - 3986.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, H.
Right arrow Articles by Weber, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, H.
Right arrow Articles by Weber, A. J.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS