|
|
||||||||
induced Sickle RBC Retention in Retina by a VLA-4 Antagonist
1 From the Wilmer Ophthalmological Institute, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland; 2 Texas Biotechnology Corp., Houston, Texas; 3 Department of Immunology, University of Texas, Houston; and 4 Division of Hematology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
. TNF-
stimulates expression by endothelial cells of adhesion molecules,
including vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM) 1. Others have
demonstrated that VLA-4 (
4ß1), a ligand
for VCAM-1 or fibronectin, is present on a fraction of sickle
reticulocytes. The intent of this study was to determine, using a rat
model, if TNF-
increases retention of sickle erythrocytes in retina
and if that retention can be inhibited.
METHODS. TNF-
was given intraperitoneally to rats 5 hours before IV
administration of FITC-labeled, density-separated sickle erythrocytes.
After 5 minutes, rats were exsanguinated, and retinas were excised and
incubated for ADPase activity, permitting the determination of the
number and location of retained cells.
RESULTS. TNF-
caused a three- to fourfold increase in retention of sickle
erythrocytes in retinal capillaries (P < 0.05) but
not of normal human erythrocytes. Preincubation of sickle erythrocytes
with TBC772, a peptide that blocks the binding of
4ß1 and
4ß7,
or a monoclonal antibody against VLA-4 (19H8), significantly inhibited
the TNF-
induced retention (P
0.02), whereas
a control cyclic peptide and antibody had no effect. IV TBC772 also
inhibited sickle erythrocyte retention (P = 0.01).
Two intravenously administered anti-fibronectin antibodies inhibited
sickle cell retention as well, but an anti-rat VCAM-1 antibody did not
inhibit retention.
CONCLUSIONS. The authors conclude that TNF-
stimulates retention of sickle
erythrocytes in the retinal vasculature. This increased retention can
be blocked by a VLA-4 antagonist, suggesting that the cells retained
after cytokine stimulation are reticulocytes. The counter-receptor for
VLA-4 in this rat retina model appears to be fibronectin and not
VCAM-1, based on data obtained using antibodies against these
molecules.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have developed a rat model for sickle cellmediated vaso-occlusion to study these events in the retina.14 The initial study with this model demonstrated that dense erythrocytes (SS4 cells) from subjects with sickle cell anemia (SS genotype) were retained in normal rats during normoxic conditions, and the number increased as arterial PO2 decreased. In contrast, neither the reticulocyte-rich, normal-density fraction from SS subjects (SS2) nor density fractions from subjects with SC disease (SC2 and SC4) were retained in significant numbers under the conditions tested.14 One possible explanation is that the rats used in our model were inflammation- and infection-free animals. Sickle cell disease subjects, on the other hand, have high circulating cytokine levels, high white cell counts, and frequent infections.15
Cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)
and IL-1
upregulate leukocyte adhesion molecule expression by vascular
endothelial cells.16
17
TNF-
and IL-1
are elevated
in steady state sickle cell subjects.18
19
Sickle
erythrocyte retention produces low-level tissue damage15
and/or more severe tissue damage associated with painful crisis
events.2
TNF-
is one of the most potent stimulators of
endothelial cell upregulation of leukocyte/endothelial cell adhesion
molecules, although the time course for upregulation of each adhesion
molecule depends on the origin of the target endothelial
cell.20
21
22
Several groups have recently demonstrated that some reticulocytes from
sickle cell subjects have the integrin
4ß1 (VLA-4) on their
surface.23
24
25
These cells could be stress reticulocytes
that have been prematurely released from marrow because of rapid
clearing of circulating RBCs in sickle cell subjects. The endothelial
cell/leukocyte adhesion molecule VCAM-1 has been reported to mediate
sickle reticulocyte binding to human endothelium in vitro via the VLA-4
counter-receptor present on some reticulocytes.23
24
25
Setty and Stuart26
have found that VCAM-1/VLA-4
interaction is responsible for the in vitro adherence of dense cells
and reticulocytes to both macrovascular and retinal microvascular
endothelial cells. It remains to be determined if these findings can be
reproduced in in vivo vasculatures.
The present study evaluates the effect of the cytokine TNF-
on
sickle erythrocyte retention in the retinal vasculature. The potential
involvement of VLA-4 on sickle erythrocyte retention in retina was
investigated using a cyclic peptide antagonist of
4ß1 and
4ß7,
TBC772,27
and IV antibodies against
4ß1 and its receptors,
VCAM-1 and fibronectin. The results demonstrate that increased sickle
erythrocyte binding in cytokine-stimulated retina can be prevented by a
VLA-4 antagonist.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Immediately on receipt, the cells were washed in phosphate-buffered saline and then labeled with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC; Research Organics Inc., Cleveland, OH): 0.1 ml of packed cells/2.0 ml of 0.1% FITC in PBS, for 1 hour at room temperature by the procedure of Butcher and Weissman.29 AA RBCs were stored overnight as well before labeling. Kaul et al.30 demonstrated that FITC-labeling of sickle cells has no effect on adhesion of SS2 cells or retention of SS4 cells in rat mesocecum by comparing results for pairs of FITC-labeled and unlabeled cells. All animal experimentation was completed within 24 hours after the cells were drawn.
Preparation of Rats
Male SpragueDawley rats (Harlan, Frederick, MD)
weighing 200 to 250 g were anesthetized with 0.1 ml of ketamine
(50 mg/ml; Phoenix Scientific, Inc., St. Joseph, MO)/Rompun (5 mg/ml;
Phoenix Scientific, Inc.) per 100 g body weight given IM. A
tracheotomy was performed, and the animals were ventilated using a
Harvard Rodent Ventilator (TV = 1.5 cm3/kg,
RR = 100). Femoral arteries were catheterized with polyethylene
tubing (PE-50) to draw samples for blood gas analysis (Acid Base
Laboratory ABL-5; Radiometer, Copenhagen, Denmark). Arterial blood
oxygen levels ranged between 100 and 150 mm Hg. A femoral vein in the
contralateral leg was catheterized with polyethylene tubing (PE-50)
tubing for delivery of FITC-labeled RBCs (300 µl, Hct 10). Cells were
injected slowly and allowed to circulate for 5 minutes. Animals were
treated in accordance with the ARVO Statement for Use of Animals in
Ophthalmic and Vision Research, and the studies were approved by the
Johns Hopkins University Institutional Review Board.
The animals were killed by an overdose of sodium pentobarbital after perfusion at 5 ml/min with 60 ml heparinized saline via the left ventricle after severing the jugular veins, and then the eyes were removed. Retinas were removed and processed by our ADPase flat-mount technique.31 The entire retinal vasculature was visualized under darkfield illumination (lead ADPase reaction product), and FITC-labeled cells were visualized by fluorescence microscopy. The number of RBCs in each retina and their location within the vasculature were noted for each set of experiments. AA cells were used as controls and yielded <10 cells retained per retina under all conditions. For some animals, after counting the number of FITC-labeled RBCs, granulocytes and monocytes were detected by incubating the retinas for enzyme histochemical demonstration of nonspecific esterase with napthol AS-D chloroacetate as substrate (kit 91; Sigma, St. Louis, MO), which labels granulocytes prominently red and monocytes pink.
Ten or twenty micrograms of TNF-
(recombinant rat TNF-
; R&D
Systems, Minneapolis, MN) per kg body weight was administered
IP at 5 and 9 hours before delivery of FITC-labeled RBCs. The
involvement of VLA-4 in sRBC retention was investigated with TBC772, a
cyclic peptide that is an antagonist of
4ß1 and
4ß7, and with TBC1194
as a control. TBC 772 is a cyclic hexapeptide with the sequence CWLDVC,
and peptide TBC1194 is a cyclic hexapeptide with a scrambled sequence
(CDLVWC).27
TBC772 blocks binding of VLA-4 to VCAM-1,
fibronectin, and mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule-1
(MadCAM-1)27
and can neutralize integrin coactivation
systems as occur in activation of T cells.32
Before administration to rats, SS-RBCs were also preincubated for 15
minutes with monoclonal antibody (mAb) 19H8, which recognizes
4ß1 but not
4ß7.32
33
There are two vascular endothelial cell counter receptors that could be
responsible for VLA-4mediated adhesion, the CS-1 portion of
fibronectin and VCAM-1. To determine whether SS-RBC retention in retina
was modulated by either of these counter-receptors, we administered IV
the following monoclonal antibodies, 30 or 60 minutes before
administration of SS-RBCs: 5 and 7.5 mg/kg anti-VCAM-1 (clone 5-F-10;
generously provided by Roy Lobb at Biogen, Boston,
MA)34
35
; 7.5 mg/kg anti-human fibronectin (FN-15,
Sigma); 7.5 mg/kg anti-CS-1 (clone 7E5, graciously provided by Tatiana
Ugarova, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH); or an isotype
matched mouse IgG (Jackson Laboratories, West Grove, PA).
Data are presented as the mean number of cells in retina ± SD.
The difference between cells retained with control versus experimental
peptides and antibodies were analyzed by the Students
t-test to determine statistical significance.
P
0.05 was considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
/kg, administered 5 or 9
hours before administration of FITC-labeled SS-RBCs. Both times of
administration resulted in a significant increase in SS-RBC retention
in rat retinal vessels (P < 0.05), and there was no
significant difference between the time periods (Fig. 2A
). Henninger et al.36
demonstrated that ICAM-1 (a
neutrophil/endothelial cell adhesion molecule) is elevated on
endothelium in mouse at 9 hours but not 5 hours after TNF-
.
Therefore, TNF-
administration 5 hours before delivering SS-RBCs was
used in all subsequent experiments to avoid any polymorphonuclear
leukocyte (PMN)-mediated vaso-occlusion. We then evaluated 10 and 20
µg TNF-
/kg body weight and found that 20 µg of recombinant rat
TNF-
yielded greater SS2 retention (P = 0.05) than
10 µg (Fig. 2B) . Furthermore, TNF-
stimulated the retention of
both SS2 (P = 0.008) and SS4 erythrocytes
(P = 0.001; Fig. 2C
). TNF-
at 20 µg/kg did not
increase the number of AA cells retained in rat retina (results not
shown). TNF-
at 20 µg/kg also did not change the number of
granulocytes (mostly PMNs) retained in retina, and when nonspecific
esterase positive cells were observed, they were not associated with
retained FITC-labeled erythrocytes (results not shown). These data
suggested that the increased number of FITC-labeled SS-RBCs observed in
retina after TNF-
(20 µg/kg given 5 hours before
FITC-erythrocytes) was not retained because of their association with
PMNs.
|
had stimulated production of
VCAM-1 by vascular endothelial cells and
VLA-4/
4ß1 on
reticulocytes was modulating adhesion of some SS erythrocytes to
vascular endothelium. Therefore, we investigated an antagonist of
4ß1 and
4ß7, cyclic peptide
TBC772. We evaluated the effect of TBC772 initially by preincubating
the SS2 or SS4 cells with 200 µM TBC772 or control peptide TBC1194
and gently rocking the cell suspension for 15 minutes before
administration of the SS-RBCs. Rats in these studies received 20 µg
TNF-
, 5 hours before administration of cells. As in our previous
study, more SS4 cells were retained in retina under normoxic conditions
than SS2 cells (Figs. 2C
and 3A) . TNF-
increased retention of both SS2 and SS4 (Figs. 2C
and 3A) .
Cells preincubated with TBC772 were retained in retina at the same
level as in rats not receiving TNF-
, that is, TBC772 prevented
TNF-
stimulated retention of both cell types (P
0.02; Fig. 3A
). The inhibition of TNF-
initiated retention by
TBC772 was dose dependent in that 200 µM yielded complete inhibition
of retention of SS2 cells (P < 0.001), whereas 50 µM
inhibited retention to a lesser extent (NS; Fig. 3B
). TBC772 can block
both
4ß1 and
4ß7, so a monoclonal
antibody that recognizes
4ß1 but not
4ß7 (mAb
19H8)32
33
was evaluated. This antibody significantly
inhibited SS-RBC retention in retina when FITC-labeled SS-RBCs were
incubated with it for 15 minutes before administration
(P < 0.002; Fig. 4
).
|
|
treated rats could also be inhibited by IV
delivery of TBC 772 (25 mg/kg), 5 minutes before administering cells
(P = 0.01; Fig. 3C
). If the peptide was administered IV
8 hours before administering cells, the inhibition was not
statistically significant (P = 0.06).
There are two well-established vascular endothelial cell
counter-receptors that could be responsible for VLA-4mediated SS-RBC
retention, the CS-1 portion of fibronectin and VCAM-1. TBC772 and mAb
19H8 antagonize VLA-4 binding to either of these
receptors.27
To determine whether either of these
counter-receptors on endothelial cells was involved in increased
retention of SS-RBCs in TNF-
treated animals, we administered mAbs
against them intravenously to rats before administering cells. The
monoclonal antibody against VCAM-1 (clone 5-F-10), which had previously
been shown to functionally block rat VCAM-1,34
35
was
administered 30 or 60 minutes before administration of SS-RBCs. Neither
dose (5 or 7.5 mg/kg) nor time of administration prevented increased
retention of SS-RBCs in TNF-
treated rats (Fig. 4)
. An mAb against
human fibronectin (7.5 mg/kg, FN-15) or an isotype-matched mouse IgG
was administered intravenously, 30 minutes before administration of
SS-RBCs. Anti-fibronectin inhibited retention of SS-RBCs
(P < 0.001; Fig. 5
). Furthermore, a mAb against the CS-1 domain of human
fibronectin37
38
also significantly inhibited retention of
SS-RBCs when administered IV 30 minutes before SS-RBCs
(P = 0.01; Fig. 5
).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
increase retention of sRBCs in retina, especially fractions rich in
reticulocytes. It has already been demonstrated that sickle cell
subjects, even in steady state, have increased circulating levels of
TNF-
and IL1ß.18
19
The high levels of these
cytokines may be due to frequent infections, low-level inflammation
from a continuum of vaso-occlusions in peripheral tissue, increased
white cell count, or more severe tissue damage that is incurred during
painful crisis.15
It is interesting that infections often
are precipitating factors for painful crisis in sickle cell
disease.15
39
Administration of lipopolysaccharide from
Gram-negative bacteria 20 hours before SS-RBC delivery increases
retention of SS-RBCs, especially reticulocyte rich fractions, in
retina.40
TNF-
upregulates expression of many leukocyte/endothelial cell
adhesion molecules like ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 and activates leukocytes such
as PMNs.16
17
36
Administration of TNF-
5 hours before
injection of FITC-labeled RBCs was chosen for most experiments to
minimize the expression of ICAM-1, based on the observations of
Henninger et al.36
in mouse. PMNs, which bind to ICAM-1
and can easily obstruct capillary lumens, were visualized in some
retinas by nonspecific esterase activity and were not increased in
retina nor associated with retained FITC-labeled-RBCs. VLA-4 is
expressed not only on sickle reticulocytes but also on mononuclear
leukocytes and prominently on T cells.41
Because we
completely blocked retention of FITC-RBCs by preincubating these cells
with peptide TBC772, it is unlikely that rat monocyte or T-cell
adherence to retinal endothelium via VLA-4 was involved in increased
SS-RBC retention. Finally, AA cell retention did not increase in
TNF-
treated rats, suggesting further that adhesion of rat
leukocytes did not cause human RBC retention.
It seemed surprising that both SS2 and SS4 cell retention was increased
in TNF-
treated rats. The SS4 fraction is the densest and contains
the most irreversibly sickled cells, whereas the SS2 fraction is
enriched for reticulocytes. Heterogeneity in the composition of
density-derived fractions is well established, as is heterogeneity in
erythrocyte characteristics between sickle cell
patients.42
Retention of both fractions may be due to the
presence of VLA-4positive reticulocytes in both fractions. FACS
analysis of SS2 and SS4 fractions using antibody 19H8 demonstrated
VLA-4positive cells in the SS4 fraction of some sickle cell subjects
(McIntyre B, Lutty G, unpublished results, 1998).
Additionally, we observed variation in cytokine-stimulated SS4 cell
retention in retina, suggesting that there may be interindividual
variation in the number of VLA-4positive cells in the SS4 fraction
(cf. Figs. 2C
and 3A
). Increased retention of both fractions was
observed in the in vitro study of Setty and Stuart,26
in
which they suggested that both fractions bind to VCAM-1.
The inhibition of SS-RBC retention by a peptide (TBC772) and a
monoclonal antibody (19H8) that block VLA-4 and not by a control
peptide or antibody suggests that the retention may be modulated by
VLA-4 on reticulocytes.23
24
25
There are two well
characterized vascular endothelial cell counter-receptors that could be
responsible for VLA-4mediated SS-RBC retention, the CS-1 portion of
fibronectin and VCAM-1. In vitro studies have demonstrated that either
VCAM-1 or fibronectin on endothelial cells could be the
counter-receptor for reticulocyte VLA-4.26
43
44
45
TBC772
antagonizes VLA-4 binding to either of these receptors.27
Attempts to block the retention of cells by administering anti-rat
VCAM-1 to the rats before administration of SS-RBCs were unsuccessful.
The antibody used in those experiments has been previously reported to
block rat T-cell entry into thymus at the same in vivo dose used in the
present study, to block adherence of T cells to rat high endothelial
cells in vitro, and to recognize VCAM-1 in histologic sections of rat
lymph nodes.34
35
This suggests either that VCAM-1 is not
elevated as predicted in the rat retinal vasculature 5 hours after
administration of 20 µg TNF-
/kg36
or that the level
of antibody administered was not sufficient to neutralize the VCAM-1
expressed on retinal vascular endothelial cells in this experiment.
However, anti-fibronectin (FN-15) completely inhibited increased
retention so it is probable that TBC772 is blocking the binding of
VLA-4 to the CS-1 segment of fibronectin, although the epitope on
fibronectin that this antibody recognizes is unknown. Additionally, IV
administration of a mAb against CS-1 in our model significantly
inhibited retention of SS-RBCs in TNF-
treated rats, further
suggesting that CS-1 is the receptor on retinal endothelial cells.
Kasschau et al.46
previously demonstrated in vitro
adherence of sickle RBCs to fibronectin, whereas normal RBCs do not
adhere. Kumar et al.45
have demonstrated that the same
fibronectin antibody used in the present study blocked adherence of
phorbol estertreated sickle erythrocytes to endothelial cells in a
flow chamber. They demonstrated further that CS-1 peptides could also
block this adherence.
The present study suggests that, in TNF-
treated rats, the
counter-receptor for VLA4 in retinal blood vessels is fibronectin.
TNF-
can modulate production of matrix components like
fibronectin.47
Perhaps TNF-
, while increasing vascular
permeability, exposes the CS-1 portion of fibronectin in the process.
Conformational changes in fibronectin have been demonstrated to alter
its cellular adhesive properties.48
Alternatively, changes
in endothelial cell membrane fluidity may cause CS-1 on endothelial
cell fibronectin to be exposed. Increased luminal exposure of CS-1 has
been observed in synovia during arthritis, a condition where TNF-
is
prominent.49
Manodori et al. have observed increased
adhesion of sickle RBCs after induction of interendothelial cell gaps
by thrombin.50
Inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-
and
IL-1b induce increased permeability in retinal blood vessels by
producing gaps between endothelial cells.51
Although fibronectin appears to be the receptor in our rat model,
in vitro studies have suggested that either the VCAM-1 or CS-1 portion
of fibronectin can serve as the counter-receptor for sickle
reticulocyte VLA-4.26
43
44
45
It has been suggested by in
vitro experiments that the counter-receptor in human sickle cell retina
may be VCAM-1.26
Stuart and Setty52
have
recently observed increased serum levels of soluble VCAM-1 during
sickle cell acute chest syndrome. We observed, in a recent
immunohistochemical study, increased expression of VCAM-1 in retinal
blood vessels and preretinal neovascularization of sickle cell
subjects.53
In ex vivo rat mesocecum after stimulation
with platelet activating factor, antibodies against
Vß3-inhibited
sickle cell retention.54
TBC772, however, shows no
inhibition of
Vß3 at doses as high as 1 mM.55
Therefore, it appears that there are many pathways involved in
retention of sickle RBCs in vivo and adherence to endothelial cells in
vitro. The pathway involved is probably dependent on the vasculature
studied and the stimulus for retention.
There are probably two mechanisms for sickle RBC retention in retina.
We have previously demonstrated that the number of dense cells from SS
subjects retained in retina increases after 5 minutes exposure to
decreasing arterial
PO2,14
which is
compatible with mechanical obstruction, i.e., obstruction due to
nondeformability. The present study demonstrates a second mechanism
that occurs when the retinal vasculature is stimulated with TNF-
,
adherence of VLA-4positive sRBCs to endothelium. Both of these
mechanisms could co-exist in the sickle cell subjects retina. If
elevated cytokines are present, VLA-4positive cells may adhere to
activated endothelium. Although the reticulocytes tend to be more
pliable, their presence in the microvasculature would block the dense,
rigid irreversibly sickled cells from passing through the
microvasculature. This would create hypoxia that, as we have already
demonstrated, will increase the dense cells retained in these vascular
segments. Fabry et al.56
have documented a similar
scenario in hind leg of rats. Kaul et al.30
57
58
have
also observed retention of SS2 sRBCs in the mesocecum and mesoappendix
and retention of dense cells after lighter density cells have adhered,
or during hypoxia.
The effects of TBC772 and mAb 19H8 on sickle RBC retention suggests VLA-4 as a target for prevention of cytokine-stimulated sickle RBC retention. TBC772 or similar molecules have potential therapeutic application in sickle cell disease because it interferes with VLA-4 binding to both VCAM-1 and CS-1 on fibronectin, so either VLA-4 binding site would be blocked. This has implications well beyond retinal vascular occlusion and retinopathy. If this approach can disrupt and/or prevent occlusion in other organ systems, it might be used in shortening the duration of sickle cell painful crisis and improve the quality of life and survival of these patients.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Submitted for publication November 20, 2000; revised January 17, 2001; accepted February 7, 2001.
Commercial relationships policy: E (PV); F (all).
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page
charge payment. This article must therefore be marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
1734
solely to indicate this fact.
Corresponding author: Gerard A. Lutty, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 170 Woods Research Building, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287-9115. glutty{at}jhmi.edu
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
/cachectin (TNF
) in sera from patients with sickle cell disease Acta Haematol 90,172-176[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
4ß1 and glycoprotein IV (CD36) are expressed on circulating reticulocytes in sickle cell anemia Blood 82,3548-3555
4ß1-integrin expression on sickle reticulocytes: vascular cell adhesion molecule-1-dependent binding to endothelium Blood 82,1891-1899
4 integrins J Immunol 158,1710-1718[Abstract]
4 integrin antagonist peptide J Immunol 158,4180-4186[Abstract]
4ß1 heterodimer involved in the regulation of cell adhesion J Biol Chem 269,8348-8354
4 integrin-VCAM-1 interaction Int Immunol 11,1861-1871
4 integrins in vivo J Clin Invest 94,1722-1728
4ß1 integrin receptors on sickle reticulocytes and fibronectin Blood 88,4348-4358
and interleukin-1ß activity mediates fibronectin synthesis in coronary artery smooth muscle cells J Cell Physiol 163,19-29[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
Lab Invest 70,850-861[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
vß3 (7E3 and LM609) inhibit sickle red blood cell-endothelium interactions induced by platelet-activating factor Blood 95,368-374
is mediated by
4 integrins Angiogenesis 2,265-275[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. J. Telen Role of Adhesion Molecules and Vascular Endothelium in the Pathogenesis of Sickle Cell Disease Hematology, January 1, 2007; 2007(1): 84 - 90. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Woodside, R. M. Kram, J. S. Mitchell, T. Belsom, M. J. Billard, B. W. McIntyre, and P. Vanderslice Contrasting Roles for Domain 4 of VCAM-1 in the Regulation of Cell Adhesion and Soluble VCAM-1 Binding to Integrin {alpha}4beta1. J. Immunol., April 15, 2006; 176(8): 5041 - 5049. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Embury, N. M. Matsui, S. Ramanujam, T. N. Mayadas, C. T. Noguchi, B. A. Diwan, N. Mohandas, and A. T. W. Cheung The contribution of endothelial cell P-selectin to the microvascular flow of mouse sickle erythrocytes in vivo Blood, November 15, 2004; 104(10): 3378 - 3385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Holtzclaw, D. Jack, S. M. Aguayo, J. R. Eckman, J. Roman, and L. L. Hsu Enhanced Pulmonary and Systemic Response to Endotoxin in Transgenic Sickle Mice Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 15, 2004; 169(6): 687 - 695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Wei, J. M. Runnels, and C. P. Lin Selective Uptake of Indocyanine Green by Reticulocytes in Circulation Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2003; 44(10): 4489 - 4496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M. Matsui, A. Varki, and S. H. Embury Heparin inhibits the flow adhesion of sickle red blood cells to P-selectin Blood, November 15, 2002; 100(10): 3790 - 3796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M K. Mathews, D S McLeod, C Merges, J Cao, and G A Lutty Neutrophils and leucocyte adhesion molecules in sickle cell retinopathy Br. J. Ophthalmol., June 1, 2002; 86(6): 684 - 690. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |