|
|
||||||||
1 From the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1-proteinase inhibitor
(
1-PI) and
2-macroglobulin (
2-M) are reduced, especially in
the epithelial layer. An increased expression of the transcription
factor Sp1 was also demonstrated. The role of Sp1 in regulation of the
genes affected in keratoconus was examined in this study.
METHODS. DNA segments, containing 5'-flanking promoter sequences of the
1-PI,
LAP, cathepsin B, and
2-M genes were ligated into the secreted
alkaline phosphatase (SEAP) reporter gene vector. These constructs,
along with the pSVß-galactosidase control vector, were transfected
into cultured human corneal epithelial and stromal cells and skin
fibroblasts. Cotransfection with the Sp1 expression vector was
performed in parallel. SEAP and ß-galactosidase enzyme activities
were assayed.
RESULTS. In corneal epithelial cells, as in stromal cells,
1-PI promoter
activity was suppressed by cotransfection of pPacSp1. The LAP,
cathepsin B, and
2-M promoters were functional in corneal cells,
whereas activities of these promoters were much lower in skin
fibroblasts. Cotransfection experiments indicated that the up- or
downregulation of LAP, cathepsin B, and
2-M observed in
keratoconus-affected corneas was not mediated by Sp1.
CONCLUSIONS. These results support the theory that the corneal epithelium, along
with the stroma, is involved in keratoconus. An upstream role of Sp1 is
indicated and the Sp1-mediated downregulation of the
1-PI gene may
be a key event in the disease development.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The exact cause of this disease is still not clear. Previous biochemical studies by our group8 and others9 have shown that the amount of total protein present in keratoconus corneas is lower than that in normal control corneas, whereas protein synthesis proceeds normally in some cases.8 9 10 This led to the formulation of the hypothesis that the abnormality in keratoconus may lie in the degradative pathway of macromolecules.8 10 Subsequent data support the degradation hypothesis, demonstrating increased levels of degradative enzymes11 12 and decreased amounts of protease inhibitors13 14 in keratoconus specimens compared with those of normal and other disease control specimens. The defects were observed not only in the stroma, but also, and even more prominently, in the corneal epithelium, implying a role for this layer in the disease process.
The degradative enzymes found to be enhanced in corneas with
keratoconus include lysosomal acid phosphatase (LAP), acid esterase,
acid lipase,11
and cathepsins B and G.12
The
inhibitors that are reduced include
1-proteinase inhibitor (
1-PI)
and
2-macroglobulin (
2-M).13
14
The up- or
downregulation of these genes was noted at both protein and mRNA
levels.15
In view of the multiple gene involvement and the
possibility of a coordinated gene regulation mechanism, several
transcription factors were examined. Sp1 was found to be specifically
upregulated in keratoconus-affected corneas.16
A putative promoter fragment of the human
1-PI gene was cloned and
sequenced in our laboratory.17
It is of interest that
coexpression of Sp1 in corneal stromal cells suppresses the
1-PI
promoter activity,17
indicating that Sp1 upregulation may
be directly related to
1-PI downregulation in corneas with
keratoconus.
The present study was undertaken to determine whether in corneal
epithelial cells, as in stromal cells, the
1-PI promoter is
functional and Sp1 sensitivity exists. In addition, experiments were
performed to examine whether altered expression of genes including LAP,
cathepsin B, and
2-M in keratoconus corneas are related to the
upregulated Sp1 level in both normal human corneal stromal and
epithelial cells. Promoter fragments of these genes, all of which
contain Sp1 sites,18
19
20
21
were cloned into reporter
vectors. Their functional activities in corneal cells and skin
fibroblasts were measured and the effects of Sp1 coexpression were
evaluated.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Corneal stromal fibroblasts were cultured from normal human corneas (donor ages: 10, 19, 35, and 44 years) obtained from the Illinois Eye Bank, Chicago. Normal human skin fibroblasts were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA; donor age, 28 years) as a nonocular control cell type. These cells were grown and maintained in Dulbeccos modified Eagles medium supplemented with glutamine, 10% (vol/vol) fetal calf serum, nonessential and essential amino acids, and antibiotics, as previously described.22
The tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki for research involving human subjects were followed, and the research was approved by the University of Illinois Institutional Review Board.
Construction of Promoter Fragments
DNA fragments containing the 2.7- and 1.4-kb 5'-flanking
sequence of the
1-PI gene were ligated into one of the secreted
alkaline phosphatase (SEAP) series vectors (pSEAP2-Basic; Clontech,
Palo Alto, CA), as previously described,17
yielding
p
1PI2.7-SEAP+ and p
1PI1.4-SEAP+ constructs. Promoter fragments
for LAP, cathepsin B, and
2-M genes were made by long PCR, using
gene-specific primers selected through the computer software (Vector
NTI; InforMax, Ltd., Oxford, UK) based on the known promoter
sequences.18
19
20
21
The primers for LAP (exon 1) were
upstream (US), TTGTGCAGGGCAGGAACGGTA, and downstream (DS),
GCGGCATCACCACCAGGTT; for cathepsin B, US, GATCCCAGGCGCGGGTTCTG, and DS,
TTGGCGTTGCCGGAGCGGTT; and for
2-M, US, TCTGTAGCAAACATAGGATC, and DS,
TCTGGTCCCAAACACTTCCC. All primers were synthesized by Genemed
Biotechnologies, Inc. (South San Francisco, CA). The PCR products were
analyzed on a 1.0% agarose gel and were cloned into a vector (pGEM-T
Easy; Promega, Madison, WI). The expected sizes of the PCR products
were 0.67 (-586 to +79), 0.44 (-361 to +74), and 5.77 (-5761 to +12)
kb, containing two, nine, and two putative Sp1 binding sites,
respectively. A shorter cathepsin B promoter region fragment (0.26 kb;
-190 to +74, containing seven putative Sp1 sites) was made from the
0.44-kb cathepsin B DNA fragment by BssHII digestion.
The LAP, cathepsin B, and
2-M promoter fragments subcloned into the
pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega) were ligated into the EcoRI
multiple cloning sites of the pSEAP2-Basic vector (Clontech), yielding
the pLAP-SEAP+, pCatB0.44-SEAP+, and p
2M-SEAP+ vectors. The shorter
cathepsin B promoter fragment was ligated with HindIII
linker at both ends and subcloned into multiple cloning sites of the
pSEAP2-Basic vector, yielding pCatB0.26-SEAP+. Constructs were
purified, partially sequenced, and restriction digested to confirm the
identity and orientation of the inserts. The genes examined and
constructs made in this study are summarized in Table 1
.
|
1-PI, LAP, cathepsin B, and
2-M promoters in normal human corneal epithelial cells, corneal
stromal cells, or skin fibroblasts was investigated in transient
transfection assays. The promoter plasmids and pSEAP2-Basic
(promoterless reporter gene vector), pSEAP2-Control (positive control,
driven by the simian virus 40 early promoter), along with the
pSV-ß-galactosidase control vector (Promega) used to normalize the
transfection efficiency, were used in cell transfections.
The cells were plated at 40,000 cells/well on 24-well plates 24 hours
before DNA transfection. They received fresh medium and were
transfected 2 hours later using FuGENE 6 transfection reagent (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN). In brief, 0.75 µg of the
test plasmid (p
1PI2.7-SEAP+, p
1PI1.4-SEAP+, pLAP-SEAP+,
pCatB0.44-SEAP+, pCatB0.26-SEAP+, p
2M-SEAP+, pSEAP2-Basic, or
pSEAP2-Control) and 0.2 µg pSV-ß-galactosidase vector were mixed
with 2.85 µl of FuGENE 6 in 100 µl serum-free medium, as
recommended by the manufacturer. Another series of cells also received
0.1875 µg of the Sp1 expression vector pPacSp1 (a generous gift of
Robert Tjian, University of California Berkeley). None of the test
plasmids was added to cells serving as negative control cultures. The
medium was collected from each well 48 hours later for SEAP assays.
For SEAP assay, 100 µl of the medium was mixed with 300 µl dilution buffer. After a 30-minute incubation at 65°C, 100-µl aliquots were mixed with 100 µl each of assay buffer and reaction buffer supplied from the kit, according to the manufacturers protocol (Tropix, Inc., Bedford, MA). The enzyme activity, represented by the light emission, was read for 5 seconds on a luminometer (MGM Instruments, Inc., Hamden, CT). For ß-galactosidase assays, cells harvested were lysed with 70 µl Galacto-Lysis Solution (Tropix, Inc.) and centrifuged at 14000 rpm to pellet the debris. The extract was used for measurements of ß-galactosidase activity and protein content (BCA method; Pierce, Rockford, IL). Assays were performed in triplicate, and each experiment was repeated at least three times. The ß-galactosidase activity was used to normalize the SEAP enzyme activity. The significance of the data was analyzed by two-tailed Students t-tests.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1-PI 5'-Flanking Element in Human
Corneal Epithelial Cells and Their Responsiveness to Sp1 Expression
1PI2.7-SEAP+) and 1.4 kb (p
1PI1.4-SEAP+) of
the 5'-flanking sequence of the
1-PI gene were approximately 19 and
15 times more active at driving the SEAP reporter gene expression than
the promoterless pSEAP2-Basic vector used to detect the basal activity
(Fig. 1) . This result indicated that the
1-PI promoter sequences conferred
functional activity in corneal epithelial cells. The 1.4-kb fragment
was sufficient for promoter activity.
|
1PI2.7-SEAP+ or p
1PI1.4-SEAP+ construct was
cotransfected with Sp1 expression vector pPacSp1 into corneal
epithelial cells, the level of SEAP expression was significantly
reduced (P < 0.05; Fig. 1
).
Functional Analysis and Sp1 Responsiveness of the LAP, Cathepsin B,
and
2-M 5'-Flanking Elements
In normal human corneal stromal cells, the vector that contained
0.67-kb 5'-flanking sequence of the human LAP gene (pLAP-SEAP+) had 53
times greater activity than the pSEAP2-Basic vector (Fig. 2) . Likewise, the SEAP activity in stromal cells driven by constructs
containing the 0.44-kb promoter fragment of the cathepsin B gene
(pCatB0.44-SEAP+) and the 5.77-kb
2-M promoter sequence
(p
2M-SEAP+) was significantly higher (approximately 64- and 21-fold,
respectively) than the basal expression (Figs. 3
and 4)
. In contrast, pCatB0.26-SEAP+ showed little promoter activity (Fig. 3)
. None of the promoter activity was modified by pPacSp1
cotransfection.
|
|
|
2-M genes was much lower in skin fibroblasts (Figs. 2
3 and 4)
, suggesting that there may be tissue- or cell
typespecific expression of these genes.
When transfected into cultured corneal epithelial cells, the
pLAP-SEAP+, pCatB0.44-SEAP+, and p
2M-SEAP+ vectors were
approximately 168, 127, and 7.6 times more active, respectively, at
driving SEAP reporter gene expression than the pSEAP2-Basic vector
(Fig. 5) . The pCatB0.26-SEAP+ was again, as in corneal stromal cells, not
functional in the epithelial cells. When cotransfected with pPacSp1,
the level of SEAP expressions remained unaltered with all constructs
except pCatB0.44-SEAP+, for which a significant reduction
(P < 0.05) was observed (Fig. 5)
.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1-PI and
2-M were reduced13
14
in corneas with keratoconus, presumably resulting in the increased net
(a balance of enzyme and inhibitor) degradative activity detected. The
biochemical abnormalities were observed both in the corneal stroma,
where thinning occurs in keratoconus, and the corneal
epithelium.11
12
13
14
15
An involvement of the epithelial layer
in the disease has thus been surmised. By immunostaining, Western blot analysis, and electrophoretic mobility shift assay, an upregulation of transcription factor Sp1 was observed in the stroma and the epithelium of keratoconus-affected corneas.16 It was further noted that the basal level of Sp1 expression in stromal cells cultured from eyes with keratoconus was greater than that in normal human cells,29 suggesting that the diseased corneal cells carry and retain the Sp1 abnormality, even after they are maintained in tissue culture through two passages. The Sp1 defect therefore appears to be an inborn error in keratoconus, not merely occurring secondarily as a result of other factors.
In an earlier study, we showed that an augmented level of Sp1 directly
repressed the promoter activity of the
1-PI gene in corneal stromal
cells.17
The present study further demonstrates a similar
1-PI downregulation conferred by Sp1 in corneal epithelial cells.
These results may argue for both an epithelial involvement and an
upstream role of Sp1 in the development of keratoconus. The
Sp1-mediated
1-PI downregulation appears to be a key event. It is
possible that in the corneal epithelium, the Sp1/
1-PI abnormality
contributes to the degradation and breaks in the epithelial basement
membrane zone, resulting in the earliest pathologic
features30
31
seen in keratoconus. In the stroma as well,
the anomaly may lead to increased degradative activity and eventual
manifestation of thinning and scarring.
The current data indicate that Sp1 cotransfection confers little impact
on the transcriptional regulation of the LAP, cathepsin B, and
2-M
genes in corneal stromal cells. The constructs that contain the
promoter fragments of these genes (Table 1)
were made from sequences
available in the literature.18
19
20
21
LAP is one of the
lysosomal hydrolases that are involved mostly in lipid metabolism, not
in turnover of protein or connective tissues. The 0.67-kb LAP promoter
has no TATA and CAAT box sequences, has high GC content, two
Sp1 binding sites, and a region complying with the properties of a CpG
island.18
Similar to the
1-PI gene,17
the
characteristics of the LAP promoter identify it as a housekeeping gene.
Unlike the
1-PI gene, however, the LAP gene promoter does not
respond to the Sp1 overexpression. This demonstration is in line with
our previous finding that LAP activity is enhanced in both the cornea
and the conjunctiva32
of eyes with keratoconus, whereas
Sp1 upregulation is seen only in the former.16
33
Taking
all evidence together, we suggest that the LAP abnormality in
keratoconus may represent merely a microenvironmental change on the
ocular surface. Perhaps environmental factors that have long been
speculated to be associated with keratoconus, such as eye rubbing and
contact lens wear, modify the hydrolase levels in cells both in the
cornea and the conjunctiva.
The human cathepsin B promoter region also possesses high GC content and has no canonical TATA and CAAT boxes.21 Such TATA-less promoters are often activated by Sp1 and are dependent on the presence of clusters of Sp1 binding sites in the proximity of the transcription start site. Cathepsin B thus appears to be typical of an Sp1-regulating promoter.34 35 A total of nine Sp1 binding sites were identified in the 0.44-kb fragment used in our study. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays and site-directed mutagenesis studies have confirmed the involvement of multiple Sp1 sites in regulation of the cathepsin B proximal promoter.21 In this vein, it is somewhat surprising that the results indicate that cathepsin B expression in corneal stromal cells is insensitive to Sp1 coexpression and hence may not be regulated directly by Sp1. Either additional factors are required, or the regulation is through an Sp1-independent mechanism. A shorter 0.23-kb promoter fragment with seven Sp1 sites has been shown to be transactivatable by Sp1 cotransfection in Schneiders Drosophila line 2.21 We therefore made and tested an additional construct containing a 0.26-kb promoter sequence and the same Sp1 binding sites. The functionality of this construct, however, was minimal in corneal cells.
The human
2-M gene promoter contains a TATA box. There are two
potential Sp1 binding sites, although their functionality has yet to be
established.20
The absence of Sp1 responsiveness of the
2-M promoter was not entirely unexpected.
In corneal epithelial cells, the 0.67-, 0.44- and 5.77-kb promoter
fragments for LAP, cathepsin B, and
2-M genes were all functional.
Similar to that found in stromal cells, the LAP and
2-M promoters
were not Sp1 responsive. The cathepsin B promoter activity, on the
other hand, was suppressed by the Sp1 cotransfection. The experiments
were repeated three times, and repression was observed in every
experiment. The significance of this result is unclear at present.
In conclusion, the present study demonstrates, on the basis of
transient transfection assays, that among the known enzyme and
inhibitor genes affected in keratoconus, only
1-PI is regulated by
Sp1. The Sp1 regulation is operative in both corneal epithelial and
stromal cells. These results support the epithelial involvement theory
and suggest that the Sp1-mediated downregulation of the
1-PI gene
may be a key event in the development of keratoconus.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported by Grants EY03890 and EY05628 and Core Grant EY01792 from the National Institutes of Health. BYJTY is a recipient of a Senior Scientific Investigator Award from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc.
Submitted for publication December 8, 2000; revised March 30, 2001; accepted April 19, 2001.
Commercial relationships policy: N.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Corresponding author: Beatrice Y. J. T. Yue, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1855 W. Taylor Street, Chicago, IL 60612. u24184{at}uic.edu
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1-Proteinase inhibitor levels in keratoconus Exp Eye Res 50,549-554[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
2-Macroglobulin levels in normal human and keratoconus corneas Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 35,4008-4014
1-proteinase inhibitor messenger RNA levels in keratoconus corneas Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38,529-534
1-proteinase inhibitor gene J Biol Chem 273,9959-9965
2-macroglobulin gene and its promoter Biochem Biophys Res Commun 184,596-603[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. H.-K. Ma, J.-Y. Yao, M.-T. Kuo, L.-C. See, K.-Y. Lin, S.-C. Chen, J.-K. Chen, A.-S. Chao, S.-F. Wang, and K.-K. Lin Generation of Endostatin by Matrix Metalloproteinase and Cathepsin from Human Limbocorneal Epithelial Cells Cultivated on Amniotic Membrane Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., February 1, 2007; 48(2): 644 - 651. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Chiambaretta, H. Nakamura, F. De Graeve, H. Sakai, G. Marceau, Y. Maruyama, D. Rigal, B. Dastugue, J. Sugar, B. Y. J. T. Yue, et al. Kruppel-like Factor 6 (KLF6) Affects the Promoter Activity of the {alpha}1-Proteinase Inhibitor Gene Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., February 1, 2006; 47(2): 582 - 590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Nakamura, J. Ueda, J. Sugar, and B. Y. J. T. Yue Developmentally Regulated Expression of Sp1 in the Mouse Cornea Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2005; 46(11): 4092 - 4096. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H Nakamura, F Riley, H Sakai, W Rademaker, B Y J T Yue, and D P Edward Histopathological and immunohistochemical studies of lenticules after epikeratoplasty for keratoconus Br. J. Ophthalmol., July 1, 2005; 89(7): 841 - 846. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Adhikary, J. F. Crish, F. Bone, R. Gopalakrishnan, J. Lass, and R. L. Eckert An Involucrin Promoter AP1 Transcription Factor Binding Site Is Required for Expression of Involucrin in the Corneal Epithelium In Vivo Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2005; 46(4): 1219 - 1227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Adhikary, J. Crish, J. Lass, and R. L. Eckert Regulation of Involucrin Expression in Normal Human Corneal Epithelial Cells: A Role for Activator Protein One Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2004; 45(4): 1080 - 1087. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Chiambaretta, L. Blanchon, B. Rabier, W. W.-Y. Kao, J. J. Liu, B. Dastugue, D. Rigal, and V. Sapin Regulation of Corneal Keratin-12 Gene Expression by the Human Kruppel-like Transcription Factor 6 Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2002; 43(11): 3422 - 3429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |