|
|
||||||||
1 From the Oncology Service and 2 Ophthalmic Pathology Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS. The extent of exudative RD was recorded retrospectively in a population-based cohort of 167 consecutive patients with eyes enucleated from 1972 through 1981 because of choroidal and ciliary body melanoma, representing all melanomas treated during that period. Histopathologic features including microvascular loops and networks, microvascular density (MVD), and tumor-infiltrating macrophages were determined. Clinical and histologic predictors of RD were modeled by multiple logistic regression with a split-sample, cross-validation design. Survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and adjusted for the effect of competing predictors by Cox proportional hazards regression.
RESULTS. Of 142 (85%) eyes with adequate data, 25% had no RD, 16% had subretinal fluid around the tumor, 43% had clinical RD in one to two quadrants, and 16% had RD in three to four quadrants. The RD was more extensive if the tumor was large (P < 0.0001) and had microvascular loops and networks (P = 0.0094) and less extensive if it involved ciliary body (P = 0.011). High MVD (P = 0.054) and ruptured Bruchs membrane (P = 0.065) tended to be associated with RD. Multiple logistic regression showed largest basal diameter (odds ratio [OR] 1.43 for each 1-mm change, P < 0.0001), microvascular loops and networks (OR 1.95 for each category change, P = 0.0095), and ciliary body involvement (OR 0.20, P = 0.0039) to be independently associated with RD; ruptured Bruchs membrane (P = 0.96) and MVD (P = 0.87) were not associated. Clinical RD predicted poor survival (0.59 vs. 0.37 at 20 years; P = 0.029) by Kaplan-Meier analysis, but not after adjusting for other prognostic factors by Cox regression (hazard ratio [HR] 1.00, P = 1.0).
CONCLUSIONS. Tumor size, which may be a surrogate measure for total vascular content and decompensation of choriocapillaris and retinal pigment epithelium, is a strong predictor of exudative RD. Microvascular loops and networks are likewise associated with exudative RD. Exudative RD is not associated with survival after adjusting for tumor size and microvascular loops and networks.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The influence of exudative RD on survival is a moot point.7 10 Although the presence of exudative RD was found to be a risk factor for tumor growth, metastasis, and tumor-related death among patients who underwent enucleation and proton beam therapy for choroidal and ciliary body melanoma,9 11 it did not predict which patients would have metastasis after plaque brachytherapy.11 12
Although exudative RD is an established marker of disease activity4 5 6 7 and high complication rate8 9 after conservative therapy for uveal melanoma, factors other than large tumor size and posterior location that contribute to the presence of RD are incompletely understood.3 10 13 Textbooks that speculate on this matter suggest that reduced venous return leads to diffuse choroidal leakage, in particular when a posterior melanoma presses against a vortex vein or when Bruchs membrane is ruptured and acts as a tourniquet around the base of the tumor.1 3 14 Fluorescein angiography indeed reveals diffuse extravasation from tumor and retinal vessels.15 16 Presence of RD has also been linked with rapidity of growth and necrosis of the tumor.3 14 We designed a study to establish to what extent the presence of exudative RD in eyes with malignant uveal melanoma is associated with clinical and histopathologic characteristics of the tumor and with melanoma-specific survival, giving special emphasis to microvascular factors.
| Patients and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
The inception cohort was a consecutive, population-based series
of 167 patients with a malignant melanoma of the choroid and ciliary
body, validated by obtaining all available follow-up data and
histopathologic material.17
In brief, logs of the
Ophthalmic Pathology Laboratory, Helsinki University Central Hospital,
Finland, were searched backward from 1981 to 1972, and all patients who
had had an eye removed because of uveal melanoma were enrolled. Before
1982, enucleation was the standard treatment for all but the
smallest melanomas, some of which were first observed for growth, and
all eyes enucleated in the district were submitted to this laboratory,
making the series essentially unselected and representative of all
malignant uveal melanomas treated during the study period. During this
period, patients were mostly evaluated with the Goldman three-mirror
lens, but indirect ophthalmoscopy was also used. This series was
considered suitable for the present study, because it represented the
full spectrum of uveal melanoma, tumor specimens were available from
every patient, and long-term follow-up data were also available. Only
two thirds of total mortality from uveal melanoma is observed within
the first 10 years after treatment.
Eyes that had clinical data on presence or absence of exudative RD were eligible for the analysis of clinical predictors of RD. Eyes in which media opacities precluded adequate examination of the retina (18 patients) or in which clinical data were inadequate (7 patients) were excluded, leaving 142 (85%) of the eyes for clinical analysis. Eyes in which microvascular patterns and density (MVD) could reliably be determined were eligible for the analysis of histopathologic predictors of RD. If the tumor was more than 50% necrotic (5 patients) and less than 50% of the tumor remained or the remaining part was entirely on the vitreal side of Bruchs membrane (13 patients), the eye was excluded, leaving 124 (74%) of the eyes for histopathologic analysis.
Assessment of Basic Tumor Characteristics
The location (choroid, ciliary body, or both), largest basal
diameter (LBD) and height of the tumor, and integrity of Bruchs
membrane (unruptured, ruptured) were ascertained from the original
clinical and pathology reports and checked to be consistent with the
sections available. Cell type was registered according to the modified
Callender classification (spindle, mixed, or epithelioid). If the
original report mentioned the presence of epithelioid cells in a tumor
classified as spindle-cell type, the tumor was upgraded to the
mixed-cell type.
Tumor-infiltrating macrophages were semiquantitatively graded (few, moderate, or many) from sections immunostained with mAb PG-M1 to the CD68 epitope (IgG3, diluted 1:50; lot 101; Dakopatts, Klostrup, Denmark) after predigestion in 0.4% (wt/vol) pepsin in 0.01 M HCl.18 The avidin-biotinylated peroxidase complex method (Vectastain ABC Elite Kit; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) and 3,3'-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride as chromogen were used.18 Melanin was bleached after immunostaining with hydrogen peroxide and disodium hydrogen phosphate.19
Assessment of Retinal Detachment
The clinical extent of RD was assessed according to predefined
criteria from patient charts by one investigator masked to
histopathologic data. Clinical rather than histopathologic criteria
were used, because almost all melanoma-affected eyes have microscopic
subretinal fluid,20
21
the extent of RD is more difficult
to grade from sections, and investigator bias may be caused by
awareness of microvascular and other histopathologic features of the
tumor. Each eye was classified into one of four categories:
These categories were easy to apply. In case assignment was not explicit, a second investigator reviewed the chart, and final categorization was based on consensus.
Assessment of Microvascular Factors
Closed microvascular loops and microvascular networks,
consisting of at least three back-to-back loops, were identified
according to Folberg et al.22
23
from sections bleached
with potassium permanganate and oxalic acid and stained with periodic
acid-Schiff without counterstain, as described previously. They were
viewed under a green filter (Wratten 58; Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY).
Microvessels were identified with the mAb QBEND/10 to the CD34 epitope of endothelial cells (diluted 1:25, lot 121202; Novocastra Laboratories, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK).24 They were counted from the most highly vascularized area by using an eyepiece with etched graticule corresponding to 0.313 mm2 (WK 10x/20L-H; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).25 Any immunolabeled channel, clearly separate from adjacent ones and totally inside the graticule or touching its top or left border, was counted as a microvessel.26
Assessment of Survival
Complete follow-up data until December 1999, obtained from the
Finnish Population and Cancer Registries, patient charts of hospitals
where the patients had been treated for uveal melanoma and other
malignancies, pathology laboratories, and death certificates reviewed
by previously described routines,17
were available for 166
of the 167 patients. The median follow-up time was 22 years (range,
1826) for patients who were still alive. Histopathologic diagnoses of
50 (63%) of 80 metastatic uveal melanomas were reconfirmed by
immunohistochemistry, as described.17
In addition, 14
(17%) tumor-related deaths had been confirmed by fine-needle
aspiration biopsy. Nine patients had had a second primary tumor, but
histopathologic confirmation of the cause of death was available for
all of them.17
Statistical Analysis
Analyses were performed by computer (SPSS for Windows ver.
9.0.1; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL; and StatXact-3 and LogXact-3 software;
Cytel Software, Cambridge, MA). All tests were two-sided and used exact
probability distributions. Continuous variables between unordered and
ordered groups were compared with the Mann-Whitney and
Jonckheere-Terpstra tests, respectively.27
28
Pearsons
2, Kruskal-Wallis, and Jonckheere-Terpstra
tests were used to compare proportions in unordered, singly ordered,
and doubly ordered contingency tables, respectively. If subgroups were
analyzed separately, Bonferroni correction was used to adjust
probabilities for multiple comparisons.27
For statistical analysis, cell type was collapsed into two categories according to the presence of epithelioid cells (spindle, nonspindle)18 23 and tumor location according to presence of ciliary body involvement (no, yes). Microvascular loops and networks were analyzed as a three-category variable that considered networks to be an advanced stage of loops (no loops, loops without networks, networks).17 22 The extent of RD was analyzed in four categories (no RD, subretinal fluid, clinical RD of one to two quadrants, clinical RD of three to four quadrants), and alternatively as collapsed into two categories based on the presence of clinical RD (described later). LBD and MVD were treated as continuous variables. The latter was square-root transformed to obtain normal distribution.25 26
Multiple logistic regression was used to model exudative RD.29 30 Because logistic regression demands a two-category dependent variable, eyes with either no subretinal fluid or subretinal fluid only over and surrounding the tumor (no clinical RD) were compared with those with exudative RD in at least one quadrant (clinical RD). This categorization was made because it provided two groups of approximately equal size and because subretinal fluid is occasionally observed around presumed choroidal nevi. If one of the two categories is small, it is difficult to build a logistic model that outperforms simple assignment of all eyes to the larger group, and subretinal fluid over nevi and small melanomas may have a different set of predictors than clinical exudative RD.
Internal validity of the logistic model was ensured by choosing a split-sample, cross-validation design.29 31 The sample was randomly divided into an analysis and a holdout sample 10 times in a ratio of 3:2 using computer-generated random numbers.29 The multivariate model was developed on the analysis samples and then applied to the validation samples to obtain the hit ratio (the percentage of eyes correctly classified). Independent variables were allowed in the model if P < 0.10. Confounding variables were kept in the model, irrespective of statistical significance.30 Different models were compared with the likelihood ratio test.30 The hit ratio was compared with maximum-chance criterion, obtained by assigning all eyes to the larger group (clinical RD), and with proportional chance criterion, obtained by randomly assigning all eyes to the two groups and calculated as (proportion of eyes without clinical RD)2 + (proportion of eyes with clinical RD) 2.29 The best model obtained was then applied to the entire sample.
Survival time data were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method and log-rank test.32 Patients judged to have died of causes unrelated to uveal melanoma were censored at the time of death. Equality of follow-up was ascertained by comparing Kaplan-Meier curves with reverse censoring.32 Power calculation indicated that the present study had an 80% power to detect a 0.25 difference in 20-year melanoma-specific survival as significant. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to adjust survival data for the effect of previously identified prognostic factors.32 33 The assumption of proportional hazards was confirmed by adding each covariate by log time interaction to the model and assessing the significance of the product term.33
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Multivariate Analysis of RD in Relation to Tumor Characteristics
Presence of exudative RD in eyes with uveal melanoma was modeled
by multiple logistic regression. Based on the anatomic fact that
ciliary body tumors do not have full potential to leak under the retina
because of their location, involvement of the ciliary body was modeled
as a confounding variablethat is, as a variable that theory dictates
must always be included in the model.
In a starting model, LBD and the status of Bruchs membrane, the two
factors that RD is most often ascribed to in textbooks, were assessed
as independent variablesthat is, statistical analysis was used to
look for evidence of their association with RD (Table 2)
. High LBD was significantly associated with presence of RD (odds ratio
[OR], 1.40 for each 1-mm change; P = 0.0004, Wald
2 test), but a rupture in Bruchs membrane
was not associated with presence of RD (P = 0.96). A
model that included presence of epithelioid cells (OR, 1.29; 95% CI
0.394.34; P = 0.63) was also discarded. Consequently,
a reduced model that excluded these nonsignificant variables served as
a basis for further comparison (Table 2)
.
|
The final model consequently included LBD, microvascular loops and
networks, and involvement of the ciliary body (Table 2)
. It fitted the
data significantly better than the reduced model, which included only
LBD and ciliary body involvement (-2 log likelihood, 81.476.9 =
4.50, 1 df, P = 0.034,
2 test). This was reflected in the fact that
the predicted probabilities of RD were located farther from the cutoff
score than those predicted by the reduced model (Fig. 2)
.
|
After the validity of the final model was confirmed, more precise coefficients were estimated from the entire series of patients (Table 2) . These coefficients were entered into the general logistic model, and the probability of exudative RD was calculated for uveal melanomas of various size, location, and microvascular pattern (Table 3) . This table can be used as a guide to estimate the risk for exudative RD in clinical practice or to compare the risk between two given tumors. For example, a choroidal melanoma with microvascular networks and 9-mm LBD is readily seen to have a 10 times higher risk (0.50 vs. 0.05) for exudative RD than a ciliochoroidal melanoma of identical size but without any microvascular loops (Table 3) .
|
When all four categories of exudative RD were considered, a statistically significant trend was observed among the 142 patients toward higher mortality with increasing extent of RD (Fig. 3A ; P = 0.023, log-rank test for trend). When analyzed according to the presence of clinical RD, the melanoma-specific probability of survival was significantly higher in patients without RD (Fig. 3B ; 20-year survival, 0.59 vs. 0.37; P = 0.029, log-rank test).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The logistic model does not reveal the mechanism by which large tumors cause RD; in particular, it does not tell whether LBD is a surrogate measure of one or more underlying tumor and host characteristics that lead to RD. We were able to exclude a number of variables including age and gender, presence of epithelioid cells and infiltrating macrophages, and globally highest MVD. It is not inconceivable that the sheer mass of large tumors may be responsible for RD. For example, the total vascular content and leakage from tumor tissue would be expected to be proportional to tumor volume. Findings in the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study21 showed that vascularity of large melanomas is more prominent than that of medium-sized ones, and evidence of broken bloodocular barrier increases with increasing tumor size.34 35 Fluid movement from subretinal space into the choriocapillaris is a major force that keeps the retina attached.36 37 Large tumors have proportionally larger surface areas and may cause proportionally more widespread decompensation of the choriocapillaris and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE).38 39
Because uveal melanomas that extend to the ciliary body are located only partially under the retina, they intuitively have a smaller than average chance of causing RD than choroidal tumors that lie entirely under the retina. It has also been suggested that anteriorly located tumors have less chance of compressing vortex veins. Indeed, involvement of the ciliary body turned out to be an indicator for a low risk of exudative RD. Entirely choroidal tumors were estimated to have a five times higher chance of causing RD than tumors that extend to the ciliary body, when controlling for tumor size and microvascular loops and networks. Ciliochoroidal melanomas are predicted to cause RD only if they are 3 to 6 mm larger than choroidal melanomas and if they reach a diameter of 15 to 18 mm.
Qualitative and quantitative aspects of tumor microvessels have recently been found to be independent predictors of death caused by uveal melanoma, a cancer that can spread only hematogenously unless the conjunctiva is invaded.17 22 23 25 26 40 41 42 43 Logistic regression provided evidence against a major role of "hot spots," areas of densest vascularization, which are associated with poor prognosis of choroidal and ciliary body melanoma and are postulated to be active sites of metastasis in other tumors.44 In contrast, the association of RD associated with microvascular loops and, in particular, networks, was statistically significant. The model suggested a dosage effect, compatible with a hypothesis that microvessels that form loops may be unusually leaky and, especially when present in sufficient quantities to form networks, they may contribute to exudative RD. Although qualitative aspects of microvessels may be germane to the development of exudative RD, until experimental evidence for disproportionate leakage from loops is obtained, the possibility exists that loops are indicators of hidden, more direct tumor or host effects in this analysis.
Although the logistic model that included microvascular patterns provided a significantly better fit in our data set, evidenced by a clearer separation of true-positive and -negative estimates, it did not affect cases that scored as false positives and negatives, compared with the reduced model that included LBD as the only independent variable. In fact, all models we considered predicted correctly the presence of RD in 72% to 73% of eyes. Although they were better predictors of RD than either systematic or random assignment, expected to provide a correct prediction in 56% and 51% of eyes, respectively, the proportion of eyes that were misclassified was notable. Several theories can be invoked to explain this observation.
Because the study was a retrospective one, we may have assigned some eyes to the wrong groupfor example, because a dependent RD was missed or not mentioned in the chart. In that case, the logistic model may have classified the eye correctly, but the result would count as a false negative or positive classification when calculating the hit ratio. Although this could have been avoided by a prospective study, in particular with the help of B-scan ultrasonography, it would not have been possible to get unbiased, population-based histopathologic data, because the majority of small- to medium-sized melanomas are now managed conservatively, and statistical results can be extrapolated only to the population from which the sample is drawn. Moreover, a long enough follow-up for survival analysis would not have been available. In the future it may be possible, however, to find microvascular loops and networks clinically by confocal angiography or high-frequency ultrasonography.45 46
Secondly, because logistic regression can handle only a dichotomous dependent variable, it was obligatory to combine eyes with no RD with those that had subretinal fluid over and surrounding the tumor. If local RD were caused by the same factors as clinical RD, it would be a demanding task to separate these two groups from one another, making it understandable that false negative and positive assignments would occur even if the model includes all major variables contributing to RD. This might have been avoided by using multinomial logistic regression, but the sample size was not adequate for such an analysis. It should be explicitly noted that the present model was not designed to predict which small melanomas will involve overlying subretinal fluid rather than clinical exudative RD.4 5 6 7 We believe that a different set of variables may contribute to local subretinal fluid, not only because it can be associated with presumed nevi but also because steep, collar-buttonshaped uveal melanomas sometimes seem to mechanically elevate the retina around the tumors base.
Thirdly, the inability to capture all variation in RD and to improve the hit ratio compared with the reduced model indicates that additional variables must contribute to RD. These may include excessive leakage because of high total vascular content or damage to the RPE and choriocapillaris or because of unbalanced influx of fluid from the vitreous cavity and abnormal retinal vessels to the subretinal space caused by changes in osmotic pressure, blocked vortex veins, and reduced suction from the normally elastic choroid.16 34 37 47 The role of these latter factors in uveal melanoma is elusive. Although damage to the RPE is frequently given as a cause for exudative RD in eyes with uveal melanoma,16 38 39 experimental data suggest that such damage may also improve outflow of water by allowing the oncotic force of the choroid to suck out subretinal fluid.4 5 36 37 48 Some of these possibilities may be addressed by future prospective clinical studies.
Regarding survival, RD has been an inconsistent indicator of metastatic death caused by uveal melanoma.7 9 10 This is understandable, because previous studies have been based on subpopulations of patients with disease managed by enucleation or some conservative measure and thus are probably unbalanced regarding tumor size.11 We could confirm a modest risk of metastatic death by univariate analysis, but Cox regression definitely showed that the survival difference was entirely due to the association of RD with large tumor size, microvascular loops and networks, ciliary body involvement, and, to a lesser extent, high MVD. When these factors were controlled for, the survival rates of patients with and without exudative RD were identical. Consequently, the presence or absence of RD in eyes with malignant uveal melanoma alone does not carry any information on survival prognosis.
Exudative RD in conservatively managed eyes with uveal melanoma is associated with a higher than average risk of complications.8 9 So far, it has been impossible to reduce the dose or otherwise control the radiation to combat these complications. Better understanding of which factors cause and maintain RD in eyes with uveal melanoma may help ophthalmic oncologists, not only to predict the risk for persistent exudative RD and secondary neovascular glaucoma after irradiation, but also to modulate some of them in the future to reduce this risk.9 Radiation-induced alterations may contribute to exudative RD after brachytherapy and charged-particle treatment, however, and these effects must also be investigated.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Submitted for publication September 15, 2000; revised March 9, 2001; accepted March 29, 2001.
Commercial relationships policy: N.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Corresponding author: Tero Kivelä, Department of Ophthalmology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4C, PL 220, FIN-00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland. tero.kivela{at}helsinki.fi
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. S. O. Missotten, I. C. Notting, R. O. Schlingemann, H. J. Zijlmans, C. Lau, P. H. C. Eilers, J. E. E. Keunen, and M. J. Jager Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A in Eyes With Uveal Melanoma Arch Ophthalmol, October 1, 2006; 124(10): 1428 - 1434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Clarijs, M. van Dijk, D. J. Ruiter, and R. M. W. de Waal Functional and Morphologic Analysis of the Fluid-Conducting Meshwork in Xenografted Cutaneous and Primary Uveal Melanoma Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2005; 46(9): 3013 - 3020. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Harbour, S. Ahmad, and M. El-Bash Rate of Resolution of Exudative Retinal Detachment After Plaque Radiotherapy for Uveal Melanoma Arch Ophthalmol, November 1, 2002; 120(11): 1463 - 1469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |