IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tyynismaa, H.
Right arrow Articles by Alitalo, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tyynismaa, H.
Right arrow Articles by Alitalo, T.
(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2002;43:3160-3164.)
© 2002 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.

A Locus for Autosomal Dominant Keratoconus: Linkage to 16q22.3-q23.1 in Finnish Families

Henna Tyynismaa1,2, Pertti Sistonen3, Sari Tuupanen1,2, Timo Tervo4, Anja Dammert5, Terho Latvala5 and Tiina Alitalo1,2

1 From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; the 2 Department of Medical Genetics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; the 3 Finnish Red Cross, Blood Transfusion Service, Helsinki, Finland; the 4 Department of Ophthalmology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; and the 5 Department of Ophthalmology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
PURPOSE. The estimated world-wide prevalence of keratoconus is 50 to 230 per 100,000 in the general population. Sporadic keratoconus is the leading cause of corneal transplantation surgery in Western countries. Positive family history has been reported in 6% to 8% of patients. The purpose of this study was to map the disease locus in 20 Finnish families with autosomal dominant keratoconus, each family having two or more affected members and with no other associated genetic disease.

METHODS. DNA was extracted from blood samples, collected from 42 affected and 34 unaffected family members. Genomic DNA from patients and their parents, was typed for alleles of 292 polymorphic markers. A genome-wide screening was performed to localize the disease gene. Fluorescent markers were amplified by polymerase chain reaction and separated on an automated sequencer. Allele sizes were assigned to each family member, after which LOD scores were calculated.

RESULTS. The disease locus was mapped to chromosome 16q, between the markers D16S2624 and D16S3090, with a maximum parametric multipoint LOD score of 4.10 and corresponding nonparametric score of 3.27 (NPL, P = 0.00006). Evidence from 20 families provided support for the linkage, consistent with a single locus for familial autosomal dominant keratoconus without heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS. This study is the first genome-wide linkage study to map the keratoconus gene. The results suggest that the causative gene in keratoconus is located within the 16q22.3-q23.1 chromosomal region.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Keratoconus (KC; Mendelian Inheritance in Man [MIM] 148300; Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD: available in the public domain at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Omim/) is a noninflammatory disorder of the cornea in which the central cornea becomes thin and conical, inducing myopia and irregular astigmatism and causing mild to marked impairment in the quality of vision.1 2 Onset is often at puberty, although KC may commence later in life. KC is usually progressive until the third or fourth decade of life. Decreased expression of the gene may induce the subtle forms found in KC, including keratoconus forme fruste or mild irregular astigmatism.2 These mild disease stages can be detected with videokeratography. Histopathologic findings include thinning of corneal stroma, breaks in Bowman’s layer and iron deposition in the basal layers of corneal epithelium. The pathogenesis of keratoconus is unknown. Associations with Down syndrome, atopy, connective tissue disease, eye rubbing, and numerous other multisystem, ocular, or corneal disorders have been reported.2

KC has been diagnosed in all populations. The estimated prevalence is 50 to 230 per 100,000 in the general population.2 Sporadic KC is the leading cause of corneal transplantation surgery in Western countries. Positive family history has been reported in 6% to 8% of patients with KC. A study by Wang et al.3 supports an autosomal recessive inheritance model for KC, and parental consanguinity in some families has also implied autosomal recessive inheritance.4 However, most of the published studies have suggested that the familial KC cases are due to autosomal dominant inheritance with incomplete penetrance or variable expression.2 5

Because of the scarcity of multiple case families, genome-wide linkage scans to localize the KC gene or genes have not yet been published. Previous mapping studies, published as abstracts, include a directed chromosome-21 scan in one family6 and an association study in eight unrelated patients in Tasmania.7 The chromosome-21 scan resulted in a multipoint LOD score of 2.4 for markers on 21q, and a shared haplotype, covering 2.7 Mb on chromosome arm 18p, was identified in the association study. In addition, Rabinowitz et al.8 have excluded one of the collagen genes, COL6A1, as the causative gene in KC.

The lack of genome-wide linkage studies clearly indicates that families with multiple cases of KC are difficult to ascertain. In an epidemiologic study, reported by Ihalainen,9 19% of the KC cases investigated in northern Finland were found to be familial. In 24 of 28 multiple-case families the pattern of inheritance was autosomal dominant. The use of family data from a homogeneous, isolated population increases the odds of finding linkage between chromosomal markers and a genetically heterogeneous disorder. The Finns are a well-known sample population with a clear founder effect.10 11 In this study, we present the results of a genome-wide linkage analysis that is based on the family data collected from 1964 to 1984 in Oulu in northern Finland.9


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients and Clinical Studies
The study included analysis of blood samples obtained from 20 KC-affected families from northern Finland: seven families with two affected siblings, two with three affected siblings, one with four affected siblings, four with both an affected parent and child, one with affected first cousins, and one with both an affected parent and monozygotic twins. The remaining four families were also multiple-case families, but samples were obtainable only from one patient along with unaffected members (Fig. 1) . The high frequency of multiple-case families in the Oulu region indicates that KC has an enrichment in northern Finland. Genealogical studies were not initiated, but to our knowledge the families are not closely related, although they may share a common ancestor if traced back a few centuries, a feature that is typical of Finnish families originating from a restricted geographical region. The Oulu area belongs to the late-settlement region and was inhabited in the late 15th century by a small number of people from southern and western Finland. Population expansion began in the 17th century.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. The partial pedigrees of the Finnish families affected by KC, showing the family members who participated in the study (samples were not obtained from the members marked with dotted line).

 
We performed an ophthalmic reexamination of patients with KC and their first-degree relatives, using both clinical and videokeratographic evaluation. Inclusion criteria were the following: central or paracentral stromal thinning and conical protrusion of the cornea and other classic signs of KC and videokeratographically evident KC or corneal penetrating keratoplasty performed because of KC; and no clinical signs of KC in the slit lamp examination but abnormal corneal topography (KC forme fruste) according to the guidelines of Rabinowitz,12 including central steepening, inferior-superioir dioptric asymmetry, difference between right and left central corneal power, and skewing of the steepest radial axes above and below the horizontal meridian. All the patients were more than 35 years of age, except one who aged 15 years (KC forme fruste). No other genetic disease was segregated in the families.

DNA Extraction
The research adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all participants, in accordance with the requirements of the University of Helsinki, Department of Medical Genetics Ethics Committee. Genomic DNA was isolated by standard methods from venous blood, collected from 42 affected and 34 unaffected family members.

Microsatellite and Linkage Analysis
A genome-wide screening, with 292 highly polymorphic autosomal microsatellite markers spanning the entire genome except for chromosomes X and Y, with average spacing of 11.7 centimorgans (cM, modified from CHLC Screening Set 6; obtained from the Cooperative Human Linkage Center; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; http://gai.nci.nih.gov/CHLC/), was performed to localize the disease gene. Genomic DNA from family members was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), using fluorescently labeled markers. PCR products were separated on an automated sequencer (model 377; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) before analysis on computer (Genescan 2.2 and Genotyper 2.0 software; Genescan was developed by Christopher Burge, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, and is provided to academic users at no fee by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, at http://mit.edu./Genescan; Genotyper 2.0; Applied Biosystems). Parametric (LOD scores) and nonparametric (NPL scores) multipoint linkage analysis for the genome wide screen were performed with the Genehunter program (version 1.2; provided in the public domain by the Laboratory of Statistical Genetics, Rockefeller University, New York, NY; available at linkage.rockefeller.edu/).13 Nonparametric linkage analysis concentrates on allele-sharing between family members with the same phenotype. Pair-wise linkage calculations were performed with the MLINK program of the FASTLINK package (version 4.1P; FASTLINK is provided in the public domain by the National Institutes of Health and is available at ftp://fastlink.nih.gov/pub/fastlink/fastlink.tar.Z/).14 Heterogeneity testing was performed with the Genehunter program. Allele frequencies of the microsatellite markers were obtained from the CEPH database (provided in the public domain by Fondation Jean Dausset—Centre de’Etude du Polymorphisme Humain (CEPH; Center for the Study of Human Polymorphism) Paris, France; available at www.cephb.fr/cgi-bin/wdb/ceph/systeme/form. The frequency for the putative KC gene was set at 0.0015.9 No sex difference was assumed. Based on the family data, the penetrance of the disease in Finnish KC-affected families was estimated to be 50%9 and was set thus with one liability class. The disease phenotype was analyzed as an autosomal dominant trait, but because in some small families the mode of inheritance was not obvious, we also included nonparametric linkage analysis, which is independent of the model of inheritance. Haplotypes were constructed manually.

To check the two previously assigned potential loci for KC on chromosome arms 18p and 21q, we analyzed these chromosomes first and also genotyped additional chromosome-18 and-21-specific markers. The primer sequences for these markers were obtained through the Genome database (data not shown; the Genome database is provided in the public domain by the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and is available at http://www.gdb.org).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
No evidence for linkage between KC and the markers on chromosome arms 18p or 21q was observed. The multipoint LOD scores were negative throughout both chromosomal regions (Fig. 2) .



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Linkage results of the genome scan for KC with 292 autosomal markers in 20 pedigrees. Black line: multipoint LOD scores; gray line: NPL scores. The figure illustrates the approximate genomic coverage and was constructed from the values obtained in Genehunter. The lines at chromosomal boundaries are discontinuous.

 
Significant exclusion was obtained for all markers, except for four regions on chromosomes 2, 10, 15, and 16 with LOD scores exceeding 1.5 (Fig. 2) . Additional markers flanking the four peak regions were genotyped and increased multipoint LOD scores were obtained only for markers on chromosome arm 16q. The highest initial LOD score on chromosome arm 16q was obtained with the genome-wide panel marker D16S518. The flanking dinucleotide repeat markers D16S2624, D16S3033, D16S2642, D16S512, D16S3018, D16S3115, D16S3118, D16S3083, D16S3090, D16S3138, and D16S3029 were used to obtain a denser marker map of the region. The order of markers was obtained from the physical map by Liu et al.15 and the GenBank genomic sequences (GenBank, the genetic sequence database, is provided in the public domain by the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Genbank/) The use of additional markers resulted in the maximum multipoint LOD score of 4.11 and NPL (assuming no fixed model of inheritance of KC) of 3.27 (approximate P = 0.00006, Fig. 3 ). No heterogeneity was observed. A maximum two-point LOD score of 2.31 (at {theta} = 0.001) was obtained between KC and the marker D16S3115 (Table 1) .



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Linkage results with chromosome-16-specific markers. The peak multipoint LOD score of 4.1 was obtained at the marker locus D16S3018. Black line: multipoint LOD scores; gray line: NPL scores.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Two-Point LOD Scores for Chromosome 16 Markers within and Flanking the Critical Region for KC

 
The allele data, which were obtained using 14 markers from the region D16S771-D16S3029, was used to construct disease haplotypes. Recombinations were observed in families 2, 6, 11, and 19 (Table 2) . Based on the haplotype data, the KC gene was localized between the markers D16S2624 and D16S3090, a region of approximately 6.9 cM.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Summary of the Haplotype Data of the KC Candidate Region

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The results of the present genome-wide linkage study suggest that the causative gene in KC is located within the 16q22.3-q23.1 chromosomal region, in an interval of approximately 6.9 cM. Three genes with defects resulting in different corneal disorders are located on or near the KC candidate region and are thus worth checking more thoroughly. The lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase gene (LCAT) is responsible for fish-eye disease with corneal lesions (MIM 136120).16 The tyrosine aminotransferase (TAT) gene, causes tyrosinemia, which is characterized by herpetiform corneal ulcers (MIM 276600).17 Recently, the carbohydrate sulfotransferase 6 gene (CHST6) was identified as the causative gene for macular corneal dystrophy types I and II (MCD, MIM 217800).18 Autosomal recessive MCD is characterized by progressive clouding of corneal stroma. In MCD type I, neither cornea nor serum contains appreciable levels of antigenic keratan sulfate (aKS), whereas in MCD type II aKS is present in cornea and serum. Homozygous inactivating mutations were detected in the coding region of CHST6 in patients with MCD type I, whereas in patients with MCD type II DNA rearrangements were found in the upstream region of the same gene. MCD has not been reported to be associated with KC. The 6.9-cM KC candidate gene region also includes several other mapped genes, none of which was an obvious functional candidate (Fig. 4) .



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. A karyogram of chromosome 16, showing the KC candidate region and the genes localized to this region (according to the National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; available in the public domain at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/).

 
Functional candidate genes for KC have been proposed based on histologic findings. These include corneal collagens, proteinases, proteinase inhibitors, and interleukin-1-associated proteins. Only COL6A1 (MIM 120220) on chromosome arm 21q has been excluded as the causative gene in autosomal dominant KC.8 The expression levels of a number of degradative enzymes and protease inhibitors have been compared in normal and KC corneas. For example, the expression of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 (MIM 120360) in KC-affected cornea has been actively studied.5 19 20 Because KC is considered to be genetically heterogeneous, the results of expression studies depend strongly on the genetic background of the cornea donors. Ihalainen et al.5 found an increase in type IV collagenolytic (or MMP-2) activity in primary KC corneal cultures of Finnish patients. The MMP-2 gene maps to 16q21.21 It has now been excluded as the causative gene for KC, because it was mapped outside the candidate gene region (data not shown).

A future goal is to narrow the candidate gene interval by linkage disequilibrium studies involving both additional markers and patients. In the present study, the patients in each family shared a common disease haplotype in the 6.9-cM interval, but the haplotypes of these patients varied among families. It is probable that linkage disequilibrium can be detected by using a denser marker map of the region, as has been shown in two other linkage studies of Finnish families.22 Even though it is not yet known whether the gene on chromosome 16 is defective in patients with KC worldwide, identifying the gene in a Finnish KC subtype improves the understanding of the pathogenesis of this complex trait and may provide insight into the cause of the more common sporadic form.


    Acknowledgements
 
The authors thank the families with members affected by keratoconus for participation, Sinikka Lindh for assistance with samples, Riitta Lehtinen for help with fluorescent markers, and the Department of Medical Genetics for giving us access to the mapping panel and helping to assay the samples.


    Footnotes
 
Part of the study was performed at the Folkhälsan Institute of Genetics.

Supported by Finnish State Grants TYH8301 and TYH1338, Sigrid Juselius Foundation, Jenny and Antti Wihuri Foundation, The Eye and Tissue Bank Foundation, and Biomedicum Helsinki Foundation.

Submitted for publication January 23, 2002; revised May 6, 2002; accepted May 30, 2002.

Commercial relationships policy: N.

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Corresponding author: Tiina Alitalo, Associate Professor, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Department of OB/GYN, Genetics, Haartmaninkatu 2, PO Box 140, Helsinki, 00029 HUS, Finland; tiina.alitalo{at}hus.fi.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Krachmer, JH, Feder, RS, Belin, MW. (1984) Keratoconus and related noninflammatory corneal thinning disorders Surv Ophthalmol 28,293-322[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Rabinowitz, YS. (1998) Major review: keratoconus Surv Ophthalmol 42,297-319[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Wang, Y, Rabinowitz, YS, Rotter, JI, Yang, H. (2000) Genetic epidemiological study of keratoconus: evidence for major gene determination Am J Med Genet 93,403-409[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Duke Elder, S, Leigh, AG. (1965) Keratoconus (conical cornea) Duke-Elder, S eds. Diseases of the Outer Eye ,964-976 Mosby St. Louis.
  5. Ihalainen, A, Salo, T, Forsius, H, Peltonen, L. (1986) Increase in type I and type IV collagenolytic activity in primary cultures of keratoconus cornea Eur J Clin Invest 16,78-84[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Zu, LX, Yang, HY, Wang, YP, et al (1999) Identification of a putative locus for keratoconus on chromosome 21 (abstract) Am J Hum Genet 65,161A31
  7. Fullerton, JM, Paprocki, P, Foote, S, Mackie, D, Williamson, R, Forrest, S. (1999) An association approach using eight affected individuals from Tasmania, Australia maps a locus for keratoconus (abstract) Am J Hum Genet 65,160A31
  8. Rabinowitz, YS, Maumenee, IH, Lundergan, MK, et al (1992) Molecular genetic analysis in autosomal dominant keratoconus Cornea 11,302-308[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Ihalainen, A. (1986) Clinical and epidemiological features of keratoconus: genetic and external factors in the pathogenesis of the disease Acta Ophthalmol Suppl 178,1-64
  10. de la Chapelle, A. (1993) Disease gene mapping in isolated human populations: the example of Finland J Med Genet 30,857-865[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Peltonen, L, Jalanko, A, Varilo, T. (1999) Molecular genetics of the Finnish disease heritage Hum Mol Genet 8,1913-1923[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Rabinowitz, YS. (1995) Videokeratographic indices to aid in screening for keratoconus J Refract Surg 1,371-379
  13. Kruglyak, L, Daly, MJ, Reeve-Daly, MP, Lander, ES. (1996) Parametric and nonparametric linkage analysis: a unified multipoint approach Am J Hum Genet 58,1347-1363[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Cottingham, RW, Jr, Idury, RM, Schaffer, AA. (1993) Faster sequential genetic linkage computations Am J Hum Genet 53,252-263[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Liu, N-P, Dew-Knight, S, Jonasson, F, Gilbert, JR, Klintworth, GK, Vance, JM. (2000) Physical and genetic mapping of the macular corneal dystrophy locus on chromosome 16q and exclusion of TAT and LCAT as candidate genes Mol Vis 6,95-100[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Funke, H, von Eckardstein, A, Pritchard, PH, et al (1991) A molecular defect causing fish eye disease: an amino acid exchange in lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT) leads to the selective loss of alpha-LCAT activity Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88,4855-4859[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Natt, E, Kida, K, Odievre, M, Di Rocco, M, Scherer, G. (1992) Point mutations in the tyrosine aminotransferase gene in tyrosinemia type II Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 89,9297-9301[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Akama, TO, Nishida, K, Nakayama, J, et al (2000) Macular corneal dystrophy type I and type II are caused by distinct mutations in a new sulphotransferase gene Nat Genet 26,237-241[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Collier, SA, Madigan, MC, Penfold, PI. (2000) Expression of membrane-type 1 matrix metalloproteinase (MT-MMP) and MMP-2 in normal and keratoconus corneas Curr Eye Res 21,662-668[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Smith, VA, Easty, DL. (2000) Matrix metalloproteinase 2: involvement in keratoconus Eur J Ophthalmol 10,215-226[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Huhtala, P, Eddy, RL, Fan, YS, Byers, MG, Shows, TB, Tryggvason, K. (1990) Completion of the primary structure of the human type IV collagenase preproenzyme and assignment of the gene (CLG4) to the q21 region of chromosome 16 Genomics 6,554-559[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Paavola, P, Avela, K, Horelli-Kuitunen, N, et al (1999) High-resolution physical and genetic mapping of the critical region for Meckel syndrome and mulibrey nanism on chromosome 17q22–q23 Genome Res 9,267-276[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
T. L. Young, R. Metlapally, and A. E. Shay
Complex Trait Genetics of Refractive Error
Arch Ophthalmol, January 1, 2007; 125(1): 38 - 48.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
X. Li, Y. S. Rabinowitz, Y. G. Tang, Y. Picornell, K. D. Taylor, M. Hu, and H. Yang
Two-stage genome-wide linkage scan in keratoconus sib pair families.
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2006; 47(9): 3791 - 3795.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
N. Udar, S. R. Atilano, D. J. Brown, B. Holguin, K. Small, A. B. Nesburn, and M. C. Kenney
SOD1: A Candidate Gene for Keratoconus.
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2006; 47(8): 3345 - 3351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
A. J. Aldave, V. S. Yellore, A. K. Salem, G. L. Yoo, S. A. Rayner, H. Yang, G. Y. Tang, Y. Piconell, and Y. S. Rabinowitz
No VSX1 Gene Mutations Associated with Keratoconus.
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2006; 47(7): 2820 - 2822.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
A Khan, K Chandler, D Pimenides, G C M Black, and F D C Manson
Corneal ectasia associated with Cohen syndrome: a role for COH1 in corneal development and maintenance?
Br. J. Ophthalmol., March 1, 2006; 90(3): 390 - 391.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
S A Al-Swailem, A A Al-Assiri, and A A Al-Torbak
Woodhouse Sakati syndrome associated with bilateral keratoconus
Br. J. Ophthalmol., January 1, 2006; 90(1): 116 - 117.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
L. Bisceglia, M. Ciaschetti, P. De Bonis, P. A. P. Campo, C. Pizzicoli, C. Scala, M. Grifa, P. Ciavarella, N. D. Noci, F. Vaira, et al.
VSX1 Mutational Analysis in a Series of Italian Patients Affected by Keratoconus: Detection of a Novel Mutation
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2005; 46(1): 39 - 45.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
H Hutchings, H Ginisty, M Le Gallo, D Levy, F Stoesser, J F Rouland, J L Arne, M H Lalaux, P Calvas, M P Roth, et al.
Identification of a new locus for isolated familial keratoconus at 2p24
J. Med. Genet., January 1, 2005; 42(1): 88 - 94.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
F Brancati, E M Valente, A Sarkozy, J Feher, M Castori, P Del Duca, R Mingarelli, A Pizzuti, and B Dallapiccola
A locus for autosomal dominant keratoconus maps to human chromosome 3p14-q13
J. Med. Genet., March 1, 2004; 41(3): 188 - 192.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
A. E. Hughes, D. P. Dash, A. J. Jackson, D. G. Frazer, and G. Silvestri
Familial Keratoconus with Cataract: Linkage to the Long Arm of Chromosome 15 and Exclusion of Candidate Genes
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2003; 44(12): 5063 - 5066.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
K. Nielsen, K. Birkenkamp-Demtroder, N. Ehlers, and T. F. Orntoft
Identification of Differentially Expressed Genes in Keratoconus Epithelium Analyzed on Microarrays
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2003; 44(6): 2466 - 2476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tyynismaa, H.
Right arrow Articles by Alitalo, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tyynismaa, H.
Right arrow Articles by Alitalo, T.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS