|
|
||||||||
1 From the Departments of Pharmaceutical Chemistry and 3 Pharmaceutics, University of Kuopio, Finland; and the 2 Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Natural Products, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS. The rates of enzymatic degradation for AEA, 2-AG, and noladin ether were determined in bovine cornea and iris-ciliary body homogenates. 2-AG and noladin ether were dissolved in either hydroxypropyl-ß-cyclodextrin (HP-ß-CD) or propylene glycol and administered unilaterally to the rabbit eye. IOPs were measured in the treated and untreated eyes. The CB1 receptor antagonist AM251 was administered topically 15 minutes before the cannabinoids to investigate whether CB1 receptors mediate the effect on IOP produced by 2-AG and noladin ether.
RESULTS. Noladin ether degraded more slowly than either 2-AG or AEA in the iris-ciliary body and cornea homogenates. The effect on IOP of 2-AG was biphasic (i.e., an initial increase in IOP followed by a reduction in the treated eye). Noladin ether decreased IOP immediately after topical administration, and no initial IOP increase was observed in the treated eye. The CB1 receptor antagonist AM251 (25 µg) blocked the effect on IOP of noladin ether but did not affect the action of 2-AG.
CONCLUSIONS. Topical administration of the novel putative endogenous cannabinoid noladin ether decreased IOP in rabbits. This IOP reduction was most probably mediated through the CB1 receptor. The effect on IOP of noladin ether differed from those of the known endogenous cannabinoids AEA and 2-AG, probably because of its more stable chemical structure.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
As with typical neurotransmitters, AEA and 2-AG are rapidly inactivated after their biosynthesis and release. Both endogenous cannabinoids are apparently transported into cells by a common carrier-mediated uptake mechanism.9 10 In cells, AEA is enzymatically hydrolyzed to arachidonic acid and ethanolamine by fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH),11 whereas FAAH and the yet uncharacterized lipase activities are thought to be involved in the enzymatic hydrolysis of 2-AG to arachidonic acid.9 The cellular uptake of noladin ether has recently been suggested to occur through the endocannabinoid transporter.7
In this study, the enzymatic stabilities for 2-AG, AEA, and noladin ether were compared in bovine cornea and iris-ciliary body homogenates. It has already been demonstrated that various cannabinoids affect intraocular pressure (IOP) in rabbits12 13 14 15 and humans,16 particularly in patients with glaucoma who are resistant to conventional glaucoma therapies.17 For this reason, we examined the ability of noladin ether, the more enzymatically stable endocannabinoid, to decrease IOP in rabbits and compared its effect on IOP to those of 2-AG. Finally, we examined whether the effect on IOP of 2-AG and noladin ether were mediated through CB1 receptors.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Preparation of Eye Homogenates for Degradation Study
Cornea and iris-ciliary body homogenates (20% wt/wt) were prepared as follows. Approximately 20 bovine eyes, obtained from a local abattoir (Atria Oy, Kuopio, Finland) were immediately rinsed with ice-cold 0.9% NaCl solution, and the corneas were dissected within 3 hours of death. Iris-ciliary bodies were detached from the eye as a single tissue sample. The removed eye tissues were cut into smaller pieces, weighed into separate centrifuge tubes and homogenized in tubes with four volumes of ice-cold isotonic 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) using a homogenizer (model X-1020; Ystral, Ballrechten, Germany). The crude homogenates were centrifuged for 90 minutes at 9000g at 4°C (RC-26 Plus centrifuge; Sorvall DuPont, Newtown, CT). Pellets were discharged and supernatants were stored at -80°C until use. The protein concentrations, determined by using the Bradford method,18
were 7.1 mg/mL for cornea and 7.3 mg/mL for iris-ciliary body homogenates, respectively.
Degradation Study
The degradation rates for 2-AG, AEA, and noladin ether were determined in 10% bovine cornea and iris-ciliary body homogenates. An appropriate amount of test compound (initial concentrations were 0.7 mM for AEA and 2-AG and 0.1 mM for noladin ether) was dissolved in one volume of 50 mM isotonic phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 0.1% ethanol. One volume of preheated cornea or iris-ciliary body homogenate was added, and the solution was incubated at 37°C in a water bath. At predetermined time intervals, 200-µL aliquots were withdrawn and immediately mixed with 400 µL ice-cold acetonitrile to terminate the reaction. After 5 minutes of centrifugation at 14,000 rpm (16,000g), the clear supernatant was assayed for remaining amounts of endogenous cannabinoid by HPLC.
HPLC Analysis
The analytical HPLC system (Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) consisted of a pump (model L-7100), interface module (model L-7000), diode array detector (model L-7455; 200400 nm, set at 211 nm) and a programmable autosampler (model L-7250). An endcapped reversed-phase column (125 mm x 4 mm, 5 µm; Purospher RP-18; VWR International, Niittyrinne, Finland), protected with an end-capped guard column (4 mm x 4 mm, 5 µm), was used for chromatographic separations.
Isocratic elutions for the hydrolysis studies in bovine iris-ciliary body and cornea homogenates were performed with a mobile phase mixture of 18% phosphate buffer (20 mM, pH 3.0) in acetonitrile at a flow rate of 1.2 mL/min. The concentrations of the eye drops were determined by a gradient method, in which the mobile phase consisted of 20 mM monobasic potassium phosphate buffer (20 mM, pH 7.0) in acetonitrile. The proportion of acetonitrile was linearly increased from 60% to 90% during a 15-minute period, maintained at a 5-minutes plateau, and subsequently returned to the initial concentration during the course of 6 minutes.
Preparation of Eye Drop Solutions
2-AG and noladin ether were dissolved either in HP-ß-CD solutions or propylene glycol. The aqueous eye drop solutions were adjusted to pH 7.4 with 0.1 M sodium hydroxide solution, and the solutions were made isotonic with sodium chloride. Final eye drop concentrations in HP-ß-CD were 1.25 mg/mL (12.5% HP-ß-CD) and 2.5 mg/mL (25% HP-ß-CD) for 2-AG and 0.625 (6.25% HP-ß-CD) and 2.5 mg/mL (25% HP-ß-CD) for noladin ether.
2-AG was dissolved in propylene glycol to concentrations of 0.3125, 1.25, and 5 mg/mL and noladin ether to a concentration of 5 mg/mL. A 25% HP-ß-CD solution or propylene glycol was used as a control vehicle in the IOP studies. The CB1 receptor antagonist AM251 was dissolved in 45% HP-ß-CD to a concentration of 0.5 mg/mL.
Animals
Normotensive pigmented Dutch belted rabbits (2.43.6 kg, n = 6) or New Zealand White albino rabbits (3.04.0 kg, n = 6), of both sexes, were used as experimental animals. The rabbits were housed singly in cages under controlled illumination (12-hour light-dark cycle, with lights-on at 7:00 A.M.) and environmental conditions (temperature, 20.0 ± 0.5°C, 55%75% relative humidity). The rabbits were given water and food ad libitum, except during the experiments. All animals were treated in accordance with the ARVO Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research.
IOP Measurements
For each experiment, rabbits were placed in plastic restraining boxes that were located in a quiet room. A drop (2550 µL) of test solution was instilled unilaterally into the left eye on the upper corneoscleral limbus. During installation, the upper eyelid was gently pulled slightly away from the globe. IOP was measured by using a pneumatonometer (Digilab Modular One; Bio-Rad, Cambridge, MA) for pigmented rabbits or a handheld tonometer (Tonopen XL; Mentor, Norwell, MA) for albino rabbits. Before each measurement, 1 or 2 drops of topical anesthetic (0.04% oxybuprocaine) was applied to reduce discomfort. For every determination, at least two readings were taken from each treated (ipsilateral) and untreated (contralateral) eye, and the mean of these readings were used. IOP was measured at 1 hour before administration, then at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 hours after application of the eye drops. IOP at the time of administration of the eye drops (0 hour) was used as a baseline value. All IOP studies begun at 8:30 A.M., and were set up according to a nonbblinded, randomized, crossover design. At least 72 hours of washout time was allowed for each rabbit between doses. In the CB1 antagonism experiments, AM251 was administered topically 15 minutes before the topical administration of either 2-AG or noladin ether.
Statistical Analysis
The IOP results are presented as a change in IOP (% of the baseline) mean ± SE of the mean. The statistical analysis was performed on computer (SPSS ver. 11.0 for Windows; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL), and a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures with Bonferroni correction was used to compare treated and untreated groups. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Effect on IOP
2-AG was administered topically, either in aqueous HP-ß-CD or propylene glycol vehicle. The effect on IOP of 2-AG in the treated eyes of pigmented rabbits are summarized in Table 1
. Topical administration of 2-AG in the HP-ß-CD vehicle induced a dose-dependent increase in IOP followed by a decrease that was, however, not statistically significant. The maximum IOP reduction (-15.4% ± 6.4%) produced by 2-AG in the HP-ß-CD vehicle was obtained at 2 hours after application (Table 1)
. A similar dose-dependent IOP profile was obtained for 2-AG when it was administered in a propylene glycol vehicle (Table 1)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The present results demonstrate that noladin ether degraded at a significantly slower rate than either 2-AG or AEA in 10% bovine iris-ciliary body and cornea homogenates. The hydrolysis rates decreased in the order of 2-AG > AEA > noladin ether in both eye homogenates. These results can be explained by the fact that various esterases19 as well as FAAH-like enzyme activities20 21 are present in the eye, whereas relevant ocular enzymes for cleaving ether functional groups are probably not present. The higher hydrolysis rate for 2-AG, compared with AEA, may be because FAAH has been reported to hydrolyze 2-AG at a rate four times faster than AEA.22 In addition, these biological tissues are well known to be rich in enzymes that are capable of hydrolyzing esters. The main degradation product for AEA and 2-AG in the eye homogenates was arachidonic acid (Fig. 3) , but no arachidonic acid was formed from noladin ether during its incubation in 10% cornea and iris-ciliary body homogenates. The slow hydrolysis rate of noladin ether may raise the question of whether noladin ether is actually an endogenously produced cannabinoid receptor ligand in the ocular tissues studied. However, Fezza et al.7 have very recently suggested a shared cellular uptake for noladin ether with 2-AG and AEA, and its subsequent slow incorporation into phospholipids as an elimination mechanism in intact C6 glioma cells.
The topically administered AEA typically produces an initial IOP hypertension followed by a significant IOP reduction in the treated eye.12 23 This biphasic IOP profile for AEA is thought to be due to its rapid hydrolysis to arachidonic acid, which is subsequently biosynthesized to prostanoids that are responsible for effect on IOP.13 24 By contrast, synthetic cannabinoids, such as CP55940 and WIN55212-2, decrease IOP without an initial increase in IOP.15 25 When the effect on IOP of topically administered 2-AG and noladin ether were compared, 2-AG induced an initial IOP increase and subsequent reduction of IOP in rabbits, as reported earlier by Pate et al.14 The IOP profile of noladin ether differed from the profiles induced by other endogenous cannabinoids, because noladin ether decreased IOP immediately after topical administration without any initial elevation in IOP. On the basis of the differences in IOP profiles and degradation data (Fig. 3) , our results suggests that 2-AG is hydrolyzed, similar to AEA, to arachidonic acid in the eye, whereas noladin ether is eventually degraded to a metabolite other than arachidonic acid.
A CB1 receptor antagonist AM25126 was administered topically to study whether the IOP effects of 2-AG and noladin ether are mediated through the CB1 receptors in rabbits. AM251 blocked the IOP reduction caused by topical noladin ether but did not affect the IOP profile of 2-AG. This finding further strengthens the hypothesis that the CB1 receptors participate in the IOP effects of noladin ether. The effect on IOP of 2-AG is mediated through an alternative mechanism, most probably through its prostanoid metabolite(s). Earlier, we reported that the biphasic effect on IOP of topical AEA is not antagonized by the CB1 receptor antagonist SR141716A,25 which is also suggestive of an active prostanoid metabolite(s).
In conclusion, the present study shows for the first time that the topical administration of the putative endogenous cannabinoid, noladin ether, decreases IOP in rabbits. The present results suggest that the effects on IOP of noladin ether are mediated through the ocular CB1 receptors, whereas the effects on IOP of 2-AG are most probably mediated by its arachidonic acid metabolites. These data also demonstrate that noladin ether is the first endogenous cannabinoid identified that does not degrade to arachidonic acid after topical administration.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Submitted for publication October 29, 2001; revised May 13, 2002; accepted May 29, 2002.
Commercial relationships policy: P (RM, AB); N (KL, KJ, TJ).
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Corresponding author: Krista Laine, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Kuopio, PO Box 1627, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland; krista.laine{at}uku.fi.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, L, Breuer, A, et al (1992) Isolation and structure of a brain constituent that binds to the cannabinoid receptor Science 258,1946-1949
, L, et al (1995) Identification of an endogenous 2-monoglyceride, present in canine gut, that binds to cannabinoid receptors Biochem Pharmacol 50,83-90[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
, L, Abu-Lafi, S, Fride, E, et al (2001) 2-Arachidonyl glyceryl ether, an endogenous agonist of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98,3662-3665This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Nucci, V. Gasperi, R. Tartaglione, A. Cerulli, A. Terrinoni, M. Bari, C. De Simone, A. F. Agro, L. A. Morrone, M. T. Corasaniti, et al. Involvement of the Endocannabinoid System in Retinal Damage after High Intraocular Pressure-Induced Ischemia in Rats Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2007; 48(7): 2997 - 3004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Pacher, S. Batkai, and G. Kunos The Endocannabinoid System as an Emerging Target of Pharmacotherapy Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2006; 58(3): 389 - 462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. F. Njie, A. Kumar, Z. Qiao, L. Zhong, and Z.-H. Song Noladin Ether Acts on Trabecular Meshwork Cannabinoid (CB1) Receptors to Enhance Aqueous Humor Outflow Facility Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., May 1, 2006; 47(5): 1999 - 2005. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Nithipatikom, M. P. Endsley, M. A. Isbell, J. R. Falck, Y. Iwamoto, C. J. Hillard, and W. B. Campbell 2-Arachidonoylglycerol: A Novel Inhibitor of Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer Cell Invasion Cancer Res., December 15, 2004; 64(24): 8826 - 8830. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I Tomida, R G Pertwee, and A Azuara-Blanco Cannabinoids and glaucoma Br. J. Ophthalmol., May 1, 2004; 88(5): 708 - 713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. B. El-Remessy, I. E. Khalil, S. Matragoon, G. Abou-Mohamed, N.-J. Tsai, P. Roon, R. B. Caldwell, R. W. Caldwell, K. Green, and G. I. Liou Neuroprotective Effect of(-){Delta}9-Tetrahydrocannabinol and Cannabidiol in N-Methyl-D-Aspartate-Induced Retinal Neurotoxicity: Involvement of Peroxynitrite Am. J. Pathol., November 1, 2003; 163(5): 1997 - 2008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |