|
|
||||||||
1 From Neurotech USA, Lincoln, Rhode Island; the 2 University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; the 3 Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island; and the 4 James A. Baker Institute for Animal Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS. Polymer membrane capsules (1.0 cm in length and 1.0 mm in diameter) were loaded with mammalian cells that were genetically engineered to secrete CNTF. The cell-containing capsules were then surgically implanted into the vitreous of one eye of rcd1 dogs at 7 weeks of age, when retinal degeneration is in progress but not complete. The contralateral eyes were not treated. The capsules remained in the eyes for 7 weeks. At the end of the studies, the capsules were explanted, and CNTF output and cell viability were evaluated. The eyes were processed for histologic evaluation.
RESULTS. In each animal, the number of rows of photoreceptor nuclei in the outer nuclear layer (ONL) was significantly higher in the eye that received a CNTF-secreting implant than in the untreated contralateral eye. No adverse effects were observed on the retina in the treated eyes. The explanted capsules produced a low level of CNTF. The cells in the capsules remained viable and densely distributed throughout.
CONCLUSIONS. CNTF delivered through encapsulated cells directly into the vitreous of the eye protects photoreceptors in the PDE6B-deficient rcd1 canine model. Furthermore, sparing of photoreceptors appeared dose-dependent with minimum protection observed at CNTF doses of 0.2 to 1.0 ng/d. Incrementally greater protection was achieved at higher doses. The surgically implanted, cell-containing capsules were well tolerated, and the cells within the capsule remained viable for the 7-week implantation interval. These results suggest that encapsulated cell therapy may provide a safe and effective strategy for treating retinal disorders in humans.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Transplantation of encapsulated mammalian cells can deliver therapeutic agents to the target site in the central nervous system and produce therapeutic effects at lower doses than are required with other means of delivery.23 Therapeutic efficacy of growth factors delivered by ECT has been well demonstrated in several animal models of neurodegenerative diseases, including CNTF in the rodent and primate models of Huntingtons disease,24 25 glial cell linederived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) in rat model of Parkinsons disease,26 27 and nerve growth factor (NGF) in rodent and primate models of Alzheimers disease.28 29 30 Furthermore, previous studies have shown that mammalian-cellproduced growth factor, synthesized de novo, is more potent than purified, Escherichia coliproduced growth factor.23 31 However, ECT-mediated therapeutic delivery has not been tested in any models of ocular diseases. With limited distribution volume and easy access, eyes are an ideal target site for ECT-mediated therapeutic delivery.
Although ECT can be applied to treat several human ocular diseases, we chose RP for the following reasons: In many instances the cause and pathogenesis of the disease are well defined32 ; credible animal models that are molecular homologues of the human disease33 34 35 36 37 38 39 are available; and a number of neurotrophic factors40 41 42 43 have shown protective effects against photoreceptor degeneration.
Prior studies have demonstrated the promise of growth factors, neurotrophic factors, and cytokines as potential therapeutics for RP by intravitreal injection in short-term animal experiments.40 41 43 44 Among these, ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) has been shown to be effective.43 Unfortunately, the chronic nature of the disease and the adverse effects associated with repeated short-duration intraocular administration militates against the use of CNTF by this delivery method and has prevented the initiation of clinical trials and its further development.
In the present study, the therapeutic efficacy and safety of prolonged intraocular delivery of CNTF through encapsulated cells in RP animal models were investigated.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Expression of CNTF
Output of CNTF was determined by CNTF ELISA (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). The expression of CNTF was also monitored by Western blot analysis, using polyclonal goat anti-human CNTF antibodies (R&D Systems) followed by secondary biotin-conjugated rabbit anti-goat antibody and streptavidin-horse-radish peroxidase (both from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA).
Devices
The nonfilled device is composed of a scaffold, providing cell attachment within a sealed, hollow-fiber membrane, and a retrieval loop at one end for surgical manipulation. Before cell encapsulation, devices were assembled in a controlled environment, packaged, and e-beam sterilized (25 kGy with exposure time of 18 seconds; Titan Scan, Lima, OH). The semipermeable hollow-fiber membrane is composed of polyether sulfone (PES, >99%), caprolactame (plasticizer) and polyvinyl pyrrolidone (antifouling). PES is considered a stable polymer with decades-long stability. The membrane has a breaking strength of 200 g and an elongation of 50%. The membranes inner diameter is 845 to 880 µm and wall thickness ranges from 90 to 110 µm. Although the 90% molecular weight cutoff was calculated to be less than 20 kDa (using multidispersion dextran cocktail), we have found empirically that under normal conditions CNTF (
25 kDa) can readily diffuse across the membrane, but larger molecules such as antibodies (150 kDa) cannot.
It is important to note that molecular weight is not the only parameter that determines the diffusive property of the molecule. In addition to molecular weight, the shape of the molecule, its flexibility, and tertiary structure, all play important roles in its transport.
The substratum matrix is created by the extrusion of poly(ethylene terephthalate) into monofilament yarns. The monofilament yarns are s-twisted into 30-filament strands with a denier (thickness) of 150 dtex. There are 180 monofilament strands of yarn per device. There was no exogenous biological matrix (e.g., collagen) added to the substratum matrix at encapsulation. Polymer membrane capsules approximately 1.0 cm in length and 1.0 mm in diameter were manufactured with hollow-fiber membrane and poly(ethylene terephthalate) yarn. Device ends were secured with medical-grade methacrylate glue with a titanium loop incorporated into one end of the capsule.
NTC-201 cells harvested on the day of encapsulation were suspended in Endothelial-SFM growth media (Gibco-BRL, Gaithersburg, MD) at a density of 66,000 cells/µL. Devices were loaded with approximately 400,000 cells instilled through a syringe (Hamilton, Reno, NV), sealed, and maintained in Endothelial SFM. Before surgical implantation, devices were held for 14 days after encapsulation in growth medium to assure sterility. Different CNTF doses were achieved by either encapsulating populations of cells that had different levels of CNTF output, or mixing the nontransfected cell line (NTC-200) with the CNTF-secreting cell line (NTC-201) to maintain consistent cell density.
CNTF Release Kinetics
CNTF release from cell-filled devices was measured before surgical implantation and immediately after surgical retrieval from the rcd1 dog by CNTF ELISA (R&D Systems). Devices were incubated in 1.0 mL Endothelial SFM for 6 hours (preimplant) or 24 hours (postexplant) in 12-well tissue culture plates (Falcon Labware; BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA) in a 5% CO2, 95% humidity, 37°C incubator, after which time CNTF was quantified in the conditioned medium. For devices implanted in vivo, release of CNTF was evaluated before implantation (2 weeks after encapsulation), after 4 weeks in vivo (6 weeks after encapsulation) and after 7 weeks in vivo (9 weeks after encapsulation). Similarly, CNTF release for in vitro cohort devices (nonimplanted) was evaluated at these time points for the duration of the study (9 weeks). The preimplantation CNTF output by the device represents device performance under the optimal culture condition during the manufacturing process, whereas postexplantation CNTF output represents performance of the device in in vivo conditions.
Animals
All studies were performed according the guidelines of the ARVO Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research. All experimental procedures were performed according to written protocols approved in advance by the Animal Care and Use Committee, and the studies were conducted in compliance with the American Association for Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care.
Transgenic Rat Model for Retinal Degeneration
A rapid retinal degeneration transgenic rat RP model, S334ter-3,38
was used to investigate photoreceptor protection of CNTF delivered through unencapsulated NTC-201 cells. Heterozygous S334ter-3 rats carrying the rhodopsin mutation S334ter were produced by mating homozygous breeders (kindly provided by Matthew M. LaVail, University of California, San Francisco, CA) with wild-type Sprague-Dawley rats. The S334ter-3 transgenic rats were treated with either NTC-200 (parental cell line, n = 6) or NTC-201 (CNTF-secreting cell line, n = 6) through intravitreous injection into one eye on postnatal day (P)9, when retinal degeneration has already begun.38
Approximately 105 NTC-201 cells (in vitro CNTF output at 100 ng/million cells per day) in 2 µL phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) were injected into the vitreous of the left eye of S334ter-3 rats (n = 6) through a 32-gauge needle. Control animals were injected with untransfected parental cells (n = 6). Contralateral eyes were not treated. For the CNTF bolus injections, 1 µg CNTF (R&D Systems) in 1 µL PBS was injected into the vitreous at P9. Eyes were collected at P20 and processed for histologic evaluation. Plastic-embedded sections of 1 µm thickness stained with toluidine blue were examined by light microscopy.
Rcd1 Canine Model for Retinal Degeneration
The rcd1-affected dogs were provided by the Retinal Disease Studies Facility (Kennett Square, PA) which is a resource maintained by the National Eye Institute (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) and the Foundation Fighting Blindness (Hunt Valley, MD). The rcd1 dogs carry a mutation of the PDE6B gene, and retinal degeneration in this model has been well characterized.39
45
Encapsulated NTC-201 devices were surgically implanted into one eye of each rcd1 dog at 7 weeks of age, a point at which 40% to 50% of photoreceptors have already been lost because of degeneration39
45
(i.e., five to six layers of outer nuclear layer [ONL] remain). This age is 3 weeks after weaning and the earliest time-point that the surgical procedure can be performed without disruption of the retina (the eyes of younger dogs would be too small to accommodate a 1-cm device). As a control, the contralateral eye was not treated. Devices were explanted at 14 weeks of age (7 weeks after implantation), after which time, in untreated eyes, an additional 50% of photoreceptors are expected to be lost, leaving only two to three layers of ONL.39
45
At the end of the study, devices were explanted and evaluated for output of CNTF by ELISA and for cell viability by histologic analysis. The eyes were enucleated and processed for histologic analysis.
Histology
ECT devices were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and processed for glycidylmethacrylate (GMA) embedding, sectioned, and stained for histologic evaluation using hematoxylin and eosin (H-E). Each device was reviewed to determine cell density and viability.
Enucleated eyes were fixed in Bouins solution, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned at 6 µm. Vertical sections through the optic nerve and pupil were stained with H-E and examined by light microscopy. Clinical monitoring of potential adverse effects was conducted under the guidance of a board-certified ophthalmologist. Histopathology evaluation of the eyes was performed by a board-certified veterinarian pathologist.
Photoreceptor Evaluation
The rows of nuclei in ONL were counted within three areas each of the superior retina (S1S3) and inferior retina (I1I3). S1 is defined as within two 10x fields peripheral to the optic nerve, S2 as the midpoint between optic nerve edge and ora serrata, and S3 as within two 10x fields from the ora serrata. I1 is defined as within one 10x field from the optic nerve, I2 as the midpoint between the optic nerve edge and ora serrata, and I3 as within one 10x field from ora serrata. Three count samples were taken from each area. For area-specific protection, the average number of layers of photoreceptors in ONL for each area of treated eye were compared with the corresponding area of untreated eye for each animal. For overall protection, all 18 ONL count samples from the treated eye were compared with that of untreated eye for each animal, to determine efficacy. Statistical analysis was performed with the paired t-test.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
100 ng) was approximately 10 times less than that delivered through bolus injection (1 µg) for the duration of the treatment. These results clearly demonstrate that continuous delivery of CNTF through mammalian cells afforded better protection against retinal degeneration in this model. Intravitreous cell survival was confirmed for the duration of the study with injection of green fluorescent protein (GFP)transfected NTC-200 cells (data not shown).
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although several appropriate animal models are available, we selected RP to demonstrate retinal neuroprotection using an ECT device to deliver a therapeutic protein. Not only is the disease pathogenesis for RP in several cases well defined,32 but also there are valuable precedents: Therapeutic factors have already shown clear efficacy in photoreceptor protection.40 41 42 43 Unfortunately, their use has been limited because of the risks involved in frequent intravitreous injections. CNTF delivered through an unencapsulated NTC-201 cell line, which was injected intraocularly, prevented severe photoreceptor loss in a S334ter-3 transgenic rat model of RP. Because of the rapid photoreceptor degeneration time course of this model, protective effects could be evaluated within the first 3 weeks of life.38 We found that NTC-201 cells protected photoreceptors from rapid degeneration (Fig. 3) . The results also suggest that a sustained release of CNTF from the cells achieved better protection of photoreceptors than a bolus injection of purified CNTF protein (Fig. 4) . Similar observations have been reported with adenovirus-mediated CNTF gene transfer in the rd or rds mouse model of RP.50 51
Although the protection in the rat RP model with a very rapid retinal degeneration is encouraging, most types of human RP have a much slower time course, because photoreceptor degeneration often takes place over many decades. It was therefore important, to the degree practical, to evaluate the protective effect of CNTF in a chronic RP animal model that more closely resembles the human disease. For an intermediate term study we evaluated ECT in the rcd1 canine model of RP. In this model, retinal degeneration begins at 3.5 to 4.0 weeks of age and continues gradually over the course of a year, with 50% of photoreceptor loss at 7 weeks and 70% to 80% loss at 14 weeks.45
Because the canine eye is similar in size to the human eye, a device configuration identical in size and composition with a human clinical intraocular device was used. For those eyes that received CNTF-secreting ECT devices, significant photoreceptor protection was observed (Table 2 , Fig. 5 ). In addition, there was a dose-dependent protection of photoreceptors (Fig. 7) with minimum protection attained at 0.2 to 1 ng/d of CNTF. Incrementally greater protection was achieved at higher doses (Fig. 7) . These results, and the fact that no protective effect was observed when CNTF output was less than 0.1 ng/d, suggest that encapsulated cell-based delivery of CNTF is effective in photoreceptor protection for the duration studied, and the observed protection of photoreceptors is due to the effect of CNTF and not the presence of the device or the implantation procedure. Furthermore, unlike repeated intravitreous injections of recombinant CNTF (Pearce-Kelling S, Acland G, Aguirre G, et al., manuscript in preparation), no severe adverse effects associated with either CNTF or ECT were observed during the study period.
With an increase in aging populations in developed countries, the number of patients who have potentially blinding retinal diseases is growing rapidly. However, because of difficulties associated with delivery of potential intraocular therapeutics, few effective treatments are available to date. Implantation of encapsulated, genetically engineered cells that secrete a therapeutic factor (Fig. 1) offers an alternative to frequent intravitreous administration. To this end, ECT provides a site-directed, continuous, low-dose of de novo synthesized therapeutic molecules to the target site (Table 1) , therefore avoiding the additive risks commonly associated with repeated bolus injection or systemic delivery. In addition, that the ECT devices can be easily retrieved and replaced makes the treatment reversible and renewable, providing a safer alternative to in vivo gene therapy. The small intraocular device design, large number of potential therapeutic candidates, relatively simple surgical procedure for implantation and removal, and minimal side effects all contribute to the promise of this technology.
In summary, we have successfully developed a human CNTF-producing cell line that demonstrates protective efficacy in animal models of RP. Perhaps more significantly, with an intraocular device designed for the human eye, we have demonstrated therapeutic efficacy of encapsulated CNTF-secreting cell therapy in a mutant canine model of RP. Our data confirm that sustained delivery of protein therapeutics is more effective than bolus injection, while avoiding the additive risks of frequent intraocular injections.50 51 The availability of a delivery system for treatment of ocular diseases can accelerate the development of therapies for treating RP and other ophthalmic disorders, for which no effective therapies are currently available.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Submitted for publication December 11, 2001; revised April 29, 2002; accepted May 16, 2002.
Commercial relationships policy: E, F (WT, MBG, SDS, PJO, PFS, WJB, BJD, KAK); N (AML, RW, VAB, WGT, GMA, SP-K, GDA).
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Corresponding author: Weng Tao, Neurotech USA, 6 Blackstone Valley Place, Suite 5500, Lincoln, RI 02865; w.tao{at}neurotech.fr.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. C. Hood, C. E. Lin, M. A. Lazow, K. G. Locke, X. Zhang, and D. G. Birch Thickness of Receptor and Post-receptor Retinal Layers in Patients with Retinitis Pigmentosa Measured with Frequency-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., May 1, 2009; 50(5): 2328 - 2336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Rui Yao, Renji Zhang, and Xiaohong Wang Design and Evaluation of a Cell Microencapsulating Device for Cell Assembly Technology Journal of Bioactive and Compatible Polymers, May 1, 2009; 24(1_suppl): 48 - 62. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kondo, T. Sakai, K. Komeima, Y. Kurimoto, S. Ueno, Y. Nishizawa, J. Usukura, T. Fujikado, Y. Tano, and H. Terasaki Generation of a Transgenic Rabbit Model of Retinal Degeneration Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2009; 50(3): 1371 - 1377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Tuntivanich, S. J. Pittler, A. J. Fischer, G. Omar, M. Kiupel, A. Weber, S. Yao, J. P. Steibel, N. W. Khan, and S. M. Petersen-Jones Characterization of a Canine Model of Autosomal Recessive Retinitis Pigmentosa due to a PDE6A Mutation Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., February 1, 2009; 50(2): 801 - 813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. L. Kent, I. V. Glybina, G. W. Abrams, and R. Iezzi Chronic Intravitreous Infusion of Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor Modulates Electrical Retinal Stimulation Thresholds in the RCS Rat Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2008; 49(1): 372 - 379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. J. McGill, G. T. Prusky, R. M. Douglas, D. Yasumura, M. T. Matthes, G. Nune, K. Donohue-Rolfe, H. Yang, D. Niculescu, W. W. Hauswirth, et al. Intraocular CNTF Reduces Vision in Normal Rats in a Dose-Dependent Manner Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2007; 48(12): 5756 - 5766. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. D. Rhee, A. Ruiz, J. L. Duncan, W. W. Hauswirth, M. M. LaVail, D. Bok, and X.-J. Yang Molecular and Cellular Alterations Induced by Sustained Expression of Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor in a Mouse Model of Retinitis Pigmentosa Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2007; 48(3): 1389 - 1400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. DeMarco Jr, G. L. Yarbrough, C. W. Yee, G. Y. McLean, B. T. Sagdullaev, S. L. Ball, and M. A. McCall Stimulation via a Subretinally Placed Prosthetic Elicits Central Activity and Induces a Trophic Effect on Visual Responses Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., February 1, 2007; 48(2): 916 - 926. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Paskowitz, K. M. Donohue-Rolfe, H. Yang, D. Yasumura, M. T. Matthes, K. Hosseini, C. M. Graybeal, G. Nune, M. A. Zarbin, M. M. LaVail, et al. Neurotrophic Factors Minimize the Retinal Toxicity of Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2007; 48(1): 430 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Wen, Y. Song, S. Kjellstrom, A. Tanikawa, Y. Liu, Y. Li, L. Zhao, R. A. Bush, A. M. Laties, and P. A. Sieving Regulation of Rod Phototransduction Machinery by Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor J. Neurosci., December 27, 2006; 26(52): 13523 - 13530. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Samardzija, A. Wenzel, S. Aufenberg, M. Thiersch, C. Reme, and C. Grimm Differential role of Jak-STAT signaling in retinal degenerations FASEB J, November 1, 2006; 20(13): 2411 - 2413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. C. Gilger, J. H. Salmon, D. A. Wilkie, L. P. J. Cruysberg, J. Kim, M. Hayat, H. Kim, S. Kim, P. Yuan, S. S. Lee, et al. A novel bioerodible deep scleral lamellar cyclosporine implant for uveitis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2006; 47(6): 2596 - 2605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Sieving, R. C. Caruso, W. Tao, H. R. Coleman, D. J. S. Thompson, K. R. Fullmer, and R. A. Bush Ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) for human retinal degeneration: Phase I trial of CNTF delivered by encapsulated cell intraocular implants PNAS, March 7, 2006; 103(10): 3896 - 3901. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Yzer, B. P. Leroy, E. De Baere, T. J. de Ravel, M. N. Zonneveld, K. Voesenek, U. Kellner, J. P. M. Ciriano, J.-T. H. N. de Faber, K. Rohrschneider, et al. Microarray-based mutation detection and phenotypic characterization of patients with leber congenital amaurosis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2006; 47(3): 1167 - 1176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. V. Kukekova, J. Nelson, R. W. Kuchtey, J. K. Lowe, J. L. Johnson, E. A. Ostrander, G. D. Aguirre, and G. M. Acland Linkage Mapping of Canine Rod Cone Dysplasia Type 2 (rcd2) to CFA7, the Canine Orthologue of Human 1q32. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2006; 47(3): 1210 - 1215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Pardue, M. J. Phillips, H. Yin, B. D. Sippy, S. Webb-Wood, A. Y. Chow, and S. L. Ball Neuroprotective Effect of Subretinal Implants in the RCS Rat Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., February 1, 2005; 46(2): 674 - 682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Jacobson, A. Sumaroka, T. S. Aleman, A. V. Cideciyan, S. B. Schwartz, A. J. Roman, R. R. McInnes, V. C. Sheffield, E. M. Stone, A. Swaroop, et al. Nuclear receptor NR2E3 gene mutations distort human retinal laminar architecture and cause an unusual degeneration Hum. Mol. Genet., September 1, 2004; 13(17): 1893 - 1902. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Bush, B. Lei, W. Tao, D. Raz, C.-C. Chan, T. A. Cox, M. Santos-Muffley, and P. A. Sieving Encapsulated Cell-Based Intraocular Delivery of Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor in Normal Rabbit: Dose-Dependent Effects on ERG and Retinal Histology Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2004; 45(7): 2420 - 2430. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Zeiss and E. A. Johnson Proliferation of Microglia, but not Photoreceptors, in the Outer Nuclear Layer of the rd-1 Mouse Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2004; 45(3): 971 - 976. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Song, L. Zhao, W. Tao, A. M. Laties, Z. Luo, and R. Wen Photoreceptor Protection by Cardiotrophin-1 in Transgenic Rats with the Rhodopsin Mutation S334ter Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2003; 44(9): 4069 - 4075. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. A. Beltran, Q. Zhang, J. W. Kijas, D. Gu, H. Rohrer, J. A. Jordan, and G. D. Aguirre Cloning, Mapping, and Retinal Expression of the Canine Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor Receptor {alpha} (CNTFR{alpha}) Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2003; 44(8): 3642 - 3649. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |